…is a ground turning to desert from carbon pollution atmosphere cancer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Last Tradition, with a post on Democrats waiving background checks for their Pakistani IT guys.
Read: If All You See… »
…is a ground turning to desert from carbon pollution atmosphere cancer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Last Tradition, with a post on Democrats waiving background checks for their Pakistani IT guys.
Read: If All You See… »
You could see this one coming, right?
N.J. weather: Quick-hit April snowstorm to drop up to 6 inches today
A rapidly moving April snowstorm will make for a miserable Monday morning commute across the northern half of the state, dropping as much as 6 inches of snow before exiting early this afternoon.
Expect about 3 to 4 inches in the New Brunswick area and 2 to 3 inches around Freehold and Trenton.
Everyone from Toms River south should gets less an inch with people in Atlantic City as well as in Cape May and southern Cumberland counties seeing no snow. Parts of the state could see changes back and forth from rain to snow during the brief storm.
The snow isn’t confined just to Jersey, but the southern part of New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Mass, Vermont, New Hampshire, Eastern PA, and southern Maine. So, of course
If I hear anyone dismiss climate change I'm gonna smack them right in the head with my snow shovel.
— Danaland (@danahaviland) April 2, 2018
Read: It’s Snowing In The Northeast, So, You Know What That Means, Right? »
Ever since Scott Pruitt announce that the science would no longer be secret, at least not on the taxpayer dime, all the Warmists have been coming up with various different Excuses as to why making the science transparent is a bad idea
(Daily Caller) The New York Times editorial board came out against Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott Pruitt’s plan to stop “secret science†from being used as the basis of regulations.
Pruitt will soon require EPA to only rely on studies that make their data publicly available when crafting regulations. The Times opposed Pruitt’s transparency plan, echoing liberal critics’ claims it would violate patient privacy.
“He told his subordinates that they could no longer make policy on the basis of studies that included data from participants who were guaranteed confidentiality,†The Times editorial board wrote on Saturday.
“Over the years, such studies have been crucial to establishing links between mortality and pollution, led to regulations and saved many lives,†the editorial board wrote. “Limiting policymakers to only those studies with publicly available health data greatly narrows the field of research.â€
It’s easy to see that Pruitt’s policy is primarily aimed at the climate change scam and some of the enviroweenie regulations that we were seeing implemented during the Obama years, ones that had an impact on citizens, and the People had very little access to the actual data.
The editorial board quoted an op-ed by former Obama EPA officials who argued, “Mr. Pruitt’s goal is simple: No studies, no data, no rules.†The Times editorial ties Pruitt’s latest plan into the Trump administration’s alleged “disdain†for science.
If the data cannon stand up to transparency, then it’s not particularly good data. In fact, the full quote at the Times reads
Far better to stick his head in the sand, ostrichlike; do that, and the need for policies regulating greenhouse gas emissions or dangerous pollutants like soot and mercury magically disappears. Which is certainly Mr. Pruitt’s modus operandi. As Gina McCarthy, a former E.P.A. administrator, and her deputy for air quality, Janet McCabe, said in a recent Times Op-Ed: “Mr. Pruitt’s goal is simple: No studies, no data, no rules.â€
So, requiring that the science no longer be secret is Pruitt sticking his head in the sand, Ostritchlike? Really? Science must be replicable. It is supposed to be open. Why are Warmists advocating so strongly for it to be secret? It doesn’t take an Einstein to arrive at the real answer.
Read: NY Times Is Super Thrilled To Advocate For Secret Climate Scam Science »
This being Trump, one has to wonder if he really means it, or if he’s attempting to drive Democrats to the bargaining table
(Fox News) President Trump declared on Sunday the deal for the Obama-era DACA program was “NO MORE†and called for “tough” immigration reform after a report stated a caravan carrying more than 1,000 people from Central America is traveling through Mexico and to the United States in hopes of entering the states illegally or by asking for asylum.
Trump, who has vowed to end catch and release, tweeted Sunday morning that Republicans need to take the “nuclear option” when passing tougher immigration laws.
The president had given Congress six months to pass legislation enshrining the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA), which protects about 800,000 young immigrants brought to country illegally as children from deportation.
