NY Times Suggests Racial Profiling To Protect America From Ebola

It’s no wonder when the Editorial Board is comprised heavily of White People and Men

Stopping Ebola in America

The widening Ebola epidemic in West Africa — combined with the fears generated by an Ebola patient who carried the virus to Dallas — have led to calls for the United States to screen travelers when they reach American airports. That is a reasonable defensive tactic if done judiciously, although it is unclear if that would have stopped the Liberian man, who carried the virus to Dallas before developing symptoms.

Thomas Eric Duncan lied when leaving West Africa, because we all know that people are honest when they’ve been exposed to something like Ebola and want to escape the country and come to the US to be saved. But, for the Times to suggest advanced and intrusive screening for certain people, most who will be Black, is racist! Remember, we aren’t allowed to do this for those traveling from the Middle East who could have links to Islamic terrorist groups.

The American health care system needs to react with greater vigilance when cases do reach this country. It is incredible that doctors in a Dallas hospital reportedly made no effort to ascertain the patient’s travel patterns, and there were delays in cleaning the Dallas apartment where he had been staying, disposing of the medical waste and moving other residents of the apartment to a safer location.

True, but what did those who work for Obama do when he arrived? By the way, that’s a word that appears nowhere within the article: “Obama”.

Top American health officials are strongly opposed, with good reason, to take the more extreme step of banning all travel to the United States from Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone, where the epidemic is concentrated, as several prominent Republicans, like Louisiana’s governor, Bobby Jindal, have recommended. That could actually hamper the battle to contain the epidemic abroad — the first line of defense against the disease — in part by leaving Americans who are risking their lives to contain the epidemic stranded in Africa with no way to return home. If volunteer workers can’t return home, they may elect not to go in the first place, thus weakening the fight against the epidemic.

No Obama, but we do get a Jindal mention. Said travel ban would not be about Americans returning, who would be required to be checked heavily, but against those who live there and simply want to get the hell out.

There is room to improve the screening in West Africa, where government officials and workers are often incompetent and in some cases unable to use the temperature devices they have been given. Still the system seems to be working. Though the epidemic has been growing since it was first identified in March, only one case, Mr. Duncan’s, has reached the United States, while scores of people have been blocked from boarding planes.

Oh, the Editorial Board wants those Black people to do most of the work. Racist!

Even so, it makes sense to add another layer of protection at airports in this country. Travelers from West Africa could be asked to fill out an additional questionnaire, on which they might be less tempted to lie since they will already have reached American soil. Verbal questioning could further probe whether a passenger is likely to be infected. Until the epidemic in West Africa is controlled, it remains possible, even likely, that another Ebola case would reach this country. The American health care system should be prepared to move quickly, treat the victim and trace and isolate all people the patient had contact with. Bungled responses like the one in Dallas are simply unacceptable.

Interrogating them here? Racist!

Interestingly, again, Obama is not mentioned. If Bush, or some Republican, was president, think on the way that paragraph, heck, the entire article, would be changed in order to say that President Republican was failing to protect the citizens of the United States. Things like

Even so, it makes sense to add another layer of protection at airports in this country, which President Republican and his/her administration seem loathe to do. Travelers from West Africa could be asked to fill out an additional questionnaire, on which they might be less tempted to lie since they will already have reached American soil, a simple method for which President Republican has been slow to act. Verbal questioning could further probe whether a passenger is likely to be infected. Until the epidemic in West Africa is controlled, it remains possible, even likely, that another Ebola case would reach this country. President Republican has promised thousands of military members to help, yet only a few hundred have been deployed. What is the Republican administration waiting for? People are dying. The American health care system should be prepared to move quickly, treat the victim and trace and isolate all people the patient had contact with. Bungled responses like the one in Dallas, with President Republican’s FEMA, CDC, and other federal agencies nowhere in sight are simply unacceptable.

Still, it’s interesting that the Times thinks more screening people who will mostly be Black is a Good Idea when it comes to Ebola, but not Middle Eastern men with possible links to terrorist groups.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: NY Times Suggests Racial Profiling To Protect America From Ebola »

Oops: NASA Finds Earth’s Deep Oceans Not Warming

How will Warmists spin this? Head in the sand? Say it means nothing? Say the science is settled? Deflect to the military supposedly believing? Throw out a few slurs?

NASA Study Finds Earth’s Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed

The cold waters of Earth’s deep ocean have not warmed measurably since 2005, according to a new NASA study, leaving unsolved the mystery of why global warming appears to have slowed in recent years.

So, in other words, the excuse of the oceans ate my warming was about as credible as “no, really, officer, I had no idea how fast I was going”.

Scientists at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean temperature data from 2005 to 2013 and found the ocean abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably. Study coauthor Josh Willis of JPL said these findings do not throw suspicion on climate change itself.

Well, of course not. Nothing can dissuade cultish zealots. You have a better chance of persuading Westboro Baptist Church members that gay marriage is OK, convincing Iran to support recognize the right of Israel to exist, to keep Obama from being an utterly partisan hack.

“The sea level is still rising,” Willis noted. “We’re just trying to understand the nitty-gritty details.”

Well, yeah, that’s what happens during Holocene warm periods.

“The deep parts of the ocean are harder to measure,” said JPL’s William Llovel, lead author of the study published Sunday in the journal Nature Climate Change. “The combination of satellite and direct temperature data gives us a glimpse of how much sea level rise is due to deep warming. The answer is — not much.”

To arrive at their conclusion, the JPL scientists did a straightforward subtraction calculation, using data for 2005-2013 from the Argo buoys, NASA’s Jason-1 and Jason-2 satellites, and the agency’s Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites. From the total amount of sea level rise, they subtracted the amount of rise from the expansion in the upper ocean, and the amount of rise that came from added meltwater. The remainder represented the amount of sea level rise caused by warming in the deep ocean.

The remainder was essentially zero. Deep ocean warming contributed virtually nothing to sea level rise during this period.

Whelp, there goes that prognostication right out the window. No that, again, anything will change the utterly closed and un-science interested minds of Warmists.

Read: Oops: NASA Finds Earth’s Deep Oceans Not Warming »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful tropical tree that will soon be growing in the Arctic, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Right Wing News, with a post on a court deciding whether chimps get human rights.

Read: If All You See… »

Know How To Get Conservatives To Support A Carbon Tax?

Warmist Ian Adams opines

(Oregon Live) Conservatives are conditioned to wince at the mention of the word “tax.” Mention the term “carbon tax,” and many will recoil altogether. Still, in the only place in North America where a carbon tax has been introduced, it has been something of a success. U.S. states in the Pacific Northwest are beginning to take notice.

Canada’s British Columbia introduced a carbon tax in 2008. Designed to be revenue neutral, the tax places a price on carbon dioxide emissions, while simultaneously offsetting the cost of implementation with tax reductions in other areas. Thus, B.C. has been able to cut more than $760 million worth of income and other taxes.

Not mentioned are the artificial increases in costs of living associated with carbon taxes, along with things like rolling brownouts, inability to properly heat homes, and limitations on freedom, among others. Oh, and how 1st world nations are slowly abandoning their Hotcoldwetdry measures and taxes.

Long-time conservative tax targets like the death tax and capital gains tax could be eliminated and offset by carbon-tax revenue. Moreover, this could be done while simultaneously complying with the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed regulations on greenhouse gas emissions in a much less economically destructive way. The absolute cornerstone of conservative support for a carbon tax will be authentic revenue neutrality. Particularly out west, where tax burdens are among the most onerous in the nation, any effort to price carbon without an attendant and commensurate reduction elsewhere will be met with opposition.

1st, good luck with eliminating any taxes. Democrats will pitch a fit, proclaiming that as an attempt to kill granny, and , besides, it’s racist and favors the 1%!

Second, this is a false premise about revenue neutrality. Even if it could be achieved (good luck with that!), it would not create any neutrality within our personal and business budgets. The pain of any carbon tax well out does any benefits. Decreases in GDP. Increases in unemployment. Fewer small business start ups. The lower the economic strata the more harm will be done. All for virtually no “environmental” benefit. And this is all based on a false premise that mankind’s release of CO2 is the primary/sole cause of the miniscule increase in global temps over the last 160 years.

Read: Know How To Get Conservatives To Support A Carbon Tax? »

Surprise: Republican States Much More Charitable Than Democrat States

That’s right, campers. Eighteen of the top 20 most charitable states voted for Mitt Romney in 2012. Out of those, the first 17 states voted Mitt. The list goes:

Utah, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, S.C. Idaho, Oklahoma, Arkanasa, N.C., Kansas, Texas, S. Dakota, Kentucky, Louisiana, Nebraska, Indiana.

The District of Columbia is included on the list at #20, and, of course, went for Obama.

We also learn that cities that tend to be Republican and/or in Republican states tend to be quite a bit more charitable than those which are Democrat/in Dem states. The five cities with the biggest drop in giving since 2006 are hardcore Democrat.

The study also notes that The Rich are being less than charitable

(AP) Even as the income gap widens, the wealthiest Americans are giving a smaller share of their income to charity, while poor and middle-income people are donating a larger share, according to an extensive analysis of IRS data conducted by the Chronicle of Philanthropy.

The Chronicle, a leading source of news coverage of the nonprofit world, said in a report being released Monday that Americans who earned $200,000 or more reduced the share of their income they gave to charity by 4.6 percent from 2006 to 2012. Those earning less than $100,000 donated 4.5 percent more of their income, the report said.

The Chronicle’s analysis was based on tax returns filed by Americans who itemize their deductions, including their charitable gifts. Rankings were compiled for states and metropolitan areas based on the ratio of contributions to adjusted gross income.

The Chronicle’s editor, Stacy Palmer, noted that wealthy donors, overall, were more oriented toward support of the arts and higher education than lower-income donors, and less oriented toward support of social-service charities.

Interesting. In Obama’s America, The Rich aren’t as giving as they once were, at least to charities.

Read: Surprise: Republican States Much More Charitable Than Democrat States »

Good Grief: NY Times Op-Ed Deems Pedophilia A “Disorder, Not A Crime”

Welcome to Liberal World, as Margo Kaplan goes full on Barking Moonbat

Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime

THINK back to your first childhood crush. Maybe it was a classmate or a friend next door. Most likely, through school and into adulthood, your affections continued to focus on others in your approximate age group. But imagine if they did not.

By some estimates, 1 percent of the male population continues, long after puberty, to find themselves attracted to prepubescent children. These people are living with pedophilia, a sexual attraction to prepubescents that often constitutes a mental illness. Unfortunately, our laws are failing them and, consequently, ignoring opportunities to prevent child abuse.

We really shouldn’t be surprised by this attitude: liberals have long shown tolerance for NAMBLA, the North American Man/Boy Love Association. We’ve seen Liberal judges give extremely lenient sentences to child molesters. And Liberals have created an “if it feels good, do it” mentality. And they seem to have this base reaction to turning criminals and potential criminals into victims.

Part of this failure stems from the misconception that pedophilia is the same as child molestation. One can live with pedophilia and not act on it. Sites like Virtuous Pedophiles provide support for pedophiles who do not molest children and believe that sex with children is wrong. It is not that these individuals are “inactive” or “nonpracticing” pedophiles, but rather that pedophilia is a status and not an act. In fact, research shows, about half of all child molesters are not sexually attracted to their victims. (snip)

The Virtuous Pedophiles website is full of testimonials of people who vow never to touch a child and yet live in terror. They must hide their disorder from everyone they know — or risk losing educational and job opportunities, and face the prospect of harassment and even violence. Many feel isolated; some contemplate suicide. The psychologist Jesse Bering, author of “Perv: The Sexual Deviant in All of Us,” writes that people with pedophilia “aren’t living their lives in the closet; they’re eternally hunkered down in a panic room.”

Miss Kaplan makes an interesting case, yet, these people are not suffering from a disorder: they are just fetched (using a nicer F word) in the head, and need to be watched as people of concern. She digs deeper

The Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibit discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals with mental disabilities, in areas such as employment, education and medical care. Congress, however, explicitly excluded pedophilia from protection under these two crucial laws.

It’s time to revisit these categorical exclusions. Without legal protection, a pedophile cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support. He could lose his job, and future job prospects, if he is seen at a group-therapy session, asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist, or requests a limit in his interaction with children. Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime.

This is Liberal World, equating people who think sex with children, even just fantasies, should be treated the same as people with real disabilities. She thinks we need to extend the full raft of civil rights protections to these despicable people, and just “re-educate” them, protect them from any retaliation.

But, one has to wonder what this is really about. Is it about normalizing relationships between adults and children? She’s attempting to turn predators into victims, and provides no evidence that treatment works. She wants us to accept them. If you had one of these “virtuous pedophiles teaching your kids, driving their bus, running their after school programs, would you accept that? Ms. Kaplan wants to criminalize, under the Disabilities Act, your response to these repugnant predators.

Read: Good Grief: NY Times Op-Ed Deems Pedophilia A “Disorder, Not A Crime” »

1 In 5 Speak Language Other Than English At Home

When they do this at home, they also seem to do this in public

(Breitbart) An all-time high of nearly 62 million U.S. residents – or about one in five people – now speak a language other than English while at home, a new report from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) found.

The study, based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau, found 44 percent of those who don’t speak English primarily at home—a total of about 27.2 million—were born in the United States.

CIS’s research director Steven Camarota, the co-author of the report, said that this means the U.S.’s current immigration system is failing to properly assimilate people from foreign countries, and those assimilation problems are carrying over into future generations. Camarota said that can be attributed to all-time high levels of legal immigration with over a million people a year admitted into the U.S. legally, and a new “tolerance” in Washington for the continued surge of illegal immigration.

But, it’s considered raaaaacist to require immigrants to learn and speak the primary language of the United States. Instead, we’re supposed to change everything about us to conform to the immigrants.

The report found there were seven foreign languages other than English that more than a million people speak predominantly inside their homes, Spanish being the most prominent at 38.4 million. Chinese is second with 3 million people in America speaking it as the primary language inside their homes; national Philippines language Tagalog is third, with 1.6 million; Vietnamese fourth, with 1.4 million; French, fifth with 1.3 million; and Korean and Arabic are tied for sixth with 1.1 million each.

It’s probably raaaaacist for even mentioning this article and study. As a matter of fact, it was probably raaaaacist to do the study in the first place.

“What we need to do is make sure everyone coming into the United States understands who we are and that we are founded on Judeo-Christian values, that there is one rule of law and that’s what’s on the books and it’s not Sharia and we need to make sure we don’t engage in the same kind of mistakes in Europe where they did not engage in assimilation,” former Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-MI), the former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said in an interview with Breitbart News.

“[Europe] did not engage in assimilation so you ended up with pockets of decay in the Netherlands,” Hoekstra added. “I’m a native born Dutch guy, so I’m disappointed to see it happen. But where you did not have the assimilation then you have these pockets now where people are saying ‘We want Sharia law here,’ and you end up saying ‘No, no, no, no. That’s not how it works in the Netherlands. That’s not how it works in America.’ We have our sets of values and some things, and you know what, if you find our values and our laws somehow stifling and you can’t believe you can operate within them, then maybe America is not the best place for you to go. There have to be clear expectations for the kinds of behavior for the people who we allow to come into the United States. It’s a privilege; it is not a right.”

What used to be common sense, citizens from around the world assimilating as they came to the USA, learning our language, while also meshing their cultures with ours (how import have the Scots, Irish, and Italians been?), has been flushed down the toilet in the name of diversity and multiculturalism, as we as “tolerance”. We were once the great melting pot. Now we’re seeing the Balkanization of the nation, where you go somewhere and can barely understand the workers.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: 1 In 5 Speak Language Other Than English At Home »

Slight Area Of Melting Antarctic Is Changing Gravity!

Is there nothing that you…yes, you!…driving your fossil fueled vehicle can’t make happen?

Dwindling Antarctic ice messing with Earth’s gravity: Blame climate change

The Earth’s gravity is messing up and global warming appears to be responsible. The warming climate has caused massive ice loss in West Antarctica in recent years and this phenomenon has caused the Earth’s gravity to be weaker there.

The findings were based on measurements made by the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) satellite, which was developed to map the Earth’s gravitation field, and data from the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission, a collaboration between the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the German Aerospace Center which aims to provide accurate mapping of variations in the gravity field of the Earth.

Changes in the earth’s mass cause the gravity to fluctuate in small ways but with the large scale melting of the ice sheets in West Antarctica between 2009 and 2012, the loss was large enough to result in changes in the Earth gravitational force pulling over the region, ESA revealed.

Of course, that area only comprises 10 percent of Antarctica, with the other 90% continuing to dramatically increase. And, guess what? The melting in West Antarctica cannot be proven to have any other than typical natural causation.

Meanwhile, we have excuses #53 and #54 for The Pause. Perhaps, someday, Warmists will wake up and stop acting like the worst religious zealots, and actually become interested in the way Science works. Nah. This whole issue is about Progressives enforcing their fascistic political agenda on the nation and world.

Read: Slight Area Of Melting Antarctic Is Changing Gravity! »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful tree sucking up all the carbon pollution from Other People’s fossil fueled vehicles, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is A View From The Beach, with a post on what’s racist and what’s not.

It’s tree week on IAYS.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another gorgeous day in America as we await the Zombie Apocalypse! This pinup is by Fiona Stephenson, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. The Camp of the Saints wonders if we’re screwed by Ebola
  2. The Daley Gator has Feminist whining at Wal Mart
  3. The Other McCain wonders what happened when weather wasn’t climate
  4. The People’s Cube notes hell has frozen over at Salon
  5. Victory Girls Blog notes Panetta’s parting shot
  6. Villainous Company features things that are Sexist
  7. small dead animals wonders about real anti-science
  8. Rhymes With Right notes that Americans hate California
  9. Patterico notes that Obama really should have checked with the nurses first
  10. Moonbattery features obesity, dating, and government money
  11. Maggie’s Farm notes what Dems think about free speech
  12. Legal Insurrection covers teachers that can dodge bullets
  13. Jammie Wearing Fools notes the interesting people Obama travels with
  14. Fire Andrea Mitchell has Obama Priorities
  15. And last, but not least, Director Blue has a serious question on Obama not allowing a travel ban

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Pirate's Cove