SCOTUS Rules In Favor Of Hobby Lobby

Breaking news, no details yet, the Supreme Court had ruled 5-4, just like I predicted earlier (though not a hard prediction to make), in favor of religious freedom in Sebelius v Hobby Lobby.

Details to follow.

USA Today starts out with an interesting analysis

The Supreme Court advanced the cause of religious freedom Monday in the most closely watched case of its term, ruling that companies cannot be forced to offer insurance coverage for birth control methods they equate with abortion.

Damn, religious freedom, how about that?

In the end, the conservatives led by Justice Samuel Alito ruled that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act protects closely held for-profit corporations — those controlled by a limited number of shareholders — from the law’s so-called “contraception mandate.” But they stopped short of a sweeping assertion that corporations can practice religion in the same way individuals can under the Constitution.

So a very narrow opinion, based more on the Religious Restoration Act, and there were still 4 Justices that cared not a whit for neither the law nor the Constitution.

CBS News has the most bat guano crazy I’ve run across so far, not even making any attempt to run anything but a highly partisan piece. Fortunately, we’ll certainly see worse as the day goes on.

https://twitter.com/TPCarney/statuses/483609648147488768

That tweet may or may not work posting with Droid.

Jezebel has da crazy-insane

In a yet another ruling that indicates that we’d enjoy better legal protection if we just incorporated our reproductive organs and sent them to murder civilians in Iraq, the Supreme Court has ruled that corporations that are “closely held” cannot be required to provide contraceptive coverage. Which means that under certain circumstances, it’s officially okay, according to the highest court in the US, for a woman’s boss to determine what sort of pregnancy prevention methods she can obtain with her compensation package. This is the most Monday Monday to ever have Mondayed. And it’s not even 11 am.

By this definition, employees should be able to determine every aspect of what a company offers for compensation.

https://twitter.com/WilliamTeach/statuses/483654287868719104

More at Twitchy, which also has lots more insane Tweets from Lefties.

Read: SCOTUS Rules In Favor Of Hobby Lobby »

Has Canada Given Up On America In Respect To Keystone XL?

If they have, we shouldn’t be surprised. Canada has become more and more upset over the dithering by Team Obama, and has threatened many times that they will give up on the U.S. and send the tar sands oil elsewhere, particularly to China (via Anthony Watts)

(Breitbart) Claiming it could no longer abide the Obama administration’s five-year refusal to approve construction of the Keystone XL pipeline designed to bring 830,000 barrels a day of much-needed Alberta shale oil to U.S. refineries, the Canadian government recently approved plans for a huge new pipeline and port project to ship that oil to Asia instead.

When completed, the $7.9 billion Enbridge Northern Gateway Project, approved by Canada’s federal government on June 17, will consist of an environmentally safe, 730-mile oil pipeline. It will be capable of moving 600,000 barrels a day of Alberta oil to the pacific coast town of Kitimat, British Columbia, where a new state-of-the-art super tanker port facility will be built to ship the oil to thirsty Asian ports.

Instead of getting the oil from super friendly Canada, the U.S. can continue to rely on nations like Venezuala, Saudi Arabia, and others which aren’t exactly the best neighbors. All the jobs will be gone, and much of the tar sands oil that the U.S. does get will come by fossil fueled trucks. They can also use trains. But the pipeline would have been the safest.

At the end of the day, Keystone XL was all about politics, rather than any true concerns. It became a rallying point for unhinged Warmists, who took lots of fossil fueled plane and automobile trips to protest the fossil fuels that would flow through the pipeline. How is it political? Do you hear Warmists complaining about other pipelines? Do you see them protesting? That’s right, the answer is “no”. Joe Romm’s sugar daddy George Soros funded Climate Progress has noted many times that there are other big pipeline projects being built, yet Warmists do not seem to care.

And now Canada is flipping Obama the bird, and the oil will go elsewhere. Thanks, PBO! Heck of a job you’re doing.

Read: Has Canada Given Up On America In Respect To Keystone XL? »

Today Is Decision Day For Hobby Lobby And Obamacare Contraception Mandate

How will the Supreme Court rule?

(Fox News) Supporters of the arts-and-crafts chain Hobby Lobby — the business at the center of one of this session’s most closely watched Supreme Court cases — are sounding a confident tone ahead of Monday’s expected decision in their case challenging ObamaCare’s so-called contraception mandate.

The court meets for a final time Monday to release decisions in its two remaining cases before the justices take off for the summer.

The most contentious is that brought by Oklahoma City-based Hobby Lobby and a furniture maker in Pennsylvania. The for-profit businesses have challenged the requirement in the Affordable Care Act that employers cover contraception for women at no extra charge among a range of preventive benefits in employee health plans. It is the first major challenge to ObamaCare to come before the court since the justices upheld the law’s individual requirement to buy health insurance two years ago.

What is often missed within all the noise is that Hobby Lobby wasn’t concerned about contraceptives, as they offer them within their health plans. What they have a problem with, primarily, is being compelled by regulatory statute to offer abortifacients, such as the Day After pill, which violates their Freedom Of Religion.

Liberal supporters of the “contraception mandate”, which is not actually part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, but, rather, invented by HHS, have made their main complaint to be that companies are not people, therefore, no 1st Amendment protections, a truly dangerous position. I wonder how the liberals would feel if it was their company being told they had no free speech, no ability to ask for redress of grievance? We also hear from those on the Right that companies may not be people, but are made of people. While technically true, what gets missed is that the 1st Amendment makes no distinction between citizens and companies. It is telling government what they cannot do under any circumstances.

Of course, some news outlets, read “crazy liberals”, go a bit wonky ahead of the decision. Here’s Politico’s Stephanie Simon

Hobby Lobby aims for Obamacare win, Christian nation

The evangelical owners of Hobby Lobby made a fortune selling crafts supplies and made headlines fighting government-mandated birth control coverage. They’re also using their billions to sell the American public on the literal truth of Scripture — through a public school Bible curriculum, a huge museum around the corner from the Smithsonian and public forums on the faith of the Founding Fathers.

The Green family may be best known in secular circles for their lawsuit against Obamacare, a high-stakes — and highly political — case that could undercut the administration’s goal of setting minimum standards for health care coverage. By the end of this month, the Supreme Court will decide if the federal government can force the Greens to include methods of contraception they deem sinful as part of employees’ health insurance.

The pending Hobby Lobby ruling has thrust the Greens into the national spotlight, but the family’s mission is far bigger than a single court case. The Greens are spending hundreds of millions on a quiet but audacious bid to teach a wayward nation to trust, cherish — and heed — the Bible.

This is purely red meat for hardcore Leftists, a concern about a growing theocracy or something, rather than people who care deeply about their religious beliefs. This also attempts to put the decision in terms of pushing America towards being a theocracy, while, interestingly, Liberals never seem concerned about the real danger from Islamists pushing for a giant caliphate. Finally, if the Greens have been thrust into the national spotlight, a dubious claim, then that means that the liberal mantra about corporations not being people is completely off base.

Seriously, you have to read the entire article, a two pager, for the full effect about the concern over growing religion. Politico also notes the possibility that unions could take a major hit in Harris v Quinn. Wait, I thought “corporations aren’t people”, so, therefore, unions should not have the right to compel employee behavior?

The Hill is also a bit hysterical

The boundaries of religious freedom hang in the balance as the Supreme Court prepares to close out its term with a decision on the Affordable Care Act’s “birth control mandate.”

Monday’s ruling, the most closely watched of the season, decides round two for ObamaCare at the high court, and will be the second time that the justices will close their term with a ruling on President Obama’s signature law.

The stakes are high. A ruling against the administration could undermine the statute’s provision requiring companies to offer contraceptive services to workers as part of their insurance coverage.

It would peel away a significant portion of the mandate, potentially affecting preventive health coverage for millions of women, the government and backers of the law say.

Perhaps even more important, they contend, are the ramifications of a finding that corporations could be exempt from federal statutes on grounds that they have religious objections.

One of Liberals arguments is the “slippery slope”, whereby, for example, companies would reject offering certain medicines since they violate their religious conscious, which hasn’t happened so far. Interestingly, they miss the reverse, where an administration can force companies to violate their religious beliefs, and other 1st Amendment protections.

At the end of the day, the decision is about Government compelling a violation of religious beliefs. It will not take down Obamacare, since this was, as mentioned, not an actual part of the law, but a rule manufactured by the Obama administration out of thin air. Most companies couldn’t care less about offering contraception, abortifacients, and sterilization procedures, and simply pass the cost on to their employees. Some do, and the 1st Amendment is their protection.

I expect a 5-4 decision in favor of Hobby Lobby, with the Liberals on the Court voting against the Constitution they say they cherish.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Today Is Decision Day For Hobby Lobby And Obamacare Contraception Mandate »

Huge Ocean Whirpools Help Drive Weather And Climate

Look! Science! (via The Hockey Schtick)

Huge ‘whirlpools’ in the ocean are driving the weather

11:08 27 June 2014 by Michael Slezak New Scientist

Giant “whirlpools” in the ocean, up to 500 kilometres across, are driving the world’s climate on a scale previously unimagined. We just don’t know exactly how yet.

