…is a flooded world from the potential for bombing Syria, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Director Blue, with a post on Obama’s “economic recovery”
Read: If All You See… »
…is a flooded world from the potential for bombing Syria, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Director Blue, with a post on Obama’s “economic recovery”
Read: If All You See… »
Well, it’s obviously because you used hair spray, putting out greenhouse gases and causing all the man-induced warmth to make it cooler
(UK Daily Mail) A leaked copy of the world’s most authoritative climate study reveals scientific forecasts of imminent doom were drastically wrong.
The Mail on Sunday has obtained the final draft of a report to be published later this month by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the ultimate watchdog whose massive, six-yearly ‘assessments’ are accepted by environmentalists, politicians and experts as the gospel of climate science.
Yet the leaked report makes the extraordinary concession that the world has been warming at only just over half the rate claimed by the IPCC in its last assessment, published in 2007. (snip)
Back then, it said that the planet was warming at a rate of 0.2C every decade – a figure it claimed was in line with the forecasts made by computer climate models.
But the new report says the true figure since 1951 has been only 0.12C per decade – a rate far below even the lowest computer prediction.
36 out of 38 “computer models” have failed to predict the actual temperature rise, and certainly didn’t predict the current 15+ year pause. Now we find that the rate of warming is far below what they prognosticated. But, I bet when they actually release the report there will be lots of PR campaigns which will tell us just how dooooooomed we are around 2100.
They admit large parts of the world were as warm as they are now for decades at a time between 950 and 1250 AD – centuries before the Industrial Revolution, and when the population and CO2 levels were both much lower.
Well, obviously that’s because Mankind was going to invent the fossil fueled combustion engine in the future.
The IPCC admits that while computer models forecast a decline in Antarctic sea ice, it has actually grown to a new record high. Again, the IPCC cannot say why.
I’m sure they’ll figure out a way to Blame Mankind shortly.
A forecast in the 2007 report that hurricanes would become more intense has simply been dropped, without mention.
Actually, the 2007 report claimed that hurricane activity would look more like 2005, with lots and lots of hurricanes of all sizes striking land. It was not long after that Warmists switched to the “there won’t be more, but the few that will happen will be more intense” talking point.
Starting a week tomorrow, about 40 of the 250 authors who contributed to the report – and supposedly produced a definitive scientific consensus – will hold a four-day meeting in Stockholm, together with representatives of most of the 195 governments that fund the IPCC, established in 1998 by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
So, Warmists and the IPCC like to mostly blame fossil fuels for the miniscule warming, yet are all certainly taking fossil fueled travel to Stockholm? Do as I say, not as I do.
Make sure you read the entire article, way too much to excerpt, including the death threats the Mail On Sunday’s reporter David Rose has received for daring to publish The Truth.
Read: Bummer: IPCC Report Claims Warming Is Half Of What They Previously Said »
And not only do they care, they want to know all the details. We already know that Los Federales want to know about so many other things in your life, like whether you’re enjoying your 2nd Amendment Rights (not mandatory, but the Feds recommend asking), every single bit of financial information, and other bits of your life, and this data will surely be shared across multiple federal and state agencies. And, can we really trust the IRS to not Do Something with the data it collects? Here’s something else they want (via Drudge, which features the below photo)
(NY Post) ‘Are you sexually active? If so, with one partner, multiple partners or same-sex partners?â€
Be ready to answer those questions and more the next time you go to the doctor, whether it’s the dermatologist or the cardiologist and no matter if the questions are unrelated to why you’re seeking medical help. And you can thank the Obama health law.
“This is nasty business,†says New York cardiologist Dr. Adam Budzikowski. He called the sex questions “insensitive, stupid and very intrusive.†He couldn’t think of an occasion when a cardiologist would need such information — but he knows he’ll be pushed to ask for it.
The president’s “reforms†aim to turn doctors into government agents, pressuring them financially to ask questions they consider inappropriate and unnecessary, and to violate their Hippocratic Oath to keep patients’ records confidential.
Medical centers will also be forced to ask questions about drug use, which, all together, aren’t necessarily questions some doctors may need to ask (consider your primary care giver), but this information will be shared with the Government using their one click upload of data, and medical offices can be fined if they do not share all this info about Medicaid and Medicare patients starting in 2015, and lose incentives if they do not share the info about all patients.
The government recommends you pay cash if you do not want this info in their hands. Who has cash in the Obameconomy?
Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.
There are all sorts of good reasons to not attack Syria. Canadian Warmists have found another
(Rabble…btw, you have to read their About page to understand how far left these nuts are) Syria. It’s about oil. Again.
It’s more complex than that, but as noted in the Guardian, the plans for an attack on Syria are “fueled by oil interests, not chemical weapon concern”. Obama, Harper, and other war proponents are quick to claim that a US-led war on Syria wouldn’t be another Iraq. But with an Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline plan in the balance, that’s precisely what it would be — the latest Western war waged against a Middle Eastern country to ensure control of the oil and gas in the region.
Hmm, oil, huh? Just like Libya? So, why are you Progressives out marching in the street against Obama? Or do you only do that against Republican presidents?
And while the hawks beat the oily drums of war once more, using a chemical attack in Syria as a pretext, little is said of the fact that a U.S.-led attack on Syria would be a attack on the entire world. This attack would release lethal quantities of CO2, an indiscriminate killer already known to cause at least 300,000 deaths every year, through an increasing amount of floods, droughts, hurricanes, heat waves, wildfires, and more.
By 2030, carbon-induced climate chaos could kill 500,000 annually.
The tragedy in Syria is an indisputably epic humanitarian disaster, with upwards of 100,000 killed in the civil war since 2011, 2 million refugees, and 4 million internally displaced. But launching even a “limited” bombing campaign in Syria would exacerbate the largest humanitarian disaster facing the world — climate chaos — while also claiming the lives of many Syrian civilians.
See? It’s so simple. To hell with the use of chemical weapons, hundreds of thousands killed, freedom from tyranny, any noble causes (hey, didn’t Barack just say some about reconciling “your belief in freedom and dignity for all people” for the Left just 5 days ago?), any military action could release some CO2, an “indiscriminate killer”, lethal, ya know, causing weather. And chaos. And, hey, possibly even a really cold winter. I bet it’s the reason I forgot to by Powerball tickets last night, too.
Read: An Attack On Syria Would Be An Attack On The Entire World…Cause Of CO2 »
…is the destruction of the works of man from a rising sea, you might just be a Warmist

The Blog of the day is Just One Minute, with a post on Obama accommodating our enemies.
Read: If All You See… »

Happy Sunday! Another gorgeous day in the Once And Future Nation Of America. Pinups have been a bit tame as of late, needed something that really pops today. Why? Why not? Not a clue who this pinup is by.
What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15
As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets†calendar yet? And don’t forget to check outwhat I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts
Note: I’m on the road today, left early, so only including links up by 10pm Saturday night. Anything with an asterisk or a “last week’s” is last week’s. In some cases, I guessed what the Sunday URL might be. I’ll try and update in the evening. Otherwise, click the link and then head to the home page and poke around. PS: other posts you see during the day were written last night.
Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.
The posts do take a long time, so, if you want to send me your links for Rule 5 babeage or links, use ye olde email in the header bar (remove the NOSPAM part). Preferably, create the html link so I can copy and paste how you want it to read.
Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »
Seriously, folks, what could possibly go wrong?
(Washington Examiner) Consumer Financial Protection Bureau officials are seeking to monitor four out of every five U.S. consumer credit card transactions this year — up to 42 billion transactions – through a controversial data-mining program, according to documents obtained by the Washington Examiner.
A CFPB strategic planning document for fiscal years 2013-17 describes the “markets monitoring†program through which officials aim to monitor 80 percent of all credit card transactions in 2013.
This apparently severely violates the scope of what is allowed under Dodd-Frank which created the CFPB, not too mention the possibility for all sorts of issues, depending on how much data they collect. Will they see the CC numbers, expiration data, and CV code? Will they track what people are purchasing? What will they do with the data?
But the hearing was dominated by charges of an agency operating beyond its legal authority, rife with conflicts of interest, and mismanagement.
Hensarling opened the hearing by noting that CFPB “is designed to operate outside the usual system of checks and balances that applies to every other government agency.â€
Wait, a government agency acting in this manner? Who woulda thunk it? Don’t you feel better about your CC info in their hands?
Read: Good News: CFPB Will Only Monitor 80% Of Credit Card Transactions »
…is an evil fossil fueled vehicle that is even worse because it is old, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Gateway Pundit, with a post on Democrats destroying a 9/11 memorial.
Read: If All You See… »