Democrats “Women’s Health Protection Act” Would Eliminate Almost Every State Law On Abortion

This is the priority for Democrats: it always has been. It’s not ‘climate change’, it’s not equity/equality, it’s not infrastructure, it’s not even women’s rights, it’s abortion. Rather gives a good reason why Catholic bishops should deny Democrat lawmakers communion

Democrats Introduce New Bill to Eliminate Every Single Pro-Life Law Nationwide

Senate Democrats have introduced a new bill that would eliminate every single pro-life law nationwide.

The so-called Women’s Health Protection Act, “would invalidate nearly all existing state limitations on abortion,” said Jennifer Popik, director of federal legislation for National Right to Life.

“This legislation would also prohibit states from adopting new protective laws in the future, including various types of laws specifically upheld as constitutionally permissible by the U.S. Supreme Court,” she said.

Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life, said the measure “would essentially remove all legal protections for unborn children on the federal and state level. The Women’s Health Protection Act is, in effect, a no-limits-on-abortion-until-birth bill.”

Is anyone surprised that Democrats would attempt this, which would probably see an immediate lawsuit if passed by the Senate or House? Of course, the only way it would get passed by the Senate is if they nuke the filibuster. For one thing, it would end religious objection to performing abortion, violating the 1st Amendment. The federal government also has zero Constitutional authority to do this. It was not a delegated power, hence, a violation of the 10th Amendment.

If passed, here is what this bill would do:

  • Eliminate all state and federal parental consent laws in relation to abortion
  • Eliminate all state informed consent laws, including those that allow women to view an ultrasound prior to abortion
  • Prevent states from passing laws to protect babies at 20 weeks, thereby joining countries like North Korea, China, Vietnam, Singapore, Canada, and the Netherlands in not protecting unborn children later in development
  • Force doctors and nurses opposed to abortion to lose their jobs, and Catholic hospitals could lose public funds unless they perform abortions
  • Eliminate decades-long limitations on direct taxpayer funding of abortion – including the popular Hyde Amendment, which has saved over 2 million lives since enacted
  • In short, overturn all federal and state pro-life laws, and go further to make it illegal for elected officials to even introduce pro-life legislation

“As you can see, this bill would take pro-abortion extremism to a new and alarming level. To make matters worse, they have even erased all references to ‘women’ from the language of the bill, strangely only keeping it in the feel-good title,” McClusky said. “The radicalism of this Congress and their attacks on the inherent dignity of the human person are unprecedented. In the face of this bold radicalism, we must also raise our voices and defend mothers and the unborn from this agenda.”

So, far far left crazy on abortion, and no mention of women in the bill. This is the Democrats. And even if they do not try hard to pass it, their extremism fires up their unhinged base.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

14 Responses to “Democrats “Women’s Health Protection Act” Would Eliminate Almost Every State Law On Abortion”

  1. Hairy says:

    Teach
    Abortion is legal in Israel why not here,
    Abortion is illegal in muslim countries
    Why do you want to follow muslim sharia law?
    You want to give BIG GOVRRNMENT control over what a woman chooses to do with her own body ?

    • gitarcarver says:

      Abortion is legal in Israel why not here,

      Abortion is not legal in all cases in Israel.

      According to the Penal Code (1977), it is legal for a woman to have an abortion in Israel if:

      The woman is under 17 or over 40. (In practice, the government funds abortions for women under 33 and over 40.)

      The baby is conceived out of wedlock.

      The baby may have a physical or mental defect.

      Continuing the pregnancy will put the woman in physical or mental danger.

      In addition, Israeli law does not allow in vitro fertilization except between a man and a woman that are married. Think about what that means here in the US Hairy.

      Furthermore, …

      Dr. Eli Schussheim, chairman of the pro-life group Efrat, likened the decision to theft, saying that by allocating funding for non-medically necessary abortions, the committee “is stealing… from sick people… and giving the money instead as a prize to 6,000 negligent women.”

      His sentiments were echoed by Rabbi David Stav, head of the relatively liberal Tzohar group of Orthodox rabbis, who said there is “no question” that in the absence of a medical emergency, abortion is against Jewish law.

      When a so called religious state acts outside of the laws of that religion to add to the bloodshed of innocent children, why do you support that murder?

      You want to give BIG GOVRRNMENT control over what a woman chooses to do with her own body ?

      The child does not share blood types or has the same DNA of the mother, so the child is clearly not “her body.”

      Once again we see that Hairy hates children and wants them dead on any whim.

      After all, all the left has is hate.

  2. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    William Teach: it would end religious objection to performing abortion, violating the 1st Amendment

    Get real. No one is being forced to have an abortion against their wishes, even if YOU don’t want them to have one. The 1st Amendment does not protect one against being offended by what others do. The 1st Amendment does not support your attempt to make others abide by your religious beliefs.

    • gitarcarver says:

      Get real. No one is being forced to have an abortion against their wishes, even if YOU don’t want them to have one.

      Of course in his zeal to hate what Teach wrote, Elwood missed the fact that Teach was not saying that people would be forced to HAVE an abortion, but whether medical personnel would be forced to PREFORM abortions against their religious and moral convictions.

      Of course the left would want that to happen in that the left hates freedoms and moral convictions of anyone who doesn’t agree with the “murder on demand” policies.

      Then again, all the left has is hate.

      • Dana says:

        More, what the left want is for those of us who are pro-life to have to pay for abortions.

        • Professor Hale says:

          The democrats are onto something. They certainly know their own people. They are too stupid to be allowed to live. (sadly). (See, I put the word “sadly” in there so you would know I care about people).

  3. drowningpuppies says:

    Why do the dementiacrats hate babies so much?

    #TrustUs
    Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

  4. […] Democrats “Women’s Health Protection Act” Would Eliminate Almost Every State Law on Abortion […]

    • Kye says:

      Why do demofascists hate the Tenth Amendment so much?

      • Dana says:

        That’s just it: they don’t hate the Tenth Amendment . . . when the Republicans control the federal government.

        The Democrats love them some Tenth Amendment when states try to legalize the pot they smoke, or protect illegal immigrants.

Bad Behavior has blocked 9372 access attempts in the last 7 days.