Watcha Reading?

Finished the latest Bob Moore book by Tom Andry (Hostile Territory). It was good, perhaps 4 stars instead of 5.

Omega Days by John L. Campbell was a pretty good zombie book, focusing on several characters and their travails as they cross the San Francisco-Oakland area after a breakout, and these characters come together (or get close to it) near the end. Waiting for part 2.

Started Waiting to Die by Richard M. Cochran, got bored with that one. Started well, bogged down after about 20%.

Reading Quantum Physics and the End of the Universe right now……well, not really, another zombie book, What Zombies Fear. Kinda short, only 193 pages, should have it done tonight. Not great, but more than readable.

How about you?

Read: Watcha Reading? »

If All You See…

…is a banner for planet killing beer which is infused with CO2, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Watts Up With That?, with a post wondering when the Marcott paper will have to be retracted.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another gorgeous day to remember the once and future nation known as the United States Of America. This pinup is by Gil Elvgren, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Outside the Beltway has a hissy fit over Rand Paul winning the CPAC straw poll
  2. American Power features Sarah Palin at CPAC
  3. Wake Up America has NRA head Wayne LaPierre at CPAC
  4. This ain’t Hell… features the new Colorado gun laws being unenforceable
  5. Doug Powers has hypocritical rich Dems complaining about taxes
  6. At The Lonely Conservative we have the Feinstein Follies
  7. The Jawa Report has more Islamist riots over Korans
  8. Wild Thing has a big post on St. Patrick’s Day
  9. neo-neocon discusses the latest Iraq casualties report
  10. Goldfish and Clowns has thoughts on CPAC and Blog Bash
  11. Gay Patriot has tolerance from Democrats
  12. Fire Andrea Mitchell takes on the LA Times over gun control
  13. Director Blue has an overlooked snippet from the Cruz-Feinstein rumble
  14. Bookworm Room has the Imperial President and food tasters
  15. And last, but not least, No Frakking Consensus has old time climate religion

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check outwhat I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

The posts do take a long time, so, if you want to send me your links for Rule 5 babeage or links, use ye olde email in the header bar (remove the NOSPAM part). Preferably, create the html link so I can copy and paste how you want it to read.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

NY Times: The Real Spending Problem Is Tax Breaks

Not actual spending, not $16 trillion in debt, not borrowing 43 cents for every federal dollar spent, not wasting taxpayer tax dollars on pork and projects that should be funded by private entities, not hundreds of billions in cost overruns, not the POTUS using up millions to fly across the country to make a 30 minute speech that could be made at the White House…..nope, tax breaks, according to the anonymous NY Times editorial board

Each year, the government doles out tax breaks worth $1.1 trillion. That is more than the cost of Medicare and Medicaid combined. It is more than Social Security. It tops the defense budget, and it tops the budget for nondefense discretionary programs, which include most everything else.

Tax breaks work like spending. Giving a deduction for certain activities, like homeownership or retirement savings, is the same as writing a government check to subsidize those activities. Functionally, they mimic entitlements. Like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, they are available, year in and year out, in full, to all who qualify. Yet in budget talks, Republicans ignore tax entitlements, which flow mostly to high-income taxpayers, while pushing to cut Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.

Except, there are deductions in the tax code, or, as Dems are fond of calling them, loopholes, and most of them make sense. The NY Times surely takes advantage of quite a few of them, such as for software, phone purchases and usage (wireless and wired), automobile usage, incidentals on business trips, advertising and promotion, bank fees and loan interests, internet costs, capital expenses for office equipment, supplies, and so, so, so much more. Would the NY Times, give them up? They sure liked mentioning them in their 4th quarter 2012 statement

The Company had operating profit of $44.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared with $90.8 million in the same period of 201 1. Excluding depreciation, amortization, severance and the special items discussed below, operating profit was $124.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared with $126.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2011.

Those are tax breaks. What this is is the federal government allowing people and companies to keep more of the money they earn, mostly to attempt to stimulate the economy by keeping more money in the private sector. No, it doesn’t always work. Mostly it does.

President Obama and Congressional Democrats have rightly asserted that tax breaks are ripe for cuts that could raise revenue without hurting most taxpayers. One method, as presented in the Senate Democratic plan, is to convert tax deductions, which increase in value as income rises, to tax credits, which would provide benefits more broadly and evenly among low-, middle- and high-income households.

All this would do would allow more wasteful spending by Government. It is telling that the Times doesn’t even bother to mention the meme that this extra revenue would be used for debt/deficit reduction. Because it wouldn’t. Anyhow, they mention a few types that those Evil Rich take advantage of, including

NINE-FIGURE I.R.A.’S Remember Mitt Romney’s $100 million I.R.A? Private equity partners apparently build up vast tax-deferred accounts by claiming that the equity interests transferred to such accounts from, say, their firms’ buyout targets are not worth much. No one knows how much tax is avoided this way. What is known is that I.R.A.’s are meant to help build retirement nest eggs, not to help amass huge estates to pass on to heirs.

Prick a Democrat and they’ll bleed commie red. How dare someone raise tons of money through brains and hard work that can be passed on to their heirs. I wonder if the Times will go after the Kennedy clan for this?

In this time of ill-advised budget cuts, there are surely better ways to spend that money. For $50 million, 6,000 children could attend Head Start next year.

Obama just wasted about $8 million dollars to fly to Illinois for a 30 minute speech. He surely wastes over $50 million a month on these types of travel. How much does it cost the taxpayer for him to play golf? Heck, how about cutting the $200 million spent for a reality TV show in India? $84.5 million for Amtrak snacks? Hundreds of millions for government employee conferences? $2 million for 10 cupcake startups? The list could go on an on. Apparently, though, Exxon paying $31.05 billion in taxes isn’t enough.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: NY Times: The Real Spending Problem Is Tax Breaks »

Hey, Know What’s Really Dangerous For Libya? Hotcoldwetdry

Nope, not the Islamic jihadis, climate change, because a desert nation that’s been a desert nation for a long, long, long time is threatened with become a ….. desert nation (and it obviuosly has nothing whatsoever to do with nature, plate tectonics, etc)

(Toronto Star) When dictator Moammar Gadhafi was killed in October 2011, months after the first wave of uprisings swept Libya as part of the larger Arab Spring, international analysts declared the North African country finally free.

But two years later, there are ethnic and tribal tensions and parts of the country are overrun by armed militia and religious hardliners.

Another significant challenge is from climate change, according to an essay in “The Arab Spring and Climate Change,” a study recently published by three think-tanks in Washington.

If the new government does not address the issue of water shortages, Libya could see more turmoil, Francesco Femia and Caitlin Werrell write in their essay, which examines Libya’s water and desertification problems.

Read: Hey, Know What’s Really Dangerous For Libya? Hotcoldwetdry »

If All You See…

…is an evil fossil fueled boat killing all the pandas, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Bob Owens, with a post on Diane Feinstein comparing common guns to…….

Read: If All You See… »

Feedreaders: Anyone Know A Good One Yet?

I’m sure you’ve heard about Google saying they will shut down Google Reader come July. Which sucks. Which is also silly, because way fewer people use Google+ (yes, it is still active.) So, I need a new reader by then.

So far, Bloglines, Feed Reader, Feedly, Netvibe, and so many others are failing. Most are not updating promptly. Now, that could be due to the influx of new users. Have to try them in a month or so.

Most do not sort alphabetically. With Bloglines and Netvibe (virtually one and the same), I can manually move the links around to be alphabetical.

What I need is one that is almost real time. Like Google Reader does. That’s a must have. And I’d like one that can be linked to an Android app, but that is not a must have, just a like to have. I’d prefer one that is web based.

Without a good reader, I can tell you that my Sunday Pinup post will end, at least with all the links, because it would go from an hour,   hour and a half tops to 2-3 hours or more.

Any good ideas?

Read: Feedreaders: Anyone Know A Good One Yet? »

Report: No Statistical Global Warming In 17 Years

As the new Marcott paper is still being hyped by the media, but being destroyed by actual scientists digging into the paper (including Marcott), we learn some interesting information

(GWPF) London,  15 March: A new report written by Dr David Whitehouse and published today by the Global Warming Policy Foundation concludes that there has been no statistically significant increase in annual global temperatures since 1997.

After reviewing the scientific literature the report concludes that the standstill is an empirical fact and a reality that challenges current climate models. During the time that the Earth’s global temperature has remained static the atmospheric composition of carbon dioxide has increased from 370 to 390 ppm.

“The standstill is a reality and is not the result of cherry-picking start and end points. Its commencement can be seen clearly in the data, and it continues to this day,” said Dr David Whitehouse, the author of the new report.

What this report is not saying is that the Earth is not currently in a warm period. As part of the natural cycle during the Holocene, it gets cool, it gets warm, it gets cool, it gets warm, and during the cool and warm long term periods there will be shorter warm and cool periods.

Right now, the Earth is in an elevated warm period during this extended warm period (which started in the mid-1800’s as the Little Ice Age came to an end) which is still cooler than during the previous warm periods (Medieval and Roman warm periods), with a flatlined temperature gradient.

What the report is saying is that if CO2 was the main forcing agent, global temperatures should be rising. They aren’t.

“If the standstill continues for a few more years it will mean that no one who has just reached adulthood, or younger, will have witnessed the Earth get warmer during their lifetime,” said the report’s author, Dr David Whitehouse.

This doesn’t mean that we won’t see more warming during this climate period which is called….hey, why do we have no name for it yet? I propose calling it the “things are so awesome that hysterics have time to whine about the weather instead of having to bust their humps in the mud from sun-up to bed-time” period. It’s a bit long, granted.

Read: Report: No Statistical Global Warming In 17 Years »

Surprise! Colorado Big Gun Magazine Bill Could Ban Almost All Mags

Unintentional mistake in intentional “bug”?

(Daily Caller) Colorado Democratic Rep. Rhonda Fields, whose bill to ban ammunition magazines that hold more than 15 rounds ignited an ongoing firestorm of protest and which could cost the state jobs if a manufacturer of such equipment makes good on its promise to move to another state, didn’t realize that her bill would outlaw practically every magazine currently for sale in the state.

That’s because the bill specifies that magazines that can be “readily converted” to hold more than 15 bullets will also be outlawed.

Practically every magazine on the market can be easily converted with readily available extenders, as demonstrated in a video posted by John Caldera, the president of the libertarian Independence Institute.

Remember, Democrats tell is that this is all “common sense legislation that targets criminals, not law abiding citizens.” You know, those criminals who fail to follow the law.

Fields told 9News that she had no idea her bill would effectively ban nearly all magazines with removable base plates for which extenders are made.

“I’m just hearing about that now,” she told the news station. “Our focus was on the number of bullets you can put in a magazine.”

And there’s the follow of activists and hysterics writing legislation that they fail to understand in order to Do Something.

She said still supports the bill as drafted.

“I’m not envisioning changing that because of a little plate that you can pull out,” she said. “I’m hoping that people will just comply with the law.”

So, as the flaw is pointed out she states “nope, not making any changes”. She expects law abiding citizens not to purchase these magazines, which, by the law, would be most. Criminals will thumb their noses at her. Those who own them now can keep them, but cannot transfer them to anyone, including family members. They would have to be given to The Government upon death or selling the gun, which means that no one will really want to buy a gun with no magazines.

It would be a Class 2 Misdemeanor to possess (if not owned prior to July 1, 2013), sell or transfer magazines over 15 rounds after July 1, 2013.

15 round magazine? People safe in Colorado

16 round magazine? People in EXTREME DANGER in Colorado.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Surprise! Colorado Big Gun Magazine Bill Could Ban Almost All Mags »

Lindsay Grahamnesty Offers Surprising Idea For Immigration

Well, surprising if you know his super squishy history regarding immigration

(UPI) Senators are mulling making it harder for U.S. citizens to get visas for family members while easing the path for high-skilled foreign workers, a senator said.

“We’re going to change fundamentally the immigration system,” including tighter limits on family visas, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told The Washington Post.

“Right now you get green cards to adult children, to grandparents,” Graham said. “What I want to do is reserve green cards based on the economic needs of the country, and we’ll do something for families. But the goal for me is to replace a chained-migration immigration system with an economic-based immigration system.”

This is a great idea, as it would mean fewer soon-to-be on government services immigrants, but people who actually bring skills and, yes, earnings potential. And less chance to overstay their visas. Obviously, Democrats do not like this

In the Senate discussions, Republicans would prefer to admit larger numbers of highly skilled workers, who would provide an immediate economic benefit and who business leaders say are in short supply, while Democrats generally want to give priority to family members of citizens and legal residents already in the country.

Democrats prefer more wards of the state versus productive visa holders/citizens

Read: Lindsay Grahamnesty Offers Surprising Idea For Immigration »

Pirate's Cove