What Say To $36 Trillion In Spending For Globull Warming?

Yes, you read the headline correctly (via Tom Nelson)

(CNN Money) The International Energy Agency said the world’s clean energy investments are sorely lacking and this week called for an additional $36 trillion of funding by 2050.

In a sharply-worded introduction to a 700-page report, IEA Executive Director Maria van der Hoeven said governments and private industry need to do far more if the world is to hold global warming to what most scientists say is an acceptable level.

Wait, an “additional” $36 trillion?

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

4 Responses to “What Say To $36 Trillion In Spending For Globull Warming?”

  1. david7134 says:

    That seems reasonable to me, it would take us right back to the stone age. That seems to be the agenda.

  2. Heck, we’d be back to our proto-lemur days.

  3. Gumball_Brains says:

    Welp, if Obama gets elected, we’ll supply all of that to the UN freely. We should not elect Obama and thus force anybody-but-US to pay for the crap that they want to impose on others. And then impose it upon themselves first!

    OH… and stop funding the UN. Kick the UN out. And stop funding anything that has its intent to change the amount of C02 in the atmosphere or the temperature of the atmosphere or ocean…. or … space. Or anything in space.

    I hear Mercury is alot hotter than we are.

  4. I hear Mercury is alot hotter than we are.

    Those darned Mercurians and their SUVs.

Bad Behavior has blocked 5684 access attempts in the last 7 days.