Gun Control From A Racist Point Of View

By William Teach October 16, 2017 – 10:30 am

In Chicago, which has heavy restrictions on gun ownership for law abiding citizens, 8 were killed and 11 were wounded by gunshot. The majority, if not all, were Black. The majority of those involved in gun violence in Chicago are Black. It’s a sad state of affairs that this is occuring, but, then, this is what the Democratic Party has brought about with their policies. Which leads us to this screed by Michael Harriot at The Root, a rather divisive and racial superior website, which also pushes lots of grievances

5 Ways Black People Can Force Commonsense Gun Control

They wouldn’t do it after the Las Vegas massacre. They wouldn’t do it after Gabby Giffords was shot. They wouldn’t even do it after Sandy Hook. Maybe there is no one who can break the toxic romance that America has with guns …

I bet black people could.

You know we have to do all the hard shit. We picked all the cotton. We created every iota of American music, dance and culture. We made this country an economic superpower. We fight disproportionately in every war. A black man gave this country universal health care. We invented the modern air conditioner. If it wasn’t for black people, this country would still consist of poor, backward hillbillies ballroom-dancing to Appalachian bluegrass tunes and sweating their asses off while coughing up phlegm.

You’re welcome, white people.

Except, the air conditioner was invented by Willis Carrier, a white man. And we don’t actually have universal health care. But, hey, let’s not let some facts get in the way of reverse racism and playing of the race card.

Anyhow, Harriot has lots of ideas, like

1. Get lots of black people to buy guns.

I know it seems antithetical, but if black people started purchasing semi-automatic weapons legally and in large numbers, congressional Republicans would pass a gun-owner safety bill faster than white people’s fucking tempo.

This is the way racists think. The people who can only live by the race card think. One of Harriot’s other ideas is to make legal gun ownership for Blacks to be cool, thereby similarly making White’s think guns need big-time control. Same thing with “threatening animals.” All of us who support the 2nd Amendment would, in reality, be like “Great! Welcome to the club!”

We also get “Call gun ownership a form of resistance.” This would supposedly be linked to Colin Kaepernick and Black Lives Matter. Guess what? All the White people who support gun rights still wouldn’t give a damn. And we get “Lie”

Perhaps we could pay Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly to join our cause. Those bastards would do anything for money. They could tell their followers there is a little-known clause in Obamacare that allows people to trade abortions for banana clips. Maybe we could fool those idiots into putting their guns down by playing on their racism and fear of black dicks. We could just mention that there was a recent study that shows gunpowder makes white women prefer black penis, or tell them that every time someone uses the gun-show loophole, a black penis grows an inch.

How is this kind of drivel any different from what scumbags like Richard Spencer push?

Read: Gun Control From A Racist Point Of View »

Posted in 2nd Amendment, Unhinged Tools | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

Michael “Robust Debate” Mann To Write Book Telling Kids To Throw Tantrums

By William Teach October 16, 2017 – 7:54 am

And he’s doing it in the most Cult of Climastrology manner

(Daily Caller) An Australian author and noted climate scientist are asking for donations to publish a children’s book that “explains climate change to kids and empowers them to act” and is also carbon neutral, according to their KickStarter page.

The children’s book, “The Tantrum That Saved The World,” encourages kids to become global warming activists.

Author Megan Herbert and scientist Michael Mann want to publish a children’s book that tells a “story about a little girl who comes face to face with an enormous challenge, feels all kinds of frustration as she tries to overcome it, and then channels those strong emotions into action, rallying all those around her to do the same,” the authors wrote on KickStarter.

In a promotional video, Herbert said that while parents should ordinarily discourage kids from throwing tantrums, “these are not ordinary times.”

“This is the one time we should encourage our kids to make a bit of noise,” Herbert said. “They didn’t create this mess, and they have every right to be upset about it.” She added that those emotions should be channeled into “positive actions.”

What are those positive actions? They do not say. You’ll have to get the book, but, we can pretty much guess that they are the same old Big Government, big fees/taxes, and so forth actions. Spreading awareness while demanding that Other People be forced to comply.

They say that they have the book done. But, they still need final editing and proofing, then scanning, then book design. Which is where Kickstarter comes in. If they do not get enough pledges with money to buy the book, they won’t do it. In other words, give them money for a product that is not ready. Perfect Cult of Climastrology.

That and the tantrums.

Read: Michael “Robust Debate” Mann To Write Book Telling Kids To Throw Tantrums »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Global Warming | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Deporting Illegal Aliens Is Persecution Or Something

By William Teach October 16, 2017 – 7:09 am

The Hill has give Cesar Vargas, the first illegal alien admitted to the NY bar, a platform to complain about people not giving illegal aliens a break. You know, people who are unlawfully present in the U.S. And, it’s exactly this kind of stupidity that makes people harden their positions against folks like the so-called Dreamers

We can’t be complicit in persecution of immigrant communities

Yesterday, my mom and I sat at the kitchen table to discuss the White House’s latest demands for an immigration deal.

The administration says it will refuse to protect “Dreamers,” undocumented immigrants who were brought to the country as children, unless it gets a southern border wall, 10,000 new immigration agents, tougher laws on asylum seekers as well as extended families of immigrants and a right to deny federal grants to sanctuary cities.

The bottom line, as far as we could tell, was that the administration is looking to broaden how it targets, arrests and deports immigrants. As she served brown rice and boiled eggs for breakfast, my mother said calmly, “Si los ayuda a ustedes, no me importa lo que me pase a mi.”

It means, “if it helps you, I don’t care what happens to me.”

It speaks to her self-sacrifice: My mother would rather jump into the cross-hairs of an aggressive deportation regime than do anything that might prevent my younger brother and I from becoming citizens.

Her “self sacrifice” was crossing the U.S.-Mexico border with Vargas and several siblings illegally.

What the White House is asking for is the chance to persecute some immigrants in exchange for pledging to protect others. That kind of deal would only fuel a dangerous narrative about the good immigrant versus the bad immigrant, pitting better-educated immigrants against other undocumented individuals — people like my 74-year-old mother, Central American children and day laborers.

Here’s an idea: if Cesar doesn’t like that were are willing to consider some sort of legal status for those illegally brought by their parents when they were kids, well, let’s deport them all! As one wrote in the comments at The Hill “I’m so tired of illegal aliens making demands, I demand they leave my country.” Rather than being humble and contrite, and asking “please”, illegal aliens like Vargas pull a schtick of demands and insults. Do you help people who do this to you? Or do you tell them to go away? These people are not “immigrants”: per federal law, they are illegal aliens, and the law requires that they receive a small fine and be deported.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Deporting Illegal Aliens Is Persecution Or Something »

Posted in Illegal Immigration | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Americans Are Willing To Pay $117 A Year To Stop ‘Climate Change’ Or Something

By William Teach October 15, 2017 – 4:24 pm

The Cult of Climastrology members at Vox thing they’re on to something big! (the bold is Vox’s)

Designing a carbon tax requires answering two core policy questions. First, how much money should it raise? And second, how should the money be spent?

As to the first, the CLC proposal starts at $40 a ton and rises $5 a year. As to the second, the revenue goes to dividends, i.e., it is distributed back to citizens on a per-capita basis. (It’s a dividend of roughly $2,000 a year for a family of four, to begin with.) Policies like this are called “tax-and-dividend.”

Is that what the public wants?

It’s funny you should ask. The Yale Program on Climate Change Communication recently completed a large-scale survey of the public on this subject. The results were just published in the journal Environmental Research Letters.

Researchers asked a representative sample of 1,226, American adults questions seeking to determine two things. First, how much are Americans willing to pay per year to fight climate change? And second, what would they prefer government do with the revenue?

It’s the answers to the second question I want to highlight, but let’s look at the first really quickly.

How much are Americans will to pay a year to fight climate change? $177.

That’s interesting, since most Warmists haven’t been willing to pay more than a token few dollars nor make more than token changes in their own lives to become more carbon neutral.

Of course, the problem here is that any sort Doing Something will not be $177 a year, or, as the Journal puts it, “We find an overall mean WTP (willingness to pay) of US$177 per year, with a confidence interval ranging from US$101 to US$587.” It will be considerably more. Some have estimates as low as $1200 a year. Some much more. But, none of those truly factor in the rising costs of everything.

Also, notice that the scheme that is growing is one in which the Government reimburses you money for the pain they have caused, attempting to make you more dependent on Government. Which means they control you.

But, hey, Warmists, show us the way. Pony up and show that your truly believe.

Read: Americans Are Willing To Pay $117 A Year To Stop ‘Climate Change’ Or Something »

Posted in Carbon Credits, Global Warming | 9 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach October 15, 2017 – 1:00 pm

…is an evil fossil fueled vehicle causing drought and flood, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is A View From The Beach, with a post on yet another reason Trump was elected.

It’s vintage vehicle week!

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

By William Teach October 15, 2017 – 9:35 am

Patriotic Pinup

Happy Sunday! Yet another great day in America. The birds are singing, the moonbats are moonbatting, and the Dodgers took game one. This pinup is by Carlos Valenzuela, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Jo Nova covers the non-sinking Kiribati
  2. The Australian Climate Sceptics Blog notes NASA data showing the seas are not rising
  3. 357 Magnum notes that self-defense is still legal in Canada
  4. America’s Watchtower discusses the new papers found about the tarmac meeting
  5. Blazing Cat Fur covers yet another faux racism case
  6. Bunkerville discusses the Muslim Brotherhood infiltrating the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts
  7. Chicks On The Right offers #HillaryCourses at Columbia
  8. Creeping Sharia explains the case of a man tracked down by police for pickling a pig’s foot
  9. DaTechGuy (Fausta) wonders if anyone has gone to the movies lately
  10. Gay Patriot has big government at its finest
  11. Geller Reports notes Muslims taking over the streets in several cities
  12. Jihad Watch covers yet another honor killing in the UK
  13. Legal Insurrection notes a school pulling To Kill A Mockingbird
  14. Moonbattery discusses school banning having a best friend
  15. And last, but not least, neo neocon wants to know what they knew and when they knew it on Harvey Weinstein

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Posted in Patriotic Pinup | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

SNL Goes Misogynistic In Portrayal Of Kellyanne Conway As Pennywise

By William Teach October 15, 2017 – 8:37 am

It’s certainly not the first time Saturday Night Live has portrayed Ms. Conway negatively over her looks, and probably won’t be the last. It’s a pattern with SNL, and other Leftist media outlets, to attack her in a manner that would have them screaming in Offendinitiss if this was against a Democratic woman, and perhaps resounds a little heavier consider that they can barely touch any jokes about Harvey Weinstein, and, in light of Weinstein, a big Democrat, finally being exposed for the sexual harasser, and perhaps rapist, that he is

(Mediaite) Saturday Night Live lampooned Stephen King‘s It tonight by depicting Kellyanne Conway (played by Kate McKinnon) as Pennywise the Dancing Clown.

The skit opens up with “Anderson Cooper” losing his rundown notes after they are blown out of his hand and fall down a storm drain. “Kelly-wise” greets Cooper when he looks down the drain, and she tries to entice the CNN host with crazy quotes so he’ll invite her back on TV.

When Cooper doesn’t go for it, Conway tries scaring him with headlines about President Trump‘s reelection in 2020. She eventually transforms into Hillary Clinton, who offers Cooper a free copy of her book.

Cooper is unable to resist the temptation, which leads to his arm being bitten off before he’s dragged into the sewers just like poor little Georgie Denbrough.

While this is not a major thing, it highlights the Left’s casual misogyny towards Republican women, something we’ve seen for a long, long time. It should surely be understood that politics is a dirty business, and you enter it at your own risk. However, if Republicans had done this skit (or all the others), every media outlet and Democratic politician would be shrieking about misogyny, would they not? These are the same people who turned an innocuous comment about binders of female candidates for jobs into the Worst Thing Ever against Romney, a guy who is as far from being anti-woman as possible. They claimed misogyny because VP Mike Pence will not meet with woman without his wife present.

Oh, and this was not the only political skit. There was also

And other stuff. Not to go all nostaligic, but, they used to be funny, something most could laugh at and enjoy, regardless of political stripe.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: SNL Goes Misogynistic In Portrayal Of Kellyanne Conway As Pennywise »

Posted in Unhinged Tools | 11 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach October 14, 2017 – 1:00 pm

…is a rising ocean from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Not A Lot Of People Know That, with a post on penguins dying from Hotcoldwetdry.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Bummer: Terror Threats Are A Distraction From ‘Climate Change’

By William Teach October 14, 2017 – 10:30 am

Waleed Aly, an Australian born to Egyptian parents, is supposedly the face of “moderate Islam”. However, he has also been accused of being part of the extremist Muslim Brotherhood, of being a celebrity Muslim apologist, and other support for radical Islam. He writes this piece

Focus on terror threats a convenient distraction from climate change

Something illuminating always happens when terrorism and climate change are juxtaposed. It’s just that you need to remember to see it.

Take the past week, when variously our state, territory and federal governments agreed to introduce a suite of new counter-terrorism laws, while the Turnbull government reached such a point of paralysis on climate change that it even hinted it wouldn’t proceed with the clean energy target for which it has spent months laying foundations.

The contrast could hardly be starker. Extending the limits of counter-terrorism legislation in Australia is now a frictionless process. The really attentive might notice the odd squeak of concern about civil liberties, but it carries little public weight and even less political momentum, so legislative change just happens. Climate change, meanwhile, is not just beset by friction, it’s positively jammed. Even modest suggestions – and there is good analysis suggesting the Finkel report’s clean energy target is environmentally inadequate – become politically untenable. Consequently, nothing much happens.

This continues on and on and on. What Aly really wants is for the Australian government to stop spending so much time dealing with the real threat of Islamic terrorism, and switch to the fake issue of Hotcoldwetdry. One has to wonder what the real motivation here is.

Read: Bummer: Terror Threats Are A Distraction From ‘Climate Change’ »

Posted in Global Warming, RoP | 13 Comments | Trackback URL

Who’s Up For A Roswell Reboot That Goes SJW On Illegal Immigration?

By William Teach October 14, 2017 – 7:36 am

The networks are already developing several shows regarding illegal aliens, obviously in a manner that supports and defends them. The CW is now jumping into the mix with a possible reboot to the short lived show Roswell, which was about some kids in Roswell, NM having romance with space aliens as stuff

(Bleeding Cool) As the series overview shows, the new Roswell will directly address the issue of immigration on two levels: the metaphorical sci-fi theme of “aliens-as-immigrants” that was present in the original series; and the very real issues surrounding the immigration debate and the impact it has on the children of undocumented immigrants:

The new, one-hour drama series follows the daughter of undocumented immigrants who reluctantly returns to her tourist-trap hometown of Roswell, New Mexico. There she discovers a shocking truth about her teenage crush who is now a police officer: he’s an alien who has kept his unearthly abilities hidden his entire life. She protects his secret as the two reconnect and begin to investigate his origins, but when a violent attack and long-standing government cover-up point to a greater alien presence on Earth, the politics of fear and hatred threaten to expose him and destroy their deepening romance.

The Mercury News puts it this way

What The CW has revealed about the plot so far is that the daughter of undocumented immigrants returns to Roswell and uncovers the truth about her teen crush, who has become a police officer. Turns out, he’s an alien who has successfully kept his special abilities hidden. She keeps his secret as the two work together to learn more about his origins and their romance rekindles, but everything is disrupted when a violent attack and a government cover-up unveil a greater alien presence on Earth. The two must fight to keep together and his secret safe.

Isn’t nice how the networks are trying to mainstream people who are unlawfully present in the United States? Perhaps they could tell us more on stories such as

Think Roswell, or the other network shows, will touch on these issues?

Read: Who’s Up For A Roswell Reboot That Goes SJW On Illegal Immigration? »

Posted in Barking Moonbats, Illegal Immigration | Comments Off on Who’s Up For A Roswell Reboot That Goes SJW On Illegal Immigration? | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove