…is a bathtub that wastes water which can never be replaced, you might just be a Warmist

Purple is a lot harder than you’d think. Anyhow, the blog of the day is Watts Up With That?, with a post on sea level rise
Read: If All You See… »
…is a bathtub that wastes water which can never be replaced, you might just be a Warmist

Purple is a lot harder than you’d think. Anyhow, the blog of the day is Watts Up With That?, with a post on sea level rise
Read: If All You See… »
Putting Hillary’s apology statement at the top
(Politico) The anti-Islam video that sparked protests in Libya and Egypt is “disgusting and reprehensible,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Thursday, but it’s no reason for violence.
“Let me state very clearly — and I hope it is obvious — that the United States government had absolutely nothing to do with this video. We absolutely reject its content and message. America’s commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation,” Clinton said at the State Department, as she held a pre-scheduled meeting with Moroccan leaders.
The apology tour continues. Quite frankly, I’m so angry about the continued apologies and denigration of Free Speech by the Obama administration that I can’t think of what to write about this.
So as I’m sitting on standby @foxnews, I heard Hillary express regret…that our govt can’t stop the exercise of free speech here at home.
— Monica Crowley (@MonicaCrowley) September 13, 2012
She did say that “violence in response to a speech is not acceptable”, true, but to slam people engaging in free speech is despicable. Here’s the video, via Mediaite
It would seem that the purpose of the film in question, she said, is simply to “denigrate a great religion and provoke rage.â€
And Islamists are more than happy to oblige.
Original post under the fold, along with tons of links
The Obama Doctrine on display
(Press TV) Following protests in Cairo and Libya Tuesday, where a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans were murdered, hundreds of Muslims gathered outside the U.S. consulate in Morocco’s largest city Casablanca to protest an anti-Muslim film that reportedly disrespects the prophet Mohammad, according to an AFP report.
As many as 400 protesters crowded along the consulate walls and chanted anti-U.S. statements, including “Death to Obama!” At the time of this report, there had been no reports of violence and the protests were being monitored by a heavy police presence.
Via Steven Goddard, who also writes about Progressive amendments to the 1st Amendment
2012 amendments
- Doubting global warming is prohibited
- Saying anything which might insult a Muslim is prohibited
- Criticizing Obama is a racist hate crime
- Religions other than Islam are prohibited in schools
- Muslims don’t have to abide by any of the other laws of the United States
Sadly, that’s very true. And then there’s this
(Yahoo News) President Barack Obama says the U.S. would not consider Egypt an ally, “but we don’t consider them an enemy.”
Obama said in an interview with the Spanish-language network Telemundo that Egypt is a “new government that is trying to find its way.” And he warned that if the Egyptian government takes actions showing “they’re not taking responsibility,” then it would “be a real big problem.”
Via DrewM, who writes
What world does Obama live in that he thinks Egypt is some sort of never-never land between ally and enemy? Egypt is too big, too strategically located to be left to drift. I can’t think of another major country that would fit this definition. China perhaps but they’ve gone from being an enemy (the Korean War) to something less than a friend or hot enemy. But that’s progress in the right direction. Downgrading Egypt is a major foreign policy hit and one with potentially catastrophic consequences (war with Israel, the Suez Canal, intelligence sharing, etc).
Wasn’t Joe Biden brought on as VP in order to provide foreign policy advice? Maybe Joe was right about the presidency not lending itself to on the job training? And Hillary said that Obama wasn’t ready for the 3am call. She seems to be right.
Unshockingly, one liberal thinks “Sam Bacile” should be arrested. Twitchy destroyed her line of reasoning yesterday.
And American flags burned in Tunisia and Gaza City. Then there’s this from same article
The US prosecutor-general said on Wednesday that four people were being questioned after Tuesday’s events.
Nine Coptic Egyptian-Americans were also put on an airport watch list. They are believed to have contributed to the production of the anti-Islam film that led to the embassy protest.
Is that suggesting that the US put these people on the airport watch list over exercising their 1st Amendment Rights?
Out of time, off to work.
Read: Moroccan’s Chant “Death To America” – Hillary Calls Video “Reprehensible” »
The recession officially ended in July 2009. A few years later, the US has had 43 months of 8%+ unemployment, real wages and savings are down, GDP resembles a 2nd world nation, people are abandoning the jobs market in record numbers, personal debt is high, and the US debt is now over $16 trillion. People do not feel that the recession ever ended
(Fox News) Less than two months before Election Day, most likely voters think the country is still in a recession, and a majority thinks the economy will improve faster if the country changes course rather than stays the course.
That’s according to a Fox News poll released Wednesday.
Fully 80 percent of likely voters believe the recession continues — that includes 44 percent who think things are nevertheless getting better and 36 percent who say things could get worse.
Eighteen percent of voters think the recession is over, but that includes 10 percent who think another could be coming. Â All in all, eight percent of voters believe the recession is over and the economy is recovering.
