Surprise: Solar Panels Don’t Work During Forced Blackouts

By William Teach October 12, 2019 – 3:44 pm

It’s obviously wildfire season in California, like it is pretty much every year. And one is going on. Which is, of course, being linked to/blamed on ‘climate change’. But, we’ll soon find out it was caused by mankind, just not through carbon pollution. And

Yeah, and that’s the scam. The power companies use the roofs of consumers to generate solar for the grid, not for the homeowners. All for some negligible discount. My parents power company in NJ does this, and, after my father and I read the terms, we realized it was almost no benefit for the parents, and, if something happened to the roof, it could take forever to fix. And cost more.

Oh, and even if they were feeding into the house (remember, California law now requires that all homes built in 2020 and going forward have solar panels), there would only be enough power to run a few lights. Maybe 1 fridge with everything else turned off.

Read: Surprise: Solar Panels Don’t Work During Forced Blackouts »

Posted in Energy, Global Warming | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach October 12, 2019 – 1:00 pm

…are pumpkins which will disappear from ‘climate change’, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Maggie’s Farm, with a post on whether it’s possible for the U.S. to withdraw from any foreign entanglement.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

UK Police Say Extinction Rebellion Nuts Are Hiding Nails And Razors In Lock-Tubes

By William Teach October 12, 2019 – 10:30 am

These pose a danger to police

HIDDEN DANGER Extinction Rebellion protesters hide NAILS and BLADES in ‘lock-on’ tubes to make removing them more dangerous, cops claim

The eco-warriors are in the middle of a two-week demonstration to bring London to a grinding halt to try and force the Government to reduce the country’s carbon emissions.

The group has been photographed super-gluing themselves to government department buildings, handcuffing themselves to cars and climbing on roofs and planes.

Another method the leftie-group has used is putting their arms in tubes and locking themselves in.

Police have said the protesters are hiding blades and nails in the tube to make it harder to cut them out.

“What we’ve found is the protesters are making it a little bit more harder and dangerous for us and might have nails in it, blades in it and any type of sharp metal in the concrete.”

Extinction Rebellion London replied:”We sympathise with the police on duty, no-one wants to be here.

“We are peaceful, we ask for understanding & restraint. Government inaction on the climate emergency is bad for the police too. “

So, see, it’s Someone Else’s fault, not XR’s fault.

Metropolitan Police chief Cressida Dick said the force has been “stretched” by Extinction Rebellion public nuisance tactics, impeding its ability to respond to other crimes.

As the first week of demonstrations winds down, the Met said they have arrested more than 1,200 protesters as the force was also dealing with the fatal stabbings of two teenagers in the city within a matter of hours.

Metropolitan Police chief Cressida Dick said the force has been “stretched” by Extinction Rebellion public nuisance tactics, impeding its ability to respond to other crimes.

Dame Cressida said she hoped the protesters would choose to either “protest lawfully” or “go home” after their “failure to take and occupy the streets that they wanted to”.

She said: “If they do that then of course I can deploy many of my officers back to the streets, back to the neighbourhoods, back to the schools, back to the wards of the people of London.

But, they won’t. And you know what will happen, the violence will soon start showing up, as it always does from leftist groups.

Read More »

Read: UK Police Say Extinction Rebellion Nuts Are Hiding Nails And Razors In Lock-Tubes »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Climahypocrites, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

To Solve Hotcoldwetdry, We Must (Be Forced To) Change Our Lifestyles Or Something

By William Teach October 12, 2019 – 7:21 am

First, let’s note that St. Greta didn’t get her Nobel Prize, with a scorching hot take by Newsweek

https://twitter.com/atheistcritique/status/1182681000033300480

Perhaps they should have mentioned that St. Greta’s Sweden only sees 36% of its citizens believing that climate change is mostly caused by Mankind. Anyhow, over to the BBC

Climate change: Big lifestyle changes are the only answer

The UK government must tell the public small, easy changes will not be enough to tackle climate change, warn experts.

Researchers from Imperial College London say we must eat less meat and dairy, swap cars for bikes, take fewer flights, and ditch gas boilers at home.

The report, seen by BBC Panorama, has been prepared for the Committee on Climate Change, which advises ministers how to cut the UK’s carbon footprint.

It says an upheaval in our lifestyles is the only way to meet targets.

The new report, called Behaviour Change, Public Engagement and Net Zero, amounts to an extensive “to-do” list for government.

It says subsidies for fossil fuels have to go and taxes on low-carbon technologies must be cut.

It also urges the government to consider introducing a carbon tax, increasing the prices of carbon-intensive products and activities.

They want the government to be nags

The Committee on Climate Change’s official recommendation to government is that a 20% cut in red meat and dairy is needed – the emissions from the other 80% will have to be matched by CO2 that has been captured and stored permanently in order to meet the net zero ambition.

The report implies a bigger shift in diets could be needed, and says one way to get people to change will be to emphasise the health benefits this could bring.

Another will be to give people much more information on the environmental impact of different foods. It calls for mandatory carbon impact labelling on products, on till receipts, and via shopping websites and apps.

There couldn’t possibly be a backfire when citizens get tired of being nagged, right? Especially by the same people who excuse all the violence by Islamic extremists, right?

Read: To Solve Hotcoldwetdry, We Must (Be Forced To) Change Our Lifestyles Or Something »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Global Warming | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

California Bans Private Prisons And Illegal Alien Detention Facilities

By William Teach October 12, 2019 – 7:06 am

Where will California put all its criminals, of which it has quite a few due to the lax law enforcement?

New California law bans private prisons and immigrant detention centers

California must phase out private, for-profit prisons and immigrant detention centers by 2028 under a new law Gov. Gavin Newsom announced signing Friday.

The measure, Assembly Bill 32, represents a step toward the governor’s campaign promise to end the state’s use of private prisons.

It will prohibit state officials from signing new agreements with private prisons or renewing existing contracts starting next year, unless needed to comply with court-ordered population caps.

It will also ban all private detention centers from operating in California by the time their current contracts run out, including private immigrant detention facilities that contract with federal immigration authorities. It wouldn’t prohibit the federal government from building its own detention centers in California.

The time frame for this is by 2028. New contracts will not be signed, and all existing contracts end by that year. Where will they put the criminals? No one seems to be discussing that. That being said, many of these private prisons are a disgrace, even by prison standards. But, then, no one really wants to discuss what a disgrace many of the prisons run by the State Of California and counties can be.

The night before Newsom signed the bill, a spokeswoman for Immigration and Customs Enforcement said the agency would relocate migrants housed in California facilities if the state bans private detention facilities.

“If this bill, or any similar bill, were to take effect, ICE would simply transfer individuals elsewhere at a greater distance from their arrest location to where they’d be detained,” spokeswoman Lori K. Haley said in a statement. “The impact of such a state law would be felt almost exclusively by residents of California who would be forced to travel greater distances to visit friends and family in custody, not by a federal law enforcement agency.”

Can the state ban the federal government from contracting with a private company to house illegal aliens? That could be a fun court suit if ICE gives it a shot. If California thinks that Los Federales will simply release illegals as well as not detain them, they’re sorely mistaken. Or, hey, maybe they can release the illegals in the capital of Sacramento with electronic trackers.

California increased its use of private prisons roughly a decade ago after courts determined the state’s prisons were so overcrowded they violated inmates’ constitutional rights.

The California State Sheriffs Association argues banning private prisons takes away an important option the state has to ensure its prisons aren’t overcrowded.

“The concern of the sheriffs is that if you take tools off the table, you start taking things that can help address population management,” said Cory Salzillo, a lobbyist for the sheriffs. “You increase the likelihood that people could be released from prison because of, say, a population cap.”

This should get interesting when there’s nowhere to put all the criminals in California. Really, this is all based on liberals suddenly getting upset over prisons making a profit, and, rather than fixing those with issues, they just wanted them gone. Why? Because. There really is no reason. They freaked out about them first, then came up with Reasons.

