Marianne WIlliamson Recommends Mandatory National Service For Young People To Fight Hotcoldwetdry

Marianne may have been one of the less vocally nutso Democrat contenders so far, but, no matter, because she is just as much an authoritarian as the rest in her heart

Marianne Williamson wants a national mandatory service for people ages 18-26 to combat climate change

At a presidential climate change forum on Thursday, author and Democratic presidential hopeful Marianne Williamson floated the idea of a national mandatory year of service for young adults to tackle climate change.

“I would like to ask your opinion, I think during the ‘season of repair,’ we should have a mandatory national service, one year, for people between 18 and 26 because we need you,” Williamson said. “We need to fix this climate. We need to fix this country.”

MSNBC’s Ali Velshi asked the audience, which consisted mainly of students, to raise their hands if they liked the idea. “A few, alright.”

Williamson smirked at the crowd’s reaction.

“To save the country. It’s not just the climate,” she said.

Well, now, that’s interesting that only a few raised their hands. The kids are super excited to Do Something in theory about ‘climate change’, but not excited in practice for themselves. That’s kinda the way this works: Warmists are always excited in theory, but when they have to put their own lives and money on the line, the excitement drops like a dog’s smile as they pass the park on the way to the vet. The kids love that they can blow off school today to protest, but, ask them to give up their modern lives and pay more and they’ll go back to class.

The climate forum was hosted by MSNBC and Georgetown University’s Institute of Politics and Public Service, giving college students the opportunity to ask candidates questions. This is not the first time Williamson has mentioned of national service for young people. Her campaign website includes an outline of a program that would “be a way that every American citizen spends one year of their youth in service to the repair of our nation.”

If they really cared the kids would do this voluntarily, right? Perhaps it’s because belief in ‘climate change’ being mostly caused by Mankind isn’t that strong

Read More »

Read: Marianne WIlliamson Recommends Mandatory National Service For Young People To Fight Hotcoldwetdry »

Federal Judge Puts The Kibosh On California’s Tax Return Law

Seriously, other than the moonbat California Democrats who passed it, who saw this coming? Everyone

California judge blocks law requiring Trump to submit tax returns to compete in state’s 2020 primary

A federal judge in California Thursday granted the Trump campaign’s request to block a new law that requires presidential and gubernatorial candidates to release five years of tax returns to run in the state’s primary elections.

The law signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, in July would have left the sitting president off of the ballot in California’s March 2020 primary unless he submitted five years’ worth of his tax returns by a Nov. 26 deadline, the Los Angeles Times reported. Under SB 27, Trump would be included on the general election ballot in November 2020. Oppoenents of the law argue depressed GOP voter turnout in the primary could discourage voters from showing up to vote for the president in the main race.

“We are encouraged that the federal court has tentatively concluded that a preliminary injunction should be granted. We look forward to the court’s written order,” Trump’s attorney, Jay Sukelow, said in a statement, according to The Hill. “It remains our position that the law is unconstitutional because states are not permitted to add additional requirements for candidates for president, and that the law violated citizens’ 1st Amendment right of association.”

U.S. District Judge Morrison England Jr., who was appointed by President George W. Bush, said he would issue a final ruling by the end of the month. He said he handed down an initial order from the bench to prevent the “irreparable harm without temporary relief” for Trump and other candidates should the law go into effect, according to the Times. (snip)

Trump’s lawyers said SB 27 would unfairly force the president to give up his right to privacy. Trump has already complied with federal law by submitting an annual report that provides an overview of his finances. The Ethics in Government Act (EIGA), which was enacted in 1976, applies to a range of high-ranking federal officials, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Like it or not, the Constitution says exactly what is necessary to run for President of the USA, and it doesn’t include providing tax returns (which, of course, were not something people had back then). Interestingly, SB27 does not require any other person running for an elected position at any other level to provide tax returns. It is just aimed at the president, which means it is specifically targeting Donald Trump. Shouldn’t the People know the tax returns of whomever is running for California governor? And the general assembly? How about federal Senator and Representative?

You knew this judicial outcome was coming, because it is a law targeting one specific person, which is not how our system works.

Under California’s so-called jungle primary system, all candidates, regardless of party, vie for the same elected office and the top two vote-getters move on to the general election. Since it was implemented in California in 2010, this system has often ensured a Democrat-on-Democrat general election battle in all but California’s most conservative areas. Depressed GOP turnout in primaries could mean even fewer Republicans move on to general elections.

So, that would effect the down ballot votes during the primaries. California Democrats found a very interesting way to depress the GOP vote, eh?

Read: Federal Judge Puts The Kibosh On California’s Tax Return Law »

Dem Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang Wants To Take Your Fossil Fueled Vehicles

Or, is that just not allowing you any privately owned vehicle?

I’ve watched this and tried to find more information as to what his specific meaning is, but, let’s be charitable, and just assume he means you won’t be allowed to have any privately owned vehicle, you damned peasants.

Read: Dem Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang Wants To Take Your Fossil Fueled Vehicles »

Trump Goes After San Francisco Over Environmental Damage From Used Needles

It’s never wise to bait President Donald Trump, because he’s more than up to the task to coming back at you, especially when there’s a real problem

Trump threatens environmental action against San Francisco

President Donald Trump says he’s sending San Francisco a notice of violation for its homeless problem.

The president told reports aboard Air Force One on Wednesday that a tremendous amount of raw sewage from the homeless problem- including needles – is going into storm drains that then goes into the ocean.

He said the city is in “total violation” and that he will ask the Environmental Protection Agency to send out a notice very soon.

It was not immediately clear which environmental laws Trump believes San Francisco has violated.

How about the federal laws about raw sewage ending up in the waterways? How about proper disposal of used drug needles ending up in the waterways? Of course, Liberals are having fits over Trump calling them out for the situation the Liberals created

But San Francisco Mayor London Breed responded to the president on Twitter, saying “If the president wants to talk about homelessness, we are committed to working on actual solutions, like adding 1,000 new shelter beds by next year and working to pass a $600 million affordable housing bond to create more badly needed housing. We wish the federal government would offer support on solutions that help people exit homelessness.”

Hey, if we didn’t have to spend so much on housing illegal aliens, the money would be there. If San Fran wasn’t so expensive and created this homeless issue, along with tolerating the garbage, sewage, poop in the streets and used needles in the streets. And then there’s Lefty The Daily Beast

If that’s the case, then why worry about plastic straws? Really, it doesn’t matter, because Democrats will oppose Trump on anything. And now they’ll oppose him on cleaning up the environment.

Read: Trump Goes After San Francisco Over Environmental Damage From Used Needles »

If All You See…

…is a sail not moving because ‘climate change’ has damaged wind patterns, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Not A Lot Of People Know That, with a post on a list of decades of failed Hotcoldwetdry prognostications.

Read: If All You See… »

Happy International Talk Like A Pirate Day 2019 (Sticky for the day)

Talk Like A Pirate Day
Illustration by Ghergich & Co.

That’s right, mateys, it’s International Talk Like A Pirate Day! Aaaaaar!

Read More »

Read: Happy International Talk Like A Pirate Day 2019 (Sticky for the day) »

Obviously, Racial Politics Has To Be Dragged Into The Gun Grabbing Debate

Because in Liberal World, everything has to be about what racial boxes people are to be put in, and that everything is about race to them. They see the color of the skin, not the content of the character

The racial politics of gun control

When Americans talk about guns, what’s arguably most interesting isn’t what we say about the devices themselves. It’s what we betray about whose voices — and lives — matter when it comes to our country’s virulent gun culture. (snip)

Decades ago, when Congress actually passed an assault weapons ban (that, notably, was allowed to expire in 2004), the broad concern was around guns in the hands of minorities — black Americans, specifically. Our modern Congress finds itself paralyzed now that we’re increasingly facing a different dimension of the issue: white people’s guns and the consequences of their contested rights to have them.(snip)

Take, for instance, Missouri, where, in the past two decades, “an increasingly conservative and pro-gun legislature and citizenry had relaxed limitations governing practically every aspect of buying, owning, and carrying firearms in the state,” writes Jonathan M. Metzl, a professor of sociology and psychiatry at Vanderbilt University, in his new book, “Dying of Whiteness: How the Politics of Racial Resentment Is Killing America’s Heartland.”

Compare this to the rhetoric of the ’90s, when, in signing what became the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (which contained the aforementioned Federal Assault Weapons Ban), former President Bill Clinton said, “Gangs and drugs have taken over our streets and undermined our schools.”

It’s the difference between vanquishing the specter of black criminality — seen in gangs and the weapons associated with them — and protecting the property of white conservatives.

Or put another way, the hypocrisy around gun ownership in America is a broadcast of something indisputably fundamental: the country’s struggle to bolster a racial hierarchy.

See, White people are buying guns because they’re scared of black people. It’s all about raaaaacism.

The article started out discussing Dave Chappele’s thoughts from his new special, and ends on same

Dave Chappelle’s solution, though?

“Every able-bodied African American must register for a legal firearm. That’s the only way they’ll change the law,” he says.

Every law abiding Black should apply, especially in the Democratic Party run cities which have lots and lots of crime, which is primarily done by black men, many of whom have illegal guns. This would allow the law abiding to protect themselves from the lawlessness and coddling of criminals in those Democratic Party run cities.

Oh, hey, wait a minute: if gun control is about holding the black man down, if it’s racism, then what does that say about these Democratic Party run cities and states with large black populations and massive gun control?

Read: Obviously, Racial Politics Has To Be Dragged Into The Gun Grabbing Debate »

Cult: NBC Wants To Take Your Climate Confessions

You had “Jesus” showing up at the Seattle Green New Deal hearing and Greta Thunberg referred to as “Jesus”. You have people praying to plants at Union Seminary. And so much more. Now we have (via Twitchy)

It looks like this

And things are not going well

It’s getting totally beaten with non-Warmist comments.

When you go to leave a confession, you are given a little snippet of a tip, most of which seem to be about standard energy savings and environmentalism, which have nothing really to do with ‘climate change.’

Remember, though, this is all about science, and definitely not a cult.

Read: Cult: NBC Wants To Take Your Climate Confessions »

Mayor Pete To Roll Out His Own Medicare Sorta For All Plan, Taking Swipe At Other Democrats

Is this legitimate from Pete Buttigieg, or just a plan that is patronizingly thinking ahead towards the general election, knowing that the essential government takeover of the health industry by other Democrat contenders is not going to play well during the general election?

Here’s a better way to do Medicare-for-all

As president, I will put Americans in charge of their own health care with affordable choices for all. I’ll ensure that every American has access to affordable coverage either through private insurance or a public alternative. If a private insurance plan through your employer or the marketplace isn’t affordable, you can get a plan that is. It’s what I call “Medicare for All Who Want It.”

Many Democrats have proposed a Medicare-for-all plan, and while each of us would achieve universal coverage, there’s a real difference between the plan I’m announcing on Thursday and the ones offered by candidates such as Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (Mass.). Rather than flipping a switch and kicking almost 160 million Americans off their private insurance, including 20 million seniors already choosing private plans within Medicare, my plan lets Americans keep a private plan if they want to. If private insurers are unable or unwilling to offer better plans than they do today, competition from this public alternative will naturally lead to Medicare-for-all.

It’s a middle of the road plan, a have it both way plan, that you can bet will not satisfy the hardcore’s in the Democratic Party. How’s he going to pay for it?

And with my plan, we can achieve universal health care and a public alternative without raising taxes on the middle class. I’ve always said that anyone who lets the words “Medicare-for-all” escape their lips should tell us just as plainly how they plan to get there. The only way we’ll rally Americans behind a reform that affects so much of our lives and our economy is if we’re honest and straightforward about the details. So I’ll be upfront: My plan will cost about $1.5 trillion over a decade, paid for by cost savings and corporate tax reform to ensure big corporations pay their fair share.

Medicare cost the U.S. government $582 billion for fiscal year 2018. He seems to be assuming a cost rise of 150 billion per year for adding tens of millions of citizens onto the rolls, and that raising taxes on companies will work. As for “cost savings”, will he have more details on what he’s going to cut?

Lower-income people living in states that haven’t expanded Medicaid would be automatically enrolled in the public plan. Others without insurance, such as those who forgo employer coverage because it is too expensive or those who do not purchase coverage on the exchanges because they are not eligible for subsidies, would also have access to join the public plan with income-based subsidies.

Will Los Federales be sending enough money to cover this to the States? Anyhow, here’s where things get a little weird

We’d also make private health care more affordable for the millions of Americans who struggle to pay their premiums. For example, a 60-year-old in Iowa making $50,000 could face a monthly premium of roughly $1,000 for the most popular type of marketplace plan — nearly a quarter of their annual income. Our plan would cap marketplace premiums at 8.5 percent of a person’s income, which means that the same 60-year-old would pay no more than $354 a month for better-quality coverage.

The current monthly premium for Medicare in that age bracket is $135.50 a month for Medicare Part B. If you add in Part D and hospital coverage, you’re still not at $354 a month. That’s a monthly cost that causes many to forgo health insurance. Is there a deductible with Pete’s plan? He doesn’t say. It’s $185 now.

That’s only part of how our plan would empower Americans. We’d also ban the surprise medical billing that has left patients slapped with five- or six-figure bills after a bike crash or a heart attack. We’d limit out-of-pocket costs for seniors on Medicare and ensure that health providers such as hospitals price their services fairly by capping out-of-network rates at twice what Medicare would pay for the same service. My administration would also bring transparency to pricing and reduce the wasteful administrative costs that ultimately get passed down to patients. On top of Medicare for All Who Want It, our campaign will be putting forward additional plans to address issues such as drug pricing, innovation and health equity.

I’m not going to knock him for all of that, it’s what a lot of health insurance providers are doing now in order to reduce costs. However, having the government do this could cause problems with quality of care, and let’s not forget, many health services refused to take new Medicare and Obamacare patients, because they aren’t in business to lose money.

Going back one paragraph

My plan would also take an extra step to reach universal coverage by automatically enrolling those eligible for free coverage in Medicaid or the public coverage alternative. And anyone who falls through the cracks and ends up needing health care would be retroactively enrolled in the public plan.

So, this is really just a step towards creating a single payer plan. Huh.

Read: Mayor Pete To Roll Out His Own Medicare Sorta For All Plan, Taking Swipe At Other Democrats »

Seattle Brings “Jesus” To Make Their Green New Deal A Reality Or Something

What is it with climate cultists trying to bring Jesus into their Progressive (nice Fascist) push for Big Government style Green New Deal/climate garbage?

City Council Unanimously Passes Legislation That Will Make a Seattle Green New Deal Reality

The Seattle City Council unanimously passed legislation that would establish a Green New Deal Oversight Board.

Establishing the board is a crucial step in making the Seattle Green New Deal (GND), a resolution the council passed in August, a reality.

The board will lay out how to follow and implement a GND, which is an extensive list of environmentally conscious goals. The board will advise all city departments and make sure that they are following the tenets of the GND and the overarching goal of reducing the city’s greenhouse gas emissions and, ultimately, eliminating climate pollution by 2030.

They could probably start with the city doing away with its own use of fossil fuels for all the things the city does, like garbage pickup, police patrols, the fire department, and so on. But, anyhow, this dude showed up

These same people also want Christianity removed from the public space.

Read: Seattle Brings “Jesus” To Make Their Green New Deal A Reality Or Something »

Pirate's Cove