If All You See…

…is a pond full of algae caused by carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is 90Ninety Miles From Tyranny, with a post on another ROP attack in France.

It’s flannel week!

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Patriotic Pinup Earl Moran

Happy Sunday! A gorgeous day in America. The Sun is shining, the birds are singing, pumpkin spice is everywhere. This pinup is by Earl Moran, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogopshere? The Fine 15

  1. Watcher Of Weasels (Doug Hagin) notes the NFL protests are based on lies
  2. Victory Girls Blog covers kneeling at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier
  3. This ain’t Hell… has your Sunday feel good stories
  4. The People’s Cube has a solution to the NFL playing the anthem
  5. The Last Refuge notes the Puerto Rican Teamsters Union refusing to deliver relief supplies for contract leverage
  6. The Hayride covers a SCOTUS case which could wipe out public unions
  7. The First Street Journal covers the success of socialism in Venezuela
  8. The Daley Gator notes Michael Bennett’s lies about police brutality
  9. Small Dead Animals notes that liberal men really are the weaker sex
  10. Raised On Hoecakes explains the meaning of “conversation”
  11. Powerline covers Russian meddling with Black Lives Matter
  12. Pacific Pundit notes the LA Lakers saying they’ll lock arms all season
  13. Neo-neocon jumps back to the late 1960’s for protests
  14. MOTUS AD discusses fashion choices for the “stealth racist”
  15. And last, but not least, Moonbattery wonders if the Raiders threw the game for BLM ideology

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

No, Trump Didn’t Botch The Puerto Rico Response

There’s no doubt that President Trump did not help things out with all his tweeting and fighting back against people like the nutty and overly political mayor of San Juan. Playing golf was bad optics (though, the same media had to problem with Obama staying on vacation in Martha’s Vineyard. Or other things). But, the actual response? It has been excellent. Things like this

Bloomberg News, not usually a supporter of Mr. Trump, interviews former Navy Captain Jerry Hendrix, who has intimate knowledge of the goings on and someone who has been heavily involved in other emergency operations

TH: So, it seems like everybody has blasted Trump administration’s response to the Puerto Rico crisis. Has that criticism been fair?

JH: No, I don’t think so. First of all, there was a fair amount of anticipatory action that is not being recognized. Amphibious ships, including the light amphibious carriers Kearsarge and Wasp and the amphibious landing ship dock Oak Hill were at sea and dispatched to Puerto Rico ahead of the hurricane’s impact.

These are large ships that have large flight decks to land and dispatch heavy-lift CH-53 helicopters to and from disaster sites. They also have big well-decks — exposed surfaces that are lower than the fore and aft of the ship — from which large landing craft can be dispatched to shore carrying over 150 tons of water, food and other supplies on each trip. These are actually the ideal platforms for relief operations owing to their range of assets. The ships, due to their designs to support Marine amphibious landings in war zones, also have hospitals onboard to provide medical treatment on a large scale. That these ships were in the area should be viewed as a huge positive for the administration and the Department of Defense.

And early on, these were the only ways to get relief in, as the airports were trashed. The runways had to be cleared first, before even the military heavy haulers could land. And there are only a few runways in PR that can take the big planes. Commercial flights had to wait for even more runway repair, and, all these were coming from farther away, so that relief was not take from Texas nor Florida.

Then on to the use of the hospital ship Comfort

JH: Comfort can add to the solution, but her lack of well-decks and large boats as well as her limited support of helicopter operations means that she has to go alongside a pier to be effective. In the immediate aftermath of a huge storm, pulling into a port that has not been surveyed for underwater obstacles like trees or cables or other refuse is an invitation to either put a hole your ship or foul your propellers or rudders.

That being said, there was a broad misunderstanding of the Comfort’s mission. She is not an “emergency response ship” but rather a hospital ship. She was built to accompany a large military force into a war zone as part of a buildup over time of capabilities to respond to wartime injuries. She is manned by military and civilian mariners as well as active and reserve medical personnel. It takes time to both man and equip her for sea. Given that there was no certainty where the hurricane would hit, it doesn’t make sense to have readied her prior to its impact.

Let’s break that down. It takes awhile to get the personnel on board, and it was a non-optimal use of resources, as it couldn’t dock early on. The only way to get people to the ship was really via helicopter, which was limited. Sending it down is mostly political. Optics. It can’t hurt being there, though.

Captain Hendrix does not that there is a greater need for heavy machinery to do things like clear the roads, which were already in poor repair due to their financial problems. There’s much more to the article, well worth the read.

And there’s this, when it comes to the San Juan mayor going crazy and insulting

The mayor of Guaynabo, Puerto Rico cast serious doubt Saturday on the claims made by San Juan Mayor Carmen Yulin Cruz, who has repeatedly attacked President Trump and accused him of abandoning Puerto Rico in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria.

Guaynabo’s mayor, Angel Perez, said in an interview with The Daily Caller that his experience with the federal government has been different from Cruz’s, in part because — unlike Cruz — he has been participating in meetings with officials from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and other federal agencies.

Cruz, a Democrat, has repeatedly accused Trump and the federal government of abandoning Puerto Rico. She demanded in a press conference on Friday that Trump do more to help the island, adding that “we are going to see is something close to a genocide” if more is not done.

That’s right, she is not even participating in FEMA meetings. Put down the microphone, stop being political, and help your people.

However, I’ll say it again: Trump needs to stop the twitter fights. Let it go. Still, the response has been excellent, despite what Democrats and their pet news organizations are saying.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: No, Trump Didn’t Botch The Puerto Rico Response »

California Considers Ending The Use Of Fossil Fueled Vehicles

This is very interesting, considering how much in the way of fossil fuels are used by the same people making the recommendations

(Grist) Let’s ban gasoline-powered cars, says California’s governor. It’s often said that national climate policy is “Made in California,” and now Governor Jerry Brown reportedly wants to ban the internal combustion engine from its roads.

“I’ve gotten messages from the governor asking, ‘Why haven’t we done something already?’” Mary Nichols, chair of the powerful California Air Resources Board, told Bloomberg. “The governor has certainly indicated an interest in why China can do this and not California.” (snip)

A ban could come as soon as 2030, Nichols said.

Perhaps Nichols could explain how she and the governor have given up their own use of fossil fueled planes and vehicles?

(Daily Caller) Analysts and conservatives believe a Democrat-led plan to propose a ban on gas-powered cars in California later this year is a pie-in-the-sky scheme that ignores important factors about the state’s auto industry.

Assemblyman Phil Ting plans to introduce a bill in January that would ban the sale of gas-powered cars produced after 2040. The Democratic lawmaker said California drivers must adopt electric vehicles if the state is going to reduce greenhouse gas emissions – but some are scoffing at the push.

“The market is moving this way. The entire world is moving this way. At some point you need to set a goal and put a line in the sand,” Ting told reporters Friday. Environmental groups such as the Sierra Club have joined his push to wipe out the state’s fossil fuel industry.

The market isn’t really moving there, unless you are now calling The Government the market.

Kerry Jackson, a fellow at the Pacific Research Institute, a California-based free market non-profit group, for instance, told reporters that the push to force citizens to abandon their gas-powered cars is another example of the state’s overzealous environmentalism.

“The reaction is like, ‘Gee, somebody has been reading The Onion and they got taken in by the parody,” he said, responding to lawmakers’ desire to delete the fossil fuel industry. “But then it fades a little bit and you go, ‘Yeah, this is California.’”

Really, if this is so important to California, why not just restrict all sales starting in 2020?

BTW, someone once asked what was the point of using Rage Boy in that graphic. The answer is that Warmists are as unhinged and zealous as Rage Boy.

Read: California Considers Ending The Use Of Fossil Fueled Vehicles »

If All You See…

…is an evil carbon pollution infused beer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Right Scoop, with a post on freedom of speech being “genocide”.

Read: If All You See… »

NFL Favorability Cut In Half After Protests

When you’re following the lead of a guy who wore socks denoting police officers as pigs, wear shirts featuring a brutal dictator named Fidel Castro, and donating $25,000 to a group that worships cop killer Assata Shakur, things will not go well

(Breitbart) In news that will shock only those who have spent the last week living in caves, the NFL’s favorability has taken a massive nosedive this week.

The POLITICO/Morning Consult poll released this week shows that the league’s favorability has fallen from 30 percent on September 21 to a low of 17 percent only a week later.

The poll takers said that this month’s numbers are the lowest favorability ratings the poll has ever measured since it first began polling on the question.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Trump voters expressed an even harsher view. On September 21, 25 percent of Trump voters approved of the NFL, and 11 percent had an unfavorable view. But by September 28, those numbers changed dramatically with 33 percent saying they now have an unfavorable view of the NFL while only 16 percent said they felt positively toward the league.

What kind of effect has this had?

