Durham, NC Looks To Provide “4th Amendment Protections” To Illegals

Weirdly, this is not showing up on any of the major local news stations

NC City Becomes a ‘Fourth Amendment Workplace’ amid ICE Crackdown

The city of Durham, North Carolina, is pushing back against the work of President Donald Trump’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The Durham City Council on Tuesday unanimously passed a resolution to make the city a “Fourth Amendment Workplace,” the Chronicle reported Wednesday.

The article continued:

The Fourth Amendment protects citizens against arbitrary searches and arrests and serves as the basis of search warrants with a probable cause of crime. The resolution directs city staff to “uphold the 4th amendment at their workplace and city agencies and report back to Council any barriers to effective training on the 4th Amendment for any departments.”

The resolution says the city has “historically pursued equity and safety for all residents” and the trust of Durhamites is essential to the city carrying out its operations. It says the threat of “unconstitutional seizure” has prevented immigrants in Durham from “safely engaging in public life, including pursuing employment and education.”

Except, illegals are illegally present in the US, and law enforcement, particularly ICE and the Border Patrol, have every legal right to detain them pending deportation. There’s nothing arbitrary about it.

Also, the idiot Democrats who run Durham even say it when discussing the 4th: “citizens.” Illegals are not citizens. The uber-smart folks at the Duke Chronicle also mentioned the word “citizen.”

Oh, Durham has a violent and a property crime rate that are double that of North Carolina, and is a 3 (100 is best).

The Chronicle referred to an incident that happened in July when ICE agents detained an illegal alien charged with a felony at the Durham County Courthouse, which alerted citizens and officials to the fact that ICE agents were there.

The Durham Chronicle forgot to mention what it was

The following month, the outlet reported ICE arrested illegal aliens convicted of sex crimes, most against children, across the country. The article said, “Indeed, over the weekend, ICE agents arrested 45-year-old illegal alien Porfirio Bernal-Fregoso of Mexico in Durham County, North Carolina. Bernal-Fregoso has been convicted of attempted rape of a child and indecent liberties with a child.”

Do you Democrats really want to die on the hill of protecting this guy from Los Federales? If Durham does try and shield illegal every person involved should be charged.

Read: Durham, NC Looks To Provide “4th Amendment Protections” To Illegals »

If All You See…

…are trees that will soon die from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Jihad Watch, with a post on a mega-mosque built with taxpayer money and Hamas support.

I’ll be honest, if this continues on I might end this. It’s too much of a pain dealing with the up down up down. Neither the 1030am post autoposted nor this one, and, since I was traveling nothing I could do.

Read: If All You See… »

Trump Signs EO Against State Sponsors Who Detain Americans Wrongfully

Look, Trump and his people just got Democrats to start supporting a hardcore Venezuelan gang running drugs into the U.S. on boats. Now he’ll have them supporting nations which wrongfully hold Americans

Trump signs executive order creating ‘state sponsor of wrongful detention’ designation

US President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order creating a “state sponsor of wrongful detention” designation meant to penalize countries that wrongfully imprison Americans.

The new designation is meant to deter countries from illegally detaining US citizens and encourage them to release wrongful detainees that they have in custody. It will be up to the secretary of state to determine which countries will be given the designation.

“Through this Executive Order, actors designated as State Sponsors of Wrongful Detention may face severe penalties including economic sanctions, visa restrictions, foreign assistance restrictions, and travel restrictions for U.S. passport holders,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement Friday.

“The bottom line: Anyone who uses an American as a bargaining chip will pay the price,” he said.

The administration did not announce what countries might be designated as state sponsors of wrongful detention. Nations like Venezuela, Russia, Iran, China and Afghanistan all have a history of wrongfully detaining Americans.

America first!

This senior administration official said the executive order allows the administration access to the “toolbox” of punitive measures that are used against countries designated as state sponsors of terrorism.

“It’s a widening of the aperture against whom we can use those tools. You don’t have to be funding Hamas, Hezbollah or al-Qaeda, you can simply be trying to exploit our citizens wrongfully,” the official said.

Good. Do not mess with Americans.

Read: Trump Signs EO Against State Sponsors Who Detain Americans Wrongfully »

Climate Crisis (scam) Makes Unexploded Bombs Worse Or Something

The problem of unexploded ordnance is a big one, right? But, see, this is a cult, so, they have to glom on to every problem and subordinate it to the doomsday movement

How unexploded bombs cause environmental damage – and why climate change exacerbates the problem

There are a record number of conflicts raging around the world – from Ukraine and Gaza to Sudan and Myanmar. Alongside their devastating human toll, these conflicts are all wreaking havoc on the environment.

One of the key ways war leads to environmental harm is by leaving behind unexploded weaponry. Since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, Ukraine has become the most landmine-contaminated country in the world. By January 2024, roughly 25,000 sq km of agricultural land there was estimated to have been contaminated with landmines and other so-called explosive remnants of war.

The contamination of Ukrainian farmland – alongside the physical damage from exploded mines – has contributed to a sharp decrease in agricultural activity, with wheat production in Ukraine falling by 41% between 2021 and the end of 2024. Ukraine has historically been one of the world’s largest agricultural exporters. (Note: I’ve left a ton of their links out in the excerpts)

I mean, OK, seems as if the ordnance is a bit of a danger to humans and wildlife, but, I guess you can kinda see an issue with the environment

The damage wars are causing to land is also occurring at a time when climate change is driving land degradation. Rising temperatures, increased aridity and the intensification of extreme weather events are leading to reduced soil fertility and desertification. This often compounds the impact of unexploded mines and bombs on the land.

That seems a stretch (but, then, that’s what they do)

Climate hazards such as droughts, floods and wildfires can exacerbate the impact of explosive remnants of war. Floods and heavy rainfall can unearth landmines and other unexploded ordnance, sometimes displacing them into areas previously considered safe.

You mean the weather?

High temperatures from heatwaves can also cause abandoned munitions to explode. Six different munition sites exploded across Iraq during scorching hot summers in 2018 and 2019, when temperatures regularly topped 45°C. Heatwaves were blamed for a similar arms dump explosion in Jordan in 2020.

Yup, weather. In a desert region.

At the same time, the presence of explosive remnants in the environment can hamper responses to climate events. In eastern Ukraine, for example, the heavy contamination of forests with landmines and tripwires prevented fire crews from responding effectively to wildfires in 2020. The fires damaged houses and killed seven people.

Wait, wildfires in a war-torn region? That’s ‘climate change’? Piss off. This kind of crap goes on for many more paragraphs, as written by doomsday cultists.

Read: Climate Crisis (scam) Makes Unexploded Bombs Worse Or Something »

Whoops: Now Maryland MS-13 Dad To Be Sent To

Huh where? Look, I’m pretty good with geography, but, this one stumped me

Trump administration tells Abrego Garcia he now faces deportation to African country of Eswatini

The Trump administration told Kilmar Abrego Garcia on Friday it is now seeking to deport him to the tiny African kingdom of Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland, according to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement email obtained by CBS News.

The email from a top ICE official noted that Abrego Garcia’s attorneys have warned he fears being persecuted or tortured in Uganda, where federal authorities threatened to deport him last month after he was detained once again by immigration officials following his release from criminal custody.

The ICE official said Abrego Garcia, through his attorneys, has also claimed fear of being harmed if deported to more than 20 countries, most of them in Latin America.

In the email, the official called the alleged claims “hard to take seriously,” but added: “Nonetheless, we hereby notify you that your new country of removal is Eswatini, Africa.”

OK, Swaziland, in the NE part of the collapsing state of South Africa. Have fun, dude!

And on Thursday, federal authorities argued they could have a legal route to deport him to El Salvador a second time. A 2019 immigration court ruling barred the government from sending him to the Central American country, citing a risk of persecution by gangs. But in a filing obtained by CBS News, the government argued those legal protections would be voided if Abrego Garcia’s request to reopen his immigration court case is granted.

Democrats want to die on the hill of protecting this guy.

