…is a horrible fossil fueled vehicle, helpful for getting through the heat created snow, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Nice Deb, with a post on Project Veritas investigating Al Sharpton.
Read: If All You See… »
…is a horrible fossil fueled vehicle, helpful for getting through the heat created snow, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Nice Deb, with a post on Project Veritas investigating Al Sharpton.
Read: If All You See… »
I’m anxiously waiting for Warmists to assail John Kerry as an anti-science fundamentalist
(Weekly Standard) Secretary of State John Kerry continued to beat the drum on the dangers of climate change Friday, noting that “there is no Planet B.” The secretary made the remarks at the swearing-in ceremony for Ambassador-at-Large for Religious Freedom David Saperstein. He drew a religious connection to the issue of climate change, saying that “when it comes to the fundamental health of Earth, folks, we’d better stick to the Creator’s original plan.”
Kerry said he and Saperstein had worked together on a number of issues in the past thirty years, including climate change:
Together we got behind the CHIPS legislation for children’s health care. We pushed for the proposed Workplace Religious Freedom Act, which unfortunately never passed. We were partners in the struggle to help veterans who had been affected by Agent Orange. And we have been allies in trying to awaken the world to the dangers of climate change – and let me just say that when it comes to the fundamental health of Earth, folks, we’d better stick to the Creator’s original plan, because there is no Planet B. (Applause.)
Well, now, if we want to look at the Creator’s plan, we might see that the Creator created a climate that is constantly changing. It can flip between hot periods to glacial ages. It can see smaller periods of cooling and warmth. There have been multiple flips during this inter-glacial period, known as the Holocene. If we’re talking about the “Creator’s plan”, there is nothing unusual going on now, just another typical warm period.
BTW, most of Kerry’s speech, which was about “religious freedom”, which preceded Mr. Saperstein’s speech on religious freedom, rings very false in the Era Of Obama, especially since so much was about protecting the Religion Which Shall Not Be Named.
Double BTW, Rajendra Pachauri, Chairman of the IPCC, resigned after accusations of sexual misconduct (to put it mildly). No Frakking Consensus notes that his 2 page resignation letter is a love letter to himself, and includes
Pachauri’s letter talks about his “greatest joy,†and his “sublime satisfaction.†And about religion:
For me the protection of Planet Earth, the survival of all species and sustainability of our ecosystems is more than a mission. It is my religion and my dharma. [bold added]
Yes, the IPCC – which we’re told to take seriously because it is a scientific body producing scientific reports – has, in fact, been led by an environmentalist on a mission. By someone for whom protecting the planet is a religious calling.
Anyone shocked?
Did you know that emojis, thinks like
and
and
are raaaaacist? Perhaps it would be better if I used
and
and
for this Salon article by Anna Silman
We’re finally getting non-white emojiGreat news, fellow emoji users: It looks like our nonverbal communications are about to get a whole lot more inclusive.  The Next Web got their hands on some screenshots of Apple’s brand new emoji palette from iOS 8’s most recent beta release, and it seems they took the public’s appeals for more pictographic diversity to heart.
The new version will reportedly feature 300 new emoji, include a bunch of new family units in lots of different permutations (two dads, two moms, different combinations of kids, etc). In addition, a bunch of new flags made the cut — I’m happy to report my native Canada will no longer have to be represented by the five-pronged leaf emoji — while the iPhone emoji has been modernized and the watch emoji has been turned into an Apple Watch.
There will be six different skin tones to choose from, to differentiate from the uber white looking ones such as…wait, they’re mostly yellow so far? And have been? Hmm. Strange. I didn’t realize that white people were actually yellow. This sounds a bit like Asiaphobia, yes? Anyhow, they even have to go this far
Users will be able change skin tone of emojis (incl. the Santa emoji–take that @megynkelly!) http://t.co/bg3qSnp7xQ pic.twitter.com/viG1pK33Xl
— Tierney Sneed (@Tierney_Megan) February 23, 2015
Sadly, this is what people are worried about in modern time. Emoji skin tone. However, it does provide some amusement, as people looking down at their smartphones changing emoji “skin” tone will walk into things even more!
Read: Thank Goodness Our National Nightmare On Raaaaacist Emojis Will Soon Be Over! »
This comes on the heals of a similar hand wringing article from the AP, both of which seem super concerned about a certain brand of law breakers
(NY Times) For Tomás Péndola, an immigrant from Argentina, it was a normal week teaching chemistry in a public high school here, filling a whiteboard with dense equations and coaxing his students to decipher them.
For Yeni BenÃtez, a Mexican immigrant in Wisconsin, this week was when “everything just fell apart.â€
Mr. Péndola, who came here with his family when he was 10 and grew up in Florida without immigration papers, has protection from deportation and a work permit under President Obama’s program for unauthorized immigrants, known as Dreamers, who came to the United States as children. Ms. BenÃtez had been ready on Wednesday to join an expanded version of the program, which was announced by the president in November.
