If All You See…

…are a bunch of climate evil canines causing desertification, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Gay Patriot, with a post on how SJWs think free speech works.

Read: If All You See… »

Trump Flogs Conspiracy Theory About Ted Cruz’s Father And Lee Harvey Oswald

For those of you who are Trump supporters, is this the kind of thing you approve of, especially when used against a fellow Republican, not too mention someone who stands for Constitutional principles?

(Politico) Donald Trump on Tuesday alleged that Ted Cruz’s father was with John F. Kennedy’s assassin shortly before he murdered the president, parroting a National Enquirer story claiming that Rafael Cruz was pictured with Lee Harvey Oswald handing out pro-Fidel Castro pamphlets in New Orleans in 1963.

A Cruz campaign spokesperson told the Miami Herald, which pointed out numerous flaws in the Enquirer story, that it was “another garbage story in a tabloid full of garbage.”

“His father was with Lee Harvey Oswald prior to Oswald’s being — you know, shot. I mean, the whole thing is ridiculous,” Trump said Tuesday during a phone interview with Fox News. “What is this, right prior to his being shot, and nobody even brings it up. They don’t even talk about that. That was reported, and nobody talks about it.”

“I mean, what was he doing — what was he doing with Lee Harvey Oswald shortly before the death? Before the shooting?” Trump continued. “It’s horrible.”

It’s this kind of nuttbaggery that helps turn people into #NeverTrump. It’s this kind of bat guano insane that will further drive people to saying “well, I was going to put a gasmask on and fill in his name as a vote against Hillary, but, I just can’t do it.”

Even leftist Talking Points Memo thought this was insane, as did sorta left leaning Mediate, which notes

“Crazy!” said Brian Kilmeade cluelessly before moving on, while Trump was unchallenged by any of the show’s hosts on the bonkers claim.

It’s this kind of Trump support that is causing many Conservatives to turn the channel from Fox News. I tend to watch Morning Joe now, or News 14, rather than dealing with 24/7 Trump and all the fluff.

Anyhow, it’s interesting, in a despicable way, how Trump has more venom for Republicans, Conservatives, Constitutionalists, and Libertarians than he does for Hillary, Democrats, Liberals, Socialists, and Progressives.

More: Allahpundit makes an interesting observation

That’s not the worst thing he says, though. Watch his reaction to Rafael Cruz talking about how voting for Ted is voting according to the word of God. Trump: “I think it’s a disgrace that he’s allowed to say it.” That he’s allowed to say it? The only thing worse than a crank is a crank with a censorship streak.

Read: Trump Flogs Conspiracy Theory About Ted Cruz’s Father And Lee Harvey Oswald »

Slate: You People Really Need To Stop Focusing On This Wonderful Weather! Because Doom!

Slate continues its trek towards Bat Guano Crazy, and is really upset over that study, which I’ve mentioned, about people really enjoying the wonderful weather created during the current warm period. Warmists like to blame it mostly/solely on the activities of Mankind (thought most refuse to give up their own outsized carbon footprints), Skeptics say it is mostly/solely caused by nature. Just like the previous Holocene warm periods.

It Doesn’t Matter If You Think It’s Nice Out
Our understanding of global climate change needs to move beyond our personal experiences of weather.

It’s raining in Washington, D.C., as I write this, drops tapping out a steady beat that recalls the rhythms of my Oregon childhood. There’s something familiar about this weather, whatever its imperfections. Meanwhile, 1,100 miles to the southwest, a storm system threatens Dallas with tornadoes and massive hailstones. And in Maine, record April snowfalls blanketed the region just days ago. From my desk, though, these anomalies seem impossibly distant—problems that I might read about later but certainly won’t experience.

I am not alone in my easy ignorance. Research published recently in the journal Nature proposes that 40 years of seemingly pleasant weather may be blinding many Americans to the realities of global climate change. Explaining their work in the New York Times, the two researchers, Patrick J. Egan and Megan Mullin, write, “80 percent of Americans now find themselves living in counties where the weather is more pleasant than it was four decades ago.” For most of us, the winters are milder, while the summers remain temperate. Happy with the way things are, Egan and Mullin propose, we have little reason to consider that the clement weather we experience today may evolve into a harsher climate down the road.

So, don’t fall for this great weather! Because great weather is bad! And we’ll be doooooooomed soon! Our computer models, the ones that failed to actually predict the last 18+ years of the Pause, tell us so!

Cult of Climastrology member and article writer Josh Brogan wants you to forget all about how you feel, though

It may, however, be that weather—mild or extreme—has never been the right lens through which to consider climate change at all.

