…are wonderful low carbon sailboats, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Legal Insurrection, with a post on “Millionaires are Fleeing New York — Taking $11 Billion in Tax Revenue With Them”
Read: If All You See… »
…are wonderful low carbon sailboats, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Legal Insurrection, with a post on “Millionaires are Fleeing New York — Taking $11 Billion in Tax Revenue With Them”
Read: If All You See… »
I don’t quite get the push to do away with the whole Standard Time/Daylight Savings Time switch. I’ve dealt with it most of my life, no big deal. A minor sleep change for a day or two and then people move on. But, I guess in the age of social media and people being Inflamed over minor things people can’t let go
But
Standard time could become permanent in US under new bill, with some exceptions
A new bill introduced in Congress could drastically change how we observe the twice-a-year practice of changing the clocks, even as a move to make daylight saving time permanent gains traction.
For the last few years, there have been several attempts to make daylight saving time — the time we are currently observing — permanent. The Sunshine Protection Act passed through the Senate in 2022, but subsequent versions of the legislation haven’t been as lucky. (snip)
But a bill introduced in the House last week could take a largely different approach. The bipartisan “Sunshine for Our Kids Act of 2026” was introduced by Reps. Mary Gay Scanlon (D-Penn.) and Pat Harrigan (R-NC). It calls for permanent standard time — the time we observe from November through March — in the U.S., with some exceptions.
While health experts agree that standard time is better for our health, most efforts in Congress and throughout the U.S. have focused on making daylight saving time permanent. Nearly 20 states have passed legislation to observe daylight saving time year-round, should Congress approve it. Only Hawaii and parts of Arizona observe standard time year-round.
In Raleigh for Dec 1 on standard time sunrise is 706am, sunset 5pm. I’d rather that than sun up at 806am, sundown at 6
Winters would feel exactly as they do under permanent standard time. Days would feel “shorter,” with the sun setting earlier, but we would maintain the morning daylight hours health experts say are crucial to our well-being.
The sun would rise progressively earlier as the calendar flipped to spring and summer under year-round standard time. Summer sunsets would also happen an hour earlier than they currently do.
It would mean that sunrise would be around 5:08am on the longest day of summer and sunset 7:42pm. Hey, that’s what blackout curtains are for. Personally, I hate the whole staying light out way past 8pm thing. Let’s also not forget what happened last time they tried to make DST permanent in 1974: people hated those long dark mornings, and there were more accidents.
Read: Bill Submitted In House To Make Standard Time Permanent »
Too bad the Politico reporter didn’t ask if she had stopped using fossil fuels to travel herself
Hochul: ‘Do not question my credentials’ on climate, clean energy
Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul is defending her decision to walk back New York’s carbon emissions targets, telling POLITICO the state is committed to fighting climate change but that it cannot hit its near-term goals while keeping energy affordable for residents.
The changes Hochul enacted to New York’s climate law earlier this year generated fierce pushback from environmental activists who said the state “cannot afford to wait” for more action, with some alleging Hochul did not even attempt to meet the original goals.
Asked in an interview on POLITICO’s Energy podcast whether she was ignoring climate action in favor of a slower, more practical approach to clean energy, Hochul pushed back.
“If you think we’re doing nothing in New York, I encourage you to look at where we are in relation to other states,” she said. “Please do not question my credentials in this space.”
New York is not the most expensive state for energy, they are #47, with 50 as the worst (Hawaii). NY saw a 14.64% increase in energy prices from April 2025 to April 2026. So, yeah, don’t question her credentials to hose all the peasants and drive them and businesses away.
“I have to manage the challenge of ensuring that we continue our clean energy objectives and our goals — move them forward — but also to make sure that we’re not putting this on the backs of the ratepayers,” she said. “And so that’s what we had to do, is just ask for a little more breathing room. It was not a repeal.”
Too late. Hey, what kind of energy does the governor’s mansion use?
It would be a whole lot easier to simply catch and deport
Appeals court reverses decision on immigrant detention, leaving no-bond policy in place
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed a July 2 panel decision requiring bond hearings for immigrants held under the Trump administration’s mandatory detention policy.
For now, that means many immigration prisoners from all over the country can still be held indefinitely without bond in some of the nation’s largest detention centers in Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. The Trump administration policy requires detention without bond for an immigrant who crossed the border illegally, no matter how long they’ve been here.
The appeals court will rehear the case in September. (snip)
Some judges in the 5th Circuit had already ordered bond hearings or releases based on the July 2 ruling. The Supreme Court has agreed to take up a related case and resolve the conflict in its next session starting in October.
The law states that illegals can be held up to 6 months, charged a small fine, and deported. Nothing about bond hearings, especially knowing that the illegals will just disappear. Just deport them.
Read: Appeals Court Rules It’s Perfectly Fine To Hold Illegals Without Bond »
I’ll be honest, I’m not sure if I like this and agree with this
Advocates call for Kagan investigation on climate change bias
Advocates are calling on the U.S. Senate Monday to investigate conflicts of interest from U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan. The advocates argued Kagan was biased in favor of climate science and should not participate in a consequential case that could determine the future of climate change policies.
Leaders from the Judicial Crisis Network, the Heritage Foundation, the National Republican Lawyers Foundation and others wrote a letter to lawmakers on the Senate Judiciary Committee about concern over Kagan’s support for climate change.
Justices on the high court are expected to hear Suncor v. Boulder County Commissioners, a case examining whether state and local governments can prevent fossil fuel companies from engaging in global emissions activities that contribute to climate change. (snip)
In the letter, analysts point to Kagan’s authorship of a foreword in the Fourth Edition of the “Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence” published by the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine in December 2025.
The manual included a chapter on Climate Science, where it referenced the “attribution theory.” The theory is used to posit that scientific modeling is used to attribute the effects of climate change from greenhouse gas emissions.
“This section was designed to persuade ‘skeptical’ judges in state and local climate lawfare,” the advocates wrote.
The thing is, most of the liberals on the Court will vote hard left the vast majority of the time on most things, so, we already know how Kagan will vote. We know they are all hardcore Warmists. Will this all make a difference? Certainly, some Conservatives on the court can let their biases sway them here and there, right, even while attempting to stay within the framework of the Constitution
“Justice Kagan’s participation in the Suncor case is indefensible given her public endorsement of climate-lawfare plaintiff theories,” the letter read.
Carrie Severino, president of the Judicial Crisis Network, said Kagan cannot act as a “neutral arbiter” in climate change cases. She said Kagan’s writing in the manual was an endorsement of its ideals.
“Kagan’s implicit judicial endorsement of the manual and her support of climate-lawfare theories are evidence she cannot remain impartial on climate litigation, including the Court’s upcoming Suncor case,” Severino said. “She must recuse herself immediately.”
That, though, is a major problem. If Kagan is pushing climalawfare, for which Suncor is the exact definition of that type of suit, then she should recuse herself.
Read: Hmm: Skeptics Want Justice Kagen Investigated For Conflicts Of Interest On Climate Crisis (scam) »
…are palm trees which will soon grow in Alaska because Other People drive fossil fueled vehicles, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Cold Fury, with a post on “Sen Tim Scott, class act”
Read: If All You See… »
I wonder how many of these North Carolina state workers were around to vote for Barack Obama and Democrats in 2008, leading to Obamacare, even as they were told that it would increase premiums, deductibles, and costs?
‘It’s not fair’: Grassroots group gathers to support state employees after insurance premium hike
People gathered in downtown Raleigh on Saturday to advocate for affordable healthcare, just one day after the State Health Plan board approved new policies that would raise insurance premiums for state employees.
One Nation, Overcharged, a grassroots organization aiming to lower healthcare costs for U.S. citizens, was set up near the Marbles Kids Museum with their ‘Popsicles for a Purpose’ food truck offering free popsicles and asking people to speak out.
Cristina Galvan, one of the organization’s partners, said she hoped the event would spark conversations around rising healthcare costs.
“This is a nationwide issue,” Galvan said. “Our system is broken, and for far too long, profits have been made a priority over people. It’s just not a system that is sustainable. It’s not fair.”
“Our system is broken.” Well, thank Obama, because quite a bit of the cost increases can trace directly to the passage of Obamacare. Let’s dip back into one of my faves
But people with no pre-existing conditions like Vinson, a 60-year-old retired teacher, and Waschura, a 52-year-old self-employed engineer, are making up the difference.
“I was laughing at Boehner — until the mail came today,” Waschura said, referring to House Speaker John Boehner, who is leading the Republican charge to defund Obamacare.
“I really don’t like the Republican tactics, but at least now I can understand why they are so pissed about this. When you take $10,000 out of my family’s pocket each year, that’s otherwise disposable income or retirement savings that will not be going into our local economy.” (snip)
Both Vinson and Waschura have adjusted gross incomes greater than four times the federal poverty level — the cutoff for a tax credit. And while both said they anticipated their rates would go up, they didn’t realize they would rise so much.
“Of course, I want people to have health care,” Vinson said. “I just didn’t realize I would be the one who was going to pay for it personally.”
They were warned.
The event came just one day after the State Health Plan board announced that health insurance premiums for state employees would increase by 5%, a move that could see people paying anywhere from $1.76 to $32.28 extra per month, depending on which plan they have, what their salary is, and whether they also insure any family members through the state.
Mostly not a big deal compared to what other Americans are being hit with. Of course, they want a pay increase, which comes from the taxpayers, to cover it. Also of course
In response, Galvan says it will take a greater effort to make healthcare accessible across the board.
“It would be wonderful to have a single-payer healthcare system, where anybody, no matter where they live, where they come from, can go to the doctor and afford it,” Galvan said.
They just don’t get it. Where do they think the money would come from?
Read: Govt Workers Who Support Govt Run Healthcare Protest Over Premium Increase In NC »
A bit of a reach, eh?
Earth may be hotter today than at any time in the last 540 million years
A new look at Earth’s deep past is reshaping how scientists understand the planet’s climate, and it carries a quiet warning about the future. Evidence now suggests that Earth may be closer to its hottest state than once believed, even when compared with hundreds of millions of years of history.
Researchers at University of Leeds have used a new method to estimate global temperatures across the Phanerozoic, a period spanning about 540 million years. Their findings challenge earlier ideas that Earth once reached extreme levels of heat far beyond today’s climate.
For years, scientists believed that parts of Earth’s past were far hotter than today. Some earlier estimates suggested global temperatures may have reached 20 to 30 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
Those numbers painted a picture of a much hotter planet, one that still managed to support life. But the new research offers a different view.
The study suggests that past warm periods likely reached about 10 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels. That is still warmer than today, but far below earlier claims.
This finding matters because it narrows the range of conditions under which life evolved. It also raises questions about how much warming modern ecosystems can tolerate.
Oh, wait, so, the article doesn’t actually support the unhinged, doomy headline? Color me shocked.
Senior author Benjamin Mills emphasized the stakes. “The findings suggest that that Earth’s temperature has been tightly regulated over time, and that human-driven warming of 10 degrees Celsius, which is possible if all fossil fuel reserves are burned, would take us to places the Earth may never have been before. How far can we push the planet?” (snip)
Earth’s natural systems can regulate climate, but they work slowly. Weathering and other processes take thousands to millions of years to balance changes.
Human activity, by contrast, is altering the climate over decades. This rapid shift may outpace the planet’s ability to respond.
“We shouldn’t be complacent when viewing ancient hot climates that supported diverse ecosystems, and we must understand that they were established extremely slowly, and may not have been as hot as recently proposed,” Mills said. “Earth’s natural regulation systems are slow, and humans must perform our own climate regulation to keep the planet in a habitable range.”
These are political statements meant to tell Government to take people’s money, life choices, and freedom away. All based on computer models, rather than actual hard data.
It’s almost like state laws do not apply to federal law enforcement operations like this
Immigration arrests near county courthouses still persist, despite state law
Lucia Vasquez-Gonzalez thought she was doing the right thing when she went to court in March.
Vasquez-Gonzalez migrated to the U.S. in search of a better life but did not have legal permission to live here. In January, she was charged with one count of misdemeanor domestic battery in a confrontation with her roommate, according to court records, but she appeared before a judge hoping to take care of the matter responsibly — despite the risk posed by continuing immigration activity around Cook County courthouses.
After leaving court, though, Vasquez-Gonzalez said she was stopped by immigration agents a couple of blocks from the building and pulled out of her car.
“I was in complete shock because I didn’t know what was happening,” Vasquez-Gonzalez told the Tribune in Spanish. “I was like, ‘Why are they arresting me if I didn’t do anything bad? … And then they said, ‘No, it is because you missed the first rule of immigration, which was don’t get into any problems.’
Yeah, you’re here illegally, you assaulted your roommate, and now you have to pay that piper. Wild how all the illegals want to come to the U.S., which Democrats tell us is a horrible country, eh? Why do they not go to other countries?
In December, Gov. JB Pritzker signed into law a ban on federal agents making certain arrests near courthouses and easing a path for individuals to sue if they think their rights were violated during civil immigration arrests.
The Court Access, Safety and Participation Act, which is being challenged by the Trump administration, followed an order issued by Cook County’s chief judge at the time, Tim Evans, similarly barring civil immigration enforcement around county courthouses.
Despite the measures, though, the presence of immigration agents around Cook County courthouses is stubbornly persistent, according to a Tribune review of a tracker maintained by the Cook County public defender’s office.
Since the beginning of the year, immigration agents have been in or around county courthouses at least 50 times through June 9 — a rate of more than twice per week.
“What they are doing is interfering with the operation of state courts,” said Jonathan Manes, senior counsel for the MacArthur Justice Center’s Illinois office. “They are making it very difficult for people to access justice here in Illinois.”
What Illinois is doing is refusing to hand over illegal aliens to federal law enforcement. And, there’s not an f’ing thing Illinois can do about NICE coming around and arresting illegals.
Read: Surprise: NICE Still Arresting People In Illinois Near Courthouses Despite State Law »
…is an island disappearing due to climate doom sea rise, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Moonbattery, with a post on “Describing Feminine Products as Feminine Found to Be Transphobic”
It’s islands week.
Read: If All You See… »