Read: California Bans Private Prisons And Illegal Alien Detention Facilities »

Posted in Liberal World | Comments Off on California Bans Private Prisons And Illegal Alien Detention Facilities | Trackback URL

Green New Deal Inventor Slams Climate Lunatics, Pushes Nuclear Power

By William Teach October 11, 2019 – 5:10 pm

He may still be a believer in anthropogenic climate change, but, he’s step back from the cliff

Inventor of Green New Deal Renounces Eco-Lunacy, Goes Nuclear

(Delingpole goes through a hole bunch of the climate nutter actions recently)

What does all this tell us about climate change? Nothing that we didn’t know already: that it’s a bogus cause, invented by dodgy, activist scientists, propped up by mainstream media lies and hysteria and promoted by soap-dodging loons who are not only naive and ill-informed but outrageously hypocritical in the way that they want to end Western Civilisation but still somehow keep their mobile phones powered…

This is why I was so pleased to meet just about the world’s only sensible Greenie, Mike Shellenberger. Shellenberger used to be a deep green activist – pushing heavily for renewables – but then saw the light.

He still cares about nature very much. But he thinks greenies like Extinction Rebellion are doing more harm than good.

Like this?

Anyhow

“So in the early 2000s I was the co-founder of our original Green New Deal. We called it the New Apollo Project. It was for a $300 billion investment in renewables. And we succeeded. We got President Obama, he did about $150 billion in renewables between 2007 and 2015 but right away we started running into big problems.

The first you’re all familiar with: unreliable electricity means you always have to have fossil fuel power plants backing up when the sun doesn’t shine or the wind doesn’t blow. But the other issue, which had a bigger impact on my heart, is the environmental impact of all those solar and wind farms.

So you started having local conservationists raising concerns about the impacts of wind farms on bird and bat species; about the impact of solar farms on our desert tortoise. So you started having environmental consequences of renewables. I started running the numbers. It takes 150 times more land to get the same amount of electricity from a solar farm as from a nuclear plant; 17 times more materials are required for solar than for nuclear; and if you just total up all the used solar panel waste compared with nuclear, solar actually creates 300 times more toxic waste than nuclear.

For me it was like, if I care about the environment, why are we not doing more nuclear power? Even if you don’t care about climate change. Nuclear has the smallest environmental footprint because it has the highest energy density. So for me my red pill moment was realising that energy density determines environmental impact. A single coke can of uranium provides enough energy for my entire life. Whereas it would require many train cars full of coal, oil or gas; many more of renewables. So that for me was what made me change my mind.”

Many leading climate cultists are also calling for nuclear, but, the wider Cult of Climastrology is dead set against it. AOC’s Green New Deal is against it, as are many of the climate (cult) plans from the Democrats running for the nomination. They should all try living strictly on solar and wind. See how that works out.

Read: Green New Deal Inventor Slams Climate Lunatics, Pushes Nuclear Power »

Posted in Energy, Global Warming | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach October 11, 2019 – 1:00 pm

…is a horrible carbon intensive dog causing pumpkins to disappear in the future, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Legal Insurrection, with a post on the Ukraine whistleblower having worked with Biden while he was VP.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 19 Comments | Trackback URL

More Extinction Rebellion Moonbattery

By William Teach October 11, 2019 – 12:25 pm

The climate is solved!

and more

Read More »

Read: More Extinction Rebellion Moonbattery »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Global Warming, Unhinged Tools | 12 Comments | Trackback URL

Beto Calls For Stripping Churches Of Tax Exempt Status If They Don’t Support Gay Marriage

By William Teach October 11, 2019 – 7:45 am

The guy running for President doesn’t understand the Bill Of Rights

From The Blaze

CNN’s Don Lemon asked O’Rourke how far the government should punish organizations for following traditional religious beliefs about marriage.

“This is from your LGBTQ plan, and here’s what you right, here’s a quote, ‘freedom of religion is a fundamental right but it should not be used to discriminate,'” Lemon said.

“Do you think religious institutions, like colleges, churches, charities, should they lose their tax exempt status if they oppose same sex marriage?” Lemon asked.

“Yes,” O’Rourke said simply to loud applause from the LGBTQ audience.

“There can be no reward, no benefit, no tax break for any one or any institution, any organization in America that denies the full human rights and the full civil rights of every single one of us,” O’Rourke added.

“And so as as president, we’re gonna make that a priority,” he said, “and we are going to stop those who are infringing upon the civil rights of our fellow Americans.”

Gays can always go to another church to get married. But, Progressive World is all about forcing other people to believe what Progressives believe, using the government as the stick.

Read: Beto Calls For Stripping Churches Of Tax Exempt Status If They Don’t Support Gay Marriage »

Posted in Democrats | 13 Comments | Trackback URL

Bummer: Climate Crisis (scam) Disasters Could Get Worse If We Don’t Pass A New Green Deal

By William Teach October 11, 2019 – 7:05 am

You need to be taxed out the wazoo and have your liberty, freedom, and choice removed so we can “solve” this

Climate crisis disasters that could get worse if we don’t do anything

(skipping past all the yammering about the UN IPCC saying doom is coming and typical Warmist cultism)

The “business-as-usual” scenario, referred to as RCP8.5, considers no change in the world’s greenhouse gases emissions. Under this scenario, some climate scientists estimate that temperatures would rise by over 4 degrees over preindustrial levels by the end of the century. Some anticipate even higher temperature increases. The consequences of such an increase would probably be disastrous to humanity.

24/7 Wall St. consulted reports by groups such as the IPCC, NASA, the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Association, the U.S. Global Change Research Program and more to identify the potential effects of global climate change on the Earth and its inhabitants. Many of these predictions are based on average global temperature increases of at least 4 degrees Centigrade above preindustrial levels by 2100. Even if we manage to avoid the worst-case scenarios, many serious consequences of climate change are already being seen and felt around the world.

1. Rising temperatures

Global average temperatures could rise by as much as 7 degrees Centigrade, or 12.6 degrees Fahrenheit, by 2100. The average has risen by about 1 degree Centigrade.

Yeah, that’s not happening. Even in fantasy world that will not happen. The temperature has only risen about 1.5F since 1850, and even that could be debated as too high due to land use and the urban heat island effect artificially raising the average global temperature.

2. Even higher regional temperature increases

Regional temperatures could increase much more than the global average in North Africa, the Mediterranean and the Middle East. Summer temperatures could increase by 9 degrees Centigrade, or about 16 degrees Fahrenheit, in some places.

Nope. Alarmist claptrap.

4. A rise in hurricane and storm activity

Though the jury is still out on whether global warming has significantly contributed to an increase in the frequency and strength of hurricanes affecting the USA, scientists project global warming is likely to cause a substantial increase in the severity of these events.

Hasn’t happened yet, but, SOON, right? (I’m skipping some for slight brevity)

7. Arctic-free summers

If the Earth warms by 2 degrees Centigrade above preindustrial levels, scientists predict that one out of 10 summers in the Arctic will be ice-free.

Do they really want to make this prognostication again? Hasn’t worked out too well so far.

9. Sea level rise

Warming of 4 degrees Centigrade would lead to a sea level rise of 22.6 to 35.4 feet.

The first won’t happen, so the second won’t. But, this is all about Scaremongering.

10. Long-term major sea level rise

Sea levels could rise by as much as 50 feet, meaning less livable land area for humans.

Scaremongering, with more about Florida and Bangladesh being virtually gone. Oh, and major droughts to go with the flooding. And we get

18. Increase in vector-borne diseases

19. Extreme political instability

22. Starvation and food riots

24. Mass extinction

20. Nuclear war

But, remember, they are all about Science!

Read: Bummer: Climate Crisis (scam) Disasters Could Get Worse If We Don’t Pass A New Green Deal »

Posted in AGW Scaremongering, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove