…is the flag of the world’s most evil carbon polluting nations, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Black & Right, with a post on finding WMD in Iraq that supposedly didn’t exist.
Read: If All You See… »
…is the flag of the world’s most evil carbon polluting nations, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Black & Right, with a post on finding WMD in Iraq that supposedly didn’t exist.
Read: If All You See… »
Says the guy
Here we go
WASHINGTON (CBS DC) – Former Vice President Al Gore compared the civil rights movement to the fight against climate change while speaking to graduates at Princeton University on class day.
Gore explained that before a change can happen, American society must agree that there is a problem to begin with. The Democrat recalled a moment during his childhood in the South where a friend made a racist remark and his other friends were quick to tell the kid to “shut up.†They informed him that his way of thinking was no longer acceptable.
He then went on to explain that progress can be made for climate change through changing the discussion, much like the civil rights movement.
“After the conversation was changed, the laws were changed,†Gore stated.
Changed with no thanks to his father and lots of other Democrats.
“It took some time, and the administration didn’t want to go along with that, but over time it was seen as the right thing to do,†Gore said. “So there will be a conversation, not only about divestment or the EPA’s announcement today, but about the future of human civilization, and I’m going to ask you to help win that conversation.â€
Well, Gore is certainly winning with all that oil money for selling Current TV, wouldn’t you say?
Read: Gore: Fighting Climate Change Like Civil Rights Movement »

I’ve been a bit remiss in mentioning this from the other day, Political Clown Parade offers up her 2nd Annual Paul Revere Award, and lists me with some great company. Make sure you head on over and pay a visit to all those listed.
Read: Political Clown Parade Offers 2nd Annual Paul Revere Awards »
Well, of course they do. They’re all about Someone Else bearing the burden for the insane policies of Liberals
(Avik Roy, Forbes) Over the past twelve months, there has been an energetic debate among health policy researchers about the extent to which Obamacare will increase the underlying cost of individually-purchased health insurance: what observers have come to call “rate shock.†Yesterday, the Manhattan Institute published the most comprehensive study yet on the topic, analyzing premium data from 3,137 U.S. counties, and finding an average rate hike of 49 percent. In response, left-wing bloggers are trying out a new talking point: that rate shock doesn’t matter, because taxpayer-funded subsidies will bear the higher costs.
There are a number of reasons why the underlying cost of health insurance matters. First: not everyone is eligible for subsidies. If your income is above 400 percent of the Federal Poverty Level, you don’t qualify. Second: subsidies don’t always make up for rate shock. If your premiums go up by $200, and Obamacare gives you a subsidy for $120, your premiums have still gone up by $80. Our interactive map explains the interaction of these factors for every U.S. state—just click on the “Who Qualifies?†and “Your Decision†tabs and see for yourself.
Third: subsidies aren’t free. They’re financed by taxes: not just taxes on “the rich,†whoever they are, but on average Americans. So if Obamacare increases the underlying cost of insurance, taxpayers are hit with a double whammy: higher insurance costs for themselves, and higher taxes to subsidize those costs for other people.
This reminds me (again) of one of the quotes of 2013 “Of course, I want people to have health care,†Vinson said. “I just didn’t realize I would be the one who was going to pay for it personally.â€
I’m struck by how contemptuous the left can be about these issues, especially given the moral obligation of government to spend taxpayer dollars in the most efficient possible manner
The loudest promoter of the “rate shock doesn’t matter because subsidies!†argument is Steve Benen, a blogger for MSNBC’s The Rachel Maddow Show. Benen described the Manhattan Institute analysis as “deceptive†because many people “are buying coverage subsidized through Obamacare.†It’s one thing to explain that subsidies will defray the cost of Obamacare-based plans for certain low-income people: they will. But it is economically obtuse for Benen to argue that studying the underlying cost of health insurance is “deceptive.†It’s especially remarkable given that Benen regularly contends that there is a vast “wonk gap†between the right and the left—in the left’s favor.
Mr. Roy also notes that apples and oranges talking point offered by liberals, whereby they claim that costs are totally different, because Ocare requirements mean more coverages. Yet, that breaks down, because the higher costs are a direct result of Ocare mandates, some of which are required by the law itself, some, such as the contraception mandate, were invented by Team Obama. And at the end of the day, real people are affected by the costs of Ocare. Virtually no one is saving $2,500 a year, as Obama and his Democrat minions promised. Most are paying more than they had been previously. Their premiums went up, and are expected to jump more this year. Their deductibles are sky high. Is it really health insurance if you cannot afford the deductible? How many lower middle class folks, forced by law to obtain insurance or pay a fine/fee/tax can afford an average deductible of $5,081?
Liberals think Everyone Else, not themselves, should pay for this boondoggle. Surprise.
Read: Liberals Proclaim Obamacare Rate Shock No Big Deal, Since Other People Pay For It »
Happy Friday! Care to read something unbelievably insane?
(Reuters) Immigration rights groups in a lawsuit filed on Wednesday accused Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio of overstepping his bounds as a local official by using anti-identity theft laws to target undocumented immigrants in workplace raids.
Puente Arizona, an immigrant rights groups, filed the lawsuit in federal court, along with two women who were arrested by Arpaio’s deputies last year and a local minister who contends the sheriff is squandering his tax dollars by conducting the operations.
The lawsuit represents the latest challenge by advocates for immigrants against Arpaio, the sheriff of Maricopa County who bills himself as “America’s Toughest Sheriff” and has become a divisive figure in the national immigration debate.
Arpaio is the only local law enforcement official in Arizona enforcing state laws that make it illegal for a person to use information belonging to someone else, such as a Social Security number, to obtain employment, said Dan Pochoda, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona, which is one of the groups representing the plaintiffs.
“We know from past experience that when the (Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office) gets into the business of immigration enforcement, it’s a recipe for discrimination and abuse,” Pochoda said in a statement.
Got that? He’s divisive for *gasp* enforcing immigration law. It’s a waste of taxpayer dollars for enforcing immigration law. And the kicker, he’s the only law enforcement official who’s concerned with stopping illegals from engaging in identity theft, a criminal act which costs American citizens huge amounts of money, both directly and indirectly, and can often cause significant problems in the personal lives of American citizens. I’m sure I do not need to explain the ins and outs and costs of identity theft.
The amazing thing here is that Sheriff Arpaio, who takes an oath to uphold the law, is not being lauded for doing his job, he is being slammed. One would think he was doing a Good Thing, and all the other sheriffs would be condemned. From the comments
Please tell me every single one of you reading this article had to double-back and read that again to make sure you’re not going crazy. Let’s get this straight, this man is being sued because he’s trying to prevent the illegal use of an American citizen’s Social Security number that could have dire effects on that person’s financial security and family’s welfare and the ACLU of Arizona feels he should be stopped from carrying out his duty to protect Americans. W T F????
And
So now the court is going to entertain a lawsuit for someone enforcing a law? And the justification is partially based on the fact that other law officials don’t enforce the law? What a can of worms that would open up for our lawyers to have whole new areas to frivolously pursue. Sure enforcing the law would result in primarily targeting illegal immigrants. That is the way they hide. But they are illegally here, breaking one law, and illegally using identity documentation, breaking another. Why have laws if we are not going to enforce them?
And
So we are now going after the people that up hold the law. And praising the that don’t. To the people that think it’s OK for these illegals to be here, talk to the thousands of people that have been harmed by these invaders to our country. they drive around no insurance, They kill people. they bring drugs into our country no problem, our president lets them go. He says there future votes for his party. Lets vote everyone out that ignores their duty to uphold the laws. And put in jail the ones that violate them.
Those are some of the top rated comments, each with hundreds and hundreds of likes. And, here’s one with 1.2K likes
I wonder which laws I can break, and then have everybody feel so sorry for my plight that Congress and the President will consider special action to make everything work out just fine for me?
Meanwhile, Drudge runs this nice wink shot (story here)

Crossed at Right Wing News.
More: The Lonely Conservative notes that the illegals are bringing all sorts of diseases with them. Furthermore, she notes that as the Border Patrol is dealing with the flood of kids and such, terrorists could flood across the border and get away with it. Lest you think that is absurd, law enforcement has already stopped and caught many Middle Eastern men and women with links to Islamic radical groups coming across the southern border.
Read: Illegal Alien Supporting Groups Sue Sheriff Arpaio For Following Law »
Hot on the heals of excuse #12, “lousy data“, Warmists trot out excuse #13
(The Hockey Schtick) A paper published today in Environmental Research Letters finds a new excuse [#13 by my count] for the 15+ year ‘pause’ or ‘hiatus’ of global warming:
“a coherent cooling pattern across the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes that has emerged in the recent 15 years and is not reproduced by the models. This regional inconsistency between models and observations might be a key to understanding the recent hiatus in global mean temperature warming.”
Thus, although warm extremes are getting warmer, cold nights in the N Hemisphere are getting colder, not warmer as predicted by global warming theory. How could increased CO2 cause “a coherent cooling pattern across the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes” over the past 15+ years? Inquiring minds want to know; according to the authors,
“precisely identifying the mechanisms behind the observed regional cooling patterns in extreme cold temperatures lies beyond the scope of this paper.”
Well, fortunately, Warmists will surely Blame Mankind for the cold nights getting colder because of “climate change”.

…is an ocean that will rise hundreds of feet and swamp their big beach vacation homes, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is protein wisdom, with a post on liberal fascism, which comes from this Powerline blog post, about “feminazis”, so, posting a photo of a hot woman is perfect!
Read: If All You See… »
Interesting opinion piece by James Lambard
Climate change is a protection racket
The mafioso, call him Guido, ran a protection racket.
The business model, simple: Give Guido money and your enterprise did not burn down nor have its windows broken. You continue to have the use of both legs. A basic, criminal, wealth transfer scheme. Replication, inevitable.
The new government-sponsored scam, climate change, bears striking similarities to Guido’s “thing.†While Guido operates in the shadows, climate change enjoys enthusiastic support from progressive media, radical environmentalists, politicians, and a large portion of a poorly informed and apathetic electorate. Yes, a basic, criminal, wealth transfer scheme. Replication, complete. (snip)
You get the point, threats of disaster leading to a massive wealth transfer through, carbon taxes, carbon credits (convertible to money and tradable) higher taxes on nearly everything, electricity rates “would necessarily skyrocket“ (Barack Obama), massive dislocations in standards of living, command and control by government, of nearly every aspect of life.
To whom do you suppose this massive resultant wealth transfer is designed to accrue? I am perhaps naïve, but I suspect Guido did well with his wealth transfer scheme. We must ask who this new Guido is. Guido, remember, was believable, not benevolent. Are we expecting benevolence from those who have now grasped and manipulate the levers of intimidation? I am afraid that we already know the answer.
Makes sense. Make sure to read the whole thing.
Powerline also delves into the “climate mafia” meme, in regards to the sacking of Caleb Rossiter.
Read: Climate Change Is Like The Mafia »
Let’s note right off the bat that this is an accusation by a student. That said, would this really surprise you?
(Daily Caller) Controversy is flaring up at a Connecticut high school after a student alleged that its internet filter is biased against conservative websites.
Andrew Lampart, a senior at Nonnewaug High School in Woodbury, told a local Fox station that he was conducting research for an in-class debate on gun control when he discovered that many pro-gun sites, such as National Rifle Association’s homepage, were blocked by the school’s filter. Meanwhile, anti-gun sites remained easily accessible, he said.
Lampart says he then expanded his search and found additional red flags. The state Republican Party’s website was blocked, but not the state Democratic Party’s. Pro-life groups like the National Right to Life were blocked, but not Planned Parenthood or NARAL Pro-Choice America. Even Christianity.com and the Vatican’s homepage fell on the wrong side of the digital barrier, though islam-guide.org and al-islam.org, both top Google search results for “Islam,†went unscathed. Each of the blocked sites was struck down by the schools SonicWall filter which labeled them as impermissible “Political/Advocacy Groups†sites.
In a letter to the Woodbury Board of Education, Lampart said that he approached local superintendent Jody Goegler, who told him that some political sites needed to be blocked to prevent “hate speech†from seeping into the school. Lampart approached the school board, he said, after no action appeared to have been taken to allow more sites.
Fortunately, the Board of Education is all over this
(Board Chairman John Chapman) sent Fox CT an email saying, “the Board appreciated hearing the comments from Andrew and agree that he has raised an important issue that warrants further investigation.â€
Who thinks that said investigation will come to nothing?
This is simply a continuation of the the process whereby Liberals/Progressives deem certain things “hate” in order to shut down opponents. And if you support the hate, you are now a hater, and need to be ostracized, demeaned, and destroyed.
Read: Taxpayer Funded High School Supposedly Blocks Certain Websites Because “Hate” »
That “phony scandal” and “wacky conspiracy theory”, an issue that happened because of some “rogue agents” and set of coincidences, sure seems to be getting more legit every day. Here’s the latest
(Politico) Ex-IRS official Lois Lerner’s crashed hard drive has been recycled, making it likely the lost emails of the lightening rod in the tea party targeting controversy will never be found, according to multiple sources.
“We’ve been informed that the hard drive has been thrown away,†Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, the top Republican on the Finance Committee, said in a brief hallway interview.
Two additional sources told POLITICO the same late Wednesday, citing IRS officials. (snip)
“We believe the standard IRS protocol was followed in 2011 for disposing of the broken hard drive. A bad hard drive, like other broken Information Technology equipment, is sent to a recycler as part of our regular process,†an IRS spokesman said in response to a query from POLITICO.
Standard protocol, eh? If the IRS comes looking for your records, I wonder what their response would be if you said you kept your tax documents on your computer, it crashed, you threw it out.
(Fox News) “If the IRS truly got rid of evidence in a way that violated the Federal Records Act and ensured the FBI never got a crack at recovering files from an official claiming a Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination, this is proof their whole line about ‘losing’ e-mails in the targeting scandal was just one more attempted deception,” House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said in a statement. “Official records, like the e-mails of a prominent official, don’t just disappear without a trace unless that was the intention.”
I hope that Issa and other Republicans will still attempt to go after all the backup servers for the IRS. Furthermore, maybe it is time to reach out to the NSA for the metadata for that time period, see where those emails were going to and coming from. Even a hardcore liberal has to admit that this conduct sure seem suspect. I’ll ask them, if this happened while Bush was in office, what would you thing?
Regarding that hard drive, IRS procedure, really, government records procedure, would require that a record be kept of how that hard drive was recycled. Where did it go?
Crossed at Right Wing News.