Meanwhile

Federal agents arrest hundreds at Hyundai plant construction site in Georgia

Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) announced the arrest of 475 illegal migrants during a major immigration enforcement raid on Thursday at a Hyundai electric car battery factory in Georgia.

HSI Atlanta Special Agent in Charge Steven Schrank noted that while the raid was at a Hyundai facility, not all the migrants worked for the parent company. Some worked for subcontractors at the site.

“We are sending a clear and unequivocal message that those who exploit our workforce, undermine our economy and violate federal laws will be held accountable,” Schrank said during a news conference on Friday.

Reportedly, most were South Koreans. I wonder how many were simple overstays? Someone at those companies, including the sub-contractors, needs to be prosecuted to send a message.

Read: Whoops: Now Maryland MS-13 Dad To Be Sent To »

NY Times Wonders What Climahysteric Activists Can Do Now That The Old Playbook No Longer Works

I have an idea, been saying it for 21 years. Can you guess what it is?

The Old Climate-Activism Playbook No Longer Works. What Else Can?

At the end of a long dirt road through Vermont’s Green Mountains, Bill McKibben sat on his screened-in porch, surrounded by birdsong and the drone of buzzing insects. The July sun beat through a canopy of trees. McKibben sipped a cup of green tea and pointed outside, to the ground just past the edge of the house, where an array of solar panels tilted toward the late-morning sky. The roof, too, was loaded with panels of different vintages. “I’ve been putting them up at intervals for a quarter century,” he said.

Few climate activists have participated in more eras of the environmental movement than McKibben. In 1989, at age 27, he published “The End of Nature,” often described as the first book on global warming for lay readers, which became an international best seller. Then he turned to activism, eventually shifting his focus from combating the “greenhouse effect” to organizing pipeline protests and fossil fuel divestment campaigns. Over the decades, he has evolved from a concerned observer to an elder statesman of the climate movement.

Nature is still here

I met McKibben at a uniquely bleak time for that movement. Republicans in Congress had shredded the Inflation Reduction Act, a Biden administration law meant in part to lower greenhouse gas emissions, and President Trump was making every effort to thwart progress on renewables while boosting the oil-and-gas industry. The president had also pulled the United States out of the Paris Agreement, a climate accord that advocacy groups had helped catalyze. “In certain ways, it’s the darkest moment,” McKibben said.

He’d been coping by throwing himself into a new project. On Sept. 21, McKibben will spearhead a national “day of action” called Sun Day, for which activists across the country are organizing local events to hype up solar power and energy-efficient innovations. There will be electric-car shows, open houses at all-electric solar homes and solar installation tours. In August, McKibben also published a book on solar and wind power called “Here Comes the Sun.” He wants to convince Americans that renewable energy is not a pricey, boutique alternative, but the accessible, abundant, cost-effective future of electrified life — no longer the Whole Foods of energy, as he put it, but the Costco.

And most will show up in fossil fueled vehicles. This is starting to sound like the old playbook

But Sun Day also feels like a tactical swerve for McKibben. Climate activism over the past decade has been defined by global protests against fossil fuels, by Greta Thunberg’s student strikes, by the emergence of the Sunrise Movement. McKibben has been among the strongest exponents of that era’s climate-activism strategy — confrontational, morally stark, bent on shutting down economic activity that endangered humanity in the long-term even if it meant reducing corporate profits and curtailing Americans’ lifestyle options in the short term.

Now McKibben is taking a different tack, one that seems to share a message with a more moderate, adaptationist wing of the climate world while also harking back to the innocence and idealism of Earth Day. “This is clearly the thing that we can work on at the moment that stands a chance of making a difference,” he told me. His own shift in strategy comes as many activists are asking themselves some difficult questions: What has climate activism really given us? And where should it go from here?

Hah, it’s the same thing in a different package. They still want Government to ban fossil fuels and replace them with expensive, unreliable “renewables”. One day they will be ready for prime time.

American public opinion on climate has arrived at a complicated juncture. In a Gallup poll this year, a record 48 percent of respondents said that global warming will pose a “serious threat” to them or their way of life. People can feel the hotter summers, the snowless winters, the hurricanes raging harder. Some surveys have found evidence among Republicans, too, of a willingness to link extreme weather to climate change. Yet when asked to rank the issues that affect their votes, Americans regularly place climate near the bottom of the list.

Popular in theory, not in practice. Hence why so many Warmists use fossil fueled vehicles.

Positioning Sun Day politically was a challenge, too. Jamie Henn — a climate activist who co-founded 350.org with McKibben and has been working on Sun Day — said in a recent interview with the podcast Volts that, when they began organizing Sun Day, he thought, “One of the things that the clean-energy movement needs is a really good villain.” But then they tested some language along the lines of “Big Oil is standing in the way of solar. Trump doesn’t want you to have it.” The response, Henn said, was more or less: “I don’t want to hear this stuff — like, I’m already depressed.”

Really, throughout this incredibly long article (might be nice if the Times spent this much time showing what Obama admin officials, Jim Comey, etc, did to manufacture the Russia Russia Russia conspiracy) there really isn’t any sort of new playbook. Government, demonize, depress, by hypocrites. It will be humorous when they have the Sun Day and leave a lot of trash at the protest sites, eh?

Read: NY Times Wonders What Climahysteric Activists Can Do Now That The Old Playbook No Longer Works »

If All You See…

…is a field perfect for a windfarm, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Gatestone Institute, with a post on Bangladesh racing towards being a caliphate.

Read: If All You See… »

DOJ Sues SCB Over Sanctuary Policies

What causes Democrats to want to shield illegal aliens who have been arrested for committing crimes?

Trump’s DOJ sues Boston over immigration enforcement policy

President Donald Trump’s administration filed suit Thursday against Boston, arguing its policies that limit police cooperation with civil immigration enforcement violate federal law.

The Department of Justice lawsuit follows similar legal actions by the administration against New York, New Jersey and Los Angeles that seek to overturn what it calls “sanctuary” policies that pose obstacles to Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration.

“The City of Boston and its Mayor have been among the worst sanctuary offenders in America – they explicitly enforce policies designed to undermine law enforcement and protect illegal aliens from justice.” Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement announcing the lawsuit. “If Boston won’t protect its citizens from illegal alien crime, this Department of Justice will.”

Mayor Michelle Wu was defiant in a response, accusing the administration of seeking to enforcement an “authoritarian agenda” and noting that Boston is the safest major city in the country.

I’ll give Sanctuary City Boston this, for Democrat cities it is a lot better than most, being ranked a 12 (100 is best) by Neighborhood Scout. Still, like all the other sanctuary cities, they attempt to hide crime by illegals and the illegals themselves, something they wouldn’t do for American citizens if you committed the same crimes.

DOJ’s lawsuit targets Boston’s Trust Act, which was adopted in 2014 and limits the amount of assistance that local law enforcement can provide to federal authorities involving the enforcement of civil immigration or low-level criminal offenses. It doesn’t prohibit Boston police from working with federal authorities on major crimes involving non-citizens.

I guess Boston doesn’t consider “assault to rape, kidnapping, indecent assault and battery, and intimidating a witness” a “major crime” when it involves illegal aliens. Or all the charges these 1,500 have against them.

Still, the Justice Department suit calls Boston’s policy “obstructionist” and says it interferes with immigration enforcement in the city, where the Trump administration is planning a major operation as part of its broader crackdown.

It singled out Wu for recently saying “Boston will never back down” on its policy, which the City Council reaffirmed in a December 2024 resolution.

“Her resistance endangers public safety, resulting in a number of criminals being released into Boston who should have been held for immigration removal from the United States,” it said.

I remember when Democrats stated that Los Federales had ultimate authority on immigration when they were suing Arizona over SB 1070, the “show me your papers (sic)) law. Local and state law enforcement have a duty to help federal law enforcement on other crimes, so, why not immigration?

I will also say, as I have for a very long time, that the feds should start using full warrants rather than detainers, then arrest the hell out of the people in sanctuary jurisdictions when they let illegals go.

It’ll be fun if she gets arrested for shielding illegals. Doubt that will happen, even if they deserve it.

Read: DOJ Sues SCB Over Sanctuary Policies »

Bummer: Derbyshire Kills Of Their Climate (scam) Goals

Will they be the first of many to do this?

Reform UK scraps Derbyshire climate change aim

An aim to tackle the causes and impact of climate change has been scrapped by Reform UK-led Derbyshire County Council.

The authority will now “support the development of energy security, energy efficiency and clean energy”, it has confirmed.

Reform UK said the decision was made due to the cost of net zero, though this figure was not confirmed.

The Labour government has said the climate and nature crisis is the greatest long-term global challenge we face and wants to reduce carbon emissions to “net zero” by 2050.

Reform scrapped the county’s climate change committee in May 2025 one week after winning power, saying they did not believe the committee was of “any value”.

They still sound like they sorta kinda care, but, that could just be making noises for the unhinged cultists.

The government said it wants the UK to be a global leader in the technology needed to decarbonise the world’s economies and The Confederation of British Industry said the transition to a greener economy was bringing jobs to parts of the UK experiencing industrial decline.

But Graves claimed the money generated in the green transition comes mainly from taxpayers.

“Is that what people want to spend their taxes on? That’s what you have to ask as a question,” he said.

They realized Net Zero costs a lot of money, it’s unsustainable at this time, and the taxpayers are on the hook.

The UK Met Office says that, on average, winters will become wetter and summers drier due to climate change, but summer rain will be more intense.

The 10 years between 2011 and 2020 were 9% wetter than the period between 1961 and 1990, it added.

It’s always some sort of doom with these people.

Read: Bummer: Derbyshire Kills Of Their Climate (scam) Goals »

Surprise: Wacko Judge Overruled By Appeals Court On Closing Alligator Alcatraz

Back on August 22nd I noted after the moonbat judge made her ruling

Liberals are celebrating this, but, you know the ruling will, yet again, be overturned on appeal. But, hey, perhaps DeSantis could build a new holding facility near where the judge lives.

Of course, it wasn’t all that hard to write that, since so many of these crazy judges are overruled by appeals courts

Appeals court panel stops order to wind down operations at ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ in Everglades

A federal appeals court panel on Thursday put on hold a lower court judge’s order to end operations indefinitely at the immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades dubbed “Alligator Alcatraz.”

The three-judge panel in Atlanta decided by a 2-1 vote to stay the federal judge’s order pending the outcome of an appeal, saying it was in the public interest. The ruling will allow the facility to continue holding detainees for the time being.

U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams in Miami issued a preliminary injunction last month ordering operations at the facility to be wound down by the end of October, with detainees transferred to other facilities and equipment and fencing removed.

Williams’ decision was issued in response to a lawsuit brought by Friends of the Everglades, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Miccosukee Tribe, who accused the state and federal defendants of not following federal law requiring an environmental review for the detention center in the middle of sensitive wetlands.

She went for a homerun swing but was holding a wiffle bat.

“We said we would fight that. We said the mission would continue,” DeSantis said. “So Alligator Alcatraz is in fact, like we’ve always said, open for business.”

The Department of Homeland Security called Thursday’s ruling “a win for the American people, the rule of law and common sense.”

“This lawsuit was never about the environmental impacts of turning a developed airport into a detention facility,” DHS said in a statement. “It has and will always be about open-borders activists and judges trying to keep law enforcement from removing dangerous criminal aliens from our communities, full stop.”

Sad trombones for the open borders folks, who also do not want the illegals/fake asylum seekers near where they live.

Well, he’s telling us this, he’s telling us that, changing it everyday
Say’s it doesn’t matter
Bases are loaded and Casey’s at bat, playing it play by play
Time to change the batter

Bonus points if you know the song.

Read: Surprise: Wacko Judge Overruled By Appeals Court On Closing Alligator Alcatraz »

Pirate's Cove