“Border Patrol Agents are not allowed to properly do their job at the Border because of ridiculous liberal (Democrat) laws like Catch & Release. Getting more dangerous. ‘Caravans’ coming. Republicans must go to Nuclear Option to pass tough laws NOW. NO MORE DACA DEAL!†the president tweeted.
Border Patrol Agents are not allowed to properly do their job at the Border because of ridiculous liberal (Democrat) laws like Catch & Release. Getting more dangerous. “Caravans” coming. Republicans must go to Nuclear Option to pass tough laws NOW. NO MORE DACA DEAL!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 1, 2018
The caravan the president was likely referring to was first reported by BuzzFeed News on Friday. Organized by Pueblos Sin Fronteras, or People Without Borders, the caravan traveled through Mexico without authorization last week, according to the report. Officials in Mexico have not attempted to stop the migrants, about 80 percent of them from Honduras. The group’s intent is to provide those people a safe way to travel to the U.S.
And they are planning on coming into the U.S. illegally in multiple ways, including sneaking in and getting caught at checkpoints, where they expect that catch and release will be used, and then they disappear into the nation. Legal Insurrection has the whole deal on this caravan on future illegals.
That all said, what happens when they do start catching them? Will the Trump admin advise the Border Patrol to refuse admittance? Immediately remove those caught entering illegally back to Mexico? And, again, does Trump actually look to move on from any DACA deal, or is this a bargaining ploy?
Read: Trump Declares DACA Deal Dead, Calls For Tough Immigration »
…are trees that hate carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Right Scoop, with a post on Trump saying there’s no more DACA deal.
Read: If All You See… »

Happy Easter Sunday! The sun is shining, the birds are singing, the Devils are 5 points up on the Panthers, and it is a day that He Has Risen. This pinup is by Mayo Olmstead, with a wee bit of help.
What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15
As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets†calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me
Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!
Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list.
It’s hard to tell which outlet is nuttier these days, Salon or CNN
CNN Article Claims That The Easter Story Is Like A ‘#MeToo Moment’
An article from CNN.com published Friday bewilderingly claims that the biblical story of Easter is a #MeToo story from Mary Magdalene’s perspective.
“The men refused to listen to her story,†the article begins. “She was publicly smeared as a whore. And when she emerged as celebrated advocate, powerful men tried to silence her because she threatened their status. Nevertheless she persisted.â€
“The woman we’re talking about, though, is not a leader in the #MeToo movement — the viral campaign raising awareness about sexual assault and harassment against women,†it continues.
“She is Mary Magdalene, the first person Jesus appeared to after his resurrection, according to the New Testament, and the first person to preach the good news that he had been raised from the dead.â€
The post, which is not marked opinion, continued to make comparisons between the way women are allegedly mistreated in 21st Century America with the way Mary Magdalene, the biblical character, was marginalized.
Well, pretty much everything at CNN is opinion, or barely veiled opinion. There’s nary a point to even having an opinion section anymore at CNN. Oh, and just too be clear, the writer of the CNN moonbattery isn’t even a woman. Looks like he’s mansplaining things to women. Directly from the CNN screed
For billions of Christians around the world, Easter Sunday is a celebration of a risen savior. Yet what happened to Mary Magdalene shows that Easter can also be seen as something else — a #MeToo moment, some pastors and biblical scholars say.
They say Easter is also a story about how charismatic female leaders such as Mary Magdalene — and even Jesus himself — were victimized by some of the same behavior that sparked the #MeToo movement: the sexually predatory behavior of men, the intimidation of women and an orchestrated attempt to silence women who drew too much attention when they spoke up.
One of the most obvious links between Easter and #MeToo, some say, is the way Mary Magdalene has been slut-shamed.
At this point, the article hasn’t even made it to the quarter race mark. It keeps going on and on and on.
One New Testament scholar captured the tension between interpreting the Bible and seeing it through a modern lens when he wrote about a push to make biblical translations more gender-inclusive.
“Should we refrain from calling God our Father because some people have had sinful, oppressive fathers?” asked Vern S. Poythress, a professor of New Testament interpretation at Westminster Theological Seminary in Pennsylvania.
“Should we stop using ‘He’ to refer to God because some people will think that God is literally of the male sex? If we allow these concessions, will not others enter from the wings, seducing us into an indefinite series of mollifications of the Bible for the sake of not ‘unnecessarily’ offending modern readers?”
It’s not going to get any better, folks. It really doesn’t.
In a paper titled, “Crucifixion, State Terror and Sexual Abuse,” he explained why:
“In a patriarchal society in which men competed against each other to display virility in terms of sexual power over others, the public display of the naked victim by the ‘victors’ in front of onlookers and passers-by carries the message of sexual domination.
“The cross held up the victim for display as someone who had been — at least metaphorically — emasculated.”
These people. Oh, and as a commenter notes at the Daily Caller “So you want to tie a 2000+ year old story to the metoo movement, but still haven’t heard a word about how women in Muslim countries are continued to be treated as 2nd class citizens. Why do these libs never want to protest for their rights? Where is the denouncement for the countries that require women to cover themselves?”
This is what decades of spreading awareness on ‘climate change’ along with turning kids into Special Snowflakes brings
The heavy snowfall and its wider social implications
The snow has gone now, but for a few days it was as if our city was in lockdown. When a human being’s physical environment changes so drastically, so quickly, it is not unusual to feel all kinds of emotions, discombobulated and out of touch being just a couple. Though being cut off from our day-to-day routines and the faces we are used to is disconcerting, amongst all this there lies a prospect more terrifying. This is the idea of a permanent and radical shift in the physical environment, which fundamentally changes our lives. Imagine if the streets you walk down every day, and the buildings in which you eat, sleep, work and read, never looked the same again.
That is what it felt like in Edinburgh with the onset of the ‘Beast from the East’. Normal life was paralysed. Economic activity became pretty much impossible; the chance to study and learn was temporarily put on hold. Yet, in our cold and windswept corner of the developed world, we can afford an interruption like this. Scotland, for the most part, enjoys a standard of living which is the envy of the world. Not all are so lucky.

These people are soft. It’s a storm. Nothing even that bad. Go outside and play. Enjoy. Instead, these people go into mental meltdown.
Hysteria has no place in the climate debate…
Yet, we saw it in the first two paragraphs
…Thick-headed remarks like ‘tut-tut, must be climate change’ whenever the weather changes drastically are unhelpful, because they confirm the deniers of man-made climate change with their implicit scepticism.
Yet the issues are increasingly scary. For millions of people worldwide, climate change represents a permanent and disruptive change to their physical environment: their lives will never be the same again. Whether it’s desertification in the Sahel, or intense flooding in Bangladesh, the fact remains that there are people in the world who will, and are, feeling the full force of climate change now. They are the first to feel the consequences of our dirty path to prosperity; it is they who will suffer for modernity’s crime.
Soft. Very soft. Mushy headed. Grow a pair, youngsters.
Read: ‘Climate Change’ Caused Snowfall Has Big Social Implications Or Something »
…is a horrible carbon pollution spewing fridge, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Jihad Watch, with a post on Imams working to avoid getting caught praying for genocide against Jews.
Read: If All You See… »
Have to keep the scare factor going, you know
(Weather Channel) Climate change is the greatest threat to humankind, the head of the United Nations said Thursday, noting that “a tsunami of data that should create a storm of concern.”
Speaking at a press Q&A at U.N. headquarters in New York, U.N. Secretary General António Guterres called climate change “the most systemic threat to humankind†and called on world leaders to reduce their countries’ greenhouse gas emissions.
Guterres said the world reached several “dire milestones in 2017,” including the economic costs of climate-related disasters that hit a record $320 billion and the atmospheric concentrations of CO2, methane and nitrous oxide, which he said are the “highest they have been in 800,000 years.”
“Energy-related carbon dioxide emissions rose 1.4 percent, to 32.5 gigatonnes, a historic high,” Guterres said. “In 2017, the hurricane season in the Caribbean was the costliest ever, un-doing decades of development in an instant.”
So, in the decade plus with minimal tropical storm activity, especially for major hurricanes, that was just nature. One big season, and it’s Doom caused by carbon pollution.
“I am beginning to wonder how many more alarm bells must go off before the world rises to the challenge,†Guterres said. “We know it can be hard to address problems perceived to be years or decades away. But climate impacts are already upon us.â€
Why should we listen to people who refuse to practice what they preach? Who have oversized carbon footprints?
Read: ‘Climate Change’ Is Humanity’s Greatest Threat, Say U.N. Chief »