(CBS News) Operators of two of the largest U.S. ticket marketplaces say they are seeing declines in orders for NFL games amid festering controversy over the national anthem.

NFL ticket sales at TickPick slumped 17.9 percent this week compared with the prior week, their steepest decline since 2014, while sales at TicketCity plunged 31 percent. For pro football games in September, ticket sales at TicketCity are down 16 percent from a year ago. TickPick’s NFL sales rose this month, but by the smallest margin since 2015. The vendors’ data reflect tickets sold in the secondary market, as opposed to direct sales from NFL teams.

What will the NFL do when this starts hitting the league in the wallet? Meanwhile, the New Yorker’s Ian Crouch has Trump living rent free in his head

In the third quarter of Thursday night’s N.F.L. game between the Chicago Bears and the Green Bay Packers, the Bears linebacker Danny Trevathan laid a brutal, helmet-to-helmet hit on an opposing receiver, Davante Adams, causing Adams’s neck to jerk back and his body to crumple to the ground. It was the kind of hit that, not too many years ago, the announcers might have celebrated, but which, in 2017, they have learned to meet with shock. “That sounded awful,” one said. Adams had to be wheeled off the field on a stretcher. He gave the crowd a shaky thumbs-up sign with his right hand.

If Donald Trump were watching the game, he might have liked what he saw—at least up until the point that the referee threw a flag, penalizing Trevathan and the Bears fifteen yards for unnecessary roughness. Last Friday, in Alabama, during his tirade against N.F.L. players who kneel during the national anthem to protest racial injustice, Trump also complained about the state of football more generally. He believes that the game has become too soft. “Today, if you hit too hard—fifteen yards!” he shouted. “Throw him out of the game! They had that last week. I watched for a couple of minutes. Two guys, just really, beautiful tackle. Boom, fifteen yards!” He went on, “They’re ruining the game! They’re ruining the game. That’s what they want to do. They want to hit. They want to hit! It is hurting the game.”

The game has become rather soft. What used to be legal, good hits are now penalties. Trump wasn’t talking about things like spearing and late hits. Football fans have been saying this for awhile. Here’s where it gets truly deranged

These comments were nonsense, and relied on the same kind of racially coded, dehumanizing, us-versus-them rhetoric as the “son of a bitch” remark that got much more media attention. “They want to hit”—he repeated the phrase twice. But what Trump meant was that he wants to see them hit, and for them to otherwise keep their mouths shut. This is a different thing altogether.

PS: Trump still should have stayed out of it. I criticized Obama for getting involved where he should not have, and I’ll do the same for Trump.

Read: NFL Favorability Cut In Half After Protests »

The Numbers Show Just How Strong Trump Has Been On Illegal Aliens

Say what you will about some of Trump’s missteps, the illegal alien policies of his administration have been excellent, leading to this freakout from Mother Jones’ Kanyakrit Vongkiatkajorn

These Numbers Show Just How Bad Trump Has Been for Immigrants
Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests of undocumented immigrants with no criminal history skyrocketed by more than 200 percent.

Between January and July of this year, Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests of undocumented immigrants with no criminal history skyrocketed by more than 200 percent, according to a Reuters analysis—jumping from 1,411 arrests in January to a whopping 4,399 in July. Arrests of immigrants with criminal records have also increased but by a much smaller margin of 17 percent.

Reuters’ findings demonstrate the chilling effects of President Trump’s crackdown—and that his policies have led to repercussions across the justice system and multiple borders.

While Reuters only looks at data through July, the Washington Post reports the trend is ongoing; immigrants without criminal records have become the fastest-growing category of ICE arrests this year.

No record but being in the U.S. unlawfully. And you know what all these arrests have led to?

Despite the uptick in arrests, the number of removals has actually slowed. Immigration experts, though, say that’s not due to a lack of effort by the Trump administration—rather there’s a backlog in the immigration court system and significantly fewer people are attempting to cross the US-Mexico border since Trump took office. In August, arrests at the border dropped by more than 40 percentcompared to the same time last year, according to US Customs and Border Protection.

Mother Jones doesn’t seem to understand that all these publicized (and politicized by illegal alien supporters) arrests have had the effect of reducing the number of people who come across the border. We also lean that the Trump admin are opening deportation cases at a rate against those who were previously spared around three times that of Team Obama. So, this is all

along with

(NBC News) A federal operation to arrest undocumented immigrants this week netted nearly 500 people in cities and states that have openly opposed the Trump administration’s deportation initiatives.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials said Thursday that its four-day “Operation Safe City” targeted people in New York, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Denver, Washington and Baltimore as well as Cook County, Illinois; Santa Clara County in California’s Bay Area; Portland, Oregon; and Massachusetts.

Where better to arrest illegal aliens then the places that shelter them? And guess who they were?

According to ICE, of the 498 people arrested this week, 317 had criminal convictions. Some were also categorized as “immigration fugitives,” “previously deported criminal aliens,” and/or associated with a gang.

Most of the criminal convictions were for driving under the influence as well as assault- and drug-related offenses, ICE said. Others were arrested for marijuana possession, traffic offenses and even charges of being a “peeping tom.”

So, criminals. Interestingly, illegal alien supporters always tell us they only want the “good ones”, yet, shelter the criminals.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: The Numbers Show Just How Strong Trump Has Been On Illegal Aliens »

It Gets Dumber: Youth Football League Won’t Play National Anthem To Avoid Controversy

On one hand, you can see where they’re coming from

https://twitter.com/PoliticalShort/status/913723930040340480

As Nurse Patriot notes “The fans will start singing it. You watch”

Controversy over the NFL national anthem protests may seem far separated from children’s sports in the Houston area, but one youth league is putting a stop to any potential issues by canceling the anthem before their games.

Starting Saturday, the national anthem won’t be allowed at youth games, according to leaders with the Cy-Fair Youth Sports Association. The change is an effort to prevent controversy in case people choose to use the anthem for political displays, they said.

Obviously, the point here is to keep the wacko America, cop, flag, military hating people who also love Che, Mao, and Castro from creating problems, especially in America, cop, flag, military loving Texas. On the other hand, they’re taking the celebration of Freedom away from the majority. I wonder if someone will bring their boom box and jam it out?

Interestingly

Gray’s Creek High School’s principal Lisa Stewart sent a recorded message to parents Thursday night to “address concerns regarding a potential disruption to our learning environment.”

“We have been made aware of social media posts making reference to students forming a protest tomorrow at school,” the message said in part. “As you know, protests are welcome in our society, but are not welcome on public school grounds. Students will not be allowed to protest in any capacity tomorrow.”

So, let’s see: private organizations are not allowed to stop protests, per America cop flag military hating Leftists, but, Government is allowed to shut down protests on government property.

Read: It Gets Dumber: Youth Football League Won’t Play National Anthem To Avoid Controversy »

Torrential Rains From Recent Hurricanes Is A Strong ‘Climate Change’ Signal Or Something

Hurricanes happen. They always have. Harvey was made much worse due to the interaction of multiple fronts which hemmed it in, instead of allowing it to move quickly like hurricanes usually do. It’s called “weather”. But, not in the Warmist World of Vox

The torrential rain from Hurricanes Maria, Irma, and Harvey is a strong signal of climate change

As Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria plowed through unusually warm oceans this summer, each one broke records, startling even the scientists who study extreme weather.

“All of these storms went through a period where they gained strength quickly,” said James Kossin, an atmospheric scientist at the NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction. “That was alarming.”

The intensity of Hurricane Maria, which made landfall on Puerto Rico as a Category 4 storm on September 20, was part of why it was so devastating to the island and its weak infrastructure, leaving Puerto Ricans in a humanitarian crisis.

But this year’s intense Atlantic storm season had another element tying its biggest events together: a monstrous, and sometimes deadly, amount of rain.

OK, you get where Excitable Umair Irfan is going, and, of course, Umair throws in the standard line

No single weather event — even an extreme one — can be “caused” by climate change, as Vox’s David Roberts has explained in detail. And when talking about hurricanes, researchers are quite hesitant to even estimate how much climate change is to blame. Huffman said he’s not yet sure if this storm season is “unprecedented” in its ferocity.

Of course, Umair goes on to attempt to Blame these storms on a changing climate, with the unspoken assertion that this is all caused by Mankind. One has to wonder why the previous almost 12 years of minimal landfalling major hurricanes isn’t included? Seriously, if all this talk of warmer temperatures, expanding and rising seas, more water in the atmosphere, etc, are such strong signals, then what to make of the previous 12 seasons?

Read: Torrential Rains From Recent Hurricanes Is A Strong ‘Climate Change’ Signal Or Something »

If All You See…

…are leaves changing color due to carbon pollution from Someone Else using a hair dryer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Last Refuge, with a post on Puerto Rico recovery issues explained.

Had another redhead in the IAYS folder.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove