Warmist Takes Unnecessary Fossil Fueled Flight To Compare Skeptics To Slave Owners

This is a fantastic way to get people to come over to the Warmist side

Climate-change scepticism must be ‘treated’, says enviro-sociologist

Dubious on warmo peril? You’re the kind who’d own slaves

Scepticism regarding the need for immediate and massive action against carbon emissions is a sickness of societies and individuals which needs to be “treated”, according to an Oregon-based professor of “sociology and environmental studies”. Professor Kari Norgaard compares the struggle against climate scepticism to that against racism and slavery in the US South.

To call this a silly comparison would be to reduce the silliness. Those who fought, and died, to stop slavery, and to pass the civil rights laws would and should be appalled by this idiotic, irresponsible comparison, but, we all know that the Warmists are desperate as their cult dies a slow, painful death, which is why we are seeing more and more unhinged, apoplectic, apocalyptic, and deranged garbage coming out daily.

The good prof is in London at the moment for the “Planet Under Pressure” conference, where she presented a paper on Wednesday dealing with how best to do away with the evil of scepticism and get the human race to focus all its efforts on saving the planet.

Hmm, looks like she isn’t too worried about the greenhouse gases she puts out herself. Hypocritical much?

According to an Oregon uni statement announcing the paper:

Resistance at individual and societal levels must be recognized and treated …

“This kind of cultural resistance to very significant social threat is something that we would expect in any society facing a massive threat,” [Norgaard] said.

The discussion, she said, is comparable to what happened with challenges to racism or slavery in the U.S. South.

If memory serves, racism is and slavery was a real issue. Globull warming is not. Rather despicable to even make the comparison, but, like I wrote, Warmists are desperate. But, they love traveling the world while telling others to stay at home.

“We find a profound misfit between dire scientific predictions of ongoing and future climate changes and scientific assessments of needed emissions reductions on the one hand, and weak political, social or policy response on the other,” Norgaard said. Serious discussions about solutions, she added, are mired in cultural inertia “that exists across spheres of the individual, social interaction, culture and institutions.

Do as I say, not as I do.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

2 Responses to “Warmist Takes Unnecessary Fossil Fueled Flight To Compare Skeptics To Slave Owners”

  1. david7134 says:

    Perhaps you are not looking at the real message. Warming has nothing to do with the environment. We all readily realize that fact. If we stopped all modern activity at this point, then the earth would still warm according to the models that these people put forward. So what is the purpose of all this sound and fury? It is control. By establishing the enviornment as such a fragile entity, then we can control other through carbon credits and other instruments. This is not idle thought as it has been used to modify certain countries activities outside of the enviornment concerns.

    So how does that compare to racism and slavery in the South? Exactly the same. Both issues where used to alter the South and reduce the political impact of the people in our region. Slavery is an old, legitimate economic model. It has been used as long as women have been sell their bodies. It is out of flavor now due to our technicology. But it will return as the civilization changes. In many ways, we may already say that we are slaves, only to another master. Then racism, my God, racism is worse in the North than ever in the South (look up Black Laws). Even with slavery, the South was and still is less racist than the North (no I will not provide references). The laws against racism are nothing more than a breaking down of basic freedom and means of control of the Southern people. To constantly hit the South with charges of racism is to reduce the political impact of our region and nullify our ability to have a return of freedom to our region and country.

    So the ultimate purpose of both concepts is very much similar.

  2. Definitely not going to disagree that the real purpose behind the AGW movement is simply control along with redistribution of wealth. Warmists would be very surprised if this went through, and realized that this all applied to themselves. Much like happened in Australia.

Bad Behavior has blocked 9066 access attempts in the last 7 days.