Interestingly. It’s not just low level jobs illegals are taking from Americans, but good paying ones. And, even more interestingly, ones that are paid by the legal tax paying citizens, which should have also been subjected to a background check including immigration status, per federal law.
“I’m back to this sense of insecurity, of being afraid every day, every hour, every minute,†said Ms. BenÃtez, who has a college degree in engineering but is working in a factory. “It really is taking a toll on me.â€
That feeling tends to happen when one is in violation of the law.
Mr. Péndola and Ms. BenÃtez now stand on two sides of a sharp divide created by disagreements over how far a president can change immigration policy by executive action.
How about “virtually no change”? That’s the job of the Legislative Branch, per that pesky Constitution, and if the President doesn’t like it, isn’t getti nc b what he wants, too bad. TS.
Of course, we all know that the minute a Republican wins the White House, liberals will suddenly have a problem with any Exec orders, especially ones that illegally usurp Congresses job.
Read: NY Times: Illegal Aliens Like Super Fearful After Judge Upholds Law »
Interestingly, he really doesn’t seem to want to pass cap and trade, he just wants to use it for political reasons….hmm, that sounds exactly like what I’ve been saying for years, that “climate change” is primarily a political tool
(CNN) With Republicans in control of both houses of Congress, the odds of passing a climate change bill this year are virtually non-existent. But Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Maryland, plans to reintroduce legislation to cap carbon emissions this week, anyway, due in part to the impact it could have on the 2016 election.
“Our goal is to keep attention focused on this issue as we head into this congressional session, and also into the presidential election in 2016,” Van Hollen told CNN, explaining the bill serves as a vehicle for discussion.
Van Hollen’s objective is to force Republicans to address the issue, and he believes they’re slowly coming to the negotiating table. Think Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, and her crusade against income inequality to push Hillary Clinton toward embracing a populist mission as she forms an economic platform for her likely presidential bid.
Again, this is about politics, not actually passing legislation that Democrats really want. They could have rammed through cap and trade during the time they fully controlled Congress, 2009-2010, with a Democrat president, much as they rammed through Stimulus, Obamacare, Dodd-Frank, and many other bills. They chose not too.
Yes, there are squishy Republicans who Believe, and like the idea of more Central Government. But, again, as my long running meme, if all these Warmists really believed that “climate change” will doom us, and Mankind is mostly/solely at fault, they’d practice what they preach rather than attempting to force their beliefs on Other People.
Read: Good News: Chris Van Hollen (D) To Push Cap And Trade »
…is a horrid cold warming ocean that will rise up and swamp all the land, you might just be a Warmist
![]()
The blog of the day is Jack Shaw, with a post on Hillary Clinton’s war on women.
Read: If All You See… »
Obviously, this invalidates everything, you guys!
Leading climate change denier was paid by energy companies
Wei-Hock Soon earned more than $1 million publishing erroneous reportsWei-Hock Soon, a leading climate change denier whose work has fortified right-wing political arguments for years, was paid more than $1.2 million by energy companies, The New York Times reports. New documents uncovered by Greenpeace via the Freedom of Information Act show that over the last decade, Soon received sizable funding from oil and gas corporations, which he failed to disclose in scientific papers he published.
Who else will pay? The government surely won’t. They are in the business of only funding one side, the same as groups like WWF, Sierra Club, Greenpeace, etc. They in no way want anything that diverges in the least from their cultish beliefs
Climate Statistician Dr. Matt Briggs: ‘What effect do you think the billions of government money flooding into the system has? Why is it government money is seen as ‘pure’ and industry money ‘tainted’, especially when the government far outspends industry. The government is, after all, an interested source. Just think of EPA grants. What will you say of the common practice whereby scientists review grants and also receive them from the same agencies (not simultaneously of course)? Tremendous conflict of interest! Do you recall Eisenhower’s speech where he not only cautioned against the military-industrial complex but also about the corrupting influence of government money?’
I kinda missed the part about “erroneous reports”. Oh, here it is, back to original article
“What it shows is the continuation of a long-term campaign by specific fossil-fuel companies and interests to undermine the scientific consensus on climate change,” Kert Davies, executive director at the Climate Investigations Center, told the Times. Experts say Woon’s work employs “out-of-date data, publishes spurious correlations between solar output and climate indicators, and does not take account of the evidence implicating emissions from human behavior in climate change.”
Interesting. It’s called “erroneous” because it refuses to mostly/solely Blame Mankind. Does the Climate Investigations Center fund skeptics to do research? No.
This is a witch hunt designed to discredit people in order to discredit research Warmists do not like, rather than responding directly to the research and rebutting it. No one really cared about James Hansen being funded by Government and the Heinz Foundation. The media collectively yawned at all the errors and lies in multiple IPCC reports.
Yet, these Warmists still won’t practice what they preach.
Read: Shocking News: Climate Skeptic Paid By Fossil Fuels Companies »