Also, that Billie Eilish’s mom was there…you know, the mom of the pop star who lives in a big mansion and takes lots and lots of fossil fueled travel to put on shows
Hollywood once promised to help save the planet. Leonardo DiCaprio warned of climate catastrophe from awards stages. Celebrities flew to climate conferences. Studios pledged greener productions. Streaming platforms rushed to commission environmental documentaries. But in 2026, with the aftermath of wildfires, heatwaves and floods becoming routine, a question lingers: Does Hollywood still care about climate change?
At the seventh annual Hollywood Climate Summit in Los Angeles this week, organizers attempted to answer with a resounding yes. The event gathered filmmakers, actors, comedians, activists, scientists and media executives to explore how storytelling can inspire climate action across food systems, health, infrastructure and popular culture.
One of the most recognizable voices came from Maggie Baird, founder of Support + Feed and mother of Grammy-winning musician Billie Eilish. We wrote about Maggie’s new show here. Speaking on the panel “How Food Tells Our Stories,” Baird described how her daughter’s global tours have become platforms for climate-conscious food choices.
Um, if she’s one of the most recognizable faces, than, no, Hollywood no longer cares. But, then, did they really care, or just mouth platitudes while living in mansions, driving fossil fueled luxury vehicles, and flying in private jets?
Meanwhile, a panel called “Greenlight California” explored how climate infrastructure projects such as high-speed rail and sustainable urban planning could determine the future of film production in Los Angeles. California Film Commission Director Colleen Bell argued that investing in infrastructure is ultimately an investment in Hollywood itself.
Does anyone think the celebs will take the train? Provided it is ever finished. And most of them live far away in the suburbs, away from the urban areas they want to plan for the peasants.
Seriously, there’s not one name mentioned in the article that 99.999% of people would recognize.
Hollywood once promised to help save the planet. Leonardo DiCaprio warned of climate catastrophe from awards stages. Celebrities flew to climate conferences. Studios pledged greener productions. Streaming platforms rushed to commission environmental documentaries. But in 2026, with the aftermath of wildfires, heatwaves and floods becoming routine, a question lingers: Does Hollywood still care about climate change?
The agency driving President Trump’s mass deportation campaign is now preparing to welcome millions of foreign visitors at the World Cup.

A union representing 2,000 workers at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles that has demanded protection from possible immigration enforcement during the World Cup voted Friday to authorize a possible labor stoppage just a week before the U.S. team’s opening match.
Just days after an unusually early heatwave hit much of France, the government’s spending cuts to address the fallout from the war in the Middle East are now having a major impact on environmental policy. Environment-related spending is not the only sector affected, nor even the hardest hit, with a total of €275 million in credits either canceled or frozen. But the move is particularly bitter for environmental advocates, who have criticized the government for failing to adequately prepare France for extreme heat.
Graham Platner, the presumptive Democratic nominee for Senate in Maine, moved to quell
A proposed state law that would force dozens of fossil fuel companies to shell out $50 billion to help pay for the cost of climate change has taken another step forward in New Jersey.

