If All You See…

…is a horrible carbon pollution filled can of beer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Watts Up With That?, with a post on British humour roasting climate catastrophism.

Read: If All You See… »

Jewish Protester Charged For Mocking Hezbollah In The UK

How many have been arrested in the UK over chanting “from the river to the sea”? Or wearing Intifada keffiyehs, a sign of killing Jews and replacing Israel with a Palestinian caliphate? Or for flying flags in support of Hezbollah and Hamas, designated terrorist organizations by the United Kingdom? Heck, for terrorizing and assaulting Jews?

Jewish protester charged over placard mocking terrorist leader

A Jewish protester was arrested by the Metropolitan Police after he briefly held a placard satirising a Hezbollah terrorist leader, The Telegraph can reveal.

The British man, who has asked to remain anonymous for his safety, was detained and charged last September over a cartoon that showed Hasan Nasrallah, the Lebanese terror chief, with a pager and the words “beep, beep, beep”.

The placard satirised a targeted Israeli attack, dubbed Operation Grim Beeper, in which explosives in pagers and walkie-talkies killed 42 people, mostly Hezbollah terrorists. Nasrallah survived, but was killed in an air strike a week later.

During questioning, police repeatedly asked the man – who was part of a counter-demonstration against a pro-Palestinian march – if he believed the image would offend “clearly pro-Hezbollah and anti-Israel” activists.

Hezbollah is a terror group, which is proscribed in the UK.

Well, the government has to placate their Islamic terrorism supporters, who also hate Jews. You know, all the ones they invited in who are changing the UK into an Islamist nation

The decision by police to allow pro-Palestinian demonstrators to march through London since the Oct 7 massacre, including in areas with high Jewish populations and near synagogues, has been highly contentious.

The man’s case is the latest in a string of heavy-handed police responses to lawful expression. Last year, The Telegraph reported how columnist Allison Pearson was questioned at home by two officers over an X post following pro-Palestinian protests.

The Telegraph also uncovered the case of Julian Foulkes, a retired special constable, who was wrongly cautioned by Kent Police for warning about the threat of anti-Semitism in Britain.

The British police have been pretty heavy handed on many things, like COVID. Like “mean” social media posts. Except where Jew hatred and Islamic extremism is concerned. Then it will be ignored. That’s how you end up with the Rotherham grooming/raping issue, which went on for over a decade.

Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said it was an example of “two-tier policing in action”.

He told The Telegraph: “In recent times, the police have failed to act when confronted with protesters calling for jihad and intifada in London. Yet this man was apparently arrested because he might have offended supporters of a banned terrorist organisation.

The UK is pretty much lost at this point. How do they change

The area, near the home of Tzipi Hotovely, the Israeli ambassador, has been targeted almost weekly by pro-Palestinian activists since the October 7 massacre.

On Sept 20, a pro-Palestine demonstrator was filmed in the area shouting “I love the 7th of October” and “I like any organisation that starts with H”. He was arrested under terrorism legislation, but was not charged.

And the man arrested was at the counter-demonstration the same day.

Read: Jewish Protester Charged For Mocking Hezbollah In The UK »

Defund NPR: They’re Pushing Electric Grills Over Fossil Fueled Ones

Bunch of nags

Electric grills are a climate-friendly option to fossil fuel grills

Summer grilling usually starts with filling a propane tank or buying a bag of charcoal briquettes. But some people are ditching these fuels for a more climate-friendly electric grill.

Just before dinner recently, Stoio Kachev wheeled his electric grill across his family’s backyard patio to an electrical outlet, plugged it in and hit the power button.

“You can choose what temperature you want,” Kachev says, setting it to 500 degrees Fahrenheit on the digital display. “So you see it’s at 152 now and it’ll take about 15 minutes to get to 500.”

On the menu are two family favorites. “We are making some Bulgarian short ribs, and we’re going to make some Vietnamese pork belly,” says Doanh Nghiem. She and Kachev say convenience is the main reason they switched to an electric grill.

Must be crazy liberals to get all high-toned and fancy todo

Climate change is another reason Nghiem and Kachev switched. Before the grill, the couple replaced several fossil fuel items with electric ones — first their car, then lawn mower and trimmer, a water heater and last year the grill.

Switching from a fossil fuel-burning device to an electric one — called electrification — is a key climate solution, especially as they are powered by electricity generated from an increasingly cleaner grid that uses renewable energy instead of fossil fuels.

Piss off. It’s just not the same. Like using MSG instead of properly spicing food. These people are just insufferable, and, want to force Everyone Else to comply.

Read: Defund NPR: They’re Pushing Electric Grills Over Fossil Fueled Ones »

Trump Admin Ending Hearings For Certain Illegals In Order To Fast-track Repatriation

It really should be easy: “did you come to the U.S. illegally? Yes? Then you are being deported.” Anyone who illegally crosses the border should be fast tracked out

ICE ending migrants’ court cases in order to arrest and move to deport them

The Trump administration has launched an operation to terminate the immigration court cases of certain migrants, in order to arrest them and place them in a fast-tracked deportation process instead, government officials and attorneys told CBS News.

Lawyers and advocates this week reported arrests of migrants outside of immigration courthouses across the U.S., saying teams of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers had detained individuals whose cases in front of immigration judges had just been terminated at the request of the government.

Two Department of Homeland Security officials told CBS News that ICE is conducting an operation to expedite the deportation of migrants with court hearings scheduled in the near future. It’s the latest step taken by the Trump administration to dramatically ramp up immigration arrests across the country and fulfill what the president has promised will be the largest deportation campaign in American history.

The operation involves ICE prosecutors asking immigration judges to terminate the court cases of certain migrants, so agents at the agency can instead arrest those individuals and place them in a more rapid deportation process known as “expedited removal,” the officials said.

Instead of taking years, it can be quick

Migrants who lack proper documents and can’t prove they have been in the U.S. for more than two years are eligible to be deported under expedited removal, without a court hearing.

Really, any who are here illegally should be fast tracked. Let’s make it happen.

Expedited removal can also be applied to unauthorized migrants who entered the U.S. with the government’s permission at legal entry points, and there’s no two-year entry limit for those cases. That would place the nearly 1 million migrants who entered the U.S. under a Biden administration program known as CBP One at risk of being targeted by the new ICE operation.

Let’s be honest, most will not be eligible for asylum. Most seem to be fighting age men, not women and children.

You know what would be fun? To hold court in upscale liberal areas, and house the illegals there while waiting. Martha’s Vineyard, Beverly Hills, near Obama’s house in Chicago, near Biden’s beach house in Delaware, etc. Since they love them so much.

Read: Trump Admin Ending Hearings For Certain Illegals In Order To Fast-track Repatriation »

LOL: New Zealand Abandoning Net Zero Goals, Plans To Start Drilling Again

I’m sure she looks just like that

(Telegraph) New Zealand has abandoned its pursuit of net zero by revoking a ban on drilling for oil and gas.

The country’s government confirmed the shift in its latest budget this week, which unveiled plans to invest NZ$200m (£90m) in new offshore gas fields.

The reversal marks an end to a policy announced by Jacinda Ardern, the former prime minister, in 2018. She claimed at the time that “the world has moved on from fossil fuels”.

However, Nicola Willis, New Zealand’s finance minister, has consigned Ms Ardern’s policy to history by announcing plans to expand offshore gas fields.

In particular, she is seeking to attract international oil and gas companies with a taxpayer-backed subsidy of NZ$200m (£88m).

Why would she be sad: doesn’t she need all that fossil fuel for all her flights around the world?

Meanwhile, this is insane. The Biden regime was handing out almost a $100 billion in “loans” 76 days before Trump took office.

Twitchy has a partial transcript.

Read: LOL: New Zealand Abandoning Net Zero Goals, Plans To Start Drilling Again »

If All You See…

…is an urban area flooded by carbon pollution Bad Weather, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Not A Lot Of People Know That, with a post on West Nile virus lie exposed.

Read: If All You See… »

Progressives Grapple With Their Beliefs Causing Murder Of Jews In D.C.

They think it betrays their values. I’m not sure how, because hating Jews/Israel and supporting radical Islam is part of their values, and has been for a while

‘It betrays our values’: Progressives grapple with deadly shooting

Progressives are grappling with the killing of two people who worked at the Israeli embassy in Washington by a gunman who echoed a slogan that has become a rallying cry for many American liberals since the start of the war in Gaza.

After his arrest, the man suspected of killing the couple outside the Jewish Museum in Washington on Wednesday night exclaimed “free, free Palestine,” a phrase that has become ubiquitous at peaceful demonstrations and on social media over the past 18 months.

The attack brought renewed focus to a strain of violent radicalism on the left, even as progressives pointed out they share nothing with the gunman except his apparent support for Palestinian rights. What the attack did, they said, was hurt their cause.

“It betrays our values and hands more power to those already pushing authoritarian crackdowns,” said Layla Elabed, an organizer in Michigan and the leader of the Uncommitted National Movement, which arose in protest of U.S. support for Israel’s response to the Hamas attack launched on Oct. 7, 2023.

A fringe, more radical wing of the pro-Palestinian movement has blinked in and out of national attention since the onset of the war in Gaza. Thousands of protesters have been arrested, including dozens who forcibly entered and occupied university buildings. And last year, POLITICO reported that an online network of pro-Palestinian activists in the U.S. included resources on how to “escalate” political actions beyond legal bounds, as well as pro-Hamas content.

Were all those who’ve been protesting on college campuses and in the streets part of the “radical wing”? That’s a lot of people in the radical wing. How about all those wearing Intifada keffiyehs, a sign of murdering Jews and erasing Israel? Just a small group? Those yelling “from the river to the sea”? A small group? All those railing against Jews and Israel online?

Asked if members of the left are doing any soul searching, Kevin Rachlin — the Washington director of the Nexus Project, a left-leaning Jewish advocacy group — said, “I think they are.”

“This is more and more proof that we need to address antisemitism as a full society versus addressing [it] on the left or on the right,” Rachlin said.

Well, I can’t say I am surprised by that answer: when busted for things they have done, like, say, fake hate hoaxes, Democrats tend to say we need to look at it as a whole, not that their people are batshit insane.

Antisemitism historically and in recent years has more closely been associated with fringe groups on the alt-right, including most notably the 2017 “Unite the Right” neo-Nazi march in Charlottesville, Virginia. President Donald Trump himself dined with white nationalist and Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes at his Mar-a-Lago resort in 2022.

Yes, there are wackos on the far right who are Jew haters. They kinda hate everyone. But, they aren’t also taking the side of Islamists. And they gained their Jew hatred elsewhere. Democrats learned their Jew hatred and support of radical Islam from their fellow Progressives, particularly in college. And, it is nothing new. This is Time Magazine on May 22, 2025

The Rise of Antisemitism and Political Violence in the U.S.

It’s rather antiseptic, providing data, and, then, of course, J6, but, it fails to dive into where it comes from. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, though a bit more briefly: this is planned by the Islamists, particularly the Muslim Brotherhood and the groups associated with it. It started getting much stronger in the mid-1990s, not just in the U.S. but in European countries and Australia. This is what the MB wanted, part of their playbook: a soft integration of the Western World. Get the West to comply with Islamist beliefs. Integrate them into society. Integrate them into actual law. Create Sharia law, and force the West to comply. Because they want to comply.

They teach this in colleges. The members of the Muslim Student Association, a Muslim Brotherhood backed group, teach it, spread it. It’s a soft push, hitting all the hot buttons of malleable liberal minds. The US government has continued to allow these crazies into the US, even after the first World Trade Center bombing, and, more importantly, after the attack on 9/11. And the hard rise of extreme Islamism after. Britain saw their 7/7 attack, and then still prioritized bringing Islamists into the nation. I could keep going, but, you get the idea, and know lots of this yourself.

Supporters of the pro-Palestinian movement, including liberal lawmakers, found themselves on the defensive after the shooting outside the Capital Jewish Museum in a way that conservatives have had to respond to far-right violence in recent years.

If they are on the defensive, perhaps it’s because Jew/Israel hatred is embedded within the Democrat party. Most in the GOP do not have to defend anything, because those far-right wackos are pure fringe and have nothing to do with the GOP. We don’t bother with them. Jew hatred is part of the Democrats. They’ve elected radicals, such as Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib.

Now, some pro-Palestinian activists worry the shooting, which federal authorities called a targeted act of antisemitism, could set back any progress they’ve made in their policy goals amid an increasingly dire humanitarian crisis in Gaza and an expansion of Israel’s military operation in the decimated territory.

They got what they were pushing for: Jew deaths. Own it.

The photo above? That’s from the old Zombietime website. From a march in San Francisco on March 20th, 2004. The Jew hating radicalism was emanating from the colleges, and, as the kiddies graduate they keep those beliefs.

Read: Progressives Grapple With Their Beliefs Causing Murder Of Jews In D.C. »

Senate Votes To Kill PRC’s EV Mandate

Once again I will state that I am not against EVs. If you want one, get one. What I am against is government forcing citizens to buy them, especially when the people mandating it aren’t driving them themselves

Senate votes to revoke California’s EV emissions waivers

The Senate on Thursday voted to revoke three vehicle emissions waivers in California, a controversial move that the chamber’s parliamentarian says Republican lawmakers may not have the right to make.

The vote was 51-44, with Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan joining Republicans in voting in favor of revoking the waivers.

Ahead of the vote, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, called it “the nuclear option.”

The three waivers the Senate revoked set stricter vehicle emissions standards than federal regulations. Two waivers relate to reducing tailpipe emissions from medium and heavy-duty vehicles, as well as limiting smog pollution from trucks.

The last is what’s frequently called California’s “EV mandate,” a rule that aims to phase-out gas powered cars and require all new vehicle sales in California be zero emissions by 2035. The rule to phase out gas powered vehicles goes into effect in 2026.

I wonder if all the media outlets who are for mandates would be willing to run polls across the country, see if We The People want the mandates. Especially in the People’s Republik Of California.

  1. Do you approve of mandating that citizens be forced to no longer be able to purchase fossil fueled vehicles, even hybrids, and can only purchase electric vehicles?
  2. Do you agree with government forcing truckers to only drive EV trucks, which will slow down deliveries and raise costs?
  3. Do you think that the politicians and bureaucrats forcing the mandates should be required to drive an EV before passing mandates?
  4. If you agree with number one, do you own an EV right now?

I’d love to see the outcome

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican who supported revoking the waivers, said in remarks Tuesday on the Senate floor that “the EPA has submitted the waivers to Congress as rules — which is all that Congress has ever needed to decide to consider something under the Congressional Review Act.”

But Democrats say such a vote is illegal, and argue overruling the parliamentarian and bypassing the filibuster sets a dangerous precedent.

I don’t care, Margaret. How many of you Dems are currently driving EVs?

California Gov. Gavin Newsom and state Attorney General Rob Bonta announced Thursday that they would sue the Trump administration over the vote.

“This Senate vote is illegal,” Newsom said. “Republicans went around their own parliamentarian to defy decades of precedent. We won’t stand by as Trump Republicans make America smoggy again — undoing work that goes back to the days of Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan — all while ceding our economic future to China. We’re going to fight this unconstitutional attack on California in court.”

Is Gavin driving around in an EV, or a fossil fueled SUV?

Read: Senate Votes To Kill PRC’s EV Mandate »

Consequences: Trump Admin Says Harvard Can No Longer Enroll Foreign Students

Harvard already lost billions in federal funding over allowing and coddling Jew hatred. No

Trump administration ends Harvard’s ability to enrol international students

The Trump administration has moved to end Harvard’s ability to enrol international students, escalating a standoff with America’s oldest university.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wrote on X that the administration had revoked Harvard’s “Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification as a result of their failure to adhere to the law.”

“Let this serve as a warning to all universities and academic institutions across the country,” she posted on Thursday.

Harvard called the move “unlawful” in a statement.

Unlawful how? I’ve read about 10 articles on this, and none say how. You’d think a follow up on “unlawful” would be something actual reporters would want to do.

“We are fully committed to maintaining Harvard’s ability to host our international students and scholars, who hail from more than 140 countries and enrich the University – and this nation – immeasurably,” the university responded.

“We are working quickly to provide guidance and support to members of our community. This retaliatory action threatens serious harm to the Harvard community and our country, and undermines Harvard’s academic and research mission.”

The Trump administration’s decisions could affect thousands of international students who study at the university. Over 6,700 international students were enrolled at the institution last academic year, university data shows, making up 27% of its student body.

Yeah, well

(Axios) [Kristi Noem] accused the university of “fostering violence, antisemitism and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus.”

Axios also failed to ask about “unlawful”, as did the NY Times. Harvard dug it it’s hole.

Read: Consequences: Trump Admin Says Harvard Can No Longer Enroll Foreign Students »

We’re Apparently At The Penguin Poop Can Help ‘Climate Change’ Portion Of The Show

This is the kind of stuff that would have been in the Weekly World News, or, at least, a minor news outlet, not a major national one. But, this is a cult, so, there is no thought given to how insane this all sounds

How penguin poop can help to mitigate climate change

Penguins could be playing a crucial role in stabilizing the climate in Antarctica when they go No. 2, according to new research.

The ammonia in penguin guano — or poop — could help to reduce the impacts of climate change by contributing to increased cloud formation, a paper published in Communications Earth & Environment on Thursday found.

Penguins, a key species in Antarctica, are “major emitters” of ammonia, according to the paper. When the ammonia reacts with gases that contain sulfur emitted from phytoplankton in the ocean, it increases the creation of aerosols, which give water vapor a surface to condense upon and leads to cloud formation, Matthew Boyer, a researcher at the University of Helsinki’s Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research and lead author of the paper, told ABC News.

“Could”? They either are or aren’t. If you are not sure, then there is not story. And no scientific paper.

The researchers spent two months from January to March 2023 measuring the concentration of ammonia in the air near a colony of 60,000 Adelie penguins at Marambio Base in Antarctica. They observed that when the wind blew from the direction of the colony, the ammonia concentration increased to more than 1,000 times higher than the baseline value, according to the paper.

Smelly little buggers. Also, not a particularly long study. Two months in just one year is not enough to create a baseline.

They found that when the wind blew from the penguin colony, the number and size of aerosol particles sharply increased. A fog that remained three hours after the wind charged was likely a result of the increased concentration of aerosol particles, the researchers said.

“Likely”? It is or isn’t related. Do they teach the Scientific Method nowadays? This is all ifs and buts. What percent is “likely”?

The poop is likely helping to reduce the impacts of climate change on the continent, further highlighting the necessity of protecting native ecosystems and biodiversity, which are critical to mitigating climate change.

“What we have demonstrated is that there is a deep connection between ecosystem processes — being the ocean phytoplankton activity as well as penguins — and atmospheric processes that can have an impact on the local climate,” Boyer said.

There’s that likely again. The only ones surprised by the interaction of facets of the ecosystems seems to be the “scientists.”

Read: We’re Apparently At The Penguin Poop Can Help ‘Climate Change’ Portion Of The Show »

Pirate's Cove