The bodies of swirling water, called mesoscale eddies, are 100 km to 500 km in diameter. They form when patches of water are destabilised by obstacles like islands. The eddies carry huge volumes of water and heat across the oceans, until they slowly stop spinning over days or months and reintegrate with the surrounding water.

The assumption was that they gradually diffused the heat they carried in all directions as they travelled, which would hardly do anything to the climate. Now, for the first time, the amount of water and heat they carry has been measured and it turns out the eddies have a big effect after all. (snip)

It’s not clear what this means for the weather, but it is likely to be significant. Some of the world’s biggest sources of climate variability, such as the El Niño Southern Oscillation, are powered by heat moving around the oceans, driven by wind and ocean currents. The eddies could have similar effects, says Qiu, and once we understand them it should help us create more accurate predictions of the regional effects of climate change.

As the Hockey Schtick notes

Amazing what climate scientists can discover about natural climate change by making measurements and observations instead of assuming what “the consensus” previously believed to be true. The junk output of climate models does not incorporate very important natural phenomena such as these newly discovered large eddies or ocean and atmospheric oscillations, which are the true drivers of weather and climate, not CO2.

Next up, Warmists will surely tell us that the whirpools have increased and have a bigger impact because of Mankind’s “carbon pollution” output.

Read: Huge Ocean Whirpools Help Drive Weather And Climate »

If All You See…

…is a horrible fossil fueled vehicle and the evil flag of a massive carbon polluting nation, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Climate Etc, with a post on whether Steven Goddard is right.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another awesome day in the Once And Future Nation Of America. We have Independence Day approaching at the end of the week, and, of course, some people are still freaking out about the Washington Redskins. This pinup is by Gil Elvgren, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. The Lonely Conservative discusses Obama’s leadership skills
  2. American Power has graphic video of events in Iraq
  3. Amy Ridenour discusses the right to not participate in abortion
  4. Black & Right has the bonehead of the day
  5. Cold Fury is questioning some patriotism
  6. Director Blue links car thefts and open borders
  7. Fire Andrea Mitchell notes illegals bringing whooping cough
  8. Just One Minute notes that the meme of “rich is someone else”
  9. Legal Insurrection has the latest insanity from Lois Lerner
  10. Moonbattery has some real questions on anthropogenic global warming
  11. neo-neocon wonders about the “clean food” craze
  12. Pamella Geller notes Islamic supremacism cloaked in victimhood
  13. protein wisdom covers a loony liberal whining about the names of military helicopters
  14. Public Secrets has the cost of a crazy EPA conference
  15. And last, but not least, White House Dossier wonders about the media wondering how sexy First Ladies should be
  16. And one to grow on: The First Street Journal discusses the premeditated invasion

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Obama To Request $2 Billion For Border, Illegal Children

This is an interesting turn of events for a guy and his administration who had essentially created the current situation at the border

(NY Times) (NM) President Obama will ask Congress to provide more than $2 billion in new funds to control the surge of illegal Central American migrants at the South Texas border, and to grant broader powers for immigration officials to speed deportations of children caught crossing without their parents, White House officials said on Saturday.

Mr. Obama will send a letter on Monday (he obviously couldn’t do that Saturday, cause golf) to alert Congress that he will seek an emergency appropriation for rapidly expanding border enforcement actions and humanitarian assistance programs to cope with the influx, which includes record numbers of unaccompanied minors and adults bringing children. The officials gave only a general estimate of the amount, saying the White House would send a detailed request for the funds when Congress returned after the Fourth of July recess that began Friday and ends July 7.

The president will also ask Congress to revise existing statutes to give the Homeland Security secretary, Jeh Johnson, new authorities to accelerate the screening and deportation of young unaccompanied migrants who are not from Mexico. Fast-track procedures are already in place to deport young migrants from Mexico because it shares a border with the United States.

Mr. Obama will also ask for tougher penalties for smugglers who bring children and other vulnerable migrants across the border illegally, the officials said.

This seems like a serious and reasonable proposal from Mr. Obama. One has to wonder what the catch is, considering that, as mentioned, it was his administration policies that created the “humanitarian crisis” in the first place. Perhaps he’s realizing that there is zero chance of any sort of amnesty, er, sorry, pathway to citizenship, passing Congress, particularly the House, as long as he is seen by Republicans as being weak on border security.

Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi headed to the border to meet with the Border Patrol and other law enforcement personnel, who are working hard to deal with the influx

(Breitbart) Saturday at a press conference from the Rio Grande Valley, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) discussed her tour of a border holding facility and addressed the humanitarian crisis of thousands unaccompanied minors flooding across the U.S.-Mexico border, which she called a “humanitarian opportunity.”

Pelosi explained, “We are all Americans — north and south in this hemisphere,” and urged America to see this as not a crisis but an opportunity “to be helpful.” She also said she wished she could simply “take home” the thousands of children temporarily housed in the overburden facilities.

Oh, wait, no, she met with the illegals, and rather than excoriate them for breaking the law, she called them Americans. Powerline notes that Nancy has plenty of room at her mansion which would allow her to take quite a few home with her. And her vineyard has lots of space. “As long as they don’t try to join a union, anyway: the Pelosi vineyard is strictly non-union.”

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Obama To Request $2 Billion For Border, Illegal Children »

Army Clears Bowe Bergdahl Of Misconduct During “Captivity”?

Things that make you go “wait, what? Seriously?”

(The Wire) As the Army continues to investigate whether Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl is guilty of deserting his unit, this afternoon they said there is no reason to believe that Bergdahl engaged in any misconduct during his five years in captivity.

In fact, that’s all that the Army said:

We have no reason to believe that he engaged in any misconduct.”

Bergdahl electrified the national discourse last month after he was freed in a prisoner swap involving five members of the Taliban held at Guantanamo Bay. As charges against his character emerged, the narrative quickly shifted from Bergdahl as POW to Bergdahl as despicable deserter, unworthy bargaining chip, unwitting endangerer of America, and worse.

How is this possible? The Army has yet to read him his rights. He hasn’t even been asked why he left his post. Is this the Army actually clearing him, as reported by The Wire, the Wall Street Journal, and other media outlets, or the Army simply giving a statement?

Read: Army Clears Bowe Bergdahl Of Misconduct During “Captivity”? »

If All You See…

…is an evil carbon pollution infused beer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Bookworm Room, with a post on the dangerous progressive illusion that government makes us safer.

Read: If All You See… »

UN Warns Of Likely El Nino, Media Bloviates

This is one of the reasons we cannot have a legitimate debate on “climate change”: the news media doesn’t understand what climate is. Here are two articles, the first by Jonathan Fowler at AFP

The “El Nino” phenomenon, which sparks climate extremes around the globe, is likely to take hold in the Pacific Ocean by the end of the year and could even do so within weeks, the UN said on Thursday.

There was an 80 percent likelihood that El Nino could start between October and November and 60 percent that it would do so between now and end of August, said the UN’s weather agency, the World Meterological Organization.

The El Nino phenomenon — which can lead to extremes including droughts and heavy rainfall across the globe — occurs every two to seven years, when the prevailing trade winds that circulate over surface waters in the tropical Pacific start to weaken.

It does not spark “climate extremes”. It can, and does, cause changes in weather patterns. Warmists like to point out that weather is not climate (except when they want to blame every weather event on “climate change”). In this, they are right. Climate is created by long term weather, and weather is going to do weather things. The very fact that El Ninos occur every 2-7 years is proof that it is not extreme, but, in fact, part of the overall weather patterns, which also means it is part of the normal long term climate.

Then there’s John Heilprin from the AP

There’s a strong chance an El Nino weather event will reappear before the end of the year and shake up climate patterns worldwide, the U.N. weather agency said Thursday.

The El Nino, a flow of unusually warm surface waters from the Pacific Ocean toward and along the western coast of South America, changes rain and temperature patterns around the world and usually raises global temperatures.

An update Thursday from the Geneva-based World Meteorological Organization puts the odds of El Nino at 60 percent between June and August, rising to 75-80 percent between October and December. It said the expected warming would come on top of the effects of man-made global warming.

Both writers were apparently reading from the same playbook, probably a press release from the UN. Again, this is not climate: the climate patterns will not be shaken up worldwide. The weather will be shaken up, but there is nothing unusual about it. How can we have a legitimate debate when the news media is comprised of idiots?

Of course, it may be that they are intentionally using the terms in this manner to scare people regarding climate change. That is serious possibility, when we get this from the AFP article

The two climate patterns are watched carefully by scientists who say that, while they are not caused by climate change, rising ocean temperatures stoked by global warming may affect their intensity and frequency.

“It is too early to assess the precise impact on global temperatures in 2014, but we expect the long-term warming trend to continue as a result of rising greenhouse gas concentrations,” noted (WMO Secretary-General Michel) Jarraud.

Notice how the Warmists fold in a natural event, which has been occurring for a long, long time, and isn’t understood very well, under the banner of their cult. You can see in the AP excerpt that the same was done, and it also has that same quote from Jarraud. More from the AFP article

Both (El Nino and La Nina) are significant markers of global climate fluctuations.

Again, it’s weather, not climate.

Read: UN Warns Of Likely El Nino, Media Bloviates »

Pirate's Cove