…is a horrible world baked by a 1.4F increase in temperatures, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Victory Girl’s Blog, with a post on an Obamacare truth teller being audited.
Read: If All You See… »
…is a horrible world baked by a 1.4F increase in temperatures, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Victory Girl’s Blog, with a post on an Obamacare truth teller being audited.
Read: If All You See… »
And like some radio stations going to all Christmas music and retailers putting up Christmas displays before Thanksgiving, Warmists are preparing for Christmas early
Climate Change Threatens Christmas Trees, Maple
Growing the perfect Christmas tree takes close to ten years, but in March 2012 just four days of extreme heat pummeled much of Vermont and New Hampshire’s Christmas tree crop.
“It gave us an eye opener, you know, something we hadn’t anticipated,” says Sandy Wilmot, a Forest Health Specialist with Vermont’s Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation.
Bob White’s Christmas trees withstood the heat then, but as he surveys his Essex farm this year he’s discovered a new problem.
The culprit? Summer flash floods. (snip)
“We’ve already seen some dramatic changes in the last fifty years,” she says.
In those fifty years, winter temperatures spiked some four point five degrees. Summer temperatures, two degrees. Additional warming will change the make up of our forests.
Bummer, trees can’t withstand tiny temperature changes. I wonder how any trees survived during all the previous warm and cool periods? It’s not like they’ve evolved over millions of years. But, hey, you know, Bad Weather only started happening in 1988 or something. Funny how North Carolina is seeing a top rate Christmas tree crop this year. Oh, wait, sorry, Christmas trees are doomed in the future. My Bad!
Of course, Warmists are pushing their dogma for gifts
Vivienne Westwood is no stranger to championing environmental causes. In fact, it could be said that Dame Viv’s passionate political campaigns often steal the limelight away from her fashion collections.
So, it makes perfect sense that Vivienne should want to try and revolutionise our Christmas habits, especially when it comes to things like wasting paper and buying too many throwaway products, which, let’s face it, we’re probably all guilty of.
In an endeavour to make us all a little bit greener, and to think of our envirnonent, Vivienne has collaborated with cosmetics company Lush to create a scarf, or knot wrap, that also doubles as gift wrap. (WT- misspellings are the stories, not mine. Not that I’m perfect)
The scarfs include the notion of “climate revolution”
The knot-wraps are available in camel or light pink and are printed with two Climate Revolution images designed by Ms Westwood. The black-eyed unsmiling face – the Face of War – is the designer’s symbol for the fight against climate change and environmental degradation.
Warmists are really depressing people, wouldn’t you say?
Read: It’s Never Too Early To Link “Climate Change” And Christmas »
Conversely, this is what happens to many bathrooms post-Thanksgiving meals.
We’re doomed, because the climate should always stay exactly the same, just like it did till 1988 when CO2 passed 350ppm
(Climate Progress) It’s known as “blue gold†and it has been cultivated in Provence, France since the Middle Ages. But now, a tiny bacteria-infected cicada is laying waste to a crop which is as iconically tied to Provence as lobsters are to Maine, or maple syrup is to Vermont — lavender. Researchers studying the lavender worry that the problem will only get worse as climate change leads to hotter and drier summers in Provence, ideal conditions for the spread of the pest.
Unlike it’s larger cousin the cicada, which is loud but harmless, the cicadelle, or leafhopper in English, attacks lavender plants in two ways. Cicadelle larva feast on lavender roots all winter long and then the adults attack the leaves in the spring and early summer. Even more destructive, however, is a micro-bacteria called stolbur phytoplasma, carried by the hungry insects that blocks the plants’ sap canals, causing the plant’s inevitable decline
Even if a means of controlling the pest is developed in time, the march of climate change will likely force lavender cultivation to move northwards, perhaps out of Provence altogether.
Wait, you want to control pest? Why are you messing with Mother Nature? Really, though, what’s this about?
(Guardian) Now locals, whose livelihoods depend on the plants, are appealing for funds to save the lavender that has been produced in the region since the Middle Ages.
Money. The climate is always changing, so people are using the “climate change” scare to get some cool cash. Back to Climate Progress
Provence is far from the only flower-growing region in the world to face new climate challenges. Kenya is the biggest exporter of cut roses to the European Union, responsible for 38 percent of the market share. In 2012, Kenya exported a total of 123, 511 tons of flowers, worth $500 million. But a long-standing drought in Kenya is forcing flower growers to turn to precious and scarce lake resources to keep their valuable crops alive.
In the U.S. Northwest, the problem is too much water. The Snoqualmie Valley near Seattle, where lilies, gladiolas and dahlias thrive, is increasingly stressed by wet weather and floods — 23 since 2006 alone. In 2009, the Snoqualmie River crested at 62 feet, eight feet above flood stage, breaking the previous record set in 2006 when the river crested at 61 feet. Most flower growing operations in the valley are small, family farms that are least able to weather the financial losses.
So, wet and dry are Bad. Yup. Cult.
…are evil dogs creating Bad Weather that could be mitigated by building a solar farm in that awesome field, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is American Power, with a post on the reality of Black Friday deals.
Read: If All You See… »
Democrats and Mr. Obama love to create a fight when things should be simple
(The Hill) Guns that cannot be detected by X-ray machines will no longer be banned if Congress does not renew the decades-old prohibition by Dec. 9.
The 1998 Undetectable Firearms Act will sunset that day, ending the prohibition at a time when new technology has made it easier than ever before to manufacture plastic guns with 3-D printers.
Gun control activists warn that a lapse would allow anyone with a few thousand dollars to build a homemade gun that would be undetectable at airports, government buildings or schools.
How dangerous are these guns? Well, let’s see. No one has been prosecuted over the 1998 law. There are no reports of the guns being used in crimes. The bullets and several components must be made of metal, otherwise no bang. And the AFT found that 3D printed guns were likely to blow up in one’s face.
Senator Sessions objected to a unanimous consent decree, and said they would be happy to take it up when the Senate returns on December 9th.
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said it was Senate Democrats who were to blame for refusing to work with Republicans on a separate proposal reauthorize the law for either five or ten years.
“Congressional Republicans support a lengthy extension of the ban on firearms that cannot be picked up by metal detectors,” Grassley said Tuesday via a written statement. “The Senate Majority consciously and consistently rebuffed our efforts to continue the prohibition for five to ten more years.”
Unsurprisingly, Democrats attempted to add all sorts of gun control riders to the re-authorization
“We are looking at a world in which anyone with a little bit of cash can bring an undetectable gun, that can fire multiple bullets, anywhere — including planes, government buildings, sporting events and schools,†Schumer said in a written statement to The Hill.
“This ban cannot be allowed to expire.â€
A little bit of cash being thousands and thousands of dollars, access to proper materials, and access to a 3D printing machine, all to make a gun that doesn’t work very well, and still requires metal, all when it would be easier to obtain a regular gun when someone has murder in their heart.
I suspect that this will turn what should be a simple re-authorization of the act into a big fight, with Democrats and Obama demagoging the issue, as they typically do, after they add all sorts of unacceptable riders to the legislation.
As it is, there is already a dearth of doctors and medical facilities that accept Medicaid. Why?
(NY Times) Dr. Ted Mazer is one of the few ear, nose and throat specialists in this region who treat low-income people on Medicaid, so many of his patients travel long distances to see him.
But now, as California’s Medicaid program is preparing for a major expansion under President Obama’s health care law, Dr. Mazer says he cannot accept additional patients under the government insurance program for a simple reason: It does not pay enough.
And there it is. I know liberals like to think otherwise (except for those liberals who are in the medical profession), but medical professionals aren’t in business to lose money. They have huge costs to run their businesses, much less the student loans. They won’t stay in business if they lose lots and lots of money.
“It’s a bad situation that is likely to be made worse,†he said.
His view is shared by many doctors around the country. Medicaid for years has struggled with a shortage of doctors willing to accept its low reimbursement rates and red tape, forcing many patients to wait for care, particularly from specialists like Dr. Mazer.
Yet in just five weeks, millions of additional Americans will be covered by the program, many of them older people with an array of health problems. The Congressional Budget Office predicts that nine million people will gain coverage through Medicaid next year alone. In many of the 26 states expanding the program, the newly eligible have been flocking to sign up.
The primary “success” of Obamacare since the Exchanges went live is the huge number of people who have been put on Medicaid. They’re not getting traditional insurance as they apply, which is surely what most were attempting to sign up for. The number of docs who accept Medicaid is already low, and many will either refuse to accept any more Medicaid patients, or only accept a few. This means long, long waits to see medical professionals for Medicaid patients.
As for this being in the NY Times, now they tell us. But, who could have predicted that Obamacare would create long waiting lines and limited medical facilities? Oh, that’s right, everyone who cast a critical eye at the legislation.
Crossed at Right Wing News.
Read: Predictable: Medicaid Expansion Could Cause Bigger Doc Shortage »