Don’t worry, though, because “the private sector is doing fine.” The one you didn’t build
Meanwhile, by a 55-33 percent margin, likely voters say — regardless of which candidate wins the election — the economy will rebound faster if we “change course†rather than “stay on our current course.â€
Not surprisingly, 93 percent of those who want to stay the course back President Obama in this year’s presidential election. Of those who say the country needs to change course, 73 percent support Mitt Romney.
Almost all Republicans (91 percent), over half of independents (53 percent) as well as a quarter of Democrats (25 percent) think the economy will recover faster by changing course.
I’m amazed that the numbers aren’t higher in favor of changing course. After 4 years of Obamanomics, it’s quite clear that Obama’s polices, along with those of his Democrat compatriots, have failed miserably.
The American people have a choice come November 6th: continue on this path of malaise or vote to try something different. Unfortunately, there are a ton of people who are beholden to the government for their livelihood and lives.
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years.†― Alexis de Tocqueville
Read: Most Voters Think Economy Will Improve If We “Change Course” »
…is a world that has been turned into a desert because someone charged their iPhone, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Lonely Conservative, with a post on HHS defining “full time”.
Read: If All You See… »
Marc Morano at Climate Depot raises a toast to this
(The Hill) An Environmental Protection Agency official said during a Tuesday hearing that a House Republican-sponsored bill would “cripple†the agency’s ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on Energy and Power hearing discussed a bill (H.R. 4255) that would eliminate EPA’s ability to offer financial assistance for international greenhouse gas reduction activities.
It’s not a large sum of money, “just” $140 million since 2001 (that we officially know about), but why should we spend money around the world to deal with hotcoldwetdry? We shouldn’t be spending it here, either.
“The EPA believes that HR 4255 will cripple the agency’s ability through grants to address harmful air pollutants that affect both the global and domestic environment,†Hooks said in written testimony. “Air pollution from overseas sources represents a growing problem for public health globally and here in the United States.â€
Yeah, we should do away with that dastardly Carbon Dioxide which is …. necessary for life on Earth.
Read: GOP Bill Would “Cripple Global Hotcoldwetdry Efforts” »
Most know I’m no longer a big fan of Sarah Palin, but, she mostly makes sense during an interview with Bill O’Reilly
(CNS News) “We’re not explaining to the rest of America, who thinks that they’re going to get a bunch of free stuff from Obama, that you have a choice. You either get free stuff or you get freedom. You cannot have both, and you need to make a choice.
“And if we could explain and get that message through to people that there is no such thing as a free lunch — and that we are an insolvent nation when you consider us being $16 trillion in debt, we’re broke. We can’t keep continuing down this path.”
Of course, the problem with this is that a lot of people (read: Liberals) like free stuff, ie, other people being taxed heavily so that Liberals can get stuff they didn’t work for, and are willing to give up freedom to get the free stuff. These are called “moochers”, and that’s who the Democrat Party mostly represents.
If the party can’t light a fire under its base — “and get them convinced that Barack Obama’s lack of a plan to get us out of these economically woeful times — if you can’t get your message through that filter of the media, then we’re in a world of hurt.”
On this I have to disagree: it’s not the base which is the problem, it’s getting the message through to the Independents and squishy Republicans and Democrats who can switch their votes.
(Mediaite) Then speaking more specifically about campaign strategy, O’Reilly questioned whether Romney should go after President Barack Obama “in a more personal way.†Whether he should use “buzz words†like “incompetent,†“dangerous†and “socialist.†Palin argued those aren’t buzz words — they’re the truth. And yes, he should: “He needs to be severely aggressive in his articulation.â€
Well, Mitt is sort of going after Obama in that manner, and the race card is pulled for ever attack, such as the “Obama Isn’t Working” one. Mitt has tried to portray himself as the adult in the room, interested more in Getting Things Done rather than play petty political games. But, his campaign is going to have to get a bit nastier, because you know that Team Obama will. Half of what Team O has offered has been direct personal attacks.
Video below the fold
Breaking news, it wasn’t just our ambassador to Libya who was killed yesterday (see previous post)
(Fox News) The U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other American staff members were killed Tuesday in an attack on the U.S. consulate in the Libyan city of Benghazi, the White House confirmed. President Obama, in a written statement issued Wednesday morning, called the attack “outrageous” and “senseless.”
Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was killed Tuesday night when he and a group of embassy employees went to the consulate to try to evacuate staff. The protesters, angry over a film that ridiculed Islam’s Prophet Muhammad, were firing gunshots and rocket-propelled grenades.
The State Department identified one of the other three Americans killed as Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith, a husband and father of two who had worked for the State Department for 10 years. The U.S. government is still notifying the next of kin for the other two individuals killed, and has not identified them.
Embassies around the world (read: in the Muslim world) have been put on notice to be on guard against further violence.
I’m confident all the Islamist apologistas will be out in full force (ones like The Atlantic’s Max Fisher), blaming America and attempting to paint Christians as exactly the same, yet, can anyone point towards Christians storming buildings, setting them on fire, and killing people? No one ever seems to be concerned about offending Christians and Jews, partly because …… Christians and Jews won’t go bat guano insane and riot, burn, and kill. And, about that video
A spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood, the mainstream Islamist group and the sponsor of Egypt’s first elected president, Mohamed Morsi, urged the United States government on Tuesday to prosecute the “madmen†behind the video, according to the English-language Web site of the state newspaper, Al Ahram.
The spokesman asked for a formal apology from the United States government and warned that events like the video were damaging Washington’s relations with the Muslim world. He also emphasized that any protests should remain peaceful and respect property.
Sorry, bub, but we have a thing called freedom of speech here in the US, and do not prosecute people for offending Muslims and denigrating Mohammed…..actually, under the crazy “hate crimes” laws, that could actually happen.
More: I listened to Hillary Clinton’s statement earlier, and some of it was just plain aberrant
(Mediaite) “This is an attack that should shock the conscience of people of all faiths around the world,†said Clinton. “We condemn in the strongest terms this senseless act of violence and we send our prayers to the families, friends and colleagues of those we’ve lost.â€
Um, why should it shock Christians, Jews, etc? This was being done in the name of Mohammed.
“This is not easy,†said Clinton. “Today, many Americans are asking – indeed, I asked myself – how could this happen? How could this happen in a country we helped liberate in a city we helped save from destruction?â€
Anyone else get the feeling she’s somewhat blaming the US? Anyhow, we kinda know the answer, and that it involves al Qaeda/hardcore Islamist front groups getting heavily involved with the Libyan rebels, much like in many other “Arab Spring” countries.
Oh, and the US embassy in Cairo was defaced with pro-Osama graffiti.
DrewM at Ace of Spades:
Compare that with Obama who said in part…
Appearing with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton in the White House Rose Garden, Obama said: “We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others, but there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal attacks.â€The President of the United States of America should not “reject” a citizens right to speak however he or she wants even (or especially) if it offends someone. A President who prioritizes the feelings of foreigners over a strong, unequivocal defense of an American citizen’s exercise of our fundamental freedom is unfit for office. (snip)
Naturally, the maker of the film that is the supposed flash point of this exercise in outrage is in hiding. Obama had no kind words of support for him.
Naturally, Outside The Beltway goes full on RDS (Romney Derangement Syndrome). I’m having a hard time differentiating OTB from Little Green Footballs, The Democrats Underground, Daily Kos, etc.
Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.
Read: Four Americans Killed In Embassy Attack In Libya – Clinton Statement Added »
Good thing our efforts in Egypt have worked
(CNN) Angry protesters climbed the walls of the U.S. Embassy in Cairo on Tuesday and tore down the American flag, apparently in protest of a film thought to insult the Prophet Mohammed.
A volley of warning shots were fired as a large crowd gathered around the compound, said CNN producer Mohammed Fahmy, who was on the scene, though it is not clear who fired the shots.
The Jawa Report thinks they have a copy of the video, and you should probably download it before Youtube goes all squishy (as usual) and bans it. Anyhow, the “protesters” hung a flag
The black flag, which hangs atop a ladder inside the compound, is adorned with white characters that read, “There is no God but Allah and Mohammad is his messenger,” an emblem often used in al Qaeda propaganda.
But, wait, it gets better! This comes from the US Embassy in Cairo
The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy. Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others
And on Twitter
We condemn the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims
— US Embassy Cairo (@USEmbassyCairo) September 11, 2012
It’s cool, though, to treat women like garbage, hang gays, threaten Jews and Christians, assault Coptics…..Can’t have feeeeeewings be hurt
We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others.
— US Embassy Cairo (@USEmbassyCairo) September 11, 2012
In other words, screw your free speech, a radical Islamist’s feeling might get hurt
3) Sorry, but neither breaches of our compound or angry messages will dissuade us from defending freedom of speech AND criticizing bigotry
— U.S. Embassy Cairo (@USEmbassyCairo) September 11, 2012
And that’s why the radicals win, because people like these State Dept. weenies refuse to see.
Others discussing: The Gateway Pundit, Washington Free Beacon, Israel Matzav, The PJ Tatler, Le·gal In·sur·rec· tion, American Spectator, Blazing Cat Fur, Tablet Magazine, Weasel Zippers , Hot Air
More: The Other McCain points out that a mob of mostly non-radical Islamists set fire to a US Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
Doug Ross: “Another completely predictable result of The Obama Doctrine: ever-increasing chaos in the Middle East.”
Wednesday morning update: Those first two tweets have since been deleted (hence the missing icons) after the State Department disavowed the tweets. And then Hillary Clinton put out this statement which pretty much confirms the tone and content of the tweets
Press Statement
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
September 11, 2012I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.
This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.
Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.
In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.
Which is rather strange, since Liberals and the State Dept. rarely have a problem when Christian and Jews religious beliefs are denigrated.
And over in Libya, our Ambassador was killed.