If All You See…

…is horrible water intensive golf course, probably owned by that evil Denier Donald Trump, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Maggie’s Farm, with a post asking an un-PC question.

Read: If All You See… »

Climate Change Makes Fires So Hot Now That They Melt Stoves

The first thing that caught my attention with this University Of Brokeifornia article was the headline, Why the climate change fight needs a new type of entrepreneur, figuring that writer Andy Murdock was going to argue for more Government intervention in creating new entrepreneurs. And it it does include that

Policies have proven to be effective to change behavior, and can provide opportunities for clean tech businesses to gain a competitive advantage. Soliculture, Carter’s own startup that sells solar greenhouse technology originally developed in her UC Santa Cruz lab, has benefited from the tax rebates available to consumers who invest in solar building projects.

Here’s Da Crazy, where, apparently, because Other People drive fossil fueled vehicles, fire is now hotter

“It’s only been in the last five years that we’ve seen the real impacts of climate change on our livelihood, and that’s going to cause the right situation for entrepreneurs to play a role in climate change mitigation,” said UC Santa Cruz physics professor and tech entrepreneur Sue Carter.

The impact of climate change couldn’t be more real to Carter. In 2015, her house burned to the ground in California’s massive Butte fire, during the worst wildfire year on record in the western U.S.

“It was so hot that even the wood burning stove was completely melted,” said Carter.

When climate change is a vague, distant concept, it’s easy to ignore. When your house burns to the ground, you pay attention. But where others might have just seen tragedy, as both a researcher and entrepreneur, Carter saw opportunity.

Read: Climate Change Makes Fires So Hot Now That They Melt Stoves »

In Scotland, Trump Hails Britain Leaving The EU

In case you missed it, Brits voted to leave the European Union, what was called BrExit, by a margin of 51.9% to 48.1%. The UK Telegraph has an interesting breakdown of the vote by UK nation and area.

Now, many wondered why Donald Trump would take a few days in the middle of a campaign to head over to Scotland to re-open his golf course. Perhaps he was counting on using the vote, especially if Leave won, as a means to push his campaign

(Reuters) U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump thrust himself into the heart of Britain’s internal struggle on Friday, saying Britons had retaken control of their country by voting to leave the European Union.

In Scotland to reopen a golf resort, the wealthy New York businessman stopped to take questions from reporters after arriving in his signature helicopter at Turnberry near his clubhouse resort, a Scottish flag blowing in the wind.

Asked about Thursday’s down-to-the-wire British vote, Trump said: “They took back control of their country. It’s a great thing.” He said people all over the world were angry, adding: “They’re angry over borders, they’re angry over people coming into the country and taking over.”

In a written statement Trump, 70, said Americans would have a chance “to re-declare their independence” and “reject today’s rule by the global elite” when they vote on Nov. 8 for a U.S. president to succeed President Barack Obama, a Democrat who had urged Britons to stay in the EU.

Right now, Trump is also taking more questions, which I’m watching live. He’s actually doing a good job, giving clear, concise answers before moving on to other questions, and he’s taking quite a few. He even managed, thanks to a question, to take a jab at Obama over Obama stating that BrExit could move the U.K. to the back of the queue on US trade deals. Trump made sure to say this would not happen with his administration.

He’s making some great points on the unfettered and barely controlled immigration from other countries, especially those with Islamist background, causing major issues within the host countries.

Many in the media are rather shocked that Trump would use the occasion to pimp his golf course and hotel interests. He was just asked if it was appropriate for him to be in Scotland. He said “yeah, because I support my children” and moved on.

Meanwhile, The NY Times’ Jim Yardley makes a good point

From Brussels to Berlin to Washington, leaders of the Western democratic world awoke Friday morning to a blunt, once-unthinkable rebuke delivered by the flinty citizens of a small island nation in the North Atlantic. Populist anger against the established political order had finally boiled over. (snip)

Even as the European Union began to grapple with a new and potentially destabilizing period of political uncertainty, the British vote also will inevitably be seized upon as further evidence of deepening public unease with the global economic order. Globalization and economic liberalization have produced winners and losers — and the big “Leave” vote in economically stagnant regions of Britain suggests that many of those who have lost out are fed up.

Time and again, the European Union has navigated political crises during the past decade with a whack-a-mole response that has maintained the status quo and the bloc’s lumbering forward momentum toward greater integration — without directly confronting the roiling public discontent beneath the surface.

There are now moves in France and Holland to hold referendum’s like Britain’s. Perhaps people are tired of having everything dictated to them by elected and un-elected elites.

