Washington Post: Be Scared That Congress Won’t Do Anything About Guns

First they tell us that the problem is only the scary looking assault rifles, so we have to Do Something. But, then they expose their true agenda. Here’s the Washington Post Editorial Board exposing the true agenda

Don’t be scared by NRA hysteria. Be scared Congress will do nothing.

IT WAS a stunning moment: The father of a 14-year-old girl killed in a mass shooting at her high school confronted a U.S. senator: “Look at me and tell me. Guns were the factor in the hunting of our kids in this school this week. And look at me and tell me you accept it and you will work with us to do something about guns.”

Those words from Fred Guttenberg at CNN’s town hall just seven days after his daughter Jaime (“the energy in the room ”) was one of 17 people murdered at a South Florida school were unnerving to Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), and we hope to other members of Congress. Finally they must recognize that there is a crisis of guns in this country, and that they have an urgent responsibility to do something about it. (snip)

The first step, as Mr. Guttenberg emphasized, must be to actually say what the problem is — and the problem clearly is guns. Yes, there are other issues at play, such as mental health and violence in our culture, and they too must be addressed. But troubled people and violent videos exist in other countries and yet only the United States is awash in gun deaths — from homicides, suicides, accidental shootings and the ever-increasing mass shootings.

There’s no other way to read this but that the WPEB is blaming guns, so, something needs to be done about them all. It doesn’t matter that Government at multiple levels utterly failed in the case of Nutjob Shooter Cruz in Florida, that the sheriff’s department failed to do their duty and go into the school, it’s the guns

To seriously confront gun violence — save lives and prevent injuries — there have to be fewer guns. We would start with banning the semiautomatic rifles that — along with large-capacity ammunition magazines — have become the weapon of choice of mass shooters

See? A ban on scary looking weapons and large capacity magazines are just the first things to do. The first things to start with. The WPEB offers some other ideas

Just as there is the expectation of responsibility and accountability for people who drive cars, so there should be for people who own guns. That means requiring registration, training and insurance.

Training sounds good. I’ve never had a problem with requiring that gun owners go through a training course for approval of a permit. But, registration? This is just a way for Government to know exactly which weapons you have, the better to be able to confiscate it. Insurance? That’s simply to make the cost of ownership so expensive that people cannot afford a firearm.

Other steps are needed. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives should be strengthened so it can do its job of regulating and tracing guns. Innovations should be encouraged that make weapons safer, such as improved gun triggers or smart guns. Laws should be amended to keep weapons out of the hands of domestic abusers. And research funding should be directed at determining what has worked in reducing gun violence.

Perhaps the WPEB could finally come out in favor of full investigation into the Fast and Furious gun running scheme by the Obama administration, which included BATFE. Get NJ to nullify their law on smart guns, and people would develop them. I’m actually all for studies on what works, because we’ll find that having people in gun free zones with guns tends to dissuade nutjobs, while massive controls and bans in places like Chicago do not.

Regardless, all these things are just steps to banning private ownership of firearms by citizens, leaving them in the hands of government.

BTW

https://twitter.com/WilliamTeach/status/967581625633705984

Read: Washington Post: Be Scared That Congress Won’t Do Anything About Guns »

We Need Open Borders To Stop ‘Climate Change’ Or Something

Funny how the Cult of Climastrology’s dogma/talking points jibes so well with Progressive talking points, wouldn’t you say? Also funny how a news outlet, Al Jazeera, funded by fossil fuels (and with links to radical Islam) is pushing this

To stop climate change, we need to open borders

Europe is facing its biggest refugee crisis since World War II. What is new this time around is that many of the displaced are being driven from their homes by the destructive effects of climate change. And this is just the beginning.

As sea levels rise, swallowing island nations and swamping large parts of Bangladesh, and as droughts trigger  food shortages across much of the global South, the refugee crisis will only worsen. And we can expect that Europe’s right-wing parties will respond by doubling down on their already-potent anti-immigrant rhetoric with a push to seal off the borders. 

Pundits on the left denounce this as a craven, mean-spirited stance towards those who are suffering the most from our collective climate crisis. And they’re right: opening the borders to climate refugees is a matter of basic justice. We need to devise policies to ensure that all have the right to access safe and habitable parts of the planet we share.

But there is something more to be said here. An open border policy may also be the key to stopping climate change itself. 

Yes, and open borders allows a flood of hardcore jihadists from 3rd world shitholes into developed nations. Surprise!

The solution is simple, at least conceptually: open the borders. By tearing down the walls that separate the causes and consequences of climate change we can force a more honest reckoning with reality. Once the victims of climate change have the right to seek refuge in Europe and North America, it will obliterate the moral hazard of global warming. As rich nations finally start to feel the heat, so to speak, you can bet they’ll act fast, doing everything in their power to ensure that people’s home regions remain livable. Even if it means pushing for a new, more ecological, economic model.

Yup, nothing like letting the developed world be over-run by people who’s beliefs are stuck in the 10th Century to stop ‘climate change”, eh? This is what Leftists would call “intersectionalist”, as they are attempting to use Hotcoldwetdry as a means to get their hardcore buddies en masse into 1st World nations.

Read: We Need Open Borders To Stop ‘Climate Change’ Or Something »

If All You See…

…is an evil plastic bottle of water causing drought and flood, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is American Power, with a post on American satisfaction with the nation.

Read: If All You See… »

CNBC: You Should Totally Take Long Fossil Fueled Trips To Visit These Destinations Before ‘Climate Change’ Destroys Them

One has to wonder if CNBC’s Helen Zhao really thought about this ahead of time

3 ‘last chance’ destinations drawing travelers worried about climate change

Some bucket-list trips may be more about anticipating the destination’s demise than yours.

Certain countries susceptible to climate change have seen a spike in travel interest over the past year, according to a new report from travel insurance comparison web site Squaremouth. People may be advancing their plans to see these places in all their current glory, they note.

The report is based on data Squaremouth collects when people input their destination and trip costs into the site to compare policies.

For example, interest in the Maldives — an island chain southwest of India that is fighting rising sea levels — jumped 68 percent from 2016 to 2017. In comparison, Squaremouth’s 20 most-traveled destinations saw an average increase of 15 percent in the same time period.

Nothing says “I totally believe in anthropogenic climate change which is mostly caused by fossil fuels and I’m Very Concerned” like taking long fossil fueled trips, eh?

Along with the Maldives, Australia has increased 25%, because people want to see the Great Barrier Reef before it bleaches out or something like that, because corals, which have dealt with much warmer seas (and higher sea levels) are super threatened (on Warmist computer models).

And then there’s Antarctica, up 17%. Talk about taking long fossil fueled trips to the ends of the Earth. Climahypocrisy lives.

Read: CNBC: You Should Totally Take Long Fossil Fueled Trips To Visit These Destinations Before ‘Climate Change’ Destroys Them »

Heavy Majority Want Merit Based Immigration System

The majority of 1st World Nations already have merit based immigration systems in place. Heck, many 2nd and 3rd world nations have the same. Nations would prefer that people who come in have skills, won’t be a drain on the nation, speak the language, and will assimilate

(Daily Caller) The vast majority of Americans prefer an immigration system which prioritizes immigrants who contribute to the U.S. over a family based system, a new Harvard-Harris poll finds.

The broad based U.S. representative poll found that 84 percent of respondents agreed with the statement that immigration policy in the U.S. “should be based on a person’s ability to contribute to America”. Only 16 percent agreed with the statement that it “Should be based on a person having relatives in the U.S.”

The lowest support for a merit-based immigration system was 69 percent among African-Americans and 75 percent held among self identified “Democrats” and “liberals.” Eighty-three percent of Hispanic respondents agreed with the statement posed.

The high muckety mucks in the Democratic Party and their special interest groups might be railing against a merit based system, but when 75% of self identified Democrats/Liberals agree with such a system, that’s pretty big. Why would we want to take in people who have few skills, do not speak the language, won’t assimilate, will go and live in their insular neighborhoods, and also demand that the U.S. change to accommodate the immigrant, all while having to be supported by the government and wanting to bring in more family members who will also not speak the language, won’t assimilate, etc and so on?

Of course, that is a double edged sword, since this would mean people coming in who would take American jobs. But, it also means that these are people who WANT to be Americans, rather than just bringing in large groups of people with low to no skills who have to be supported by the government. Realistically, we should do what has been done many times previously, and significantly limit legal immigration for a few decades in order to allow all those here now to assimilate.

Read: Heavy Majority Want Merit Based Immigration System »

The System To Stop The Parkland Shooter Completely Broke Down, But Let’s Blame The NRA

The Washington Post points out just how badly the system broke down. They note all the red flags and warnings

How a system built to stop the Parkland school shooter repeatedly broke down

The Broward County Sheriff’s Office received a call in November with an ominous warning: Nikolas Cruz, a troubled 19-year-old, was collecting guns and knives and “could be a school shooter in the making.”

It was one of at least four times local or federal authorities were contacted about such a threat linked to Cruz, including a tip the FBI received in January warning that he would “get into a school and just shoot the place up,” according to a transcript of the call obtained by The Post on Friday. Another tip to the sheriff’s office the previous year warned that Cruz “planned to shoot up the school.”

In the era of “see something, say something,” members of the public did just that. But what happened after the November call fit a disturbing pattern in the lead-up to the Parkland, Fla., massacre: No report was filed, and there is no evidence the threat was ever investigated. (snip)

Investigations into mass shootings often reveal warning signs that seem blindingly clear with the benefit of hindsight. But the Parkland shooting has stood out for the sheer scale of how many alarms were raised before the Feb. 14 rampage.

There are dueling narratives over whether his guns could be taken away or he could have been involuntarily committed under Florida’s Baker Act. Regardless, all the signs were there, and action was not taken.

Law enforcement officials have drawn intense criticism for lapses involving Cruz. The FBI said it failed to investigate the January warning about concerns that he wanted to kill people, owned guns and could carry out a school shooting.

This person told the FBI that she worried Cruz was “going to explode,” a federal law enforcement official said Friday. Details of her call were first reported by the Wall Street Journal, which reviewed a transcript of the call. A federal law enforcement official confirmed the information to The Washington Post.

One has to wonder if local law enforcement, including the Broward Sheriff’s Office, were notified. They were called to other disturbances, and the school resource officer, who failed to do his job and go into the school when the shooting started, may have done nothing with the information.

In November, a caller alerted the Broward County Sheriff’s Office that Cruz was collecting guns and knives, wanted to join the Army, may commit suicide and could be a school shooter. Authorities have not identified the caller, except to say they called from Massachusetts.

The Broward County Sheriff’s Office said this week that no report was filed on that call. After the Stoneman Douglas shooting, a deputy said he referred the caller to the Palm Beach Sheriff’s Office, but a spokeswoman for that office said they were never told of that threat. The Broward County Sheriff’s Office said it launched an internal investigation into the call but declined to provide further details about what happened after, citing the ongoing internal affairs investigation.

I’m just taking snippets out of the article for the overall failure of law enforcement at multiple levels (and we’re not even sure if the Florida state police ever were involved and failed) to take some sort of action. But, of course

Robert Bonczek (a 17 year old student at the school where Cruz went murderous) said most students are focusing not on blame, but with channeling their anger to press for changes to laws regulating guns.

“The FBI didn’t do their job, but it’s hard to do anything about that,” he said. “But with Congress, we can specifically make calls for change.”

See? This is the narrative. People failed to take action with a constant litany of credible threats, but, hey, it’s the gun’s fault, so, let’s pass more laws to disarm the law abiding citizens who won’t be turning into unhinged murderers.

I mean, we have kids suspended and kicked out of school for making finger guns, biting Pop Tarts into the shape of a gun, bringing in army men with fake plastic guns, bringing in water pistols. Kids have been told they can’t wear Army and Marines shirts. Yet, no one did anything about Cruz. But, we’ll try and take your guns in the meantime.

Read: The System To Stop The Parkland Shooter Completely Broke Down, But Let’s Blame The NRA »

Warmists: Warm, Pleasant Weather Is Ominous Or Something

During the recent bitter cold, the Cult of Climastrology was saying it was all about ‘climate change’. It totally validated their talking points that greenhouse gases were changing the atmosphere! But, now we have some warm weather, so

Extreme February temperatures on East Coast raise question about climate change

Summer came early to New York City on Wednesday, as temperatures soared to a record 76°F — more than 30 degrees warmer than the average February high. Up and down the the East Coast, from Atlanta to Baltimore to Cleveland to Boston, an unusual warm spell broke temperature records.

While everyone enjoys T-shirt weather in February, this week’s mild weather is an ominous sign of global climate change. When heat makes history, it tends to bear a human fingerprint.

Carbon pollution from cars, trucks, factories, farms, and power plants is trapping heat, driving up temperatures around the world. The result is more days of extreme heat and fewer days of extreme cold. Over the last year, the continental United States saw more than twice as many record highs as record lows.

Good thing Warmists have all given up their fossil fueled vehicles and are now off the grid using solar panels, right?

Consistent with climate change, the warm weather back east proved more anomalous than the cool weather out west. Rising temperatures around the world mean that when it’s cold, it’s cold, but when it’s hot, it’s really hot.

Interestingly, here in Raleigh, we’ve only had one or two hundred degree days over the past 3-4 years, when we usually get 5 on average. But, hey, when it’s really cold, it’s also due to you driving a fossil fueled vehicle.

This whole thing is the very hallmark of a cult.

Read: Warmists: Warm, Pleasant Weather Is Ominous Or Something »

If All You See…

…is a horrible vending machine putting out fatty snacks which are bad for ‘climate change’, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is A View From The Beach, with a post on your Olympics sore loser of the week.

Read: If All You See… »

Surprise: New Cause Of Warming Discovered By Scientists Doing Science

Meh. It’s still probably your fault for refusing to live in an off the grid tiny home while growing your own veggies and making your clothes out of hemp

Scientists Identify A Major Source Of Climate Warming. It’s Not CO2

For the first time, scientists were able to use satellites to map the potential warming effect of large-scale changes to vegetation on the Earth’s surface.

“Our results show that vegetation cover change over the period 2000–2015 has produced on average a brighter but warmer land surface,” reads a new study published in the journal Nature.

The European Commission Joint Research Center’s new study found “perturbations in the surface energy balance generated by vegetation change from 2000 to 2015 have led to an average increase of [0.23 degrees Celsius] in local surface temperature where those vegetation changes occurred.”

“Vegetation transitions behind this warming effect mainly relate to agricultural expansion in the tropics, where surface brightening and consequent reduction of net radiation does not counter-balance the increase in temperature associated with reduction in transpiration,” the study found.

A large part of this study is looking at land use, and how small changes can have big impacts, something that Skeptics have been saying for a long time, to go with the Urban Heat Island effect (UHI) and natural variation. Things like forestation, deforestation, turning woodland into farmland (or cities). Planting crops in areas that didn’t used to have them. Creating woodland in areas that didn’t use to have them. All these things and more can have profound effects on weather patterns, and those long-term weather pattern averages are what is known as climate.

And let’s not forget that increased CO2 increases plant growth, and nature puts out more CO2 than mankind.

Read: Surprise: New Cause Of Warming Discovered By Scientists Doing Science »

Armed Officer Never Went In During Parkland Shooting, Now Getting More Protection Than Schoolkids

Did you hear about this one?

(Miami Herald) Eight days after mass shooter Nikolas Cruz murdered 17 people inside Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, Broward’s top cop on Thursday revealed a stunning series of failures by the sheriff’s department.

A school campus cop heard the gunfire, rushed to the building but never went inside — instead waiting outside for another four agonizing minutes as Cruz continued the slaughter.

And long before Cruz embarked on the worst school shooting in Florida history, Broward Sheriff’s Office deputies had multiple warnings that the 19-year-old was a violent threat and a potential school shooter, according to records released Thursday.

In November, a tipster called BSO to say Cruz “could be a school shooter in the making” but deputies did not write up a report on that warning. It came just weeks after a relative called urging BSO to seize his weapons. Two years ago, according to a newly released timeline of interactions with Cruz’s family, a deputy investigated a report that Cruz “planned to shoot up the school” — intelligence that was forwarded to the school’s resource officer, with no apparent result.

The school’s resource officer, Scot Peterson, 54, was suspended without pay then immediately resigned and retired. Two other deputies have been placed on restricted duty while Internal Affairs investigates how they handled the two shooter warnings. (snip)

Peterson — named school resource officer of the year for Parkland in 2014 — was in another building, dealing with a student issue when the shots sounded. Armed with his sidearm, Peterson ran to the west side of Building 12 and set up in a defensive position, then did nothing for four minutes until the gunfire stopped, the sheriff said.

On Thursday, Israel said surveillance footage captured the officer’s inaction. Asked what Peterson should have done, Israel said: “Went in. Addressed the killer. Killed the killer.”

And then there’s this

(Business Leader) Deputies from the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s office are guarding the home of the school resource officer who was stationed at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School after his family requested the protection, according to multiple news reports on Thursday.

Local Fox affiliate WSVN said it sent a reporter to the Boynton Beach, Florida, home of Broward County Sheriff’s deputy Scot Peterson for an interview when the reporter was met with six deputies “standing guard outside.”

One man gets six armed law enforcement officers. An entire school gets one. Who failed to act as gunfire rang out in the school.

As far as arming teachers, here’s an idea. First, allow retired military members and police officers who have experience with guns to serve as protection officers. I bet there are plenty of granddads who would be up for it. Second, allow teachers to be armed if they choose. They’d have to go through a background check and a firearms safety course, as well as be trained in the use of the gun.

Stress to teachers that they do not even have to load the weapon if they are uncomfortable (bear with me a minute, I know what you’re thinking). Allow them to carry one of those fake pistols that look utterly realistic. Some will open carry, some will concealed carry. The point here is not to shoot someone, but to deter a wacko from coming to the school looking for an easy murder spree. This would apply to all schools, all the way up through colleges. Deterrence.

If you’re banning guns, you’re taking them away from the law abiding. Criminals will still have theirs. Let’s allow schools to have the same protection the failed officer is getting.

Read: Armed Officer Never Went In During Parkland Shooting, Now Getting More Protection Than Schoolkids »

Pirate's Cove