Yes, Obama Did Refer To Climate Change Opponents As Deniers

By William Teach June 15, 2014 – 7:11 pm

A follow up to this mornings post regarding Obama’s silly commencement speech, where CNN had stated that Obama referred to skeptics as “deniers” (I refused to listen to the video), but failed to include any supporting quotes. Nor did I find anything on the ‘net to bring it up. However, perusing Bishop Hill’s blog, I noticed in the comments that BH has linked to a comment on Watts Up With That? by Roger Sowell that has the full transcript, which includes

The climate change deniers suggest there’s still a debate over the science. There is not. The talking heads on cable news suggest public opinion is hopelessly deadlocked. It is not. Seven in ten Americans say global warming is a serious problem. Seven in ten say the federal government should limit pollution from our power plants. And of all the issues in a recent poll asking Americans where we think we can make a difference, protecting the environment came out on top. (Applause.)

Warmists started using the term “denier” in order to equate climate skeptics with Holocaust deniers. It’s a despicable use of terminology meant to shut down debate and denigrate opponents.

Bishop had also noted in his post

I would have thought that someone who was trying to deal with an existential crisis would have been moving heaven and earth to unite people rather than divide them. Using fallacy – and abusive fallacy to boot – makes him look more like someone who sees global warming as a useful wedge issue than someone who really thinks he is trying to save the planet.

But, that’s Obama’s way on pretty much everything.

Read: Yes, Obama Did Refer To Climate Change Opponents As Deniers »

Posted in Barry Obama, Global Warming | 6 Comments | Trackback URL

Masking Real Environmental Issues With “Climate Change”

By William Teach June 15, 2014 – 2:55 pm

I’ve mentioned many times that one of the things about the “climate change” movement is that it takes real, and sometimes very serious, environmental issues, and places them under the banner of “climate change”, when they have really nothing to do with CC and would be best off standing on their own. Here we go again

(Slate) When all seems lost, sometimes all there’s left to do is laugh.

Last month, 487 artists from 72 countries submitted 1,063 drawings to compete for the Niels Bugge Cartoon Award, an international competition aimed at drawing attention to environmental issues. Their combined perspective (how often do you get to see political cartoons from Iran, Serbia, and Brazil side-by-side?) is a powerful reminder that we’re all dreading the next news of the painful state of our planet’s health together.

A quaint Danish hotel named for a 14th-century knight organized the competition, which is now in its second year and is billed modestly as the “World Cup of satirical cartoons.” This year’s theme, “the oceans are in our hands,” focused on climate change. The jury is composed of nine, mostly European, cartoonists, and the competition is sanctioned by the Federation of Cartoonists Organizations. After the Prophet Muhammad cartoon controversy in 2006, FECO organized a competition called “Make Humor Not War.”

Here’s the lead drawing

Read: Masking Real Environmental Issues With “Climate Change” »

Posted in Environment, Global Warming | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach June 15, 2014 – 1:00 pm

…is a horrible fossil fueled vehicle which should be banned for Everyone Else, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Camp Of The Saints, with a post wondering if American society is too stupid to survive.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

By William Teach June 15, 2014 – 8:47 am

Happy Sunday! Another gorgeous day in the Once And Future Nation of America. This pinup is by Henning Ludivgsen, no help needed, a bit of belated cheesecake for Flag Day. And a Happy Father’s Day to all.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Raised On Hoecakes discusses asset forfeiture
  2. Moonbattery notes what happens with increased gun sales
  3. Legal Insurrection brings up a wonderful Biden quote regarding Obama and Iraq
  4. House Of Eratosthenes brings up victimhood
  5. Grumpy Patriot wonders if we’re still the greatest country in the world
  6. Flopping Aces discusses employee of the month in Obama’s America
  7. Director Blue notes 10 things Dave Camp should be doing right now regarding “lost” emails
  8. American Power covers liberals going racial on Scott Walker
  9. Allen B. West notes the proper use of the 2nd Amendment
  10. Zilla says Obama is really a war surrenderer
  11. Independent Sentinel notes that gun grabbers have been busy
  12. Weasel Zippers notes how the DNC celebrates flag day (oops)
  13. Victory Girls Blog wants you to meet one of the guys Obama released
  14. The Last Refuge has more insane government tyranny
  15. And last, but not least Real Science says the EPA is wrong about the 2014 winter

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Posted in Patriotic Pinup | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

Man Takes Long Fossil Fueled Flight, Lots Of FF Vehicles To Complain About “Climate Change”

By William Teach June 15, 2014 – 8:16 am

I noted yesterday that (NMP) Obama was going to mention “climate change” during his UC Irvine commencement speech. I probably should have anticipated that he would go off the reservation and go hyper-partisan on the issue, attacking, denigrating, and insulting Skeptics. Because that’s what he constantly does, regardless of the issue. Basically, he’s an asshole (Donald Douglas has video, if you can take it)

(CNN) Describing lawmakers and pundits who deny manmade climate change as a “fairly serious threat to everybody’s future,” President Obama on Saturday called for less debate and more action in combating warming trends.

Delivering the address at University of California Irvine’s commencement, Obama underscored the view of some scientists that the effects of climate change are already being felt nationwide and said he was allocating new funds for communities recovering from natural disasters.

Says the man who took a cross-country fossil fueled trip, followed by a giant convoy of fossil fueled vehicles, speech, then back in the convoy, then off to Palm Springs, which uses a tremendous amount of water to keep the golf course in shape, a massive use of water that Warmists tell us is bad for climate change.

Speaking at Angel Stadium in Anaheim, Obama compared the scientific problem of curbing climate change to that of putting a man on the moon. And while skeptics in the 1960s may have made a case against the mission, Obama said he couldn’t remember “saying the moon wasn’t there, or that it was made of cheese.”

Funny thing is, most of the moon landing skeptics were lefties. Regardless, ask yourself, “is it appropriate for the POTUS to insult a good chunk of the American population in this manner?” Warmists, if it was a Republican president making nasty remarks about you, what would you think?

(Daily Caller) “Since this is a very educated group, you already know the science [on climate change],” Obama told the crowd of nearly 8,000 graduates, gathered at Angel Stadium on Saturday.

“The 18 warmest years on record have all happened since you graduates were born,” said Obama, who cited fires in Western states, smaller snow packs in mountainous tourist areas, and flooding streets in cities like Miami to make his case about the fallout from climate change.

Yet, wildfire activity has been decreasing. Any reduced snow pack and flooding is entirely consistent with natural causation. Oh, and

That’s science. Obama simply gave the graduates the same type of speech, which included other talking points on other subjects, which he would give while on the campaign stump. This was not presidential in the least. This is why I refer to him as Not My President (NMP). He doesn’t represent me. He doesn’t give a damn about me as an American citizen. He constantly insults me and fellow conservatives and Skeptics in a personal manner

(Bloomberg) Republicans were more open to the idea “before the Tea Party decided it was a massive threat to freedom and liberty,” he said, referring to the small-government political movement.

So, a nasty shot at Tea Party members, who are American citizens. He also spent time mocking Republican members of Congress, because the best way to get people to work on your agenda is to denigrate them.

(NY Times) Mr. Obama’s remarks came during a four-day visit to the West Coast that has been shadowed by the crisis in Iraq. The White House said the president spoke by phone with his national security adviser, Susan E. Rice, on Friday evening and Saturday morning. Ms. Rice and other aides were meeting in Washington to develop military options for Mr. Obama.

Determined not to let the crisis paralyze his trip, Mr. Obama kept the focus firmly on climate change Saturday. This month he announced regulations that would cut carbon-dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants 30 percent from 2005 levels by 2030.

Yeah, why let dealing with a crisis and doing the Job Of President get in the way of attending several fundraisers, at least one of which was $32,500 a plate, insulting American citizens, and playing golf?

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Man Takes Long Fossil Fueled Flight, Lots Of FF Vehicles To Complain About “Climate Change” »

Posted in Barry Obama, Climahypocrites, Global Warming, Unhinged Tools | 5 Comments | Trackback URL

State Dept. “Concerned” Over Russian Tanks Crossing Into Ukraine

By William Teach June 14, 2014 – 2:54 pm

Remember this tweet from a post yesterday?

https://twitter.com/brooks_rosa/statuses/477255213640728577

Uh huh

(The Hill) Russia has supplied Ukrainian separatists with tanks, rocket launchers and other military vehicles, the State Department said Friday.

A convoy of three Russian tanks crossed the border near the Ukrainian town of Snizhne, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said Friday.

U.S. intelligence also indicates that “several” BM-21 or Grad multiple rocket launchers and other military vehicles were deployed from Russia.

“This is unacceptable,” Harf said, adding that the U.S. was “highly concerned.”

“We call on Russia to use this opportunity to demonstrate its commitment to peace, to stop weapons and fighters from crossing into Ukraine, and to cooperate with Ukraine in the peace plan’s implementation,” Harf said. “A failure by Russia to de-escalate the situation will lead to additional costs.”

Next comes “Mmm. Whatever”.

Read: State Dept. “Concerned” Over Russian Tanks Crossing Into Ukraine »

Posted in Current Affairs | 7 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach June 14, 2014 – 1:00 pm

…is a flooded world because Someone Else refused to buy local, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Theodore’s World, with a post on our idiot Israeli ambassador.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Obama To Call On College Grads To Do Something About Hotcoldwetdry

By William Teach June 14, 2014 – 10:00 am

Hey, why not, they have nothing else to do, considering how poor their job prospects are. And considering how many kids are graduating with essentially worthless degrees

(ABC News) President Barack Obama is encouraging college graduates to keep up the fight against climate change.

The president is expected to issue a call to action on global warming in a commencement address Saturday at the University of California, Irvine. Earlier this month, he announced a contentious plan to cut pollution from power plants.

Obama also plans to raise money for the Democratic National Committee at a closed-door fundraiser at a private home in Orange County.

He’s spending the rest of the Father’s Day weekend at the Rancho Mirage home of White House decorator Michael Smith and his partner, U.S. Ambassador to Spain James Costos.

Oh, OK. A campaign speech about “climate change” after taking lots of fossil fueled air and vehicle trips, followed by fundraising, then spending time without his kids. And don’t forget about golf! Fortunately, since most of the air travel on AF1 to California is considered official, he won’t have to reimburse the taxpayers for what is essentially a personal/fundraising trip.

Read: Obama To Call On College Grads To Do Something About Hotcoldwetdry »

Posted in Barry Obama, Climahypocrites, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Anti-2nd Amendment Op-Ed: Why Aren’t We Doing Something About Gun Violence?

By William Teach June 14, 2014 – 7:35 am

A bit of insensitivity to start this Saturday morning, since the op-ed writers, Mark Barden and David Wheeler, both lost their sons to the Sandy Hook nutjob. Yet, if they are going to jump into the political realm in order to call for restrictions on our Constitutional Rights, and use Father’s Day as an excuse, there is every right to respond.

A Father’s Day gift for kids: Protect them from gun violence

This is the second Father’s Day we will have spent without our sons Daniel and Ben, who were murdered a year and a half ago at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. But unlike last Father’s Day, when we grieved quietly, passing the day in solemn remembrance with our families and surviving children, this Father’s Day we feel compelled to speak out.

What has changed since the Sandy Hook shooting? There have been 74 more school shootings, according to the group Everytown for Gun Safety, which tracks news of firearms being discharged at schools as a result of assaults, homicides, suicides and accidental firings. Seventy-four, including tragedies such as those just this month in Seattle and Troutdale, Ore. How could that number not make you outraged? Incensed? Incredulous? How is it that after our beautiful sons were murdered, along with 18 of their classmates and six brave adults, we have seen no major federal policy passed to address this problem? Why is it that we now see summer not as a time of celebration and vacation but as a relief from having to read about new school shootings because kids are no longer at school or on campus?

And now so many school shootings later, with so many families facing the same agony and pain we face this Father’s Day, we have to ask a question. (snip)

Our question is the same (as Obama’s): Why aren’t we doing something about this?

First off, let’s consider how many of those shootings were suicide and gang violence. Nor had anything really to do with schools. Nor injuries. And were even caused by knives. Nor occurred on school property nor during school hours.

Getting beyond that, it should be noted that they did try to Do Something: they made schools gun free zones. How’s that working out? About the same as with liberal cities with heavy gun restrictions. Los Angeles, Chicago, Detroit, New Orleans, and NY City are among those with the most gun violence. Gun violence in states tends to be driven by the urbanized areas, which tend to lean and vote Democrat, and have the most gun restrictions.

A better question to ask would be: why aren’t heavy gun restrictions and gun free zones working?

Another would be: why are anti-gun forces focusing on legal citizen ownership instead of criminals?

Read: Anti-2nd Amendment Op-Ed: Why Aren’t We Doing Something About Gun Violence? »

Posted in 2nd Amendment | 10 Comments | Trackback URL

Say, Was Biden Right About Sectarian Conflict In Iraq?

By William Teach June 14, 2014 – 6:55 am

He might very well have been. It only took 8 years and a different President

(Politico) The advance of Islamic militants across Iraq has brought fresh criticism for the Obama administration — but may also deliver a grim measure of vindication to one very prominent White House official: Vice President Joe Biden.

In recent months, former officials and pundits questioned and even ridiculed Biden’s foreign policy acumen.

Former Defense Secretary Bob Gates wrote in his memoir that Biden “was wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue of the past four decades.” (snip)

This week paints Biden’s judgment in a far different light.

Recent events in Iraq call attention to his prediction nearly a decade ago that the war-torn nation was heading towards a break-up along sectarian lines — and to a prescription he offered to try to manage that reality by granting Sunnis, Shia and Kurds greater autonomy over various parts of the country.

In other words: while Biden may have taken a beating repeatedly in recent years for some foreign policy calls he’s made, his judgment on Iraq’s capacity to stay one country now looks almost prescient.

“Some will say moving toward strong regionalism would ignite sectarian cleansing. But that’s exactly what is going on already, in ever-bigger waves,” Biden wrote in a 2006 New York Times op-ed he co-authored. “Others will argue that it would lead to partition. But a breakup is already under way. As it was in Bosnia, a strong federal system is a viable means to prevent both perils in Iraq.”

We’ll never know if the idea of splitting Iraq up into a federal republic (funny how Biden doesn’t seem to think our federal republic is great, since he serves the Democrat Party and a president who seems to despise anything other than naked federal executive power). A few Republicans and Democrats also were pushing that plan, as well, including early in the war. When it comes to sectarian conflict, let’s remember a few things. First, much of that, by the time 2006 rolled around a goodly chunk of the violence was being fueled by outside forces which were streaming in to Iraq and/or meddling. Al Qaeda and other Islamic extremist/terrorist groups. Islamists from around the world were in Iraq fighting. Iran and Syria were meddling. The Bush plan was not working, and failed to stop the influx of foreign fighters. Then they wen t with the Surge. Democrats will proclaim that it did not work, and they would be wrong. The Surge allowed more political reconciliation, reducing conflict.

What Biden was 100% correct on was when he said “The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training”. Iraq has been Barack Obama’s since January 20, 2008, when he assumed the Office of the Presidency. At that point, George W. Bush had no control over US policy in Iraq. What has happened in the 5+ years since is partly the result of Obama’s poor foreign policy. Obviously, we cannot simply Blame Obama for everything. Bush still bears some blame, and we cannot forget about the role that the Iraqi government has played. Nor the role that hardcore Islamists have played. But, as the saying went while Bush was president and it was learned how much occurred in setting up the September 11th attacks during the Clinton years “who’s president now?” It’s not like the rest of Obama’s Middle East policies (among other foreign policy) has worked particularly well.

And a Joe Biden prediction from 8 years ago and two presidential elections has only come to fruition thanks to the guy he works for. But, is hardcore terrorism really “sectarian conflict”?

Of course, you know what’s really important?

(Newsbusters) As city after city in northern Iraq falls to deadly Islamist extremist militias pressing onward to Baghdad, questions are now being raised about the wisdom of the United States’ swift exit from the Middle East nation just a couple of years ago at the direction of President Obama. But leave it to MSNBC to preemptively shut down any criticism of the White House.

On the June 12 edition of NewsNation, host Tamron Hall had several foreign policy experts on to analyze the chaos in Iraq specifically and the Middle East more generally. Towards the end of the conversation, Hall felt the need to defend attacks against Obama from the right [MP3 audio here; video below]:

Well, of course. Democrats are great at casting blame, but not particularly good at accepting it.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Say, Was Biden Right About Sectarian Conflict In Iraq? »

Posted in Barry Obama, Democrats, Joe Biden | 3 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove