We Can Blame Barbie For Rape Culture And “Climate Change”

The Herald Sun’s Andrew Bolt catches something wonky from the Aussie Greens

The Greens really are ridiculous, hysterically accusing Barbie of secretly sneaking out of the toy basket to help bash women and steal their pay:

GREENS Senator Larissa Waters has urged Christmas shoppers to rethink buying bright pink jewellery or dolls for little girls, linking gender-stereotyped toys to domestic violence and pay inequality.

Let’s go to that Daily Telegraph Australia article

GREENS Senator Larissa Waters has urged Christmas shoppers to rethink buying bright pink jewellery or dolls for little girls, linking gender-stereotyped toys to domestic violence and pay inequality.

The minor party’s gender spokeswoman has endorsed the ‘No Gender December’ campaign, set up by grassroots group Play Unlimited, which calls on retailers to stop using old-fashioned gender stereotypes as marketing ploys this Christmas.

It warns aisles of pink and blue merchandise, while seemingly harmless, can lead to serious social problems including violence against women and children.

She goes downhill from there. But, Warmists are also pushing this

Climate Change Fuels Sexual Violence

This month a study added to the long-running controversy over whether temperature rises as a result of climate change may contribute to increased levels of violence. It found only an indirect link between temperature and violence, contradicting a study from 2013.

The paper concedes that climate change in Sub-Saharan Africa could exacerbate stresses and tensions over scarce resources, but it concludes that key political, economic and geographic factors are more important drivers of violence.

But however indirect this link between climate change and violence is, we should not underestimate it. Especially when it comes to violence against women and girls.

Although evidence is as yet patchy there is enough empirical evidence to suggest causal links: climate change leads to increased conflict over natural resources, which in turn leads to heightened violence against women and girls.

So, even though the link is indirect at best, Warmists are Utterly Sure that there is a link between rising temperatures, er, well, temperatures that will surely rise, according to their flawed computer models and talking points, in the future and sexual violence against women. So, we see that Barbie, a paragon of toys for little girls, is responsible for rape culture and climate change.

Tim Blair decides to give Barbie a makeover

So let’s fix Barbie and make her Greens-compliant.

First, the name has to go. Say goodbye to Barbie and hello to Barb, a women’s refuge counsellor, coal seam gas protester and cis-gender vegan poet.

Barbie needs a new hairstyle to go with her new name. That old look is clearly imposed by male concepts of beauty and attractiveness, and it isn’t very practical when you’re staging a university sit-in or chaining yourself to mining machinery. Barb’s new buzz-cut will be the talk of Toytown!

How can Barb possibly read the IPCC’s full report on climate change without proper eyewear? Barb requires a pair of glasses that project an image of assertive and confident womanhood; glasses that tell the world: “This little lady won’t be pushed around!” Maybe she can borrow a pair from Greens MP Adam Bandt.

And she’ll wear a permanent frown, just like most Lefties.

Read: We Can Blame Barbie For Rape Culture And “Climate Change” »

Obama: Ferguson Is Totally Like A National Problem, Throws Police Under Bus

There’s no surprise in any of this. Once a community agitator, always a community agitator. He’s long been a race baiter, and he easily threw the Boston PD under the bus. He quickly takes sides without evidence. He whips up negative sentiments. Now he’s putting the burden on the police for race relations

(The Hill) President Obama on Monday kept the national debate firmly on Ferguson, Mo., as he took a series of steps that he said would rebuild trust between police officers and minority communities.

The president dedicated his entire public schedule to Ferguson, meeting with civil rights leaders, Cabinet officials and law enforcement officers after a long holiday weekend when the shooting had begun to slip from the headlines.

“This is a problem that is national,” Obama said. “It is a solvable problem, but it is one that unfortunately spikes but fades into background. What we need is a sustained conversation … to move forward in a constructive fashion.”

National, huh? He’s basically blaming police officers and departments nationwide for what occurred in Ferguson, where a young thug who just robbed a store and assaulted the clerk, then assaulted a police officer and attempted to take his weapon, then charged a police officer was shot to death. That’s not the problem of the police: that’s a problem with Obama’s base. Let’s face facts: most of these types of “mistrust” issues occur in areas that heavily vote Democrat. If we want a sustained conversation, then we should certainly discuss why Obama’s base is so violent, and why they think violent actions are a proper response. Why they think looting and burning businesses in their own community is the proper response. Because that has absolutely zero to do with any mistrust.

Obama’s public events took place a week after a grand jury in Ferguson decided not to indict police officer Darren Wilson in the shooting of Michael Brown, triggering protests around the country. While the president has been careful not to take sides in the racially charged case, he made clear that he thinks changes at local police departments are needed.

For starters, Obama requested federal funding that could purchase 50,000 body-worn cameras for police officers, something the family of slain 18-year-old Brown has lobbied for.

While providing local police departments is a wonderful idea, one has to wonder as to Obama’s motives, based on his political career. Might this be a move to give the federal government more control of local policing, something that would be linked directly to the Progressive goal of giving the federal government more and more power? That thought is not out of the realm of possibility.

And Obama said he would create a new task force that will examine “how to promote effective crime reduction while building public trust,” in the words of a White House official. That panel will be led by Philadelphia Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey and former Assistant Attorney General Laurie Robinson.

How about telling his base that rioting, looting, burning cars (including police cars) and buildings, assaulting and killing each other, along with other violent activities is unacceptable? That might be a good first step. Many police and police departments are not immune to charges, but they are often responding to the problems in Obama voter communities.

BTW, when will Obama worry about the huge amount of Black on Black crime? Of course, even mentioning the crime statistics will bring immediate denial about the problems from hardcore Leftists, who prefer to stick their heads in the sand. It’s almost like they prefer Black on Black crime in inner cities.

Read: Obama: Ferguson Is Totally Like A National Problem, Throws Police Under Bus »

If All You See…

…is an evil fire that burns wood which releases carbon pollution which makes it hot then cold, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Last Tradition, with a post on just stand up and play the damned game.

Read: If All You See… »

Don’t Know About You, But I Probably Wouldn’t Use A Minivan As A Getaway Car

Would you?

(WRAL)  Three people were arrested early Sunday morning after a three county chase that ended with a crash in Durham.

The incident started after a burglary alarm was reported at Eagle’s Gas Station on Hampton Pointe Boulevard in Hillsborough at approximately 4:40 a.m. A witness said they saw a burgundy Dodge Caravan leave the store.

Moments later, an Orange County Sheriff’s Office deputy spotted the van and attempted to stop it on Interstate 85 South in Efland. The van, which investigators said was reported stolen from Raleigh on Nov. 24, led authorities down Interstate 85 to N.C. Highway 119 into Mebane, then back into Hillsborough on U.S. Highway 70 before entering Durham on Interstate 85, authorities said. The chase ended when the van crashed into a dumpster and a pole on the 600 block of Liberty Street at about 5:30 a.m.

Then again, criminals aren’t generally known for their brain-power.

Read: Don’t Know About You, But I Probably Wouldn’t Use A Minivan As A Getaway Car »

Surprise: Obama Never Thought It Would Be So Hard To Replace U.S. Stewardship Of Internet

Hey, according to Obama the U.S. is just another country, nothing special, so, hey, why not give up control of of the open Internet? As The Lonely Conservative notes “Some day we can tell our kids and grandkids about the time when the internet was free”

(WSJ) We’re at the midpoint between the Obama administration’s March announcement that it would end U.S. protection of the open Internet and September 2015, when the change is supposed to happen. During this time, there has been no progress finding an alternative for protecting the Internet from authoritarian governments.

That’s no surprise—except to Obama administration officials who apparently never considered how hard it would be to replace U.S. stewardship.

Since the Clinton administration, the U.S. Commerce Department has overseen key operations of the Internet, preventing other governments from politicizing the Internet outside their borders. Bill Clinton opposed the Obama plan soon after it was announced, warning: “A lot of people who have been trying to take this authority away from the U.S. want to do it for the sole purpose of cracking down on Internet freedom.”

Well, apparently it would be too much work for Obama to deal with. That small, white, dimpled ball isn’t going to get in the hole on its own, ya know. The Lonely Conservative goes on

All the administration has to do is renew the contract with Icann, but they refuse to do so, and have not responded to Freedom of Information Act requests for the legal justification for acting without the consent of Congress. Gee, doesn’t that sound familiar?

We also have to seriously consider that this is what Obama wants. An open Internet which allows views from non-Progressives is dangerous to the Progressive agenda. Can’t have people learning un-approved thoughts.

Read: Surprise: Obama Never Thought It Would Be So Hard To Replace U.S. Stewardship Of Internet »

Earth Is Like Totally Moving Towards A 6th Great Extinction Or Something

We need to head the warnings, y’all! Because it’s the end of days!

Heed the Warnings: Why We’re on the Brink of Mass Extinction

Evolutionary biologist Sean B. Carroll, executive producer of the doc Mass Extinction: Life At the Brink, on why mankind’s days are numbered.

…..

But now, to that list of calamities to learn from, we need to add “mass extinctions.”

Mass extinctions?

Yes, because nature’s warning lights are flashing. In the past forty years, Earth has lost half of its wild animal populations. Africa’s lions are one telling example. Thought the King of the Beasts was protected?

Think again. Fifty years ago, about 400,000 lions roamed Africa. Today, there are only about 30,000 remaining, as they have disappeared from twenty-six countries.

Carroll has a point. There is a big loss of life within the animal kingdom, and much can be blamed on Mankind. But, hey, you know this all has to point towards “climate change”, right?

The potential losses of species are on a scale that is rivaled by only a few events in the last 500 million years of Earth’s history. Five times during that span, the majority of species on the planet vanished in a short interval of time. Scientists have now identified the triggers of two of those events: an asteroid that struck Earth 66 million years ago and wiped out dinosaurs and much more, and massive eruptions of volcanoes underneath Siberia that decimated the world 252 million years ago.

While the triggers for these two calamities were different, detailed study of what unfolded in the past reveals a common mode of destruction that is relevant to understanding our predicament today: in each case, mass extinction resulted from large and rapid environmental change on a global scale. Indeed, the main weapons of mass destruction unleashed by the Siberian eruptions included enormous quantities of the very familiar climate-changing gas carbon dioxide. The great concern of scientists today is that the potential global temperature changes projected over the next century approach those that took place 252 million years ago.

Despite what computer models showed, or maybe just to spite computer models, there has been an 18+ year pause in warming, where temps have only gone up in a statistically insignificant way. There has been a miniscule 1.4F increase since 1850, less than one would expect during a Holocene warm period. But, Warmists are predicting doom and gloom in the future, anywhere from a 2C to 6C increase, based on the same computer models that failed 95% of the time.

Lest one think this is anything new, Warmists have been trotting out the 6th Great Extinction scareathon over the last few years, attempting to scare people to gin up support for their far left Progressive policies of increased taxation, increased centralized Government, and decreased control of our own lives and business, where that control is handed over to the central government.

At the current rate of loss in the animal kingdom, it would take 250,000 years to be concerned. Another book concerned about the 6th ME recycles old, outdated freakouts. Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore slammed the 6th ME yammering for what it is: a scare attempt. The 6th ME yammering relies on made up numbers and panic.

Warmists need to continue to amp up their invective in order to keep their cult going.

Read: Earth Is Like Totally Moving Towards A 6th Great Extinction Or Something »

Obama To Meet With Community Agitators For Ferguson Discussions

Will they be discussing how to keep people who are part of his voting base from rioting and looting and vandalizing and burning cars and buildings? Or simply blaming the police, whipping up the emotions as is typical?

(The Hill) President Obama on Monday will focus on the relationship between local police and the communities they protect and serve in the wake of sometimes violent protests in Ferguson, Mo.

Obama will meet with Cabinet members to discuss a review the president ordered in August of federal funding and programs that provide equipment to state and local law enforcement agencies, according to the White House.

Law enforcement officials were criticized for their militarized response to protests in Ferguson after a police officer shot and killed an unarmed black teenager, Michael Brown. A grand jury last week refused to indict Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson in the case.

There’s no doubt that police may have been a bit heavy handed in the beginning, and there is a concern with all their militarized equipment. That said, as time went on it became apparent that it was needed, what with all the rioting and violence, including attacks on law enforcement officers.

After meeting with his Cabinet, Obama will gather young civil rights leaders to the Oval Office, the White House said. Topics for that discussion will include the mistrust between law enforcement and communities of color.

In other words, the police will bear the brunt of the blame, rather than communities with lots of crime and a bad attitude towards law and order.

Later Monday, the president will meet with elected officials, community, civil rights and faith leaders, and law enforcement officials. That meeting will center on ways communities and law enforcement can work together to build trust to strengthen neighborhoods.

Here’s an idea: stop cursing the police, stop throwing things at the police, don’t charge the police, and listen to the police when they say “Stop! Get on the ground!” Trust is a two way street. Yes, there are bad and/or overbearing/overzealous police officers and police departments out there. Everyone wants to simply focus on law enforcement, while ignoring the problems in the community. What kind of community is Ferguson when the loot and burn their own business?

As Breitbart notes, hyper-Progressive NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio will be in attendance, because it’s important for him to be there to offer his advice on how to take over a town and implement policies that increase the crime rate.

Also, while not officially announced, Al Sharpton may well be in attendance, because, we all know that when you need a voice of reason and peaceful intent, Sharpton is the guy you call.

Expect this to result in Blaming The Police and creation of more victimhood.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Obama To Meet With Community Agitators For Ferguson Discussions »

If All You See…

…is a horrible Gaia killing plastic water bottle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Real Science, with a post on how much sea ice there is.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another stunning day in America. The sun is shining, the birds are chirping, the smell of tear gas has cleared. This pinup is by Romain Hugualt (same as last week), with a wee bit of help. He does lots of pinups featuring planes.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Wizbang notes who else says voter ID doesn’t suppress the vote
  2. Wild Thing discusses Louis Farrakhan’s latest disgusting rant
  3. The Other McCain has a shout-out to Princess Pelosi
  4. The Lonely Conservative notes what American’s are delaying due to high cost
  5. The Last Tradition notes why a teacher’s union has freaked out over Coca-Cola
  6. The Daley Gator wonders why the media can’t be honest
  7. David Thomspon discusses the agonies of the left
  8. Small Dead Animals has a quick thought on Islamic terrorism and mosques
  9. Raised On Hoecakes has a discussion on Ferguson
  10. Public Secrets has the gruberization of environmental politics
  11. neo-neocon highlights the “anti-Barbie”
  12. Moonbattery covers another hate hoax
  13. Legal Insurrection notes that first they came for the cashiers, then the waiters
  14. Flopping Aces notes that the next two years will be bad
  15. And last, but not least, Fire Andrea Mitchell notes the hypocrisy of the NY Times writer who published Darren Wilson’s address now asking for police protection

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

NY Times: Say, Where Do We Go After Ferguson?

Fortunately, this opinion piece doesn’t come from the Editorial Board, which features a whopping one African-American amongst the nineteen member board, but Michael Eric Dyson, who is actually a bit more thoughtful, at least as the writing in his books shows

Where Do We Go After Ferguson?

WHEN Ferguson flared up this week after a grand jury failed to indict the white police officer Darren Wilson for killing the unarmed black youth Michael Brown, two realities were illuminated: Black and white people rarely view race in the same way or agree about how to resolve racial conflicts, and black people have furious moral debates among ourselves out of white earshot.

It’s not just black and white, but conservative and progressive. Lefties see an evil cop who shot a gentle giant unarmed black kid, and wonder, if Michael Brown was actually charging Officer Darren Wilson, why Wilson couldn’t do Something Else to subdue Brown. They get a little sketchy on what he should have done, but, hey, he’s still an evil racist who is part of an evil racist system so let’s bum rush him to prison and disarm all the cops.

What conservatives see is a large man who robbed a convenience store, assaulted the owner, was a fool for walking in the street, attacked a police officer, hit the officer, tried to take his gun, ran away, then came back for more, refusing the officer’s demands to stop and get on the ground. Police are trained to shoot center mass, not for extremities. Wilson had a split second to make his decision. There was no time to call for backup.

We also see that this occurred in a heavily Democrat voting area. We see most of the protests and/or riots and/or lawlessness occurring in heavily Democrat voting areas.

From the start, most African-Americans were convinced that Michael Brown’s death wouldn’t be fairly considered by Ferguson’s criminal justice system. There were doubts that the prosecution and defense were really on different teams. The prosecutor, Robert McCulloch, looked as if he were coaching an intramural scrimmage with the goal of keeping Officer Wilson from being tackled by indictment.

Ferguson folks demanded a Grand Jury, which originally wasn’t even on the table based on the facts of the case. When they got it, and Wilson was not indicted, they then complained. And rioted and looted in their own neighborhoods.

