Obama Will Offer A Grand Vision And Optimism At SOTU Or Something

And he plans on acting the elder statesman afterwards. Here’s your morning laugh-riot article

(Politico) People inside the West Wing have a vision of President Barack Obama’s 2016: he’ll take on the role that Bill Clinton played for him in 2012, the elder statesman and battering ram, laying out a fact- and figure-based case for why Democratic governing gets better results than Republican promises.

That’s coming, aides say. But not on Tuesday.

The closest Obama’s going to come to 2016 politics in his State of the Union is setting the grand vision and offering an optimistic, aspirational contrast to the doomsday at-the-barricades mentality that’s dominating the GOP primary race.

Talking points are amusing. In reality, nothing will change in the least, except Obama will check out of the job a bit more than he already has. Obama will be just as nasty and divisive as usual, both during the SOTU and afterwards. You’re either with him 100% or you’re his enemy. And it will be preachy. Very preach, if the list of attendees sitting in Michelle Obama’s box. Based on the list, we can expect to be scolded on

  • gun control
  • free college
  • apprenticeships and a $15 wage
  • Student loan reform
  • Obamacare
  • climate change
  • How he saved GM singlehandidly
  • Illegal aliens
  • “Syrian” refugees

Will he talk about the issues that Americans really care about? Good question. If he does, it will be in a manner that attempts to make him look Superman awesome, while telling Americans we have to do better, because he’s very disappointed in us. For instance, any mention of Islamic terrorism will be couched in a manner that protects the misogynistic and violence religion while telling Americans we have to reach out and stop being bigoted to the non-violent ones. Don’t expect him to spend much time, if any, on Islamic terrorism. It’s not a subject he seems to care much about.

Very much expect Obama to take lots of shots at the Republican controlled Congress, and, by extension, all the U.S. Citizens who voted for the Republicans. This is who Obama is: a nasty, petulant man.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Obama Will Offer A Grand Vision And Optimism At SOTU Or Something »

Rapey Refugees In Germany Fear Backlash

I meant to get to this one Saturday, before my server was hit with a possible denial of service attack. It’s yet another in a long line of articles meant to protect those who look to undermine Western society, our values, our legal systems, you name it, and replace it with the same horrible systems they have in their home countries. Like systematic rape

Migrants in Germany fear backlash after sex assaults

When asylum seeker Asim Vllaznim heard about the New Year’s Eve spate of sexual attacks in Germany, blamed on a crowd of migrants, he says his spirits fell.

“Our first reaction was: now the Germans will hate us,” said the 32-year-old Kosovar, sitting with his family in their room at a migrant shelter in the western city of Cologne.

Certainly, not all the refugees (not migrants) are bad people. But, so many seem to be bringing their values to Western nations, and don’t seem to care a lick about assimilation.

Vllaznim said he fears the anti-foreigner backlash has only just begun, as furious critics have blamed Angela Merkel’s liberal refugee policy for the mob attacks.

Perhaps they should worry more about women being sexually assaulted by their fellow refugees.

“We are not bad people, we only want a better life.”

And their want of a better life is directly in opposition of the need of the people of the host countries to have a better life, one where the women are not sexually assaulted. Much less the escalating crime rates. These people are bringing their values of intolerance, violence, and repression of women (to say the least) to Germany and other nations. I fail to understand why Liberals, who constantly preach about the so called “war on women” when a Republican wants to not require religious organizations pay for birth control, abortifacients, and sterilization, have decided to kick women under a steamroller when it comes to Islam.

Read: Rapey Refugees In Germany Fear Backlash »

If All You See…

…is a world turned to desert due to Other People driving fossil fueled vehicles, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Flopping Aces, with a post on GM being bailed out so they can move jobs to China.

It’s Brooke Burke week. Can’t go wrong!

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Patriotic Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another super fine day in the Once and Future Nation of America. Unless you’re a Bengals or Texans fan. Not sure which loss was worse. Uggggggggly! This pinup is by Bell Medcalf, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Vox Popoli says Angela Merkel must go
  2. Legal Insurrection debates the debate regarding the Cologne attacks
  3. Political Clown Parade covers Bernie’s yearnings
  4. Raised On Hoecakes discusses a smoking gun from Hillary’s emails
  5. Protein Wisdom has cute Calvin and Hobbs Star Wars. And Obama subprime 2.0
  6. Pamela Geller has a “hate crime” you’ve got to read to believe
  7. neo-neocon wonders which will win out, feminism or PC protection of Muslims?
  8. Lady Liberty 1885 covers Blueprint NC and a little gem
  9. Jihad Watch covers a Toronto imam saying Muslims should only do business with Muslims (Yay, integration)
  10. Fire Andrea Mitchell covers the Muslim women kicked out of a Trump event
  11. Doug Ross @ Journal asks if you suffer from Islamist Denial Syndrome
  12. Baldilocks (Datechguy’s Blog) discusses how to recognize stupidity
  13. Chicks On The Right has answers to Buzzfeed’s white people trolling
  14. Bookworm Room has how to pick a good wine, politically
  15. And last, but not least, Blazing Cat Fur discusses mass Muslim immigration

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Obama To Have Empty Chair At SOTU In Honor Of Shooting Victims Or Something

Here’s something that’s fraught for hashtag takeover

(Fox News) President Obama will keep an empty seat next to the first lady on Tuesday when he gives his State of the Union address, to represent victims of gun violence, according to the White House.

Obama, who is trying to reduce gun violence by issuing a series of executive orders to tighten federal gun laws, announced the symbolic gesture Friday when talking on the phone with fellow supporters of more stringent gun-ownership laws.

A White House official said the president told the supporters the open seat in first lady Michelle Obama’s viewing box was for “the victims of gun violence who no longer have a voice — because they need the rest of us to speak for them.”

You know this will bring out huge numbers of media reports comparing it to the Clint Eastwood speech which featured an empty chair, representing Obama. The chair for the SOTU could represent Obama’s empty policy on the Middle East, or his empty promises regarding the ability to do background checks on “Syrian” refugees. It could represent his empty gesture to represent gun victims, a goodly portion who are Black and live in cities run by the Democratic Party, Blacks who are rarely mentioned by Mr. Obama and other Democrats.

Perhaps it could represent empty holsters, as Obama and Democrats look to put large restrictions on the ability of law abiding citizens to own/carry weapons to protect themselves from the criminality caused by Democrat criminal justice policies.

The State of the Union addresses are given in the House chambers. And as an apparent attempt to express his dissatisfaction with Congress, Obama also said the open seat should serve to “remind every single one of our representatives that it’s their responsibility to do something about this,” the official said.

Like the heavy restrictions in Democratic Party run Chicago, Baltimore, and California? Ted Cruz had a great response

“If I’m elected POTUS, there’ll be an empty seat for the over 50 million unborn children killed since Roe,” Cruz tweeted, adding the hashtag #Stand4Life.

Or, how about a seat for all the people killed in the fighting in the Middle East because Obama was too uncaring to get involved? Or all those killed by ISIS, which rose during Obama’s time in office?

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Obama To Have Empty Chair At SOTU In Honor Of Shooting Victims Or Something »

If All You See…

…is a horrible asphalt road made with evil fossil fuels, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Vlad Tepes, with a post on “German vigilantism, media deception and deflection, Jihadis threatening Italians and more”

Read: If All You See… »

Say, Are Your Text Messages Bad For Global Warming?

This is a Big Question for National Democratic Radio, er, National Public Radio

How Much Do Your Text Messages Contribute To Global Warming?

A few days back, All Tech got a question from an NPR listener that got us curious.

Tim Callahan from Seattle wrote:

“A friend asked how texting – in all its forms (admittedly a squishy thing to corral) – is contributing to global warming? After saying, ‘minimally…’, I thought about how to answer that question. Putting aside the sunk contribution caused by the manufacture and transport of the device you text with, how much does the battery emit / generate while a person does a typical or somehow average text? … Can you help quantify?”

I tracked down someone who’d get us to the answer: greenhouse gas footprinting expert Mike Berners-Lee. Climate impact calculations are just the sort of thing he does for work at Small World Consulting at Lancaster University in the United Kingdom. And estimating the impact of a text message is exactly the thing he did for his 2010 book How Bad Are Bananas? The Carbon Footprint Of Everything.

I’ll make it easy for you: the answer is that the carbon footprint of texting is very minimal

When we wrote this a few years ago, we estimated that the carbon footprint of all the world’s text messages to be 32,000 tons of CO2e per year. By now, it will have grown quite a bit, but 32,000 tons is still a tiny figure for all the world’s text messaging.

That’s the equivalent of the carbon footprint of around 1,700 US citizens, if we use the older figure of the average US citizen having a carbon footprint of 19 metric tons. Adding pictures increases the figure. And the world’s carbon footprint is 50 billion metric tons. So, a drop in the bucket.

What this does go to show is how insane the members of the Cult of Climastrology are, that they would even worry about whether their text messaging is Bad for global warming/climate change. They need to get a grip. Of course, this is what the constant drumbeat of future doom from tiny amounts of CO2 does to weak-minded and easily impressible Leftists creates.

Read: Say, Are Your Text Messages Bad For Global Warming? »

NY Times: Seriously, You People Need To Calm Down About All The Sexual Assault In Germany By Refugees

This op-ed by Anna Sauerbrey is definately in the running for the January most bat guano insane award, at least in terms of Big Credentialed Media.

Germany’s Post-Cologne Hysteria

As M asks in the comments “120 complaints of sexual assault is hysteria?”(actually more than that) Hello There writes “Ms. Sauerbrey is blaming Germany for not integrating the immigrants the same way that abused wives are often blamed for their husbands’ behavior.” NJ Voter: “Why should the women of Germany give up their freedoms (freedom of assembly, freedom of movement, freedom of expression and dress) in order to accommodate the needs of Middle Eastern refugees fleeing from problems in their own societies?” Carolyn: “In other words, blame the victim.”

Starting the article, though, I had to wonder if the headline was written by an editor, as they usually are, who didn’t actually read it

ON New Year’s Eve, hundreds of men gathered in the plaza at the main train station in Cologne, Germany, groping and robbing scores of women as they passed by. By the end of this week the police had received 170 complaints, including 120 related to sexual assault.

Despite the fact that the attacks occurred in the center of Germany’s fourth-largest city, it took days for the news to surface in the national media. Even stranger, the police seemed to know little about the attacks. No arrests were made, and authorities claimed that nearby surveillance cameras offered little help in identifying suspects. The Cologne police chief was forced from his job on Friday.

The police have since identified 31 suspects. They are a multinational lot, including Germans, a Serb and even one American. But 18 of them are asylum seekers from the Middle East and North Africa.

Let’s not forget that this occurred in multiple other German cities, as well as cities in other European nations to boot. This brought on a discussion from Anna about people jumping to conclusions “before the facts were all in”

Alice Schwarzer, a well-known German feminist, wrote on her blog on Tuesday that the events were a “product of misguided tolerance.” Frauke Petry, head of the far-right Alternative für Deutschland party, said the events were a “result of uncontrolled migration.”

And Julia Klöckner, the top Christian Democratic candidate in the coming state election in Rhineland-Palatinate, called for an “open debate” on whether foreigners, including asylum seekers, could be kicked out for committing crimes — a proposal that even Chancellor Angela Merkel cautiously endorsed, though such laws already exist.

She notes that the Right was blaming, while the Left was deflecting blame. It all seems a ration discussion on the subject. Then it breaks down, and you realize that the headline matches the op-ed

In other words, precisely when the country needs a coolheaded conversation about the impact of Germany’s new refugee population, we’re playing musical chairs: Everybody runs for a seat to the left and to the right, afraid to remain in the middle, apparently undecided.

The irony is that the Cologne attacks, by highlighting the issue of refugees and their culture, raise an incredibly important question and at the same time make it almost impossible to have a reasonable conversation about it.

We’re supposed to have a rational conversation about mass sexual assault? Really? Here in the US, Leftists freak out over stolen kisses, guys looking at girls in a sexual manner, and catcalls. The deem this all as misogyny and sexual assault. In Europe, there was actually sexual assault in mass groups. Norway is holding classes for refugees which teach them “not to rape”.  There are rape gangs and sexual assault all over Europe in refugee camps. This isn’t even taking into account the way these refugees treat women overall, along with the crime of other stripes they bring along, compounded by their attitude that countries like Germany will give them whatever they want. I think a bit of hysteria is warranted.

Integration will fail if Germany cannot resolve the tension between its secular, liberal laws and culture and the patriarchal and religiously conservative worldviews that some refugees bring with them. We cannot avoid that question out of fear of feeding the far right. But integration will also fail if a full generation of refugees is demonized on arrival.

And that’s where the victim blaming comes into play. Should all Germany women, and women throughout Europe, put on a burka? Schools have told girls to cover up to avoid sexual assault from refugees. Cologne’s female mayor told women they should keep an “arms length” away from men, and no hugging or anything, because the refugees might get the wrong idea.

Assumptions have replaced observation, assertion has replaced assessment, and ideology has replaced evidence. With its vision thus distorted, Germany is speeding toward a multicultural society, chased by the mob on the Internet, without any idea of what that society should look like.

We need to regain our sense of balance — or it’s just a question of time until we hit a wall.

Obviously, you people who are concerned about rampant sexual assault from these refugees, comprised mostly of young men, are just a bit hysterical, and need to calm down. No assumptions, we have a multicultural society to form! SW writes “It sure would be nice if the politically correct would stop throwing women as a group under the bus in the name of trying to judge these mass atrocities as some kind of balancing test. Punish the offenders and keep anyone with the mindset that women are fair game to be raped out of the West, period.” Good point. Why is it that so many Leftists have decided that protecting Islamic refugees (and Islamists overall) comes before their belief that women should be treated with respect and not sexually assaulted?

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: NY Times: Seriously, You People Need To Calm Down About All The Sexual Assault In Germany By Refugees »

White House Will Shift A Few Paradigms In Order To Combat ISIS Propaganda

In case you missed it, there was an attack on a Philadelphia police officer today, with the shooter claiming he did it in the name of Islam, and has pledged allegiance to ISIS. Then we have this

(The Blaze) The White House released a statement Friday announcing a new plan for countering extremist propaganda from the Islamic State and other violent groups in the United States and abroad.

The Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice are working to form a “Countering Violent Extremism Task Force” to “integrate and harmonize” domestic efforts to counter violent extremism, National Security Council spokesman Ned Price said.

The State Department will also establish a “Global Engagement Center” to collaborate with international partners in order to message against extremist propaganda and “shift away from direct messaging.”

This is where the rubber meets the road. They need everyone to buy in on these action items. This is core competency in action. They’re empowering themselves to pick off the low hanging fruit of the Jihadi movement. The need all hands on deck, and expect to circle back to harmonize the response. If they can move the needle, they can send in the tiger teams to reduce the burning platforms. They’ll focus like a laser beam while thinking outside the box.

Or, they could simply track the SOBs and whack them.

Read: White House Will Shift A Few Paradigms In Order To Combat ISIS Propaganda »

If All You See…

…is a Pacific island doomed from rising seas from people not buying locally, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Capitalism Is Freedom, with a post on new gun tech.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove