Surprise: CNN Manages To Link #MeToo To Easter

It’s hard to tell which outlet is nuttier these days, Salon or CNN

CNN Article Claims That The Easter Story Is Like A ‘#MeToo Moment’

An article from CNN.com published Friday bewilderingly claims that the biblical story of Easter is a #MeToo story from Mary Magdalene’s perspective.

“The men refused to listen to her story,” the article begins. “She was publicly smeared as a whore. And when she emerged as celebrated advocate, powerful men tried to silence her because she threatened their status. Nevertheless she persisted.”

“The woman we’re talking about, though, is not a leader in the #MeToo movement — the viral campaign raising awareness about sexual assault and harassment against women,” it continues.

“She is Mary Magdalene, the first person Jesus appeared to after his resurrection, according to the New Testament, and the first person to preach the good news that he had been raised from the dead.”

The post, which is not marked opinion, continued to make comparisons between the way women are allegedly mistreated in 21st Century America with the way Mary Magdalene, the biblical character, was marginalized.

Well, pretty much everything at CNN is opinion, or barely veiled opinion. There’s nary a point to even having an opinion section anymore at CNN. Oh, and just too be clear, the writer of the CNN moonbattery isn’t even a woman. Looks like he’s mansplaining things to women. Directly from the CNN screed

For billions of Christians around the world, Easter Sunday is a celebration of a risen savior. Yet what happened to Mary Magdalene shows that Easter can also be seen as something else — a #MeToo moment, some pastors and biblical scholars say.

They say Easter is also a story about how charismatic female leaders such as Mary Magdalene — and even Jesus himself — were victimized by some of the same behavior that sparked the #MeToo movement: the sexually predatory behavior of men, the intimidation of women and an orchestrated attempt to silence women who drew too much attention when they spoke up.

One of the most obvious links between Easter and #MeToo, some say, is the way Mary Magdalene has been slut-shamed.

At this point, the article hasn’t even made it to the quarter race mark. It keeps going on and on and on.

One New Testament scholar captured the tension between interpreting the Bible and seeing it through a modern lens when he wrote about a push to make biblical translations more gender-inclusive.

“Should we refrain from calling God our Father because some people have had sinful, oppressive fathers?” asked Vern S. Poythress, a professor of New Testament interpretation at Westminster Theological Seminary in Pennsylvania.

“Should we stop using ‘He’ to refer to God because some people will think that God is literally of the male sex? If we allow these concessions, will not others enter from the wings, seducing us into an indefinite series of mollifications of the Bible for the sake of not ‘unnecessarily’ offending modern readers?”

It’s not going to get any better, folks. It really doesn’t.

In a paper titled, “Crucifixion, State Terror and Sexual Abuse,” he explained why:

“In a patriarchal society in which men competed against each other to display virility in terms of sexual power over others, the public display of the naked victim by the ‘victors’ in front of onlookers and passers-by carries the message of sexual domination.

“The cross held up the victim for display as someone who had been — at least metaphorically — emasculated.”

These people. Oh, and as a commenter notes at the Daily Caller “So you want to tie a 2000+ year old story to the metoo movement, but still haven’t heard a word about how women in Muslim countries are continued to be treated as 2nd class citizens. Why do these libs never want to protest for their rights? Where is the denouncement for the countries that require women to cover themselves?”

Read: Surprise: CNN Manages To Link #MeToo To Easter »

‘Climate Change’ Caused Snowfall Has Big Social Implications Or Something

This is what decades of spreading awareness on ‘climate change’ along with turning kids into Special Snowflakes brings

The heavy snowfall and its wider social implications

The snow has gone now, but for a few days it was as if our city was in lockdown. When a human being’s physical environment changes so drastically, so quickly, it is not unusual to feel all kinds of emotions, discombobulated and out of touch being just a couple. Though being cut off from our day-to-day routines and the faces we are used to is disconcerting, amongst all this there lies a prospect more terrifying. This is the idea of a permanent and radical shift in the physical environment, which fundamentally changes our lives. Imagine if the streets you walk down every day, and the buildings in which you eat, sleep, work and read, never looked the same again.

That is what it felt like in Edinburgh with the onset of the ‘Beast from the East’. Normal life was paralysed. Economic activity became pretty much impossible; the chance to study and learn was temporarily put on hold. Yet, in our cold and windswept corner of the developed world, we can afford an interruption like this. Scotland, for the most part, enjoys a standard of living which is the envy of the world. Not all are so lucky.

These people are soft. It’s a storm. Nothing even that bad. Go outside and play. Enjoy. Instead, these people go into mental meltdown.

Hysteria has no place in the climate debate…

Yet, we saw it in the first two paragraphs

…Thick-headed remarks like ‘tut-tut, must be climate change’ whenever the weather changes drastically are unhelpful, because they confirm the deniers of man-made climate change with their implicit scepticism.

Yet the issues are increasingly scary. For millions of people worldwide, climate change represents a permanent and disruptive change to their physical environment: their lives will never be the same again. Whether it’s desertification in the Sahel, or intense flooding in Bangladesh, the fact remains that there are people in the world who will, and are, feeling the full force of climate change now. They are the first to feel the consequences of our dirty path to prosperity; it is they who will suffer for modernity’s crime.

Soft. Very soft. Mushy headed. Grow a pair, youngsters.

Read: ‘Climate Change’ Caused Snowfall Has Big Social Implications Or Something »

If All You See…

…is a horrible carbon pollution spewing fridge, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Jihad Watch, with a post on Imams working to avoid getting caught praying for genocide against Jews.

Read: If All You See… »

‘Climate Change’ Is Humanity’s Greatest Threat, Say U.N. Chief

Have to keep the scare factor going, you know

(Weather Channel) Climate change is the greatest threat to humankind, the head of the United Nations said Thursday, noting that “a tsunami of data that should create a storm of concern.”

Speaking at a press Q&A at U.N. headquarters in New York, U.N. Secretary General António Guterres called climate change “the most systemic threat to humankind” and called on world leaders to reduce their countries’ greenhouse gas emissions.

Guterres said the world reached several “dire milestones in 2017,” including the economic costs of climate-related disasters that hit a record $320 billion and the atmospheric concentrations of CO2, methane and nitrous oxide, which he said are the “highest they have been in 800,000 years.”

“Energy-related carbon dioxide emissions rose 1.4 percent, to 32.5 gigatonnes, a historic high,” Guterres said. “In 2017, the hurricane season in the Caribbean was the costliest ever, un-doing decades of development in an instant.”

So, in the decade plus with minimal tropical storm activity, especially for major hurricanes, that was just nature. One big season, and it’s Doom caused by carbon pollution.

“I am beginning to wonder how many more alarm bells must go off before the world rises to the challenge,” Guterres said. “We know it can be hard to address problems perceived to be years or decades away. But climate impacts are already upon us.”

Why should we listen to people who refuse to practice what they preach? Who have oversized carbon footprints?

Read: ‘Climate Change’ Is Humanity’s Greatest Threat, Say U.N. Chief »

Democrats Are Concerned Trump Might Rig The Census With Citizenship Question Or Something

Asking people lawfully and unlawfully their citizenship status is now considered “rigging”, as we see in the Detroit Metro Times

Don’t expect Bill Schuette to sue over Trump’s plan to rig the census

Attorney General Bill Schuette reportedly won’t join more than a dozen of his peers in suing the Trump administration over its plan to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.

Attorneys general in at least 12 states have signaled they’ll join a suit alleging the change is unconstitutional. California’s AG has already filed a separate suit. The addition of a question that asks whether someone is a U.S. citizen is widely expected to lead fewer immigrants to participate in the census, meaning Michigan could lose federal funding for persons not counted and even have its Congressional districts redrawn, potentially costing Democrat seats.

Schuette’s spokeswoman initially told the Detroit Free Press Schuette did not intend to join the multi-state lawsuit because he hadn’t been asked. When pressed by the paper on whether he’d consider suing independently, the spokeswoman reportedly said she would not comment on “a hypothetical.” Asked whether Schuette could reach out to other attorneys general on the issue himself, the spokeswoman told the Freep that he had not been contacted “because this is about politics, not public policy or rule of law.”

Yes, it is about Democrat #resist politics.

This is reportedly the first time in at least 70 years that the Census is to include a question about US citizenship.

So, it used to be done? And no one else had hissy fits?

In a piece penned last fall for the Brookings Institute’s blog, former Commerce Department head Robert Shapiro described the possibly devastating effects of a major undercount. (In a piece this week, he said he expects up to about 24 million people might skip the Census if the citizenship question is included.)

Who are those 24 million?

To begin, the policy will likely cost the Census participation of not only most undocumented immigrants, but also many of the 8.8 million U.S. citizens and legal residents who live in households with 4.3 million undocumented friends and family members.  If half of those households simply misstate the citizenship status of the undocumented person and the other half ignore the 2020 Census, the Census undercount from this issue alone would be 4.4 million. Add them to the other 6.8 million undocumented people in households without anyone with legal status, and the undercount comes to 11.2 million.

Bummer.

Millions of other Americans would have good reason to hesitate about providing their names and addresses, if they believe their data might be shared with federal law enforcement. For example, 43 percent of the 22 million Americans with federal student loans are in default or very behind in their payments arrears, which covers about 9,460,000 young Americans. If we assume, conservatively, that one-third of those in such arrears will opt for discretion and skip the 2020 Census, it comes to 3,120,000 people. Moreover, the Census collects its information from households, and most of those in default or way behind in payments on their federal student loans live in households with people not in such arrears. Again, assume that half simply leave out the household member in arrears (another 1,560,000 for the undercount) and the other half opt out of the Census. Since an average household consists of 2.54 persons, Americans in arrears on their federal student loans could add a total of another 5,522,400 people to the undercount [(1,560,000 + (1,560,000 x 2.54)], bringing the total potential undercount to 16,722,400.

So, asking citizenship status will cause them to do the above? Good grief. There are two more paragraphs of those who might blow off answering the census, which includes those in arrears on child support and those who are fugitives from justice. This is definitely Trump Derangement Syndrome, thinking that asking a question on citizenship is in any way involved with these people not answering.

But, you know, this is Trump rigging the census, people.

Read: Democrats Are Concerned Trump Might Rig The Census With Citizenship Question Or Something »

Vermont May Give “Comprehensive Gun Control” A Whirl

So, if these “common sense restrictions” that are portrayed as not-infringements do not work, can we move on and put in place stronger penalties on people who use firearms in a criminal manner? Or are Democrats just bound and determined to dink and dunk their way to banning guns from the hands of law abiding citizens?

(The Hill) New gun restriction is headed for Vermont’s governor after the state Senate approved the bill on Friday.

Vermont’s Democratic majority state Senate passed the measure in a 17-13 vote on Friday, Reuters reported. The legislation passed the state House on Tuesday.

The bill will now head to Gov. Phil Scott (R), a lifelong gun owner who also holds a 93 percent approval rating from the National Rifle Association, but is expected to sign the bill.

Scott said his stances on gun control “changed completely” after the February mass shooting at a Parkland, Fla., high school where 17 people died. Vermont also averted a school shooting in February after a tip to law enforcement, according to the Burlington Free Press.

Huh. So Vermont law enforcement succeeded where the school, Sheriff’s office, and FBI failed in Parkland, but, we still need restrictions on law abiding citizens?

The legislation would raise the minimum legal age required to buy firearms in Vermont to 21, expand background checks for private gun sales, ban bump stocks and magazines of more than 10 rounds for long guns and 15 rounds for pistols.

Scott said after the Senate vote that he supports the legislation, and that it would protect citizens from gun violence without infringing on their constitutional rights.

Banning bump stocks? No problem. What they mean by expanded background checks is all private sales require a background check. No problem with that. Raising the age to 21? Silly. Banning legal adults from purchase by law is a violation of Rights, at the federal level and the State level

Article 16. [Right to bear arms; standing armies; military power subordinate to civil]

That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the State–and as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military should be kept under strict subordination to and governed by the civil power.

This Constitution for the state was passed before the federal Bill of Rights. But, hey, the same people passing this legislation (all Democrats) also want to give children the Right to vote. Anyhow, do they actually think reducing magazine size will make a difference? People will just purchase elsewhere or make their own for rifles. The vast majority of handguns take 15 rounds or less. So, really, this amounts to not doing much about anything. What you can bet will now happen is that the Democrat controlled General Assembly will pass more restrictions. Dink and Dunk, especially when the GOP gov was willing to sign this.

Read: Vermont May Give “Comprehensive Gun Control” A Whirl »

It’s ‘Climate Change’ Vs The Easter Bunny Or Something

It’s always something with these people, who are often the same ones who complain about Christianity in public (but still want their holiday days off with holiday pay)

Climate change vs. Easter bunnies

Easter is still a great day for worship, candy in baskets, pagan equinox rituals and running around the yard finding eggs, but every year it gets quite a bit worse for bunnies.

And no, not because the kids like to pull their ears. The culprit is climate change, and the folks at Climate Nexus found that rising temperatures are having adverse effects on at least five species of rabbit in the U.S.

Take the Lower Keys Marsh rabbit, for instance. An endangered species that lives in the Lower Florida Keys, this breed of cottontail is a great swimmer – it lives on the islands! – but it is already severely affected by development and now by rising sea levels. According to the Center for Biological Diversity’s 350 project, which highlights species that are most directly impacted by global warming, an ocean level rise of only .6 meters will send these guys hopping for higher ground and a .9 meter rise would wipe out their habitat completely. As creatures go, they are about as charismatic as can be – they’re even named after Playboy eminence Hugh Hefner (Sylvilagus palustris hefneri) – but that’s not going to help them with this problem.

.6 meters is equivalent to 600 millimeters. Key West has a sea rise of 2.42mm per year, equal to 247 years of sea rise. Provided it continues.

Most Easter-y of all are the pygmy rabbits, tiny bunnies native to the U.S. that weigh less than 1 pound and live in sagebrush territory in the American West. They are believed to be the smallest rabbits in the world. More and more, the pine-juniper woodlands have encroached on the sage, or their habitats have been destroyed by development. Several populations, such as the Columbia Basin pygmy, almost went extinct and were saved by zoo breeding programs. Great burrowers, pygmy rabbits also rely on winter cover by digging tunnels through the snow to escape predators, but lesser snowfall is leaving them exposed.

So, woodlands have been encroaching as well as developments have destroyed woodlands? Sounds more like nature and land use, not man-caused climate change. Sorry, sorry, I’m not supposed to mess with the Cult of Climastrology scaremongering.

Read: It’s ‘Climate Change’ Vs The Easter Bunny Or Something »

If All You See…

…are horrendous fossil fueled ships which will soon be necessary due to sea rise, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Don Surber, with a post on a special counsel investigating the FBI.

Read: If All You See… »

Bake That Cake: Sacramento Homeowner Refuses To Sell To Trump Supporters

See, if a baker refuses to bake a cake or a florist refuses to do flowers for a gay wedding because of their deeply held beliefs, well, they must be fined by the State and have their businesses and lives ruined. But, when a liberal does something similar…

Sacramento Home For Sale But Not To Trump Supporters

A Sacramento area home is up for sale, but it comes with a catch.

The homeowner has a political preference in mind for the next owner of her house, which has been in her family for decades.

“She entertained people from all walks of life,” said the homeowner who asked we not use her name for fear of retaliation.

“I told her [the realtor] that I didn’t want her to sell it to a Trump supporter,” said the woman.

She wants a sale contingent upon how someone votes, but is that legal?

Attorney Allen Sawyer doesn’t believe so.

“That’s an unlawful contractual term that infringes the freedom of association and First Amendment rights,” said Sawyer.

It’s certainly against California law. Will the State fine her? Most likely, the answer is no. However, what Sawyer is saying seems almost opposite and wrong. She is free to associate with whomever she wants, and the 1st applies to government, not deciding whom she wants to sell the home to. She should have the freedom to make that choice. As should bakers, florists, and so forth.

But, here’s the rub: it has been deemed illegal to not sell a home based on color, creed, beliefs, religion, and so forth. This came about via covenants in which homeowners promised to not sell their homes to Blacks. Is this any different? It is discrimination. The Fair Housing Act doesn’t apply to political affiliation, but court rulings and other laws do apply. If she was wise, she would have kept her mouth shut, and done it on the sly. But, nowadays, it seems everyone wants their Social Media moment.

Regardless, Lefties, you can’t have it both ways. Either all bake the cake or not. Choose.

Read: Bake That Cake: Sacramento Homeowner Refuses To Sell To Trump Supporters »

Hot Take: “Is The Gun Grabbing Movement Too White?”

There might actually be a point to this, especially as we see so many white, upper middle class and white, rich celebs and politicians push for gun control

Never Again: Is gun control movement too white?

Is the new movement against gun violence that is sweeping America too white and too rich?

It’s a question hotly debated on social media as hundreds of thousands rallied on Saturday in support of the #NeverAgain campaign that emerged after 17 people were killed in a gun attack at a high school in Parkland, Florida, last month.

Protesters are being accused of hypocrisy, as some ask why they didn’t turn out for the Black Lives Matter movement, which was set up in 2013 to end police violence against black people and highlight the impact of gun violence in ethnic minority communities.

In 2016 more than 52% of murder victims (73% killed by guns) in America were black, even though black people make up 13% of the population.

What author Georgina Rannard (who is herself pretty pasty white) forgets to mention is that almost 100% of those Blacks murdered were murdered by Blacks, in the cases where we have info on the murderer.

Debate on Twitter focused on a photograph of white protesters holding up their palms, which read: “Don’t shoot.” The slogan and gesture became a rallying cry in 2014 after 18-year-old Michael Brown, who was reported to be raising his arms, was fatally shot by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri.

Accusations that the weekend marches had appropriated the slogan were shared more than 3,000 times.

I’m having a hard time figuring out whether Georgina is pro-too white or anti-too white. Maybe she’s just reporting? In this day and age of an activist press, that would be something, eh?

Race was also the subject of signs posted online with the Black Lives Matter hashtag.

They’ll be happy when a good guy with a gun who happens to be white saves their butts one day in their violent neighborhoods.

Some critics suggested that Never Again has attracted so much attention because of the race and economic background of its founders, who are students at the Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school in Parkland.

“The Never Again movement has been spearheaded by white teens – that’s why it’s garnered so much attention,” tweeted @gideonsvid.

“Families of black victims called for an end to violence, but that did not receive widespread media coverage. Black victims, whether victims of neighbourhood violence or otherwise, have not received the support that white victims have received,” said one Instagram user, referring to a picture of a man holding a sign reading: “Black students matter.”

So the leftwing media is racist? Huh. Perhaps it could be other factors, such as whites being much larger in terms of population. Maybe it’s because there hasn’t been looting, arson, rioting, property damage, and violence associated with this #NeverAgain movement, just littering and lots of yelling, unlike what we saw with #BlackLivesMatter.

Read: Hot Take: “Is The Gun Grabbing Movement Too White?” »

Pirate's Cove