Suddenly, Democrats Have A Problem With Executive Power

Here’s the question for a President Trump: how will he sells executive power? Will he use it roll back all that Obama did, or go much further? Doesn’t matter, because come 1/20/2017, it’s bad

Trump poised to erase Obama policies
Here’s what Trump has pledged to do by executive fiat in key policy areas.

Prepare for an imperial presidency.

Donald Trump has pledged to “reform the entire regulatory code,” to “cancel immediately all illegal and overreaching executive orders,” and to place a “temporary moratorium on new agency regulations that are not compelled by Congress or public safety.”

Imperial!

 photo 62971d4a_zps18828beb.gif

You can expect quite a bit if this for the next 4-8 years.

https://twitter.com/davidharsanyi/status/796703902980833280

Read: Suddenly, Democrats Have A Problem With Executive Power »

Surprise: Republicans Now Own ‘Climate Change’

The meltdown in the Cult of Climatastrology continues

Conservatives elected Trump; now they own climate change

Anyone who voted for Trump shares the responsibility for the climate damages resulting from his presidency

I’m good with that. How about you?

The one thing that isn’t transient is the impact this will have on climate change. It is now virtually certain the world will not meet any of its climate targets. If Trump (and the Republican-controlled Congress) stand by their pledges, we will see a major rollback of the tremendous progress that has been made on reducing emissions. A Trump presidency will likely set us back at least a decade, perhaps longer. And that is a decade we can’t afford.

The world will blow past the 2C (3.6F) target set in Paris. This means it will be difficult to avoid the worst consequences of climate change.

If there were only some measures that Warmists could take in their own lives. Can anyone think what they might be?

The election also affects how we should talk about climate change. In the US, and in many other countries, opposing steps to cut carbon pollution has become a litmus test for conservative politicians. So, in this sense, conservatives now own climate change. I can just imagine the slogans, “Climate change, brought to you by your neighborhood conservatives.”

Well, now, that’s a cute rhetorical flourish in making other people responsible for something they don’t believe in.

Conservatives own climate change.

Conservatives own the consequences of climate change.

They own the increased droughts, more severe storms, sea level rise, and floods.

They own the heat waves, the loss of habitat and the shifting climate zones.

They own the climate refugees, the resulting political strive, and climate conflicts.

They own it all.

And when all the prognostications fail to materialize, will Warmists own their failure?

Read: Surprise: Republicans Now Own ‘Climate Change’ »

NY Times: Donald Trump’s Victory Was Built on Stupid White Voters Or Something

When Republicans lose an election, the become introspective  (mostly) to determine what they did wrong and how they can do better. When Democrats lose, most introspection goes out the window in favor of Blamestorming

A Victory Built on a Unique Coalition of White Voters

….

And it extended through the suburbs of Cleveland and Minneapolis, of Manchester, N.H., and the sprawl north of Tampa, Fla., where middle-class white voters chose Mr. Trump over Hillary Clinton.

One of the biggest upsets in American political history was built on a coalition of white voters unlike that of any other previous Republican candidate, according to election results and interviews with voters and demographic experts

.

Which is obviously a problem for the lily white writers at the NY Times. How dare white people vote in their best interests!!!!

Mr. Trump’s coalition comprised not just staunchly conservative Republicans in the South and West. They were joined by millions of voters in the onetime heartlands of 20th-century liberal populism — the Upper and Lower Midwest — where white Americans without a college degree voted decisively to reject the more diverse, educated and cosmopolitan Democratic Party of the 21st century, making Republicans the country’s dominant political party at every level of government.

In other words, they’re calling them all stupid. You can feel the sneering condescension, can you not?

But Mr. Trump also won over millions of voters who had once flocked to President Obama’s promise of hope and change, and who on Tuesday saw in Mr. Trump their best chance to dampen the most painful blows of globalization and trade, to fight special interests, and to be heard and protected. Twelve percent of Mr. Trump’s supporters approved of Mr. Obama, according to the exit polls.

Those people saw no hope and change. Obama’s America is one of stagnation, low wage jobs, division at all levels, a government that attacks it’s citizens while hooking up Iran, etc and so forth. Back in February, Peggy Noonan wrote about the Protected vs The Unprotected

But I keep thinking of how Donald Trump got to be the very likely Republican nominee. There are many answers and reasons, but my thoughts keep revolving around the idea of protection. It is a theme that has been something of a preoccupation in this space over the years, but I think I am seeing it now grow into an overall political dynamic throughout the West.

There are the protected and the unprotected. The protected make public policy. The unprotected live in it. The unprotected are starting to push back, powerfully.

The protected are the accomplished, the secure, the successful—those who have power or access to it. They are protected from much of the roughness of the world. More to the point, they are protected from the world they have created. Again, they make public policy and have for some time.

Go back and read it again. Seems rather right on the mark. People voting for what they perceive as the guy who will protect them. Why do you think the drain the swamp call resonated with so many?

Of course, the Dems will not accept why they failed. They will simply blamestorm.

Read: NY Times: Donald Trump’s Victory Was Built on Stupid White Voters Or Something »

Warmists Seem A Bit Unhinged Over The “Trump Effect” On Climate Change

I’m hoping to move away from lots of daily Trump posts, but, I doubt that will happen anytime soon, not when so many Leftists are providing such great material. Like

‘Trump effect’ will test global momentum on climate change

Donald Trump’s presidential victory throws into doubt America’s policy stance on the major global issue of climate change – and does so at a pivotal moment, just as nations from around the world are trying to solidify and build on a landmark accord to slash carbon emissions nation by nation.

Mr. Trump has called climate change a hoax and said he would “cancel” the Paris climate agreement reached by nearly 200 nations last year. That agreement, the details of which negotiators are now discussing at a UN conference in Marrakech, legally requires that countries monitor and report their progress on emissions of heat-trapping gases. But it doesn’t bind them to actually meet their pledged targets for reducing emissions.

Now, with the Paris agreement newly in force as of last week, it’s not clear if Trump will actually pull America out of the deal. But he can certainly withdraw US leadership on climate action – with repercussions for both US carbon emissions and international momentum on the issue.

“It is going to be difficult if the federal government pulls out of the game for the states, the cities and the businesses to do it on their own,” Alden Meyer, director of strategy and policy with the Union of Concerned Scientists, said at a press conference in Marrakech. “It is an ambitious target especially, when you’re trying to do it without the support of the Congress.”

First, I hope he keeps his word about removing the U.S. from Paris. Second, it was set up to explicitly avoid Congressional participation. You know, the duly elected Legislative branch.

Then we have, along the same lines

Trump win the ‘most miserable U.S. election result’ for fighting climate change, scientists say

Environmental activists were devastated by the election result, with May Boeve, leader of the 350.org environmental group, calling it a “disaster.”

“Trump will try and slam the brakes on climate action, which means we need to throw all of our weight on the accelerator,” Boeve said. “In the United States, the climate movement will put everything on the line to protect the progress we’ve made and continue to push for bold action.”

Let’s hope he does slam those brakes on.

Of course they do. They could see their power, prestige, and money dry up.

Read: Warmists Seem A Bit Unhinged Over The “Trump Effect” On Climate Change »

If All You See…

…is a horrendous couch made out of material from animals raised by mankind that cause climate change, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Right Scoop, with a post on Trump’s acceptance speech.

Read: If All You See… »

Washington Votes No On ‘Climate Change’ Initiative

I guess the liberals in Washington state didn’t really care to vote themselves a cost of living increase that would impact their own lives

(Puget Sound Business Journal) Washington state voters rejected the Initiative 732 proposal that would have created the first state carbon tax in the U.S.

About 59 percent of voters were rejecting the initiative Tuesday night at about 9:30 p.m.

Under the failed measure, the state would have levied a $15 per metric ton tax on carbon emissions starting in July 2017. The tax was proposed to grow to $25 per metric ton in July 2018 and increase 3.5 percent plus inflation each year until the tax reached $100 per metric ton.

The measure also would have reduced the state sales tax from 6.5 percent to 5.5 percent.

Washington Democrats were against the measure, since it gave citizens tax breaks, and they wanted people to feel the pain for daring to drive fossil fueled vehicles.

“Grassroots activism accomplished what many environmental leaders and media pundits said was impossible: we put a revenue-neutral carbon tax on the ballot,” Carbon Washington founder and co-chair Yoram Bauman said in a prepared statement. “While we did not pass the nation’s first carbon tax, many states around the country are looking at I-732 as a model and we expect a nationwide movement to take root in the years ahead. We will look back at this as a lost opportunity to create history in Washington State, but also as a catalyst for much needed U.S. leadership on climate action.”

Carbon Washington will continue its work at the Legislature “and to promote effective, equitable, economically sound and politically viable carbon pricing in other states and in Washington, D.C.,” co-chair Joe Ryan said.

If the Warmists want to lead, they should make their own lives carbon neutral. Here we see, though, getting beyond all the spin, that a majority refuse to pay through the nose for their own beliefs. They don’t think they should suffer the consequences of their own regressive beliefs.

Meanwhile, California, Maine, Massachusetts, and Nevada look to have approved the use of recreational marijuana. A few other states appear to have passed it’s use for medical purposes. All in violation of federal law.

Colorado, Maine and Arizona voters approved minimum-wage measures, raising the wage to $12 by 2020. Washington voters approved a plan raising the wage to $13.50 over the next four years.

The nearby states will be thrilled to accept the companies who escape those states.

Oh, and the People’s Republik Of Brokeifornia overturned their ban on single use plastic bags. Guess they prefer convenience over climate doom.

Read: Washington Votes No On ‘Climate Change’ Initiative »

Special Liberal Snowflakes Trend #HesNotMyPresident

Yes, it is that kind of day which deserves a second post on the Trump winning, albeit along a slightly different line. Remember when Democrats chastised Republicans for saying “Obama’s not my president”? This came after Democrats said that about George W. Bush for almost 8 years, but really starting about the time of the Iraq war. I myself proclaimed in 2011 that Obama was Not My President. But, now we get

Yeah, we do

Read More »

Read: Special Liberal Snowflakes Trend #HesNotMyPresident »

Washington Post Explains How Trump Won In A World Where America Has Issues

So, it’s official. Donald Trump, 45th president of the United States. I’m excited that Hillary was defeated. It’s enormously gratifying to see liberals, Democrats, and the media running the gamut of emotions from shock to despair. So many were predicting that Trump was done (note: I didn’t think he could pull it out, either). It will be interesting to see who is the first to proclaim misogyny in Hillary’s loss, as well as the first to proclaim that the election was stolen. You know it is coming.

The NY Times editorial board is, unsurprisingly, a bit unhinged about the whole thing. I’d usually go with their screed, but, the one from the Washington Post editorial board is a bit more amusing

You have to know that had Hillary won, it would have been about rallying behind Hillary and her mandate.

DONALD TRUMP was elected the 45th president of the United States on Tuesday. Those are words we hoped never to write. But Mr. Trump shocked the pollsters, riding a wave propelled in part by rural and Rust Belt voters who felt the political establishment had cast them aside. While Mr. Trump might not have done the same for his rival, Hillary Clinton, had she won, all Americans must accept the voters’ judgment, and work for the best possible outcome for our country and the world.

It will also be interesting to see if the main Trump supporters spend their time bashing #NeverTrump rather than Hillary and Dems. Will they be magnanimous in their surprising win? Or will they attempt to forge alliances and be welcoming? I will say, though, that bashing those Republicans who proclaimed they would vote Hillary is not out of bounds. It’s one thing to say you’ll hold on to your principles and either not vote for president or pick a 3rd party. It’s entirely something else to vote Hillary, utterly abandoning your principles.

Here’s where it starts getting really fun

What does that mean in practice? First, to hope that Mr. Trump will be a better president than we fear, and to support him when he does the right thing. Mr. Trump will soon command a sprawling federal bureaucracy, sophisticated law enforcement and intelligence agencies, and the world’s most powerful military. We have every wish that he will understand that the U.S. system of government is not for or about one person. He alone cannot fix it. The powers of the Oval Office do not exist to punish his enemies, about which he mused as the campaign drew to a close, according to a recent New York Times article.

Funny that the WPEB never bashed Obama for using the powers of the Oval Office to punish his enemies. I’m also looking forwards to the WPEB and the rest of the media bashing Trump when he plays golf.

The new president will face immense and unrelenting challenges from Day One. He inherits a world in which liberal democracy is in retreat and U.S. leadership is doubted. The Middle East is in turmoil, North Korea’s nuclear arsenal is growing, Russia and China are flexing their muscles. At home, President Obama bequeaths an economy in generally good health but facing problems: slow growth, stubborn inequality, long-term stress on the federal budget.

So, wait, things are pretty bad all around? I though the era of Obama brought rainbows, unicorns, and puppies? No? The economy is in good health for the rich. It’s the rest who are suffering.

We can’t pretend to optimism that Mr. Trump will suddenly shape more rational responses to these problems than he offered on the campaign trail, nor that he will discover a discipline or wisdom he has yet to display. Over the course of his campaign, Mr. Trump spoke about jailing Ms. Clinton, suing women who accused him of unwanted sexual advances, neutering the speaker of the House and revoking press freedoms. Per the Times article, he has spoken of creating a super PAC dedicated to political vengeance. He has promised to deport millions, rip up trade agreements, apply religious tests and sabotage international efforts to fight climate change, each of which would hurt many people.

I really can’t argue with the beginning. Some of that is what really concerned Republicans. However, Hillary belongs in jail. Perhaps she and Bill will just head off to live in another country, and we can move on to these criminals. What’s wrong with suing people who have defamed you? So far, there is zero proof of sexual assault. Is it really illegal in Liberal World for a man to come on to a woman? Political vengeance? Let’s hope that was simply election yammering, which happens every election season.

As to the last, let’s hope he follows through, especially on ‘climate change.’ If he wacks Obama’s Clean Power Plan, tears up Obama putting the U.S. (not legally, mind you) in the Paris climate agreement, and reigns in the EPA on climate change, he’ll have earned me as a follower. Now is the time to make good on what he proclaimed.

If he attempts to act on these goals and inclinations, others must rally to the defense of constitutional principles and sound government.

Like how Obama legislated from the White House with his pen and phone? Demanded that the Paris agreement be crafted so he could go around the duly elected U.S. Congress? Sicked the IRS on conservative groups? Those Constitutional principles?

At this point, I’d almost say Trump, with the way he won, has a mandate.

Americans are not and have never been united by blood or creed, but by allegiance to a democratic system of government that shares power, cherishes the rule of law and respects the dignity of individuals. We hope our newly elected president will show respect for that system. Americans must stand ready to support him if he does, and to support the system whether he does or does not.

After almost 8 years of Obama and the way the media, including the Washington Post, ignored the way Obama acted in an opposite manner from that paragraph, the only response is

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y164/wteach/bandwagon/52197-Picard-facepalm-gif-ubif_zpsz5zxfmue.gif

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Washington Post Explains How Trump Won In A World Where America Has Issues »

Good News: Global Warming Is Caused By The Expansion Of Hell

Wait, what?

Ocean Warming Data Confirms: Hell is Expanding

Creation Theory: Predictive, Testable Hypothesis 5

I have asked the question before, from a scriptural perspective, could Global Warming be caused by the expansion of Hell? There are several passages of scripture that refer to this phenomenon.

However… It’s easy for scientists, atheists and pretty much everybody to ignore such suggestions, so let’s take a more empirical approach. If hell were expanding then wouldn’t this be manifested by the earth warming from the inside out? If this were the case, would it not be logical that the oceans would be warming from the bottom up?

It turns out that that this is indeed a possible interpretation of the current data available. It didn’t take much Googling to find several recent or current studies of deep ocean water that show measurable temperature rise:

And, yes, there are links provided that attempt to make the case.

And, yes, this is nuts. There article went to the extreme other end from what the Cult of Climastrology preaches.

Read: Good News: Global Warming Is Caused By The Expansion Of Hell »

If All You See…

…is a cigarette, and you know that fossil fuels companies are EXACTLY like tobacco companies and should have their 1st Amendment rights stripped, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Jo Nova, with a post on Trump draining the climate swamp.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove