Hot Take: Irma’s Locked And Loaded Towards Trump Properties

Remember, though, that the media is totally non-partisan and utterly un-biased, so the news media tells us. And that’s how we end up with this bit of unhinged #resist from NBC News and writer Ben Popken (via Twitchy)

Irma Locked and Loaded Towards Several Trump Properties

Ire and fury are expected to rain down on several properties owned by President Donald Trump that lie in the projected path of Hurricane Irma.

Three of the 12 Trump-named U.S. golf courses are in south Florida and due for impact, as well as Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, dubbed his “Winter White House.” The private club and resort with an estimated value of $175 million lies in the mandatory evacuation zone announced for Palm Beach County last night. (snip)

Several other Trump Organization properties could also be tested by a diminished Irma if it turns north once it reaches Florida, as several computer models predict. Then it might lash the Trump National Golf Club in Charlotte, North Carolina; and the 1,300 acre Trump Winery in the foothills of the Blue Ridge Mountains in Charlottesville, Virginia.

While it might seem to be “news”, this is simply Trump living rent free in the heads of leftist news idiots like Popken. Seriously

https://twitter.com/Edgar_FullTown/status/906354724877860864

BTW, I thought the phrase “locked and loaded” was bad? No? Only when used by Democrats?

Meanwhile, lots of Democrats are really excited to see Trump voters harmed and killed by Irma. Because they’re totally tolerant and loving and if you say different they will call for your death.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Hot Take: Irma’s Locked And Loaded Towards Trump Properties »

The Hurricanes Are Sending Trump A Message On ‘Climate Change’ Or Something

It’s all about the man-made toxic gases, you guys. Probably from you, as we head over to the Miami Herald, where opinion Warmist Andre Oppenheimer apparently has nothing better to worry about

President Trump, hurricanes Harvey and Irma are sending you a message

As a Miami Beach resident who is writing this surrounded by sand bags in preparation for Hurricane Irma, only a week after Hurricane Harvey ravaged Texas, I have an urgent question for President Donald Trump and his fellow climate change deniers: how many natural disasters will it take for you to listen to the world’s most prestigious scientists?

All of them, because they are natural disasters, hence the word “natural.” Things that have been happening long since Mankind’s records

Climate deniers like Trump, citing fake news reports and pseudo-scientific studies, say the world has always had warmer and colder periods, and the current wave of global warming is just one more. According to their logic — and that of polluting industries that are behind it — mankind has nothing to do with this. It’s just nature, they claim.

How much in the way of fossil fuels and electricity were used to produce the paper and distribute it so that people can read this claptrap?

But 97 percent of climate scientists agree that global warming is being caused by man-made toxic gases, according to a 2013 scientific paper that examined 11,944 climate abstracts. That paper drives climate skeptics mad, but virtually all studies show that there is a near total consensus around man-made climate change among scientists, and that climate deniers are in most cases pseudo-scientists or conservative radio charlatans.

People who are quoting the utterly discredited and debunked pseudo science Cook et all 97% paper shouldn’t be casting any stones, especially when they yammer about a trace gas necessary for life on earth. But, then, Warmists live in their own little fantasy world, much like those practicing Scientology.

Read: The Hurricanes Are Sending Trump A Message On ‘Climate Change’ Or Something »

If All You See…

…are evil fossil fueled vehicles that create monster hurricanes, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Daley Gator, with a post on Hillary’s continuing excuse tour.

Read: If All You See… »

The Mexico Earthquake Is ‘Climate Change’ Or Something

In case you missed it

(ABC News)  At least 15 people were killed as a magnitude-8.1 earthquake rocked Mexico late Thursday night, leveling buildings in southern Mexico, triggering tsunami warning in several countries and causing people to flee into the street, buildings to sway and lights to go out in Mexico City, some 650 miles from the quake’s epicenter.

Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto, who said the quake was 8.2 in magnitude, called it the strongest the country has seen in a century. The U.S. Geological Survey measured it at 8.1 magnitude.

The powerful temblor occurred some 50 miles southwest of Pijijiapan, Mexico, off the coast of the southern Mexican state of Chiapas, at 11:49 p.m. local time (12:49 a.m. ET), according to the USGS. The depth of the earthquake was 43 miles, the USGS said.

You know what’s coming, right?

https://twitter.com/ilovewonpil/status/906024452386734081

Read More »

Read: The Mexico Earthquake Is ‘Climate Change’ Or Something »

It’s Again Time For The “Climate Change Denial Should Be A Crime” Memes

Is it actually “science denial” when 95% of the climate models are wrong? Is it science denial when virtually every prediction that the Cult of Climastrology makes falls apart? Is it science denial when Skeptics note that the data is massaged, manipulated, spun, and/or manufactured?

This little bit of nuttiness was written by Brian Merchant

Hurricane Harvey has drowned the paved, populous sprawl of Houston to an extent that, to most Americans, is all but inconceivable. Our fourth-largest city is now a sunken, subdivided ghost ship. Tens of billions of dollars of damage done. Countless homes, the vast majority uninsured, lost. Thirty-eight people killed (so far).

In such a storm’s wake, we are often reminded that it’s time to band together, to persevere, and to rebuild. Now we are also reminded, correctly, that this is what climate change looks like. These are the two guiding mantras of modern natural disaster recovery: Come together; global warming is here and now and we’d best get to work. Neither is sufficient.

We are not as often reminded that homes and lives may have been saved if officials and policymakers had incorporated the recommendations of sound science in their outlook and preparedness plans. Which is why we need to add a third response to our evolving national post-catastrophic storm mourning ritual: Identifying and investigating the negligent officials who put the public in harm’s way by repeatedly ignoring crucial data and scientific evidence that can help prevent disaster.

Would a carbon tax have stopped Harvey? How about having your cost of living artificially increased by government and losing some of your liberty? If you were forced to have a smart meter? Not allowed to use a hair dryer? Had to purchase carbon offsets?

Scientists knew a disaster like Harvey was coming….

Of course they did. Because hurricanes happen, there’s a yearly hurricane season, and storms make landfall

…Those in power who refused to listen — who refused to use the best available data to do their jobs of protecting their constituents from disaster — should be held accountable. Mike Talbott’s department could have acted on sound evidence and saved lives. They did not. They repeatedly favored development over public safety, going so far as to allow 7,000 homes to be built in low-lying, flood-vulnerable areas since 2010. It is impossible to determine how many have died as a result of any official’s refusal to appropriately prepare the city for disaster, but there is little doubt some of the blame for the scale of this calamity is theirs. The Washington Post generously calls it “ignorance.” But it’s high time to start taking this pointed refusal to prepare, this refusal to observe the basic tenets of science seriously — and call it what it is: Negligence. Criminal negligence, even.

According to the Texas penal code, “A person acts with criminal negligence, or is criminally negligent… when he ought to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the circumstances exist or the result will occur. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that the failure to perceive it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise….”

All right, you have the idea, Brad is recommending that all officials who have Wrongthink on ‘climate change’ be prosecuted and jailed. Much like in the old Soviet Union, Mao’s China, the Third Reich, Fascist Italy, and hardcore Islamic nations like Iran, among other examples.

And, of course, Brad wants Trump prosecuted. Heck, he even alludes to the notion that every Tea Party member, and perhaps almost every Republican voter, should be prosecuted for this Wrongthink. Because people have died during Harvey. Unlike the 6,000-12,000 (no one is really sure) that died during the Great Galveston hurricane in 1900 when CO2 was below 350ppm.

Read: It’s Again Time For The “Climate Change Denial Should Be A Crime” Memes »

Dream Act 2017 Is Pretty Generous On Allowing Dreamers To Commit Crimes

The normal process for applying for citizenship is pretty burdensome, and requires that people have good moral character, ie, do not commit crimes. Certain crimes will immediately knock a candidate out, no matter how long they’ve resided in the U.S. Other crimes will most likely knock them out. What about with the Dream Act? Byron York delves in

Commentary on the DACA controversy frequently notes that the nation’s nearly 700,000 so-called Dreamers are a law-abiding group. But a new bill to give DACA recipients full legal status, sponsored by Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham and Jeff Flake and Democratic Sens. Richard Durbin and Chuck Schumer, would allow newly legalized Dreamers to have many run-ins with the law — arrests, charges, convictions — and still receive benefits. Schumer, the Democratic leader, is demanding quick passage.

(Discussion of the leniency via Obama’s DACA Executive Order for crimes committed by Dreamers)

The Dream Act would exclude anyone who has been convicted of “any offense under federal or state law, other than a state offense for which an essential element is the alien’s immigration status, that is punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of more than one year; or three or more offenses under federal or state law, other than state offense for which an essential element is the alien’s immigration status, for which the alien was convicted on different dates for each of the three offenses and imprisoned for an aggregate of 90 days or more.”

The phrase “other than a state offense for which an essential element is the alien’s immigration status” could excuse a lot of criminal activity. “It would grant status to illegal aliens who have been convicted of felony ID fraud or other crimes that could be considered to be related to their immigration status,” noted Jessica Vaughan of the Center for Immigration Studies, which favors tighter restrictions on immigration. “You could say human smuggling, document fraud, benefits fraud, false claims to citizenship, illegal voting, and many other felonies have an essential element that involves immigration status.”

Furthermore, the multiple dates issue would mean that an illegal wouldn’t be knocked out of Dreamer status by being prosecuted for multiple misdemeanors on the same court date, only if they were prosecuted on at least three different court dates.

And maybe not even then, because Graham, Flake, Durbin, and Schumer would also allow the Secretary of Homeland Security to waive any denial of legalization for those crimes, or for more serious crimes, “for humanitarian purposes or family unity or if the waiver is otherwise in the public interest.” In other words, Department of Homeland Security can legalize whomever it chooses.

Which would probably not happen under current DHS Secretary Elaine Duke, but, could easily be done under future squishy DHS Secretaries.

The 2017 Dream Act also raises the age of when the illegals came from 16 to 18, which would vastly increase the number who are eligible, as well as decreasing the time in country from 5 years to 4 years.

There is no requirement for the illegals to be present in the U.S. at the time the Dream Act is passed, unlike with Obama’s DACA, which required they be present prior to June 15, 2012. This would mean there is every reason for illegals to keep streaming in at young ages.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Dream Act 2017 Is Pretty Generous On Allowing Dreamers To Commit Crimes »

Warmer World May Bring More Hotcoldwetdry Or Something

Or something

Warmer world may bring more local, less global, temperature variability

Many tropical or subtropical regions could see sharp increases in natural temperature variability as Earth’s climate warms over coming decades, a new Duke University-led study suggests.

These local changes could occur even though Earth’s global mean surface air temperature (GMST) is likely to become less variable, the study shows.

“This new finding runs counter to the popular notion that as the climate warms, temperature variability will increase and weather will get more volatile everywhere,” said Patrick T. Brown, a postdoctoral research scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science, who led the study while he was a doctoral student at Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment.

“Our research suggests a different scenario: Global unforced temperature variability will actually decrease, not increase, as Earth warms, but local decade-to-decade variability could increase by as much as 50 percent in some places,” Brown said.

Breaking it down, because you drove a fossil fueled vehicle and binge-watched Game Of Thrones, along with using an ice-maker and hair dryer, not buying locally, and not giving up more of your money and freedom to Government, there’s going to be a whole lot of Hotcoldwetdry but not Hotcoldwetdry but variability buy not variability.

Read: Warmer World May Bring More Hotcoldwetdry Or Something »

If All You See…

…are awesome trees whose only purpose is to mitigate carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Raised On Hoecakes, with a post on paying gang members to not break the law.

Read: If All You See… »

Seahawk Michael Bennett Claims Police Threatened Him, Racism

This is one that is all over the news this morning, both regular and the sports sites, which I’ve caught in multiple places while perusing the same

(Daily Caller) Bennett released a statement Wednesday morning claiming he was the target of racism and police brutality after being detained by Las Vegas police officers. He also claimed police threatened to shoot him in the head.

According to Bennett

USA Today says that his treatment is a reason for all the protests. Colin Kaepernick said it was disgusting and unjust. There are all sorts of people saying all sorts of things in solidarity with Bennett and hating on the police. But, as the DC links to a TMZ Sports report

Sources connected to the investigation tell TMZ Sports … when cops responded to the club for a possible shooting, they ordered everyone to get down and not move so they could properly search and investigate.

We’re told Bennett did not stay put — instead, he ran — and a cop outside the club stopped him and ordered him down to the ground at gunpoint.

Our sources say Bennett was detained until cops could determine he was not involved in any possible criminal activity … and he was released.

You can watch the video at TMZ yourself. It does start, let’s remember, after he was already cuffed. And, yes, it is a possibility that the officer was a complete moron and said he’d shoot him in the head. But, just because a cop detains you when you run doesn’t make it racism.

But, you can bet that the reality of what happened will not make it past the Narrative, much like the completely phony Michael Brown hands up don’t shoot garbage.

Read: Seahawk Michael Bennett Claims Police Threatened Him, Racism »

NY Times Knocks Down Hurricane Irma Is Climate Change Stories

An early shot from the NY Times, which somehow made it through Climate Justice Warrior editorial review. Of course, we’ll be sure to see many stories from the NY Times in future days blaming ‘climate change’ for Irma, because that’s what they do

First Harvey, Then Irma and Jose. Why? It’s the Season.

First came Hurricane Harvey, which barreled into Texas on Aug. 25. Now Irma, one of the most powerful hurricanes on record, is battering the Caribbean and has Florida in its sights.

Jose, currently a tropical storm, trails behind in the mid-Atlantic. And early Wednesday, a coalescing weather system in the southwestern Gulf of Mexico became tropical storm Katia — the fourth named storm in two weeks.

What’s going on?

Hurricane experts say that the formation of several storms in rapid succession is not uncommon, especially in August, September and October, the most active months of the six-month hurricane season.

“This is the peak,” said Gerry Bell, the lead seasonal hurricane forecaster with the Climate Prediction Center, a part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. “This is when 95 percent of hurricanes and major hurricanes form.”

This is why we have something called “hurricane season.” I forget who the meteorologist was, but, right after Harvey they Tweeted that this was also bound to happen sooner or later. Because this is hurricane season.

Dr. Bell said his group does not consider climate change in developing its forecasts.

Instead, he said, they consider longer-term cycles of hurricane activity based on a naturally occurring climate pattern called the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation, which affects ocean surface temperatures over 25 to 40 years.

“We’ve been in an active era since 1995,” Dr. Bell said, as ocean temperatures have been generally higher. But from 1971 to 1994, he said, temperatures were generally lower, and hurricane seasons were quieter.

But, this bit of Science will not stop climatemongering like

What caused Hurricane Irma? Did climate change cause this Category 5 tropical storm?
Climate change didn’t cause the deadly hurricane. But it did make it more horrifying

Hurricane Irma, like Hurricane Harvey, was not caused by climate change. But the horrifying destruction it has sent across the Atlantic might have been.

Scientists say that asking whether global warming was the reason for the extreme weather is the wrong question. Instead, we should be focusing on how global warming has helped turn the hurricanes into even more destructive forces than they ever would have been before.

Well, considering there were more powerful hurricanes making landfall all the way back into the late 1800’s to early 1900’s, I don’t think we can blame fossil fuels. Furthermore, without an actual full record of hurricane activity back over at least the last 500 years for comparison, heck, what happened during the previous warm period, there’s really no way to make a proper scientific comparison.

But, Warmists aren’t about science: this is politics.

Read: NY Times Knocks Down Hurricane Irma Is Climate Change Stories »

Pirate's Cove