If All You See…

…is a sky full of carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Right Scoop, with a post on Trump declaring DACA dead.

Still cleaning out the IAYS folder.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday. Another fantastic day in America. The sun is shining, the birds are singing, the zombie apocalypse hasn’t started yet. This pinup is by Valery Barykin, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. The Deplorable Climate Science Blog notes that only Democrats can say those things
  2. NoTricksZone covers Warmists suffering from Factophobia
  3. A View From The Beach notes pyromaniac hawks
  4. Blazing Cat Fur covers the latest insanity from Antifa
  5. Chicks On The Right wonders why no one lost their minds when some dude called Libya a “sh*tshow”
  6. Creeping Sharia covers what a Muslim women gave another women who left Islam
  7. DaTechGuy’s Blog discusses Canada’s message to Haitians arriving illegally
  8. Diogenes’ Middle Finger notes that not wanting to repeat past mistakes is now raaaaacist
  9. Gay Patriot discusses Millenials being problematic
  10. Geller Report covers Muslims trying to silence church bells in Italy
  11. Just One Minute discusses equal pay for equal lawyering
  12. Legal Insurrection discusses Chelsea Bradley Manning filing to run for Senate
  13. Moonbattery covers math and numbers now being raaaaacist
  14. Neo-neocon notes a book about coming out as a Republican to a Democratic family
  15. And last, but not least, Noisy Room has information on a proposed DACA deal giving parents temporary protected status

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

NY Times Rushes To Make Hawaii Missile Alert All About Trump

In case you missed it, there was a missile alert sent out in what we are told is a complete comedy of errors that there was a ballistic missile threat inbound to Hawaii. CNN’s article forgot to mention

You also had fun people like Jamie Lee Curtis and Jim Carrey blaming Trump, despite the warning system being part of the Hawaii government, which is run lock, stock, and barrel by Democrats. Other people, like Excitable Joy Reid, tweeted stupid things, but, then we have the Editorial Board of the NY Times, one of the most important newspapers in the world, rushing to do this

False Alarm Adds to Real Alarm About Trump’s Nuclear Risk

It was the sort of nightmare that had only ever been real for most people’s parents or grandparents — the fear of an impending nuclear attack. “Ballistic missile threat inbound to Hawaii,” read the emergency alert that residents of the Aloha State received on Saturday morning. “Seek immediate shelter. This is not a drill.”

The authorities quickly announced that the alert was a mistake. But it made tangible the growing fears that after decades of leaders trying to more safely control the world’s nuclear arsenals, President Trump has increased the possibility of those weapons being used.

At a time when many are questioning whether Mr. Trump ought to be allowed anywhere near the nuclear “button,” he is moving ahead with plans to develop new nuclear weapons and expanding the circumstances in which they’d be used. Such actions break with years of American nuclear policy. They also make it harder to persuade other nations to curb their nuclear ambitions or forgo them entirely.

Right. It was better when we ignored the threat from North Korea, and just gave them things, like a nuclear power plant. Or, perhaps Trump could make a deal which makes it even easier for Iran to develop nuclear weapons in about eight years, per the terms of the Iran deal Obama struck.

Now, as he tries to force North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons capability and ensure that Iran never acquires one, Mr. Trump is poised to make public a new policy that commits America to an increasing investment in those very weapons, according to a draft document made public by HuffPost and confirmed by The Times.

A major departure in the new policy is the plan to build new low-yield nuclear weapons. The rationale is that most modern weapons are so powerful that no one believes they will ever be used, so lower-explosive warheads are needed to maintain an effective deterrent. This logic is insane.

Interestingly, that deterrence worked well for over half a century. You know, the time period when the NY Times often took the side of the Soviet Union and told us how great Communism was?

Anyhow, this bit of Trump Derangement Syndrome goes on and on and on, all because someone, who is most likely a Democrat in a heavily Democratic voting state in an area (bureaucracy) dominated by Democrats, made a whopper of a mistake. Also interestingly, there doesn’t seem to be any words of condemnation for North Korea, Iran, or their leaders.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: NY Times Rushes To Make Hawaii Missile Alert All About Trump »

Good News: It’s Now Legal To Be A Witch In Canada Again

It’s especially helpful for warding off moose attacks

(Narcity)  Throughout its history, Canada has instituted a slew of strange lawsthat no one really understood the purpose of. One law in particular, found in Section 365 of Canada’s criminal code, made it illegal to pretend to practice witchcraft, sorcery and fortune telling:

365 Every one who fraudulently

(a) pretends to exercise or to use any kind of witchcraft, sorcery, enchantment or conjuration,

(b) undertakes, for a consideration, to tell fortunes, or

(c) pretends from his skill in or knowledge of an occult or crafty science to discover where or in what manner anything that is supposed to have been stolen or lost may be found,

is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

So, yeah, pretending to be a witch, Harry Potter, etc, you can be convicted of a crime. Lest you think that wouldn’t happen, the article points out that someone was charged with this in Toronto 6 months ago. Of course, the last one before that was 30-40 years ago.

The House of Commons recently passed Bill C-51, which will repeal Section 365. It’s part of a well-received initiative to repeal archaic laws from the criminal code. Wayne Stetski Kootenay, an NDP MP, had this to say to parliament regarding the outdated law:

Anyhow, the law really was in place to ward off (see what I did there?) fraudulent people. Regardless, make sure to bring your magic wand next time you visit Canada.

Read: Good News: It’s Now Legal To Be A Witch In Canada Again »

If All You See…

…is a world that’s more warlike due to carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The First Street Journal, with a post on shithole countries.

Read: If All You See… »

Surprise: Many In 1st World Do Not Care About Trump’s “Sh*thole” Remark

First off, the “shithole” remark is basically a he said/she said thing. Many claim Trump said it, many said he didn’t. And, really, the more the media and Democrats run with this, the chance for some sort of fix for the Dreamers keeps going down. But, what about around the rest of the 1st world?

Trump’s Immigration Remarks Outrage Many, but Others Quietly Agree

The Czech president has called Muslim immigrantscriminals. The head of Poland’s governing party has said refugees areriddled with disease. The leader of Hungary has described migrants as a poison.

This week, Austria’s new far-right interior minister suggested “concentrating” migrants in asylum centers — with all its obvious and odious echoes of World War II.

So when President Trump said he did not want immigrants from “shithole” countries, there was ringing silence across broad parts of the European Union, especially in the east, and certainly no chorus of condemnation.

In fact, some analysts saw the remarks as fitting a pattern of crude, dehumanizing and racist language to describe migrants and asylum seekers that has steadily edged its way into the mainstream. Coming from the White House, such words may be taken by some as a broader signal that racism is now an acceptable part of political discourse.

They love throwing around the raaaaacism word, don’t they? But, there’s a little bit of unintentional journalism in this

But the political reality is that migration has become a salient issue — and not only for right-wing, populist and nativist politicians. Across many affluent societies, people are anxious about technological change, rising inequality and stagnant wages, and they have focused their ire at the global flows of capital and, especially, labor. There are also concerns about demographic change, as the world becomes less white and as western societies age.

Moreover, the chaos and violence that have driven people from the Middle East, Southwest Asia and sub-Saharan Africa to seek to live elsewhere, even as far away as Australia and Canada, have also raised fears about refugees who do not appreciate the values of the countries hosting them — or even worse, fears of terrorists taking advantage of humanitarian policies to infiltrate societies and then carry out attacks.

Yes, people are very concerned about all these “refugees”, “migrants”, and illegal aliens streaming from shithole areas around the world into 1st world nations, bringing the same shithole values with them. In Europe, people are dealing with rape and crime epidemics, neighborhoods are being turned into 3rd world cesspools, cars are being burned, gangs run rampant, and, as much as Leftists want to dismiss it, there are no go zones where police won’t go. There are sexual grooming gangs. People are afraid to go to public swimming pools. Women are told to dress demure so they aren’t sexually harassed and even assaulted. They’re bringing their Sharia law and 9th century beliefs with them.

Sure, there are some good ones. But, how many still refuse to assimilate, and also demand that the nations change for the immigrants?

At the end of the day, nations have a responsibility to limit who they let in. Their first responsibility is to their citizens, not people bringing incompatible values

Read: Surprise: Many In 1st World Do Not Care About Trump’s “Sh*thole” Remark »

Los Angeles, Which Uses Vast Amounts Of Fossil Fuels, Considers Joining Lawsuits Against Fossil Fuels Companies

The City of Los Angeles proper is a rather large place. It encompasses 502 square miles, and has a population of almost 3.8 million. This requires a massive fleet of fossil fueled vehicles, from police vehicles to ambulances to fire trucks to helicopters to garbage trucks to buses to all sorts of other city owned vehicles. After that comes all the privately owned vehicles. And the multiple airports. And, of course, all the energy used to keep the city running. But, of course, climate signaling

(Patch) Four Los Angeles City Council members Friday called on the city to file a lawsuit against large oil companies and seek to hold them responsible for damage to the city from climate change.

The leaders signed a motion that was introduced and would direct City Attorney Mike Feuer to report to the council on options for filing claims against oil companies in a similar manner that the city of New York undertook earlier this week by filing a lawsuit against BP, Chevron, Conoco-Phillips. ExxonMobil and Royal Dutch Shell, charging that the world’s five largest publicly traded oil companies are partially responsible for global warming and have known about the consequences of fossil fuels to the environment but have tried to hide it.

“By knowing that their business practice was contributing to climate change and doing nothing to stop their destructive ways, the oil and gas industry should be held liable for the current and future damage climate change is causing our city,” said City Councilman Mike Bonin, who introduced the motion with Councilman Paul Koretz that was seconded by council members Jose Huizar and Marqueece Harris-Dawson. “Taxpayers should not be footing the bill for infrastructure repairs that likely wouldn’t have been necessary had it not been for the willful neglect of the fossil fuel industry.”

Yeah, yeah, yeah, blah blah blah. Perhaps they should blame themselves for their own use of fossil fuels. No one, get this, forced them to use fossil fuels.

Again, what all the fossil fuels companies should do is refuse to sell gasoline to the city of Los Angeles. If someone is threatening to sue you, or suing you, you don’t do business with them, do you? Let LA, and all the other municipalities, try and operate without gasoline.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Los Angeles, Which Uses Vast Amounts Of Fossil Fuels, Considers Joining Lawsuits Against Fossil Fuels Companies »

Bummer: Pink Pussy Hats Now Considered Offensive To Gender Confused

It’s always something with these people

(Detroit Free Press) A year ago, they stormed the streets of big cities and small towns to make their views known: Women’s rights are human rights. Many wore on their heads what became the de-facto symbol of feminism in 2017, the pink pussyhat.

The Women’s March is back in 2018 with its Power to the Polls anniversary protests on the weekend of Jan. 20-21. The focus during this Women’s March reboot is to register more women to vote, and to elect women and progressive candidates to public office.

But this time when marchers take to the streets in cities from Lansing to Las Vegas, there could be fewer pink pussyhats in the crowds.

The reason: The sentiment that the pink pussyhat excludes and is offensive to transgender women and gender nonbinary people who don’t have typical female genitalia and to women of color because their genitals are more likely to be brown than pink.

Money quote

The Women’s March chapter in Pensacola, Fla., posted to its Facebook page that it is discouraging marchers from wearing the hats to this year’s event.

“The Pink P*ssy Hat reinforces the notion that woman = vagina and vagina = woman, and both of these are incorrect. Additionally, the Pink P*ssy Hat is white-focused and Eurocentric in that it assumes that all vaginas are pink; this is also an incorrect assertion,” it posted to its Facebook page. The post has been shared more than 1,200 times.

Read: Bummer: Pink Pussy Hats Now Considered Offensive To Gender Confused »

If All You See…

…is an evil plastic water bottle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Political Clown Parade, with a post on Nancy Pelosi going all Marie Antoinette.

As always when I do the water bottle thing, please recycle. May not be a ‘climate change’ thing, but, is good for the real environment.

Read: If All You See… »

Canadians Totally Want To Fight ‘Climate Change’ Or Something

They’re just not too enthused on paying for it

Report says Canadians want to fight climate change – as cheaply as possible

Most Canadians care about the climate – but not quite enough to welcome massive energy bill hikes or to buy an electric car.

That was one of the many interesting snippets to come out of a recently-released report for Natural Resources Canada. The report’s purpose was to help tailor the government’s resource-related plans to meet “the needs of the public.” (snip)

When Canadians were also asked to rank their energy-related values, the most highly ranked values were usually “minimizing environmental impacts” and “keeping energy cheap and affordable.” That doesn’t mean that Canadians are willing to find a way to balance the two. When asked to consider “trade-offs” that might come up in Canada’s energy future — such as between affordability and the environment — “many had difficulty understanding why these goals might conflict with one another.”

While 62 per cent of Canadians are interested in buying an electric or zero-emission vehicle, only 32 per cent told the researchers that they had a “strong interest” in purchasing these eco-friendly rides. Four out of ten Canadians had little to no interest in buying an electric car.

It’s kind of a mixed bag, but, overall, what we find is the typical answers: no one really wants to pay for their beliefs.

Read: Canadians Totally Want To Fight ‘Climate Change’ Or Something »

Pirate's Cove