It’s Snowing In South Texas: You Know That Means Climate Doom, Right?

Most people in Texas are enjoying a bit of the white stuff

(CNN) Big and fluffy snowflakes fell across parts of south Texas on Thursday, including San Antonio and Austin.

While snow is common in parts of north Texas, it’s unusual for this region to see snowfall and people shared their delight on social media.

“A Texas Christmas miracle!” one person posted on Twitter.

Unusual, but, it happens periodically. But, of course, you know what’s coming, right?

Read More »

Read: It’s Snowing In South Texas: You Know That Means Climate Doom, Right? »

Super Snowflake: Lindsay Vonn Won’t Represent President In Olympics

#Resistantrum in play

(CNN) A number of US athletes have spoken out against Donald Trump during his presidency — and skier Lindsey Vonn has become the latest to have her say.

Targeting Olympic gold at February’s Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang, Vonn is in St. Moritz, Switzerland, where she spoke passionately about what it means to compete for the US ski team.

“Well I hope to represent the people of the United States, not the president,” Vonn told CNN’s Alpine Edge.

And Vonn revealed she wouldn’t accept an invitation to the White House if she were to win gold at Pyeongchang.

“Absolutely not,” said Vonn. “No. But I have to win to be invited. No actually I think every US team member is invited so no I won’t go.

Read: Super Snowflake: Lindsay Vonn Won’t Represent President In Olympics »

If All You See…

…is melting ice due to Someone Else using a hair dryer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Moonbattery, with a post on grinches deeming Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer to be raaaaacist.

Read: If All You See… »

Surprise: Worst Case Hotcoldwetdry Prognostications Are Most Accurate Or Something

Who’s surprised by this latest bit of cult validation, raise your hand

Worst-case global warming predictions are the most accurate, say climate experts

Current predictions of climate change may significantly underestimate the speed and severity of global warming, according to a new study.

Reappraisal of the models climate scientists use to determine future warming has revealed that less optimistic estimates are more realistic.

“Our study indicates that if emissions follow a commonly used business-as-usual scenario, there is a 93 per cent chance that global warming will exceed 4C by the end of this century,” said Dr Ken Caldeira, an atmospheric scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science, who co-authored the new study. (the actual number they’re trotting out is 4.43C, which equals 7.7F)

This likelihood is an increase on past estimates, which placed it at 62 per cent.

Of course! What they did was look at a whole bunch of models, and then take the ones that were best at replicating (snicker) the most recent past. They added in some water vapor, and, wallah! a doomy prognostication.

Other outlets, such as the Washington Post, have picked up on this, and are even more doomy than the above UK Independent.

Read: Surprise: Worst Case Hotcoldwetdry Prognostications Are Most Accurate Or Something »

Enacting A Carbon Tax Would Stop California Wildfires Or Something

This is, interestingly, occuring in the most ‘climate change’ action supporting state, which already has a carbon tax

Opinion California is on fire — in December. Congress, do something about climate change.

To the editor: It’s official: The worst fire season in California history has arrived. Your editorial points out that our warming climate may have played an important role. (“While Southern California battles its wildfires, we have to start preparing for our hotter, drier future,” editorial, Dec. 6)

It is important not to let our fear, anger or wishful thinking lead to helpless despair. Adaptation must work alongside a greening economy. We should know there are bipartisan actions our leaders in Congress can take.

One solution: Putting a price on carbon and rebating the fees to citizens would, several groups report, reduce carbon emissions up to 50% in 20 years. By holding fossil fuel companies responsible for their damages and attaching fees to the use of their products, the economics of clean energy would improve, stimulating innovation and creating jobs. The rebates protect consumers as well.

Well, of course, that should do it! We’re saved with a carbon tax!

Funny that they never seem to want to hold themselves, as users of fossil fuels, responsible.

Read: Enacting A Carbon Tax Would Stop California Wildfires Or Something »

Tucson Police Chief: Upholding Federal Law By Cracking Down On Illegal Aliens Is Bad

Chris Mangus is the police chief of Tucson, Arizona. He obviously has a problem in arresting certain law breaker, but, I bet if you decided to perform a little bit of petty theft you’d find yourself dealing with officers of the law

Tucson’s Police Chief: Sessions’s Anti-Immigrant Policies Will Make Cities More Dangerous

As the police chief here, I’m deeply troubled by the Trump administration’s campaign against “sanctuary cities,” which refuse to turn over undocumented immigrants to federal authorities. Washington is trying to retaliate against them by withholding funding for things like crime prevention, drug treatment and mental health programs.

Tucson is not technically a sanctuary city. But we are close to the border with Mexico and take pride in being welcoming to immigrants. Yet the government has warned us that our grants are in danger.

Still, while federal judges in Chicago and San Francisco have ruled against President Trump’s executive order to withhold money from sanctuary cities, the administration’s crackdown on immigrants is already having a chilling effect on police-community relations here. Many community members have told me that Latinos are not turning to us for help or working with us as often as they have in the past. Their growing sense of fear and distrust is clearly a consequence of the anti-immigrant rhetoric coming from Mr. Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Overall, illegal aliens tend to not report crimes in the first place, but, regardless, are we particularly concerned with criminals not reporting crimes against other criminals? If they have a problem, perhaps they should get the hell out of our country, which they are illegally present within. Perhaps Police Chief Mangus should actually uphold the law, not just the ones he likes. He takes an oath to uphold all laws.

The Justice Department could be playing a key role in building on the Obama-era policing reforms that many of my fellow police chiefs strongly support. Instead, the changes it wants to make — to force local police officers to cooperate much more closely with federal immigration authorities — will compromise public safety by reducing community confidence in law enforcement.

Here’s the thing: they aren’t our community. They’re another country’s community. We aren’t responsible for them.

The message from Washington is that cities need to refocus on “law and order.” Yet the harsh anti-immigrant rhetoric and Mr. Sessions’s reckless policies ignore a basic reality known by most good cops and prosecutors: If people are afraid of the police, if they fear they may become separated from their families or harshly interrogated based on their immigration status, they won’t report crimes or come forward as witnesses.

Yet, Mangus’ police arrest non-illegal aliens all the time who end up being separated from their families when they are sent to jail. Mangus continues going with all the same boilerplate on this subject, forgetting that it is his job to not pick and choose which crimes to enforce. If he’s not willing to enforce all laws, then perhaps he, and the other law enforcement supporters who protect illegals, should resign. Their first job is to protect citizens and those who are lawfully present in the United States.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Tucson Police Chief: Upholding Federal Law By Cracking Down On Illegal Aliens Is Bad »

Four Takeaways From Gathering Of Mayors Who Took Fossil Fueled Trips To Discuss Hotcoldwetdry

Nothing says “I care” like being a complete hypocrite

(NY Times) CHICAGO — Mayors came here by the dozens (45 in total) on Tuesday to voice their support for the international Paris climate accord and their displeasure with President Trump’s plan to withdraw the United States from that agreement. Their solution? They announced their own climate agreement.

In other words, they decided that their underlings citizens would bear the burden. First, they signed said agreement

Under the agreement, which is not legally enforceable, city leaders committed to reducing their own localities’ greenhouse gas emissions 26 to 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025, the national goal negotiated by Mr. Obama’s administration. The pact also called for cities to publish quarterly emissions data; to consider climate change when building infrastructure; and to take an active role in advocating climate-friendly policies.

That’s on them. Have fun with higher cost of living, people living in these Democratic Party cities. Who often do little to stop actual issues, like crime

Some mayors see climate change as a rallying cry for anti-Trump sentiment.

In other words, this is politics.

Along with big-city Democratic mayors were some small-town ones.

But, still Democrats who took fossil fueled trips on the taxpayer dime to figure out ways to put citizens more under control of government.

It was no accident that Chicago hosted this.

Mr. Emanuel, a Democrat, has emerged as a vocal, persistent check on Mr. Trump’s powers, clashing with the administration on climate change, law enforcement and immigration.

“I’m determined to make Chicago a Trump-free zone,” Mr. Emanuel said in an interview on Tuesday, though he was just a few blocks from the Trump Tower skyscraper on Chicago’s riverfront.

It’d be funny as all get out if Trump decided to start spending weekends in Chicago, tweeking Rahm’s nose.

Read: Four Takeaways From Gathering Of Mayors Who Took Fossil Fueled Trips To Discuss Hotcoldwetdry »

If All You See…

…is a horrible carbon pollution spewing dog which causes the seas to rise, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Lid, with a post on the US moving its embassy to Jerusalem.

Most definitely a Canadian, one of my favorites.

Read: If All You See… »

Who’s Up For A Hillary Clinton Tree Topper?

Obviously, this is for all those Leftists who complain about the Christian religion on display in public, people saying Merry Christmas, so forth

“Resistmas”.

From the link

Could you imagine a more fitting angel for your Christmas tree than Beyonce-perfection-Knowles?

She’s an actual angel in human form. As is Serena. Michelle Obama. Oprah.

And you can have them all decorating your festive fur, because nonprofit organisation Women To Look Up To has made a load of 3D figurines of inspiring women.

‘Every Christmas we place a ‘Topper’ […] made of no more than plastic and glitter on top of trees,’ they say.

Though Hillary isn’t mentioned in the article, she is the first you see when you hit the website for Women To Look Up To

Nothing says “role model” like losing an election twice, being considered extremely shady, and skating on allegations that would have seen other women charged and jailed.

That said, you can get one made for heroes like your mom and wife. Or, how about this spunky lady?

Read: Who’s Up For A Hillary Clinton Tree Topper? »

Newest Thing That Contributes To ‘Climate Change’: Bitcoin

If it isn’t one thing, it’s something else. The Cult of Climastrology will always find new things to link to their cult-like beliefs. Some things will be affected, some things are contributors

(Daily Caller) Bitcoin has caught the attention of liberal writers who argue the digital crypto-currency is contributing to global warming.

Vox and The New Republic (TNR) have pieces out highlighting the massive amounts of energy it takes to mine Bitcoins, most of which comes from fossil fuels. Most Bitcoins are mined in China, fueled by cheap coal power.

TNR’s Emily Atkin wrote that “Bitcoins are contributing to the warming of the atmosphere without providing a significant public benefit in return,” adding “[w]e only have 32 years left for carbon emissions to peak and then rapidly decrease, if our planet is to remain livable.” (snip)

Atkins sees Bitcoin as an environmental scourge that needs to be gotten rid of since “buying a Bitcoin is no different than investing in an unpredictable stock on NASDAQ, but the cost to planet is immeasurably worse.”

Then we have the Voxsplaining version

Vox Umair Irfan noted that “mining Bitcoin is a hugely energy-intensive process, even though the currency only exists digitally.” Bitcoin mining uses more energy than some countries, Irfan reported.

“That’s on par with the energy use of the entire country of Morocco, more than 19 European countries, and roughly 0.7 percent of total energy demand in the United States, equal to 2.8 million US households,” Irfan wrote.

They’re also very upset that Bitcoin isn’t for the public good. Regardless, it’s always something with this crowd. They always find a way to ruin everything. Well, except their own use of fossil fueled vehicles. Furthermore, one has to wonder what the electricity usage of Vox and The New Republic are.

Read: Newest Thing That Contributes To ‘Climate Change’: Bitcoin »

Pirate's Cove