Cult Decides To Change The Time Frame For ‘Climate Change’

1850 has typically been used due to that being the end of the Little Ice Ace, and, per the cult, when Mankind started clogging up the atmosphere with “carbon pollution”. So, what is the point of this?

New data raises questions about how much the Earth has warmed

Planet-warming pollution rates exploded after the end of World War II. James Watt’s steam engine launched the Industrial Revolution in 1769. Before that, for thousands of years, humans were clearing forested land for farming, releasing carbon from trees and plants into the atmosphere.

The severity of global warming has long depended on your frame of reference — on what temperature you think was normal for the Earth before humans began changing it. But what year should mark that moment?

That’s what makes a groundbreaking new temperature dataset released by a group of scientists based in the United Kingdom so striking. The datasets used to diagnose the modern history of the planet’s climate — and to proclaim that the world is now very near to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) of warming — typically begin with the year 1850.

The new one goes all the way back to 1781.

This extended time frame matters because greenhouse gases in the atmosphere increased 2.5 percent between 1750 and 1850, enough to have caused some warming that the data hasn’t accounted for.

I assume the point is to say that Mankind ended the Little Ice Age, not natural causation.

The new temperature record, dubbed GloSAT, helps contribute to the growing sense among scientists that the Earth has warmed more than what calculations based on the 1850 starting year would suggest.

See? It’s all your ancestor’s fault. Anyhow, would you be super surprised if they used climate models to create data temperature from the 1700s which, for the most part, didn’t exist. It’s just a continuation of the scam.

Read: Cult Decides To Change The Time Frame For ‘Climate Change’ »

Trump Signs EO Classifying Fentanyl As WMD

Will this cause the Trump deranged to now take the side of fentanyl dealers?

Trump declares fentanyl a weapon of mass destruction

President Donald Trump signed an executive order Monday classifying fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction, giving the U.S. government additional legal firepower in its efforts to combat illegal trafficking of the synthetic drug.

The executive order cites the lethality of the drug, which kills tens of thousands of Americans every year, and the fact that transnational criminal groups the Trump administration has designated as foreign terrorist organizations use the sale of fentanyl to fund activities that undermine U.S. national security.

Speaking in the Oval Office as he signed the order, the president said the amount of drugs coming into the U.S. by sea has decreased by 94 percent (most drugs, including fentanyl, enter the U.S. via land ports of entry). Trump added that drug flows are “a direct military threat to the United States of America.”

The administration has focused considerable resources on combating fentanyl as part of its efforts to secure the U.S. border with Mexico. Top administration officials have argued that Trump’s strict immigration limits and border security measures have led to a drop in domestic consumption of fentanyl.

This is a good thing, but, how soon till Democrats sue over this, trying to block this? Or some rogue leftist judge declares the EO invalid?

The timing of the designation is striking, as speculation mounts that the U.S. will carry out land strikes against alleged drug trafficking targets on Venezuelan soil as part of its pressure campaign against Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. Declaring fentanyl a weapon of mass destruction would give the U.S. additional legal justification to use military force against Venezuela.

Claims that Iraq still possessed WMDs were used as a legal justification for the invasion of the Middle Eastern country and the overthrow of its then-leader Saddam Hussein under the George W. Bush administration.

Read: Trump Signs EO Classifying Fentanyl As WMD »

Bummer: PBS Really Worried That Loss Of USAID (slush fund) Hurting The Fight Against Climate Doom In Indonesia

Couldn’t PBS hold a telethon fundraiser if they were so concerned?

How the loss of USAID funding affects Indonesia’s ability to fight climate change

Sherman Potter Bull CookiesThe ripple effects of the Trump administration’s elimination of USAID are being felt in dozens of countries where the agency supported initiatives ranging from public health programs to infrastructure and climate resilience projects. Angeles Ponpa from Northwestern University’s school of journalism traveled to Indonesia to see the effect on one of the world’s fastest-sinking cities.

Wait, she traveled all the way to Indonesia on a fossil fueled jet to yammer about ‘climate change’? Just to be clear, this is from a TV episode where there is a transcript

Angeles Ponpa: Outside the capital Jakarta and the Tanah Merah neighborhood, residents struggled for years to get access to clean water.

In 2016, USAID offered a program, IUWASH, that helped disadvantaged families obtain clean water.

OK, but, first, that has nothing to do with ‘climate change’, 2nd, why can’t the Indonesian government do it, especially when Americans have their own problems?

Decades of groundwater extraction have caused Jakarta, the capital of Indonesia to sink.

Meanwhile, with climate change, the seas are rising, making flooding worse and sending salty water into groundwater.

They failed to note how much the seas are rising. Or that there are serious tectonic forces along Indonesia. Or that they screwed themselves. Or how much of the money flowing from USAID through NGOs was siphoned off.

Angeles Ponpa: Jeff Cohen was USAID’s most recent mission director in Indonesia. He says the decision by the Trump administration to cut USAID funding will have dire consequences.

Jeff Cohen: Without USAID’s funding there, all the communities where we’re working are either going to have to do it on their own or find somebody else to be that catalyst. And honestly, some of them never will get access to clean drinking water, will never get access to safe sanitation until somebody replaces us. And I don’t think that’s going to happen.

You know, there might be a case if USAID was actually helping, instead of only delivering about 12% of the funds for the projects. Tell you what, let’s do a complete and full audit, utterly open, of how the money was spent. Where it went, who go it. What NGOs pocketed a ton of moola while delivering little aid. USAID had a ton of unnecessary programs wasting taxpayer money, so, the wackos screwed programs that actually helped (but should have been funded by foreign governments, not the US government). They ruined the whole thing themselves.

Oh, and giving people water wouldn’t actually fight ‘climate change’, if it existed.

Read: Bummer: PBS Really Worried That Loss Of USAID (slush fund) Hurting The Fight Against Climate Doom In Indonesia »

If All You See…

…is a horrible fossil fuels refinery, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Green Jihad, with a post on the Trump admin looking to bankroll at least 10 nuclear power plants.

Read: If All You See… »

20 Democrat AGs Sue To Stop $100K H1B Visa Fees

Apparently they prefer foreign workers over Americans getting the jobs

20 states lodge lawsuit against Trump’s $100,000 H-1B visa fee

California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced Friday that he and 19 other states are suing the Trump administration over its policy to hike fees on new H-1B visa petitions to $100,000.

Bonta claimed that the increases for the skilled-worker visa are illegal because they exceed what Congress has authorized and undermine its intent in establishing the program. All of the states joining the lawsuit have Democratic attorneys general.

“No presidential administration can rewrite immigration law,” Bonta said at a press conference in San Francisco. “No president can ignore the co-equal branch of government of Congress, ignore the Constitution, or ignore the law.”

Obama and Biden did that all the time. I’m not saying it’s right, but, many actions of the two had zero statutory authorization from Congressional bills. Heck, Congress often writes bills that are extremely broad and give the Executive Branch incredibly wide latitude to create rules and regs out of thin air. Where the hell did the contraceptive mandate come from? There is zero language in the Obamacare bill authorizing it.

Obama enacted all the stuff for Dreamers despite being pretty much un-Constitutional, and Democrats and their pet media said nothing.

The largest users of the visas are major tech companies bringing in high-skilled foreign workers, which MAGA Republicans have accused of abusing the program to pass over Americans for cheaper labor. But Bonta argued the fees will also worsen labor shortages within other important sectors to the state economy by making it more difficult to fill spots for physicians, researchers, teachers, nurses and public service employees.

How about pushing the kiddies into these disciplines, instead of getting worthless degrees that often end in “Studies” and put them in massive student loan debt? Anyhow, I’ve read about a dozen articles, none note which are all the states, other than New York and Massachusetts. Glad Democrats are fighting for Americans, eh?

The H1B authorization may or may not be legal, but, in a story about the Chamber Of Commerce lawsuit (shouldn’t they be advocating for American workers?)

First, DOJ argues that plaintiffs’ claims are foreclosed by “the longstanding doctrine of nonreviewability, which bars judicial review of the Executive’s discretionary determination under the INA to restrict the entry of aliens into the United States.” Later in the response, DOJ points to the “principles of consular nonreviewability,” writing that “The Supreme Court has long held that ‘[t]he admission and exclusion of foreign nationals is a fundamental sovereign attribute’ that is ‘largely immune from judicial control.’”

Second, DOJ states that plaintiffs do not have a cause of action under the Administrative Procedure Act because “it is well-settled that (1) the President is not subject to suit under the APA and (2) his statutory authority to regulate or restrict the entry of aliens into the United States derives explicitly from 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(f) and 1185(a).” The DOJ response adds, “Moreover, that authority is entirely discretionary, and judicial review to challenge such discretionary actions is unavailable via an ultra vires claim or the APA.”

Third, the response argues that the proclamation “does not conflict with any provision of the INA [Immigration and Nationality Act]” and “simply adds an additional restriction on the entry of a class of aliens to further a key national interest: protecting American workers and national security.” The final DOJ argument: “Any claim by Plaintiffs that implementation of the Proclamation is procedurally deficient because it did not go through APA notice-and-comment rulemaking fails because Defendants have merely implemented what the Proclamation requires.”

So, basically the DOJ is not necessarily saying that the fee is authorized, just that there can be no judicial review on it.

Read: 20 Democrat AGs Sue To Stop $100K H1B Visa Fees »

Faith Leaders Ask For Golden Calf For Climate Christmas

“I am the Lord thy God. Thou shall not have strange gods before Me.”

Faith leaders ask for Christmas gifts that ‘honour the Earth’

The seventh UN Environment Assembly (UNEA-7) met in Nairobi on December 8-12, under the theme “Advancing sustainable solutions for a resilient environment”.

“We all want the same thing: a better future for ourselves and families. This means stable climate, safe clean and sustainable environment, and pollution free future,” Inger Andersen, executive director of the UN Environment Program said.

UNEA is the top decision-making body on environment issues. While addressing climate change, nature and biodiversity loss, and pollution and waste crises, it sets the global environmental agenda and develops international environmental laws.

So, many took long, fossil fueled trips?

During discussions on environmental sustainability, Ashley Kitisya, Laudato Si’ Movement’s Africa Program Manager, said that during Advent faiths were looking at Christmas giving through the lens of the three planetary crises.

“We can choose gifts that honour both people and the Earth,” she said, voicing faith groups’ concerns about overconsumption, waste, and environmentally harmful practices during the Christmas season.

Ms Kitisya specified plastic pollution, food waste and unnecessary energy use spike during the festive season.

In their statement, the faith leaders emphasised their role as custodians of the values, ethics, moral courage and global reach needed to fight environmental degradation.

“Integrity is key to ethical leadership; let us hear the call of Mother Nature and live a life that embodies our teachings and guides others,” their statement, titled “A call to Action-Faith for Resilient Planet”, said.

Can they still be Christian leaders, faithful to God when they are putting him after their cult?

You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, punishing children for the iniquity of parents, to the third and the fourth generation of those who reject me, 6 but showing steadfast love to the thousandth generation of those who love me and keep my commandments.

These “faith” leaders have lost the plot, and are using a Holy time for their cult beliefs.

Read: Faith Leaders Ask For Golden Calf For Climate Christmas »

It Starts: Nags Already Asking For More Gun Control In Heavily Gun Controlled Australia

Perhaps there’s something else that needs to be controlled and banned

Australia had the ‘gold standard’ on gun control. The Bondi beach terror attack may force it to confront its surging number of weapons

For almost three decades, Australia’s gun laws have been recognised as among the most stringent – and effective – in the world.

After the horror of the 1996 Port Arthur massacre that killed 35 people in Tasmania, Australia’s then conservative government stared down the gun lobby to introduce restrictions that led to a dramatic decrease in the number of guns.

In an almost unprecedented display of national collaboration, the federal government worked with the states to restrict semiautomatic weapons, toughen up licensing requirements and introduce a new requirement for gun holders to demonstrate a “genuine reason” for ownership.

Australians have been rightly proud of these reforms, confident that the community remains relatively safe from gun violence and far from the American reality of frequent mass shootings.

Sunday’s Bondi attack will shake that confidence and may force the country to again grapple with its gun laws.

Police confirmed on Monday morning that one of the alleged shooters was a registered gun owner and had six legally obtained firearms.

There has been growing concern among gun control advocates that firearms remain far too easy to access despite the country’s “gold standard” framework.

Of course they want more gun control, despite there being massive bans. But, nothing about Islamist control

Khaled al-Nablusi, an immigrant from an Islamist nation who was apparently a radical was given a permit for 6 firearms. How hard would it be for an Aussie citizen to get that same permit? Of course, the Aussie government seems to like to bring in unvetted Islamists from around the world and treat them better than actual citizens.

Shooting at Bondi Beach is what a globalized intifada looks like – analysis

All those wondering what the slogan “globalize the intifada” means need look no further than Bondi Beach.

Terrorists calmly firing into a crowd at a Hanukkah celebration. Screams. Panic. Parents fleeing with hysterical children. Victims lying dead on the sand.

That is the “globalized intifada” that tens of thousands of people around the world have been chanting for since the October 7 massacre – on the streets of Sydney, San Francisco, London, New York, and elsewhere – including by political figures who either embraced the phrase or refused to condemn it.

It’s well worth reading the whole thing.

Read: It Starts: Nags Already Asking For More Gun Control In Heavily Gun Controlled Australia »

If All You See…

…is a pasture perfect to be forcibly changed to a solar farm, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Common Cents Blog, with a post on a hero in Australia.

It’s short shorts week.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another great day in Returned America. Getting a big shot of winter cold, the Devils looked good for a game, and my stomach problems from different allergy pills have finally gone away. This pinup is by David Uhl, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. The Other McCain: Red States, Blue Cities: Minnesota, Somalia and ‘The Great Replacement’
  2. The Last Refuge: CIA Outlet Concerned About Kash Patel and Dan Bongino Meeting with Top Zelenskyy Officials
  3. The First Street Journal: Philly ADA Paul George disbarred from federal court, but so far, his boss, Larry Krasner, has skated
  4. The American Conservative: The Canada of the United Kingdom Turns Right
  5. Sultan Knish: What Somalis Have Done for Minnesota?
  6. Pacific Pundit: The “Epstein” photo released yesterday by Democrats turns out to be Trump with Miss Universe contestants in 1996
  7. Newsbusters: Trade Deficit Lowest in 5 Years, Thanks to Trump’s Tariffs – Media and Analysts Shocked
  8. Moonbattery: Moonbat Reenactment of Boston Tea Party
  9. Legal Insurrection: Times New Roman and the Politics of Art
  10. Jihad Watch: UK officials let Afghan Muslim migrants roam free for a month after they admitted they raped a 15-year-old girl
  11. IOTW Report: Anti-Ice Teacher Wants Man’s Paperwork
  12. Geller Report
  13. Doug Ross @ Journal: Naughty Santa: an AI taste test
  14. Don Surber: Trump’s support costs Machado liberal support
  15. And last, but, not least, Chicks On The Right has “ISIS Is in for It: Trump Says the U.S. Will Retaliate for Attack on Troops”

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page (nope, that’s gone, the newest Apache killed access, and the program hasn’t been upgraded since 2014, so, most are hosted internally). While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your Pinups for Vets calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me. I’ve also mostly alphabetized them, makes it easier scrolling the feedreader

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. And do you have a favorite blog you can recommend be added to the feedreader?

Two great sites for getting news links are Liberty Daily and Whatafinger.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Unhinged Churches Make Wacko Anti-ICE Nativity Scenes

They’ve missed the reason for the season, and should have their tax exempt status pulled for getting political

Church Nativity scenes add zip ties and gas masks to protest immigration raids

One baby Jesus lies in a manger in the snow, wrapped in a silver emergency blanket with his wrists zip-tied. Mary stands nearby outside the Lake Street Church in Evanston, Illinois, wearing a plastic gas mask and flanked by Roman soldiers in tactical vests labeled “ICE.”

In another Chicago suburb, not far from an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility that has drawn protests over detentions, a sign at the manger outside the Urban Village Church says “Due to ICE activity in our community the Holy Family is in hiding.” And more than a thousand miles away, the Christ child went missing from a Nativity scene at St. Susanna Parish in Dedham, Massachusetts, replaced by a hand-painted sign: “ICE was here.”

These and other stark reimaginings of Christ’s birth are drawing praise and outrage as churches turn the Christmas tableau into a commentary on federal immigration enforcement under the Trump administration. Their creators say they are placing the ancient story in a contemporary frame, portraying the Holy Family as refugees to reflect on the fear of separation and deportation that many families — including their own parishioners — are experiencing today.

Supporters of the displays say the Bible is on their side, but critics call the scenes sacrilegious and politically divisive, accusing the churches of abusing sacred imagery and some arguing they should lose their tax-exempt status. The archdiocese in Massachusetts ordered that the manger must be “restored to its proper sacred purpose.”

Was all this necessary? Can’t they just do Christian stuff as it is meant to be?

St. Susanna parishioners locked baby Jesus in a cage in 2018 to protest how President Donald Trump’s first administration was separating families at the border. Another year, they depicted the infant floating in water polluted with plastic to highlight climate change.

Did they do that when Obama was building those cages and separating illegal alien families? I cannot find one story on it.

Josoma (priest at St. Susanna) said the display’s purpose is to move “beyond static traditional figures and evoke emotion and dialogue” in response to the fear many parishioners face as federal forces arrest more than undocumented immigrants, sweeping up longtime legal residents and spreading anxiety.

The display’s purpose should highlight the miracle of Jesus’ birth. That’s it. Nothing else.

The controversy in Evanston drew volunteers from a nearby synagogue, who stood outside during Lake Street’s services to help worshippers feel safe. Reactions outside the Dedham church ranged widely.

Walter Niland snapped a selfie and said he disagreed with the display. “I believe that the church enjoys a tax-exempt status,” said Niland, a Catholic from a neighboring town. “We should speak to spiritual matters, not matters of political division.”

Exactly. But, Liberalism is a mental disease, and makes some unhinged.

Read: Unhinged Churches Make Wacko Anti-ICE Nativity Scenes »

Pirate's Cove