These clashing perceptions underscore the physics of race, in which an observer effect operates: The instrument through which one perceives race — one’s culture, one’s experiences, one’s fears and fantasies — alters in crucial ways what it measures.

Where do we go after Ferguson? Here’s the best idea: get the Black communities out of under the thumb of Democrats, Progressives, community agitators organizers, and other left wing loons who whip the communities up as well as keeping them dependent upon left wing government. Better school systems, more available jobs, more responsibility. Sure, it still won’t be a perfect utopia, there are problems in Republican areas, too. People are not always good. And, hey, even educated Liberals are great at race baiting and inciting racial strife, but, it would be a damned sight better than it is now.

IT is nearly impossible to convey the fear that strikes at the heart of black Americans every time a cop car pulls up. When I was 17, my brother and I and a childhood friend were pulled over by four Detroit cops in an unmarked police vehicle. This was in the mid-70s, in the shadow of the infamous Detroit Police Department task force called Stress (Stop the Robberies, Enjoy Safe Streets), which was initiated after the 1967 riots. The unit lived up to its name and routinely targeted black people.

Eric Holder calls us a nation of cowards for refusing to discuss race. OK, so, here’s something non-PC: might there be a reason for a good chunk of that fear of police? It’s also strange that a good chunk of those with a fear of police live in areas run by Democrats.

As big a fan as he is of respectability politics, Mr. Obama is the most eloquent reminder that they don’t work, that no matter how smart, sophisticated or upstanding one is, and no matter how much chastising black people pleases white ears, the suspicions about black identity persist. Despite his accomplishments and charisma, he is for millions the unalterable “other” of national life, the opposite of what they mean when they think of America.

And right there is a difference in opinion: Liberals, not just Black ones like Mr. Dyson, race-bait, and fail to see that it is Mr. Obama’s politics and policies that are at issue, not his color. Mr. Dyson decides to deep dive into the race-baiting

Barack Obama, like Michael Brown, is changed before our eyes into a monstrous thing that lacks humanity: a monkey, a cipher, a black hole that kills light. One might expect the ultimate target of this black otherness to have sympathy for its lesser targets, who also have lesser standing and lesser protection, like the people in Ferguson, in Ohio, in New York, in Florida, and all around the country, who can’t keep their unarmed children from being cut down in the street by callous cops who leave their bodies to stiffen into rigor mortis in the presence of horrified onlookers.

Again, what we see is a horrible president, regardless of skin, who acts as the leader of the Democrat Party, not as POTUS. Someone who is nasty, to say the least, to those who oppose his policies, who thinks of those opponents as enemies. One who is thin-skinned and uses the apparatus of government to attack opponents. When Obama assumed office, I stopped doing my Surrender Monkey Friday posts, because, even though they had absolutely nothing to do with race, people would, and did, pitch a fit (it went back the old “cheese eating surrender monkeys” schtick, based on the French). It will return when Obama leaves office. We see an 18 year old man who decided theft and attacking an officer of the law was the proper decision, and he paid for it. Now Darren Wilson has to pay for the actions of Michael Brown.

More than 45 years ago, the Kerner Commission concluded that we still lived in two societies, one white, one black, separate and still unequal. President Lyndon B. Johnson convened that commission while the flames that engulfed my native Detroit in the riot of 1967 still burned. If our president and our nation now don’t show the will and courage to speak the truth and remake the destinies of millions of beleaguered citizens, then we are doomed to watch the same sparks reignite, whenever and wherever injustice meets desperation.

The truth? How about that Black Americans suffer tremendously under the hands of Leftists and their plantation politics. The truth? Black people are more likely to be victims of crime perpetrated by other Black people. They are more likely to be killed by other Black people. They are more likely to have higher crime rates in their communities. The Truth? Don’t want to be treated like a thug, do not dress like a thug, don’t act like a thug. People respond immediately to the way people are dressed. They develop almost instant evaluations of a person the way they are dressed. A white person, a Latino, an Asian, if they are dressed like a thug will be thought of as a thug. And Liberals can’t say much, because they see someone dressed in overalls and speaking with a deep Southern accent as a moron and hayseed.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: NY Times: Say, Where Do We Go After Ferguson? »

Pirate's Cove