Trenberth is right, of course, that for many, the weather only truly registers when it is unavoidably bad, but even then it does not seem to persuade us to do something about it. There’s likely more at play here than the assumption of selfishness that underlies Egan and Mullin’s work: Weather is inherently confined by the local and immediate conditions of space and time, a question of what we perceive rather than what is. To talk about the weather is to talk about about where we are, what we’re feeling and experiencing, and not about the world that exists beyond our narrowly bounded horizons. In the same way that climate is long-term and weather is short-term, climate change is a global development, while weather names a more local and personal set of experiences. In that sense, focusing on it may actually blind us to the larger stakes.

Essentially, through the rest of the bloviating article, he wants us to think globally. OK. The rest of the world is tending to have great weather, too. No one is doomed from a minuscule 1.4 degree Fahrenheit increase in temperatures since 1850. The earth was not doomed when the temperatures were higher during previous Holocene warm periods. Warmists are welcome to go for it, though, and consider that their own use of fossil fuels and their large carbon footprints are killing Gaia, per their talking points. If they really believe this, they will act accordingly within their own lives. Why won’t they?

Read: Slate: You People Really Need To Stop Focusing On This Wonderful Weather! Because Doom! »

Poll: Trump Beats Hillary 41 To 39

Well, now, this is interesting

(Rasmussen)  Last week, Rasmussen Reports gave voters the option of staying home on Election Day if Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are the big party nominees, and six percent (6%) said that’s what they intend to do for now. Clinton and Trump were tied with 38% support each; 16% said they would vote for some other candidate, and two percent (2%) were undecided.

But Trump edges slightly ahead if the stay-at-home option is removed. Trump also now does twice as well among Democrats as Clinton does among Republicans.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Likely U.S. Voters finds Trump with 41% support to Clinton’s 39%. Fifteen percent (15%) prefer some other candidate, and five percent (5%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Here’s where it gets really interesting

Trump now has the support of 73% of Republicans, while 77% of Democrats back Clinton. But Trump picks up 15% of Democrats, while just eight percent (8%) of GOP voters prefer Clinton, given this matchup. Republicans are twice as likely to prefer another candidate.

There are quite a few ways to read that, one of which is that Trump’s message appeals to Democrats, because quite a bit of Trump’s message is the same as the Democrat’s message. I suspect these are more of the squishy Democrats, though.

Trump beats Hillary with men, while Hillary wins in similar fashion with women. Hillary has a small lead among those under 40, usually a reliable Dem voting block. 25% would prefer someone else. Hillary kills it among Blacks, but Trump leads 48-33 among Whites. Remember, Blacks account for less than 14% of the population.

This all said, national polls are cool, but it will be the state polls that matter. If Trump wants to win, he will have to take enough states to win the Electoral College. He will most likely not be able to count on some of the Northern states he did really well in. What’s the chance he can win in places like Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Vermont, New Hampshire, and his home state of New York? Nor can he count on the liberal left-coast states.

If Trump wins Indiana tonight, it is pretty much over for Ted Cruz. If that happens, here’s my message: you don’t have to like Trump, but politics often pits a bad choice against a worse choice. A President Trump would be much better than a President Hillary. The GOP still needs to retain the House (little chance of losing it) and the Senate (there’s a chance of losing it if Hillary wins). With a Republican (or, should that be “Republican”?) in the White House, the Party might be able to get some things done, such as repealing and replacing Obamacare. Wait any longer, and it will be impossible.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Poll: Trump Beats Hillary 41 To 39 »

‘Climate Change’ Could Cause Sick Building Syndrome Or Something

For anyone who works in an office building, you’re utterly doomed. Why? Because someone needs funding, and other people want to control your behavior and tax you to death

How Climate Change Could Make Office Work Even Unhealthier
“Sick building syndrome” and other indoor concerns could be exacerbated by climate change

As the world heats up around us, many people take solace in the idea that their indoor lives may not be affected much by climate change.

But a number of experts say that hotter outdoor temperatures and extreme weather events like drought or storms may cause unhealthier conditions and less productivity in offices, schools and other buildings. (snip)

As early as the 1980s, office workers were complaining to their doctors about recurring symptoms like headaches, rashes or dry eyes.

Doctors eventually wrapped all these issues into the umbrella term of sick-building syndrome. “It was a fairly large hodgepodge of symptoms,” Bernstein says. But the syndrome isn’t well understood, and could have a number of different causes like background noise or the build-up of CO2, cleaning chemicals and mold.

“It’s become increasingly important to understand in detail what these causes may be,” Bernstein says.

Rising property costs and energy efficiency are two possible causes, prompting tighter buildings and the design of sealed structures more resistant to the elements. The latter saves landlords money on heating or air-conditioning, but sealed environments are also a two-edged sword, because they recirculate harmful chemicals among workers.

Climate change may be exacerbating the moisture the older buildings absorb. Bernstein says that cities like Boston are seeing more intense storms. The moisture can add up in older buildings without adequate drainage systems, causing mold.

Read: ‘Climate Change’ Could Cause Sick Building Syndrome Or Something »

Adorable Little Anchor Babies Scream Vulgar Words Towards Trump

There’s no better way to gain acceptance than this

(Daily Caller)  Trump supporters arriving at an Indiana rally Sunday were greeted by protestors cursing and screaming, many of whom were children.

“Fucking asshole! Go fuck yourself,” a young boy yelled in Spanish as a truck passed by. The passengers were holding a sign that read “Veterans for Trump.”

The boy was holding a Bernie Sanders for president sign and had a Bernie pin on his shirt.

Of course, they learn this from their parents, who are probably in the country illegally. I wonder if they realize that Trump’s illegal immigration plan includes touchback amnesty after a wall is built? Hey, why would they, a goodly chunk of Trump supporters do not realize Trump is also in favor of amnesty.

Read: Adorable Little Anchor Babies Scream Vulgar Words Towards Trump »

If All You See…

…is a mountain that probably used to be covered by glaciers before fossil fueled vehicles, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Lonely Conservative, with a post on why Fox News has become unwatchable.

Read: If All You See… »

Climate Change Will Cause Oceans To Have Too Little Oxygen In 15 Years Or Something

Good news! We have a new prognostication, and it is in a timeframe that can be easily checked. But, really, is more meant to scare everyone

Oceans won’t have enough oxygen in as little as 15 years

This story was originally published by Huffington Post and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

It should come as no surprise that human activity is causing the world’s oceans to warm, rise, and acidify.

But an equally troubling impact of climate change is that it is beginning to rob the oceans of oxygen.

While ocean deoxygenation is well established, a new study led by Matthew Long, an oceanographer at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, finds that climate change-driven oxygen loss is already detectable in certain swaths of ocean and will likely be “widespread” by 2030 or 2040.

One has to wonder how life in the oceans survived when temperatures were much warmer, like during the previous Holocene warm periods. One has to wonder how life developed and evolved at all, considering that a goodly chunk of the planet’s history had much hotter temperatures. And higher sea levels.

Ultimately, Long told The Huffington Post, oxygen-deprived oceans may have “significant impacts on marine ecosystems” and leave some areas of ocean all but uninhabitable for certain species.

We get the typical words used in this “science” like “may” and “might” and “likely”, but nothing like “will”. This is all meant to scare people into accepting more taxes and reductions in liberty and lifestyle, while ignoring actual science and history. All while the members of the Cult of Climastrology refuse to moderate their own lifestyles to match their proselytizing.

Read: Climate Change Will Cause Oceans To Have Too Little Oxygen In 15 Years Or Something »

Washington Post: Not Letting People Use Whichever Bathroom They Want Is “Dehumanizing”

The Bathroom Wars have shifted to the Washington Post today, with writer Victoria St. Martin focusing on one gender confused person

For local transgender teen, national debate on restrooms is just a start

There was the name change. The lost friendships. And the friends who kept using the wrong pronoun. Cayden McDonald, who came out in a Facebook post as transgender in April 2012, would gently remind them that he is a “he” now.

But of all the awkward adjustments and ambiguity that surround the 18-year-old’s transition, one of the most delicate has been which restroom to use.

The way the Woodbridge teen sees it, it is ridiculous to demand that he use the women’s bathroom. “I walk in, and a woman sees me, and they’re going to be hella confused,” McDonald said.

But, Cayden apparently doesn’t look male enough to use the men’s room. But, really, for the most part, men aren’t going to give a damn who walks in. Just don’t get upset if we leave the seat up. And, if you have to sit to pee? You’re a woman.

On one hand, McDonald thinks it is absurd that people are fixated on the bathroom habits of others. But he also understands that this could be an important milestone for trans rights. To him, not letting him use the bathroom of his choice is “dehumanizing.”

Dehumanizing. So, just remember that when you need to use the bathroom, and can’t wait for your biological sex bathroom to be free. Just use whichever one you want, and if someone complains, tell them they are being dehumanizing, and say you’ll call the ACLU and other interest groups.

McDonald’s journey to living as an openly trans teen began in his early teens, after he watched a series of YouTube videos of people coming out. He saw a video of a teen coming out as transgender — and a lightbulb went off.

“I was like, ‘This is what I’ve been feeling for so long.’ ” he said. “I didn’t know there were things you could do about it. So I was like, ‘I like this, this is how I feel, I’m gonna tell people,’ and I did.”

And people wonder why so many think this whole thing is a mental illness. Watching a video makes a person think they are the opposite biological gender?

He admits that his online announcement — which went something like, “This is who I am, you’re going to deal with it or don’t talk to me” — may have been unnecessarily harsh.

Which highlights another aspect: the Demand for acceptance, rather than working to convince people and bring them to your side. These in your face attitudes will always cause a backlash. And, really, the concern is not so much the tiny number of gender confused people, which some estimate at just .3% of the population, it’s people taking advantage of this to enter the ladies room and invade the privacy of women and girls. Yes, that is a misogynist attitude, but, most men couldn’t care less who enters the men’s room. One of the folks in the comments puts in well

That someone’s ever changing identity crisis is so tied to where they relieve themselves points to the simple mindedness of this whole movement (no pun). If you wish to dress as a woman then do so but don’t impose your self centered desire for everyone to ignore this obvious unbalanced behavior by making women and children feel threatened. It is so ridiculous the WAPO and the rest of the media pander to this group of selfish, egotistical, immature individuals.

Why is it that the comfort of the tiny number gender confused should trump the comfort of everyone else?

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove

Read: Washington Post: Not Letting People Use Whichever Bathroom They Want Is “Dehumanizing” »

Transgender’s Claim Of Bathroom Harassment Falls Apart On Video

Saturday I noted a story from Raleigh TV station WTVD about a transgender woman’s claim about being confronted by a janitor in the women’s room then escorted out by security at the Durham Transit Center. Now, I called it agenda driven news, because WTVD ran the story despite having not a shred of evidence that it was real, that it happened, and the thrust of my post was about that, rather than the TG woman in question, Alexis Adams. I wrote

Did [WTVD] ask to review any security video of the incident? Surely, there are security cameras within the Durham Transit Center.

I asked something similar in the comments at WTVD, as well as though email. I’m sure quite a few others did, as well. Kudos to WTVD, they followed up and Asked Questions

New video shows a different perspective in a back and forth debate between the City of Durham and a transgender woman’s bathroom experience inside the Durham Transit Center.

The transgender woman’s name is Alexis Adams. She says on Thursday afternoon, she was escorted out of the women’s restroom by security. The city of Durham owns the Transit Center and says that never happened.

Surveillance video at Durham’s Transit Center shows Adams walking into the women’s restroom at 1:17 p.m. About four minutes later, a janitor enters the restroom. Adams says the janitor confronts her and tells her to use the men’s restroom or she would call security. Adams, who transitioned to female 5 years ago, told ABC11 she was embarrassed.

“There [were] other people in there and as I was walking out of the bathroom and security took me out,” Adams said on Thursday. “The woman was making a scene about it.”

Watch the video at the link. You see her go in. A little bit later, you see a female custodian enter the bathroom. It looks like the custodian grabs what appears to be supplies from a cart or shelf prior to entering. It in no way looks like she was going in their to confront Adams. It looks like she’s just doing her job. Did Adams decide to take advantage of the janitor coming in? If so, for shame, denigrating a woman just doing her job.

Video shows Adams leaving the bathroom on her own, with no security.

Furthermore, the video shows Adams leaving the building on her own, with absolutely no security escort. Then you see her walking away with a man with a backpack. It looks like the man was waiting for her at the door.

WTVD confronts Adams with the video, and boy o boy, did she look uncomfortable. She has that “oh, crap, I got caught look”, like a child confronted by a parent for having a dirty magazine under the mattress.

On Saturday, ABC11 showed Adams the surveillance video of her walking out of the women’s restroom alone and not by security. Adams response was, “They’re not in the shot.”

ABC11 showed Adams a different camera angle-this time of her walking out of the transit center with a man that does not appear to be a security guard. Adams response was, “I can’t. I guess you just had to be there to witness it. The security did escort-ask me to leave the premises. They may not have dragged me out of the bathroom but they were there.”

And she’s sticking with her story.

So, yesterday was about slamming WTVD for running a story with zero evidence. Today is about highlighting yet another leftist agenda hoax.

More: On reflection, there’s something else that really bothers me about this story, namely, how the custodian’s job was put on the line by what certainly looks like a hoax. The minute the allegation was made, you know that the powers that be looked at all the video. When they saw the custodian, the PTB surely called her into an office for an Official Interview to get her side of it. And, as anyone can tell you who’s been a part of this, it’s not a comfortable meeting. Even when you know that you did no wrong, you’re concerned for you job. You do not know which way you’re bosses might lean. Even if they know you did no wrong, in today’s social justice warrior society, you might become a sacrificial lamb.

Even if everything shakes out OK, the bosses might be keeping an eye on her. She’ll surely be paranoid. And, would you put it past any of SJWs to attempt to wait for her to go into a bathroom and then pull the same stunt, accusing her of the “hate crime” in order to make the first one look legitimate? Most of these SJWs are unrepentant, and they seemingly have little concern for the other people they hurt. What if the custodian was fired? And then had her name leaked, and had to deal with all the picketing, abuse on social media, having all that notoriety? Would the SJWs care that they ruined this woman’s life?

Read: Transgender’s Claim Of Bathroom Harassment Falls Apart On Video »

Pirate's Cove