If NYC And Other Big Cities Are Doomed By “Climate Change”, Why Do So Many Warmists Want To Live There?

There’s a new doomy report out about NYC that urges “urgent action”

(Gothamist) We can keep debating global climate change (it’s real!) until the last polar bear takes its final gasping breath. But let’s never forget that this seaside city is in imminent danger—a new study confirms New York’s temperatures are skyrocketing, sea levels are rising, and we’re in for one hell of a grim ride.

The Mayor’s Office has just released this year’s incredibly bleak New York City Panel on Climate Change report today, noting that their findings “underscore the urgency of not only mitigating our contributions to climate change, but adapting our city to its risks.” Not that this should be surprising at this point. Here are some fun things to look forward to, according to the report:

Mean annual temperatures are expected to shoot up by 4.1 to 5.7 degrees Fahrenheit by the 2050s. By the 2080s, those mean annual temperatures could increase by as much as 8.8 degrees Fahrenheit. For comparison’s sake, mean annual temperature increased a total of 3.4 degrees Fahrenheit from 1900 to 2013, so that’s a pretty big jump in under a century.

The news gets worse. The sea level will increase between 11 inches and 21 inches by the 2050s; by the 2080s, it’ll be up to between 18 and 29 inches, and by 2100, we can expect an increase of between 22 and 50 inches. And if the science gods are against us—and aren’t they always?—that sea level could see a rise as high as six feet by 2100. Bye, Red Hook!

This cause celebre has quickly replaced the “zOMG, we’re doomed from disease due to “climate change”” that had been the talking points for about 4-5 days. And we see this same freakout for many other cities, notably Miami. Yet, Liberals, who are the primary disciples of anthropogenic Hotcoldwetdry, want to be there. Weird, yes?

Interestingly

(Scientific American) The report noted that temperatures in Central Park climbed at a rate of 0.3 F per decade from 1900 to 2013, totaling a 3.4 F rise, but the panel expects those figures to soar, with an increase of 4.1 to 5.7 F by the 2050s and 5.3 to 8.8 F by the 2080s.

The world temperature has gone up around 1.4F since 1850. If NYC has gone up 2 degrees F more in 50 years less, might there be something else at play? Cough *Urban Heat Island Effect* cough.

Read: If NYC And Other Big Cities Are Doomed By “Climate Change”, Why Do So Many Warmists Want To Live There? »

If All You See…

…is a sport that will be devastated by climate change, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Scared Monkeys, with a post on Al Shabaab threatening the Mall Of America.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another great day in the Once And Future Nation Of America. It’s big race day, with the Daytona 500 running today. This pinup is by Gil Elvgren, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Flopping Aces has a flashback regarding the Rudy G. controversy
  2. Raised On Hoecakes has a reason you might reconsider buying Girl Scouts cookies
  3. Legal Insurrection has the silliness of the Dems post-2014 massacre plans
  4. Public Secrets has tales from the Nanny State
  5. Patterico has some interesting info on Ebola
  6. Nice Deb discusses concerns about ISIS slipping into the US
  7. Moonbattery features Brigitte Bardot’s fight against Islamism
  8. Jihad Watch has an update on bomb threats against a mosque that made the media crazy
  9. Fire Andrea Mitchell highlights a media double standard
  10. Director Blue has the Huff Post lying directly about illegal aliens
  11. Blazing Cat Fur notes who Obama kept from his terrorism summit
  12. American Power features another big beheading claim by ISIS
  13. 90Ninety Miles From Tyranny has disturbing info on “net neutrality”
  14. Yid With Lid notes Obama’s childishness regarding Netanyahu’s visit
  15. And last, but not least, This ain’t Hell… digs into the silly DHS “right wing extremists” report

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Thank Goodness Uber-white Nicholas Kristoff Is Here To Discuss Your Unconscious White Privilege

Do you think you’re a pretty inclusive kind of person? That you aren’t a racist? Well, sorry, if you’re White, you are a major racist, because of your unconscious mind. Of course, this apparently only applies to White Men

Straight Talk for White Men

SUPERMARKET shoppers are more likely to buy French wine when French music is playing, and to buy German wine when they hear German music. That’s true even though only 14 percent of shoppers say they noticed the music, a study finds.

Researchers discovered that candidates for medical school interviewed on sunny days received much higher ratings than those interviewed on rainy days. Being interviewed on a rainy day was a setback equivalent to having an MCAT score 10 percent lower, according to a new book called “Everyday Bias,” by Howard J. Ross.

Those studies are a reminder that we humans are perhaps less rational than we would like to think, and more prone to the buffeting of unconscious influences. That’s something for those of us who are white men to reflect on when we’re accused of “privilege.”

White men sometimes feel besieged and baffled by these suggestions of systematic advantage. When I wrote a series last year, “When Whites Just Don’t Get It,” the reaction from white men was often indignant: It’s an equal playing field now! Get off our case!

Yet the evidence is overwhelming that unconscious bias remains widespread in ways that systematically benefit both whites and men. So white men get a double dividend, a payoff from both racial and gender biases.

It’s apparently not just White Men over Blacks, but over White Women too. So, shame on you, you evil White Men. You must prostrate yourself and strive to be mediocre in the face of what you do not even know your brain is thinking. It’s a good thing Mr. Kristoff is here to tell us these things. Otherwise I’d be concerned that the NY Times is doing nothing about their Editorial Board, which features one Black person (and he’s a man, too!!!!!) out of 17 members. Even the women on the EB are about as lilly white as can be, so, at least the EB isn’t misogynist, too.

It’s not that we white men are intentionally doing anything wrong, but we do have a penchant for obliviousness about the way we are beneficiaries of systematic unfairness. Maybe that’s because in a race, it’s easy not to notice a tailwind, and white men often go through life with a tailwind, while women and people of color must push against a headwind.

See? You should definitely strive to be mediocre and blah. Because fairness, ya know.

None of these examples mean exactly that society is full of hard-core racists and misogynists. Eduardo Bonilla-Silva, a Duke University sociologist, aptly calls the present situation “racism without racists”; it could equally be called “misogyny without misogynists.” Of course, there are die-hard racists and misogynists out there, but the bigger problem seems to be well-meaning people who believe in equal rights yet make decisions that inadvertently transmit both racism and sexism.

Whew! I feel much better that my unconscious mind doesn’t make me a hard-core racist and misogynist. I shall strive to be more inferior. Whoops! That’s certainly an unconscious word which exposes that I think I’m better than Blacks and women. Instead, I shall attempt to be unexceptional. Whoa! Yet another unconscious word.

This is Liberal World, where instead of people striving to be better, certain people must be treated in a biased manner to bring them down, everywhere from people who are rich to White People to, especially, White Men. White Men are fair game to be treated in a manner that would be out-of-bounds for any other group. Could we term that unconscious racism and sexism? For all their talk about loving people, Liberals are extremely intolerant, and must always find someone/some group to demonize. I’m not even going to get into their race baiting game at this time, beyond saying that everyone has biases and discriminations. Those can be good or bad. If you like certain foods and wines, and dislike others, you are said to have a discriminating palate. It’s the same in life. But, apparently, only Certain People are allowed to think them.

Let’s be clear: this kind of talk is meant to put White People, and especially White Men, on the defensive, in the same manner as the good old question “when did you stop beating your wife?”

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Thank Goodness Uber-white Nicholas Kristoff Is Here To Discuss Your Unconscious White Privilege »

FDA Pushing New Guidelines Based On “Climate Change”

They say they are doing this because of “the environment”, but, what the mean is Hotcoldwetdry

Nutrition panel urges Americans to eat green

Americans should consider the health of the planet along with the health of their hearts when deciding what to eat, according to an expert panel that advises the federal government on nutrition.

It is the first time the advisory committee, which updates its recommendations in a report every five years, has considered the environmental impact of food choices.

Rather than obsess over individual ingredients, the report urges Americans to think about healthy dietary patterns, with more fruits, nuts, legumes, vegetables and whole grains, and less red or processed meat. That type of diet is linked to a lower risk of cardiovascular disease. Plant-based diets also use fewer resources, such as land, water and energy, and produce fewer greenhouse gases, which trap heat in the atmosphere and contribute to climate change. Vegetables also are less likely than livestock to pollute the land, according to the report, issued Thursday.

“We need to think about a sustainable diet that’s supportable and accessible for generations to come,” says committee member Miriam Nelson, a professor of nutrition at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University. “A sustainable diet is also a very healthy diet.”

The FDA has apparently reached the point where they do not care about your health, they’re more concerned about Hotcoldwetdry.

In all fairness, they do care a bit about the actual environment, too

The report encourages people to consume fish, for example, but to choose kinds that are harvested in ways that avoid “overfishing,” or wiping out a region’s entire supply of a particular species. Although some health advocates are concerned about the risk of mercury contamination from fish, the report finds that the benefits of fish oils for the heart and brain outweigh those concerns.

Over-fishing is an actual real environmental concern, rather than “climate change”.

At the end of the day, though, their ideas about obesity and doing away with red meat are really about “climate change”, rather than being healthier. Fortunately, kids around the country will be the major recipients of this as the guidance changes their school lunches yet again, though, I’m not sure if the lunches could become more unpalatable after Michelle Obama’s push for changes in schools everywhere…well, except in the school her own kids attend.

On a hat tip to Lauren Phillips, who emailed me this Politico article. Unfortunately, that article is dramatically different now then when she sent it on around 6pm on the 19th. I mean, big time different.

Read: FDA Pushing New Guidelines Based On “Climate Change” »

If All You See…

…is horrible freezing water and snow from too much heat, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Lonely Conservative, with a post noting that dictators are thrilled by Obama’s net neutrality push.

Read: If All You See… »

Fight “Climate Change” With More Highways, Says Democrats

Here’s an interesting article on a subject that I don’t think I’ve given much thought to, but makes a lot of sense

More highways! Fight climate change! (Wait a sec…)

It’s an article of Democratic Party faith in Oregon that climate change and global warming threatens our planet with devastation within this century. This prevailing Democratic view follows the science that the human burning of fossil fuels is causing climate change and global warming, and that somewhere around one-third of this problem is coming from motor vehicles that burn fossil fuel in internal combustion engines on our highways.

It’s also an article of Democratic Party faith in Oregon that our highway infrastructure needs to be built out at breakneck speed in order to deal with growing congestion on the state’s highways, so that our economy can thrive. The annual Oregon Business Summit, held earlier this year, attended by thousands of businessmen, and capturing our leading politicians of both parties to speak there, recently proclaimed this congestion as the state’s number one issue. The Democratic Party in Oregon seems led by the nose by unions who also love that argument, including particularly the building trades and the AFL-CIO, who are dying for these local union highway construction jobs that used to be so numerous but have virtually disappeared as people drive less and drive vehicles that use less gas per mile.

No one in the Democratic Party is trying to publicly reconcile these two inconveniently opposing points of view. In fact, politicians of all stripes in Oregon would prefer that there be no public reconciliation. If there were reconciliation, the politicians would all be negligent by not acting to prevent the devastation to the planet that will eventually be caused by man-made climate change. That means rejecting the false arguments of the business and labor lobbies that we must somehow build our way out of job-stifling congestion with many large highway expansion projects.

Huh. Excellent point, and we can extend this to Obama, who is constantly pushing more roads and stuff as his “economic stimulus” idea (not ideas, he’s a one trick pony). If fossil fueled vehicles are Bad for Hotcoldwetdry, then why make it easier for them?

Read: Fight “Climate Change” With More Highways, Says Democrats »

Good News: Obama Admin. Provides Enemy Our Plan To Retake Mosul From ISIS

Isn’t it normal to release our plans? Didn’t Washington alert the Redcoats about his plan to cross the Delaware? And we gave the Japanese advance warning about our plans to retake the Philippines, right?

(Fox News) Top Republican senators Friday demanded answers after a military official revealed “detailed operational information” about a looming Iraqi mission to retake Mosul from the Islamic State, saying the disclosure has put the mission at risk.

“Never in our memory can we recall an instance in which our military has knowingly briefed our own war plans to our enemies,” Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said in a letter to President Obama.

The senators asked who was responsible for the briefing, conducted Thursday by a military official, and whether they had White House approval. “Those responsible have jeopardized our national security interests and must be held accountable,” they wrote.

The letter follows criticism in other corners that the military may have revealed too much detail in previewing the operation.

On Thursday, the U.S. military official outlined plans to retake Mosul and said the “shaping” for the battle is currently underway. He said the Iraqi military hopes to begin operations in the “April, May timeframe” with the goal of retaking Mosul before Ramadan begins on June 17.

This occurred during Obama’s little confab on combating violent extremism, particularly from the religion that won’t be named. One has to wonder whether the plan itself was serious, or simply thrown out on the table to say “hey, look, we actually have a plan”, one which they won’t say they have no plan to actually implement. Because that’s what this appears to be, talking rather than doing. Obama and his team are constantly, and rightly, accused of not having actual plans. This allows them to counter.

Of course, the Pentagon immediately responded by doubting the plan, as the Daily Beast notes. Well, yeah, because now ISIS has it. It matters little, because the release of the plan was never actually meant to be implemented. This was political butt covering.

Read: Good News: Obama Admin. Provides Enemy Our Plan To Retake Mosul From ISIS »

Team Obama Really Wants To Know The Solution To Countering Violent Extremism Which Won’t Be Named

No, really. Here’s the official blog of the Department Of State, called DIPNOTE, a term that is probably only ironic to me, since we called stupid people dips where I grew up on the Jersey Shore

What Solutions Do You Think Are Most Critical To Countering Violent Extremism?

This week, the White House hosted a Summit to Counter Violent Extremism to highlight domestic and international efforts to prevent violent extremists and their supporters from radicalizing, recruiting, or inspiring individuals or groups in the United States and abroad to commit acts of violence.  These efforts have become even more imperative in light of recent, tragic attacks throughout the world. At the Summit, Secretary of State John Kerry said, “Our goal today is to take this chance to think broadly about how to prevent violent ideologies from taking hold, and how to prevent terrorist networks…from linking up with aggrieved groups elsewhere, and how to prevent them from thereby expanding their influence.”

Secretary Kerry described this effort as the “the defining fight of our generation” and a task not just for governments but everyone, including civil society, the faith community, foundations and philanthropists, and the private sector.  The Secretary urged the Summit participants to provide their ideas and suggestions on how we can counter violent extremism, and we ask you:

Wait, I thought John Kerry said that “climate change” was the most important fight of our generation? Anyhow, they have a wonderful graphic associated with the short blog post

So, apparently, you communities are teeming with potential extremists, and if you sit down with them in coffee shops and park benches everything will be super duper fine. To paraphrase Darleen Click, this is something one would expect from The Onion. This is the same kind of thing they push in Liberal urban areas, like Detroit, Baltimore, Birmingham, Chicago, Philly, etc, which all feature heavy amounts of crime, murder, and violence, and never seems to work.

Anyhow, the comments include plenty of good ideas, bad ideas, dumb ideas, and so on, but one consistent idea is

First we need to name them REGARDLESS OF WHO OR WHAT THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ARE. Then we have to go after them no matter where they are in the world. We also need to have not only a strategy but a plan to destroy them completely. I have decided to start carrying for my own protection because Obama and his Administration won’t do it. Hell they in fact keep releasing terrorist from Gitmo and prison. And most of them are going back home and back to fighting.

Also

Quit encouraging the radical extremists with “politically correct” speech(es) and inaction. Speak loudly and carry an extremely large club.

Fortunately, John Kerry and Team Obama actually have a plan, as John Kerry lets us know

Our Plan for Countering Violent Extremism

Show the world the power of peaceful communities, and tackle bad governance that breeds frustration.

So, Obama and all his appointees, including you, will be resigning immediately, Mr. Kerry? Seriously, that’s the first paragraph, and a apparently The Idea. Which led to the silly graphic.

The rise of violent extremism represents the pre-eminent challenge of the young 21st century. Military force is a rational and often necessary response to the wanton slaughters of children, mass kidnappings of schoolgirls, and beheading of innocents. But military force alone won’t achieve victory. In the long term, this war will be won only by deploying a broader, far more creative arsenal.

In all fairness, Islamic extremism cannot be defeated solely by military force, because Islamism is an idea based on 7th century Islamic belief, rather than any sort of national identity. That said, if you’re thinking Kerry avoids using the words Islam, Muslim, and Islamist, well, not quite

A safer and more prosperous future also requires us not to be distracted by divisions grounded in hatred or bias. There is no room in this fight for sectarian division. There is no room for Islamophobia or anti-Semitism. Violent extremism has claimed lives in every corner of the globe, and Muslim lives most of all. Each of us is threatened, regardless of ethnicity, faith or homeland. We must demonstrate to the terrorists that rather than divide us, their tactics unite us and strengthen our resolve.

The only mentions, and not meant to highlight that Islamists are the ones performing most terrorist acts and pushing an extremist viewpoint. And, I don’t really think the Islamists, such as ISIS, really care about our resolve or unity, especially when the Left shows they have no resolve to fight Islamist extremism, and their unity is about deflecting, distracting, and creating strawmen to combat any condemnation of the threat from people who will not be named.

A safer and more prosperous future requires us to recognize that violent extremism can’t be justified by resorting to religion.

It might be helpful to recognize who these people and groups are. Name them.

No legitimate religious interpretation teaches adherents to commit unspeakable atrocities, such as razing villages or turning children into suicide bombers.

So, now Kerry is going to tell the adherents of the religion that won’t be named about their religious beliefs. Marvelous.

These are the heinous acts of individuals who distort religion to serve their criminal and barbaric cause.

Au contraire, this is exactly what 7th Century Islam was about, and follows exactly what the Koran says.

Anyhow, if you think the entire plan is mostly contentless and worthless, you’d be right. He really does double down on his starting sentence, thinking the solution is good governance (have you asked Obama to resign yet, John? Will you be sailing the next time there is a major world event?) and Kumbaya. OK, last excerpt of snark (seriously, every paragraph could lead to snark. Pick your favorite)

This week’s summit won’t solve all these problems, but it can catalyze a global effort.

In case John missed it, repressive, violent, and extremist Islam has spread across the planet, with many nations being part of the problem. And the non-violent adherents are using our own laws, societies, and social mores against us.

BTW, when will Obama, Kerry, and the whole team be resigning in order to create better governance and eliminate frustration? Seriously, that line alone deserved a completely separate post.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Team Obama Really Wants To Know The Solution To Countering Violent Extremism Which Won’t Be Named »

If All You See…

…is a freezing cold sea getting colder from too much fossil fueled heat, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Fire Andrea Mitchell, with a post on Rudy Giuliani schooling Megyn Kelly.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove