…is a sea that has flooded liberal cities hundreds of feet, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Legal Insurrection, with a post on Obama’s immigration defiance.
Read: If All You See… »
…is a sea that has flooded liberal cities hundreds of feet, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Legal Insurrection, with a post on Obama’s immigration defiance.
Read: If All You See… »

Happy Sunday! Another awesome day in the Once And Future Nation of America. This pinup is by Bill Randall, with a wee bit of help.
What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15
As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets†calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me
Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.
Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »
You had to use a hair dryer, take a 5 minute shower, and drive a fossil fueled vehicle to work today, stopping to pick up a breakfast sandwich, so, this will all be your fault. If it happens. Because it might mayba
Lightning Strikes 50 Percent More Often with Climate Change
We already know that climate change is increasing the likelihood of daily floods, tornadoes and heat waves. Now, new research shows that lightning will strike 50 percent more often in our warming world, though where these electric shocks will occur remains a mystery.
Actually, most of that has already been debunked, and, even if true (notice they left out tropical storms), there is no proof of anthropogenic causation.
Currently, there are about 20 million lighting strikes each year in the United States, igniting deadly wildfires and threatening to strike buildings and even people, the NOAA’s National Severe Storms Laboratory reports. And with climate change causing average global temperatures to rise, this number is only expected to increase.
Except for that 18+ year pause.
Based on 11 climate models, the new study, published in the journal Science, predicts that for every one degree Celsius of global warming, lightning strikes will increase by about 12 percent. Overall, that means that for every two lightning strikes in 2000, there will be three in 2100. However, scientists don’t yet know where or when exactly these upsurges will occur.
So, our old friends the climate models. Which have failed 95% of the time. But, hey, scientists climahysterics don’t quite know yet how this will occur. So, give them lots more money to research their already published prognostications that they say will happen.
This is not science. It’s a cult.
Read: Newest Prognostication: Hotcoldwetdry Will Increase Lightning Strikes »
…is an ocean that is obviously super encroaching on the land due to someone using their natural gas heating, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Lonely Conservative, with a post noting that Loretta Lynch is as bad as Holder.
Read: If All You See… »
Sheesh, I didn’t even get a chance to opine about the 5th video, and along comes a 6th. In the fifth, Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber mocks critics as “adolescent children”. Pretty derogatory language for someone getting paid hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars. Jake Tapper, one of the only reporters truly covering this, tells us
(CNN) In a 2011 conversation about the Affordable Care Act, MIT economist Jonathan Gruber, one of the architects of the law more commonly known as Obamacare, talked about how the bill would get rid of all tax credits for employer-based health insurance through “mislabeling” what the tax is and who it would hit.
The issue at hand in this sixth video is known as the “Cadillac tax,” which was represented as a tax on employers’ expensive health insurance plans. While employers do not currently have to pay taxes on health insurance plans they provide employees, starting in 2018, companies that provide health insurance that costs more than $10,200 for an individual or $27,500 for a family will have to pay a 40 percent tax.
“Economists have called for 40 years to get rid of the regressive, inefficient and expensive tax subsidy provided for employer provider health insurance,” Gruber said at the Pioneer Institute for public policy research in Boston. The subsidy is “terrible policy,” Gruber said.
“It turns out politically it’s really hard to get rid of,” Gruber said. “And the only way we could get rid of it was first by mislabeling it, calling it a tax on insurance plans rather than a tax on people when we all know it’s a tax on people who hold those insurance plans.”
If you think that’s bad, it get’s much, much worse
The second way was have the tax kick in “late, starting in 2018. But by starting it late, we were able to tie the cap for Cadillac Tax to CPI, not medical inflation,” Gruber said. CPI is the consumer price index, which is lower than medical inflation.
Gruber explains that by drafting the bill this way, they were able to pass something that would initially only impact some employer plans though it would eventually hit almost every employer plan. And by that time, those who object to the tax will be obligated to figure out how to come up with the money that repealing the tax will take from the treasury, or risk significantly adding to the national debt.
Unions and employers who object in 2018, he noted, “at that point if they want to get rid of it they’re going to have to fill a trillion dollar hole in the deficit…It’s on the books now.”
The remarks start at the 30:38 mark at this link.
Meanwhile, as I write this at 7am, Fox News is talking about yet another video to surface with Gurber talking about Ocare being a hoax.
Read: Gruber Wanted To Play Labeling Game To Get Rid Of Health Care Tax Breaks In 6th Video »
No, really!
Colder weather drives 2014 energy-related CO2 emissions 1.1% above 2013 level, says @EIAgov http://t.co/dH7UUt4v31 pic.twitter.com/eySfsx6d7J
— Climate Group (@ClimateGroup) November 11, 2014
From the linked article, at the US Energy Information Administration (BTW, had anyone ever heard of the EIA before?)
In the long term, energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are driven by economic and efficiency trends and changes in the fuel mix. But weather fluctuations, which drive the level of energy use for both heating and cooling, are a very significant factor affecting year-to-year variation in fossil fuel consumption and their resulting emissions.
EIA’s most recent monthly Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO), issued on October 10, forecasts U.S. energy-related CO2 emissions for 2014 and 2015 at 5,457 million metric tons (MMmt) and 5,436 MMmt, respectively, both higher than the 2013 emissions level of 5,396 MMmt. The forecasted 1.1% rise in CO2 emissions for 2014 relative to their 2013 level reflects a combination of historical energy use data already in hand for more than half of the year and forecasted energy use for the remaining months.
Very cold weather early this year contributed to an increase in total energy use and CO2 emissions for the first six months of 2014 compared with the same period the year before. EIA ran simulations using the STEO model to estimate how much lower emissions would have been had the weather in the first half of the year instead been more like the previous 10-year (2004-13) average. The results show that using this alternative weather scenario, energy-related CO2 emissions during the first half of 2014 would have only been about 0.4% higher than in the first half of 2013, well below the actual first-half to first-half emissions increase of 2.7%.
If I were a hyperalarmist, I might yammer on about “how’d they pick those years. Cherry picking!!!!” I’d probably need to write it in all caps, too.
Of course, these same buffoons want to decrease the available energy, leaving Other People cold.
…are super wonderful climate friendly bikes, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is House Of Eratosthenes, with a post on hitting the big ten-oh! Congratulations! Pirate Dance!

Though the first photo is probably more appreciate.
BTW, I actually forgot about my own ten year blogoversary in July. Oh, well.
Read: If All You See… »