Read: In Scotland, Trump Hails Britain Leaving The EU »

Surprise: Dozens Of Congressional Dems Involved In Anti-Gun Sit In Own Firearms

One has to wonder, if these same Democrats involved in the toddler-ocracy were suddenly placed on one of the secretive lists with virtually no way to get off via Due Process, would they turn in their firearms? Would they have a similar fit if they were disarmed? Would they mad if they were being stalked and were denied the purchase of a firearm? And, since they all think that guns are evil and lead to more shootings, will they say whether they have given up their own weapons?

(Heat Street) Congressional Democrats ended their 25-hour sit-in on the House floor this afternoon, failing to force a vote on two pieces of gun legislation. The controversial sit-in included 26 Democratic lawmakers who themselves own guns, Heat Street learned after examining 2013 USA Today data on congressional firearms ownership. The participants also included 12 more Democrats in Congress who either didn’t respond to USA Today’s gun survey or declined to say whether or not they possessed a firearm.

Granted, that was a survey from 2013, and things can certainly have changed for the ownership since then. But, it’s doubtful.

You also have to know that many of the Democrats who refused to answer probably own a firearm. And others who surely lied about not owning a firearm. That’s what Democrats do. Not all, of course, because even some Republicans noted that it was none of anyone’s “damned business”. There were a few that were proud, such as Joe Manchin, who stated in the USA Today article “Why would anybody not own a gun?”

Among those who participated and complained include Keith Ellison, Mike Thompson, and John Carney. You also had whining from Dem Senators, such as Harry Reid, Sheldon Whitehouse, and Tammy Baldwin. All gun owners.

Interestingly, Congress Critters are allowed to carry in their offices, but, the weapons must be unloaded and secured for the corridors. Furthermore, CCs are not subject to the laws of Washington, D.C. They can act as if they are in their home state.

Meanwhile, this is supposedly just the start of the guerrilla actions for the Dems in attempting to violate multiple Amendments in the Bill of Rights. And other things

(Politico) Already rank-and-file Democrats, energized by nationwide publicity and praise they received for occupying the House floor over demands for a gun vote, are saying they’ll likely use the same strategy again.

Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), for example, thinks a sit-in demonstration could force Republican leadership’s hands on what she called “economic justice issues,” like the minimum wage. And Rep. Maxine Waters of California said at the end of the protest Thursday that she would be ready to seize the House floor again over the gun matter when lawmakers return from their July 4 recess.

“It’s a new day in Washington; it’s a new way to fight,” said Democratic Caucus Vice Chairman Joe Crowley on the House floor in the wee hours of Thursday morning. The New York lawmaker elaborated in an interview on the House steps a few hours later: “The American people want and expect the House to do something, and they’re not just going to take silence anymore. We’re going to get in the way until we see action.”

Refer back to the “toddler-ocracy” link at the top of this post.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Surprise: Dozens Of Congressional Dems Involved In Anti-Gun Sit In Own Firearms »

Congressional Warmists Pushing Federal Bill To Force ‘Climate Change’ On Kids

They’re really not even trying to hide their agenda of propaganda and State Doctrine in the schools and to the general public anymore

(Climate Progress)  In a push to improve climate education across the country, Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced a bill to create the Climate Change Education Program on Friday. The program would help educate the public on climate change solutions, the dangers caused by climate change, and small changes people can make in their daily lives to help combat the environmental problem.

“The focus of the content would be the basics of climate change, how it works, the impacts it has, as well as the solutions to climate change — which include clean energy,” Giselle Barry, the spokesperson for Markey’s office, told ThinkProgress.

The program would include “formal learning” in classroom curricula as well as “informal learning” opportunities. The informal learning would include public service announcements or campaigns and outreach to post-secondary schools, community centers, and community groups, according to Barry. Further, the program would include information on climate change’s impact on human health and safety, as well as on new technologies, programs, and incentives related to energy conservation, renewable energy, and greenhouse gas reduction. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would establish the program.

The one thing that will be missing is the rock solid evidence, arrived at using the Scientific Method, that Mankind is mostly/solely responsible for the current warm period. But, it will surely be full of lots of dire prognostications of future doom if Other People are not force to pay more and more taxes while giving up their freedom, liberty, and modern lifestyles to bigger and bigger centralized government.

Of course, as long as the GOP controls at least one part of Congress, it won’t pass, so, it’s just another delusional attempt by Democrats to play games.

Read: Congressional Warmists Pushing Federal Bill To Force ‘Climate Change’ On Kids »

If All You See…

…are horrible golf balls, made with horrible carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Flopping Aces, with a post on Trump telling the truth on Islamic terrorism.

Read: If All You See… »

Good News: Federal Bureaucrats Have More Guns Than The Marines

Are you up for the EPA showing up on your land to make sure your little pond is in compliance with lots of guns? How about the Food And Drug Administration? Or the Small Business Administration? The tyranny of Big Government

(Free Beacon) There are now more non-military government employees who carry guns than there are U.S. Marines, according to a new report.

Open the Books, a taxpayer watchdog group, released a study Wednesday that finds domestic government agencies continue to grow their stockpiles of military-style weapons, as Democrats sat on the House floor calling for more restrictions on what guns American citizens can buy.

The “Militarization of America” report found civilian agencies spent $1.48 billion on guns, ammunition, and military-style equipment between 2006 and 2014. Examples include IRS agents with AR-15s, and EPA bureaucrats wearing camouflage.

“Regulatory enforcement within administrative agencies now carries the might of military-style equipment and weapons,” Open the Books said. “For example, the Food and Drug Administration includes 183 armed ‘special agents,’ a 50 percent increase over the ten years from 1998-2008. At Health and Human Services (HHS), ‘Special Office of Inspector General Agents’ are now trained with sophisticated weaponry by the same contractors who train our military special forces troops.”

There are over 200,000 non-military federal officers with the ability to arrest and carry firearms. The Marines have 182,000 personnel. Many of them are carrying weapons which are illegal for purchase by the general public, because they are automatic weapons.

Other administration agencies that have purchased guns and ammo include the Small Business Administration, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Department of Education, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

And don’t forget the Department Of Health And Human Services, which has lots of “sophisticated military-style weapons.”

Then you have the Railroad Retirement Board. The Social Security Administration. Geological Survey. Animal and Plant Inspection Service. Agency For International Development. And I’m sure they, and a few others, all have wonderful awesome rationales for arming their employees.

Read: Good News: Federal Bureaucrats Have More Guns Than The Marines »

Good Grief: Frankenstein Is Actually A Story About Climate Change Or Something

Members of the Cult of Climastrology love linking their pet cause to just about everything, be it real environmental issues, holidays, or shows like Game of Thrones. Now we get this from Slate, which is the slightly less sibling to Salon. Here’s nutter Warmist Kent Linthicum

How a Volcano Helped Inspire Frankenstein
The famous novel is actually a tale of climate change.

Two hundred years ago this June, during a dreadfully cold and wet summer, Mary Shelley began writing Frankenstein. Since then Frankenstein has become iconic, spawning a legion of adaptations and reinterpretations. The Oxford English Dictionary even includes entries for the verb “to frankenstein,” which means to stitch something together in a grotesque fashion, and the prefix “franken-” to make anything monstrous. The novel is shorthand for the dangers of unfettered scientific progress. But the unforgettable creation scene, depicted in movies with frenzied screams of “It’s alive!” and arcing electricity, doesn’t happen until one-third of the way through the novel. If you’ve never read the book, you might expect the story to begin with Dr. Frankenstein recounting his mistakes or heading off to school to study anatomy. Instead, we start with Robert Walton, an Arctic explorer. The Arctic exploration might seem random, but it makes more sense in the light of the environmental crisis unfolding in the Northern Hemisphere when Shelley was drafting the novel.

Have you seen the movie Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, starring Kenneth Branagh and Robert De Niro? Yeah, that’s closest to the book.

Mary Shelley was an astute observer of the world; her journals reveal a young woman with a powerful drive to learn, reading a range of political, literary, philosophical, and scientific works. For Frankenstein, she seems to have been inspired by a series of electrical experiments and new microscopic discoveries to imagine whether it would be possible to infuse the spark of life into dead flesh. But her observations were not limited to the world of books—they extended to the environment around her to include the dark forests of eastern France, the sublime peaks of the Alps, and the miserable weather of 1816. In her preface to the 1831 edition of Frankenstein, Shelley comments that the summer of 1816 in Geneva, where she was staying, was memorably unpleasant: “it proved a wet, ungenial summer, and incessant rain often confined us for days to the house.” This dreary weather wasn’t a chance occurrence—it was just one small manifestation of larger environmental changes.

Between April 5 and 11 of 1815, the volcano Tambora erupted in Indonesia, more than 7,500 miles away from Geneva. Tambora’s eruption is one of the largest in recorded human history, 100 times more powerful than Mount St. Helens’ 1980 explosion. The eruption pumped a massive quantity of sulfur into the atmosphere, radically cooling the Northern Hemisphere by 0.7 degrees Fahrenheit to 1.26 degrees Fahrenheit.* In essence, people living between 1815 and 1816 experienced an extreme, miniature global climate change event.

Yes, one of cold and wet, to add on to the already cold period known as the Little Ice Age. And Kent tells us all about the problems of a cool period. But, then we get to

Today, archival technologies allow us to understand the human dimension of climate changes throughout history: How have people in different times and places reacted to a dynamic, deadly world? Reading arcane and previously lost documents, like stories chronicling the summer of 1816, gives us the opportunity to understand the complex nature of our world, to remember what we might have forgotten, and to consider how our communities and societies can be more resilient in the face of a changing climate. The future will always be unpredictable, but every day is an opportunity to learn more from the past and put that knowledge to work. A volcano, a novel, and a smattering of newspaper reports can reveal a possible gap in our thinking about climate change today—the bedrock importance of food security and the turmoil shortages will cause, because the difference between sustenance and starvation can be a matter of degrees.

The implication here is, of course, that the current warm period will cause immeasurable harm and misery, and, since it is all Mankind’s fault, we need to totally change everything we do. And they use a book about cold and wet to illustrate the coming heat and dry.

Read: Good Grief: Frankenstein Is Actually A Story About Climate Change Or Something »

As Dems Have Their Anti-Due Process Sit In, NY Times Reminds Them That The ACLU Doesn’t Agree

You’ve seen this, right? The Democrats having a sit in over wanting to pass anti-gun bills that use all sorts of lists that violate Constitutional Due Process. It’s just one big tantrum. By people in expensive suits who are protected by all sorts of people carrying firearms. But, they don’t seem to understand Due Process very well.

Even Gawker thinks Democrats are fighting for a bad, stupid bill. So does the NY Times

After Orlando, Questions Over Effectiveness of Terrorism Watch Lists

The shooting rampage at a nightclub in Orlando, Fla., has focused new attention on the vast but murky terror watch lists that the government has used with mixed results to identify potential security threats.

At the time of the terror attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, there were just 16 names on the government’s so-called no-fly list. Today, that number stands at about 81,000, officials said, and the largest of the watch lists has 1.5 million names on it, all but a small fraction of them foreigners. (snip)

The recent proposals to stop people on the watch lists from being able to buy guns have faced resistance from an unlikely group of opponents, including the National Rifle Association and the American Civil Liberties Union.

“We’re as appalled as anyone else about the attack in Orlando,” said Hina Shamsi, the director of the A.C.L.U.’s National Security Project. “But it’s our position that there is no bar on Congress in the reasonable regulation of guns. They could do something without an overly broad, unreliable watch list solution.”

The A.C.L.U., representing Muslim-Americans and others who said they had wrongly been put on the no-fly list, won a ruling in federal court in Oregon two years ago that found the list was unconstitutional because of the high risk of errors and the difficulty of being taken off it. That lawsuit is continuing.

So, there you have it, the ACLU thinks the lists are un-Constitutional, mostly because they violate Due Process. Also, to be fair, because they love representing Islamists, but, mostly the Due Process notion. Then there’s this

Under guidelines for the biggest of the terror lists, known as TIDE, or Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment, those placed on the list are “known or appropriately suspected” of being involved in terrorist activity. Of the 1.5 million names on the TIDE list, residents of the United States account for only about 15,000.

Which means that the majority of those on that list are ineligible to purchase firearms except in certain situations. How about we fully restrict foreigners from purchasing a firearm without the approval of a judge? This would be for something like hunting, so, yes, we can restrict them to certain rifles, or because they are being threatened? But, most are not permanent residents. They are temporary. Hence, cannot purchase. Period.

Then, if you want to use these lists, if you are US Citizen, you are given all Due Process capabilities, and the Government must prove your danger from purchasing a weapon. If they can’t, they need to leave you alone. And, should have to pay your legal fees if you need a lawyer. Senator Cornyn’s measure, which would require that the government prove probable cause to a judge, just like with a search warrant, would be the best option, rather than the Democrats proposals, which shred due process in favor of mere suspicion, and create enormous difficulties for citizens to get off the lists.

Perhaps Democrats can tell us why they are for not only removing 2nd Amendment Rights, but Due Process to boot?

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: As Dems Have Their Anti-Due Process Sit In, NY Times Reminds Them That The ACLU Doesn’t Agree »

Letter Offers Best Argument For Brexit Leave

The UK Telegraph published quite a few letters, most of which were in favor of Leave, as in, leaving the European Union. This one should have been the lead

SIR – It grieves me that politicians and academic colleagues among the Remainers prefer the arguments of financial gain to the principles of freedom, independence and self-government that so many of our countrymen have cherished for centuries, fought and died for.

These fundamental principles and rights, which are the foundation stones of democracy, cannot be bought or sold.

Keeping them should be the first, overriding reason for all who desire to leave the EU. Failure to leave will mean years of dictatorial rule by unelected bureaucrats and a complete loss of our national self-esteem, pride and history, which are condensed into the word sovereignty.

Sir Norman Browse
Alderney, Channel Islands

We’ll see what happens once the voting starts in less than 16 hours. This very much is about the principles espoused by Sir Browse versus the Big Government fascistic nature of the Progressive big wigs in the EU.

Read: Letter Offers Best Argument For Brexit Leave »

Pirate's Cove