Let There Be Shred

Just not in the mood for politics, strife, ‘climate change’, controversy, so, how about some shred?

Seriously, this is the kind of song they needed when all the thrashers started in the mid-80s.

Read: Let There Be Shred »

If All You See…

…is a cloudless, super hot sky from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Legal Insurrection, with a post on a poll on most Democrats wanting to live overseas.

Read: If All You See… »

Supreme Court Rules POTUS Has Authority To Remove “Independent Agency” Heads

How can an agency in the Executive Branch be “independent” from the president?

Justices Overturn 1935 Precedent, Backing President’s Power to Remove Agency Heads

The Supreme Court on Monday handed President Trump a sweeping victory over the administrative state, ruling that Congress cannot shield the heads of independent regulatory agencies from presidential removal, and overturning a landmark 1935 precedent that had underpinned the modern regulatory framework for nearly a century.

The 6-3 decision in Trump v. Slaughter arose from the President’s firing of two Democratic-appointed Federal Trade Commission commissioners, Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, at the start of his second term. Trump cited his constitutional authority under Article II rather than any cause recognized by the FTC’s governing statute, which permits removal only for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.”

Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts concluded that the FTC’s for-cause removal protection is incompatible with the Constitution’s vesting of executive power in a single President. Officers who exercise executive power, the Court held, must remain accountable to the President — and accountability requires the ability to remove them at will.

The ruling explicitly overturned Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, which had carved out an exception to presidential removal authority for agencies exercising so-called quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial functions. The Court found that characterization had never made sense and had become increasingly untenable as the FTC’s powers expanded to cover virtually every corner of the American economy.

The decision’s reach extends well beyond the FTC, potentially exposing the leadership of dozens of independent agencies — including the SEC, CFTC, and NLRB — to at-will presidential removal.

If the POTUS doesn’t have control of an agency that what is the POTUS? The only way to shield these people is to pass a law out of the Legislative Branch and have a POTUS sign said law. Or refuse to sign but not veto, allowing it to become law with no action. The above article does briefly mention that SCOTUS held that the president has less power to fire a member of the Federal Reserve in a companion ruling, but, mostly because Lisa Cook was not given time to respond. More on that here.

And another big ruling that Trump lost

SCOTUS Rules 5-4 to Permit Counting of Mail-In Ballots that Arrive After Election Day

The Supreme Court (SCOTUS) ruled that state laws allowing for the counting of mail-in ballots after election day are not in violation of federal law, a blow to the Republican National Committee and President Donald Trump’s administration.

On Monday, SCOTUS issued a 5-4 ruling that permits states to count mail-in ballots — sent on or before election day — that are received by state election officials after election day.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority’s opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts as well as Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

“Two principles are important here. First, post-election-day receipt, considered on its own, does not conflict with the election-day statutes,” the Court writes:

Well, I kind of agree. If they were postmarked, and there really must be a clear, real postmark, then they should be counted per state law, since the Constitution gives states this power to set laws. I also understand this point by Alito

But if that is all that the election-day statutes require, there is no sense in which the electorate as a whole can be seen as making its choice on election day. Rather, the electorate’s choice would be made piecemeal over an extended period prior to election day, and that prospect is blatantly contrary to what the election-day statutes demand. [Emphasis added]

Election day is a specified date, not a span of multiple days. The election-day statutes require that federal elections occur on that date. Under the challenged Mississippi law, however, the collection of ballots continues for five more days, and therefore the “election” is not held until the end of that period. Because federal law requires that the election occur on election day, it preempts Mississippi’s statute. [Emphasis added]

But, unless the Court wants to rule to kill vote by mail and early voting, the laws, federal Constitution, and state Constitutions allow mail in. This will allow for challenges over postmarkes.

Read: Supreme Court Rules POTUS Has Authority To Remove “Independent Agency” Heads »

Bummer: Climate (scam) Education Legislation Dies In NYC

Now that’s a real shame when people be throwing out a perfectly good scam bill like that

Climate change education legislation dies in New York

When the New York legislature adjourned in early June 2026, six climate change education bills died in committee.

  • Senate Bill 2430 would have required every public school to provide instruction on climate change aligned with state learning standards.
  • Assembly Bill 1666 would have established a grant program to support climate change education for students and teachers.
  • Assembly Bill 1984 would have required the creation of a K-12 climate change and sustainability curriculum to be taught in all public schools.
  • Assembly Bill 4876 would have required every public school to provide instruction on climate change aligned with state learning standards.
  • Senate Bill 6617 would have required climate change instruction within the current established science curriculum for grades 1-12.
  • Assembly Bill 8458 would have required climate change instruction within the current established science curriculum for grades 1-12.

At the end of the 2023-2024 legislative session, seven similar climate change education bills introduced in the New York legislature died in committee.

Sniffles. The cult is Very Upset that they won’t be able to indoctrinate and there won’t be tons of scam money up for grabs in graft.

Read: Bummer: Climate (scam) Education Legislation Dies In NYC »

Surprise: All Those Biden Illegals Raised Home Prices And Rent

I wonder if this study includes all the TPS and refugee folks Biden brought in, or just the illegals/fake asylum seeker?

Biden’s illegal immigration surge caused higher rent and home prices, Fed study finds

A new Federal Reserve working paper found the record surge in illegal immigration during the Biden administration came at a cost to one of the nation’s fiercest political debates: higher home prices and rent rates.

The findings arrive as immigration remains a defining political issue, with Republicans arguing former President Joe Biden’s border policies strained housing and public resources while Democrats have pointed to immigration as helping ease labor shortages and support economic growth.

The new report, published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas by compiling individual immigration court records and government administrative data, is among the first comprehensive efforts to measure how the unprecedented wave of illegal migration between 2021 and 2024 impacted local economies and affected local labor markets. (snip)

The researchers found that illegal immigrant worker inflows increased local employment “approximately one-for-one,” meaning a 1% increase in unauthorized workers relative to a local area’s workforce corresponded with roughly a 1% increase in overall employment. The study found no evidence that the immigration surge lowered average wages.

That 1% increase in illegal immigrant worker flow, however, raised local home prices by about 2.2% and rents by roughly 1.4%, while finding little evidence that new housing construction expanded enough to absorb the increased demand, according to the study. So while wages remained relatively stable due to the influx of illegal immigration, housing prices and rent surged and left American workers struggling to keep up.

So, every 1% increase in illegals increased by 2.2%/1.4%. I mean, we can’t blame it all on Biden, we can start with China and Fauci, followed by the idiot politicians and their crackdowns.

Researchers concluded the influx of illegal immigrant workers acted as a housing demand shock in markets where supply remained relatively constrained.

The authors argued the increase in housing demand outpaced homebuilding in many areas, amplifying price pressures where housing supply was already limited.

How many months was there NOT construction? How long after did it take to get it all going again, especially since restrictions varied according local, county, and state jurisdictions? And Biden was dumping all those aliens everywhere.

The economists estimate illegal immigrant worker flows accounted for roughly 30% of employment growth in the average local labor market between March 2021 and March 2024.

They also estimate those inflows explained about 30% of home-price growth and roughly 20% of rent growth in the average metropolitan area over the same period.

So, basically, companies giving aliens jobs at low wages while homes and rents spiked. Around Raleigh homes went up around 150% since COVID.

Read: Surprise: All Those Biden Illegals Raised Home Prices And Rent »

German Chancellor Wants Global Rules On Hotcoldwetdry Or Something

Remember, this is all about science

German president says global rules key to tackling climate change

German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier has called for international cooperation and adherence to shared rules to overcome the climate crisis.

“Without greater international cooperation and mutual trust, we will not succeed in overcoming global challenges such as climate change or the fight against hunger and poverty,” Steinmeier said at the opening of the third Hamburg Sustainability Conference (HSC) on Monday.

The conference in the northern German city focuses on the themes of resilient economies, technology and the future of the planet under the motto “The Power of Cooperation: Driving Progress Together,” with around 1,600 participants from 115 countries attending.

Wait, did they just say that people took long fossil fueled trips from around the world for this? Wasn’t there just a meeting in Bonn the other week? And one before that? And before that? And the big one in Brazil in November last year?

Steinmeier said it remained important to continue working with full force to combat climate change, even in economically difficult times.

“Only if we work more closely together internationally and can rely on shared rules, only if we can count on a strong United Nations and its subsidiary organizations – only then will we succeed in achieving the sustainability goals,” he said.

Well, I certainly hope they have the AC turned off

You know the AC is cranked as they attempt to instituted their authoritarian cult on Everyone Else.

Read: German Chancellor Wants Global Rules On Hotcoldwetdry Or Something »

If All You See…

…are horrible Bad Weather clouds from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Common Cents Blog, with a post wondering if July 4th festivities make you Republican.

Read: If All You See… »

NY Times Has Nazi Platner Leading Collins By 2 Points

Democrats would vote for Hilter, Pol Pot, and Mao if they ran as a Democrat

Platner Has Slight Edge Over Collins in Tight Maine Senate Race, Poll Finds

Senator Susan Collins and Graham Platner are locked in a neck-and-neck Senate contest in Maine, according to (this link will actually work) a New York Times/Portland Press Herald/Siena poll, as voters weigh a desire for Democratic control of the Senate against Ms. Collins’s record and controversy around Mr. Platner’s past conduct.

Mr. Platner leads the race by two percentage points among likely voters, capturing the support of 49 percent, compared to 47 percent for Ms. Collins. It is a slight advantage, but one that is considered too small for polls to measure reliably, and which could easily grow or shrink as campaigning ramps up.

An oysterman who has never held elected office, Mr. Platner, 41, rode a populist message to the Democratic nomination despite reports about offensive online posts, a tattoo that resembled a Nazi symbol and his treatment of women. But the poll found that he is failing to attract some voters who otherwise want to see Democrats take power in Washington.

Fifty-four percent of voters said they would like to see Democrats control the Senate next year, a notably higher percentage than the percent of respondents who said they supported Mr. Platner. In fact, Ms. Collins, the Republican, is winning 10 percent of voters who prefer Democratic control.

It’s still early, but, that last paragraph does not bode well for Nazi Platner for when people actually go to the polls, and could reduce the number of Dems going to the polls, as they aren’t enthused over voting for a Nazi.

Mr. Platner has strong backing among Democrats and some of the party’s traditional constituencies, winning notable majorities of young, college-educated and Portland-area voters. A slight majority — 52 percent — of women say they support his bid.

The AWFLs are cool with this guy.

Joan Merriam, 79, a Democrat from Rockland, Maine., described the race as “a moral Catch-22.” Ms. Merriam, a retired teacher, said that she was unsettled by the reports about Mr. Platner’s conduct toward women, but that she also could not imagine voting for Ms. Collins.

“I’m holding my nose and voting for him,” she said of Mr. Platner. “She supports Trump way too much and doesn’t have a backbone.”

See? I mean, she could vote for neither, but, Dems will almost always vote for the Dem, regardless.

47% too extreme, because Democrats do not think he is. Same with character and moral values….Dems think a guy with a Nazi tattoo has good moral values.

65% say no impact (the graphic is kinda laid out weird) for things like having a Nazi tattoo. Here’s where it gets weird

How Our Polling Team Writes Sensitive Questions on Controversies

When preparing for the first New York Times/Siena poll of this year’s U.S. Senate race in Maine, we were faced with a common challenge in survey design: How to ask about sensitive topics without biasing the results of the poll.

Asking voters about controversies is a delicate task. Our goal is to measure the voters’ opinions as they existed before we called them. For that reason, we try to limit the amount of new information we expose voters to during a survey. But it’s equally important that voters understand exactly what they are being asked about. (snip)

In the Maine Senate race, there were a number of sensitive topics that we thought might have the power to affect voters’ decisions. Graham Platner, the Democratic nominee, has been the subject of numerous controversies. Among them are questions about his past treatment of women, a tattoo that resembled a Nazi symbol, which he has had covered, and social media posts written years ago that many found offensive.

Choosing the exact language for the Maine race was a balancing act between specificity and the desire not to bias respondents. One option we considered was describing the text messages sent by Mr. Platner as “sexual text messages sent to multiple women while married,” but we worried that could introduce bias to respondents by creating an environment where they felt pressured to respond negatively. Another version described the communications only as “text messages,” but we worried that was too vague and could be interpreted too broadly.

“Balancing”. In other words, they were trying to soften the language and went with ““text messages he exchanged with women while married.”” Sad.

Read: NY Times Has Nazi Platner Leading Collins By 2 Points »

Climate Wacko Files Suit Against New Zealand Government

The cultists always want to force their Beliefs on Everyone Else

Climate change activist files High Court proceedings over government ruling

A climate change activist has filed a court case against the government’s plans to prevent companies being sued over their greenhouse gas emissions.

Mike Smith’s case against six major emitters, including Fonterra and Z Energy, prompted the government’s decision to block tort-based litigation over climate change.

Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said the change would apply to current and future cases – stopping Smith’s landmark case from going ahead next April.

Now Smith has filed proceedings with the High Court over the government’s plans, asking for a declaration that both the decision and the process behind it were unlawful.

RNZ reported in May that a previously undisclosed briefing document had been provided to the prime minister’s office by Fonterra and Z Energy regarding Smith’s case.

RNZ also reported officials had told the government not to intervene in the court case.

In fairness, the cases prior to the law should be allowed to proceed, but, then they just need to stop. This climalawfare costs time and money, and raises the cost of living for Everyone Else. And Smith has already asked the UN to intervene about 10 days ago. Last time I checked New Zealand is a sovereign nation not run by the United Nations. Also, the citizens of NZ voted out the previous climate cult wackos because they were tired of this cult crap.

Read: Climate Wacko Files Suit Against New Zealand Government »

Tennessee To Review Immigration Status Of All On Government Programs

Really, illegals, (fake) asylum seekers, refugees, and lawful aliens should not be on any sort of government program

Tennessee law requires immigration review for public benefits starting this week

A Tennessee law set to take effect Wednesday will require local government agencies such as health departments to verify and report the immigration status of people applying for certain public benefits. Vivian Lozano Sterchi, chief operating officer of the Chattanooga immigrant advocacy group La Paz, said it’s unclear what the ramifications of the new law will be.

The law is broad and applies to any local government entity, including counties, cities, towns and local health departments. It applies to people 18 years or older who are applying for federal, state or local public benefits.

The law requires local governments to report to the state’s immigration agency the status of applicants so it can be shared with federal immigration enforcement officials. The new law makes an employee’s failure to report an individual’s unauthorized status a misdemeanor.

“I think what makes it so hard is the lack of clarity, which at the end of the day doesn’t matter, because this is a terrible bill that’s going to negatively impact hundreds of families in our state, and so families are afraid to receive medical care,” Lozano Sterchi said. “What does that mean for the overall health of our community, for our schools?”

It means anyone on public benefits who is not lawfully in the U.S. will have their names sent to ICE so they can be rounded up and deported. It means that illegals will be scared to apply, and legal aliens will also not apply (they are pretty much restricted in most cases for most visas from getting govt aid), leaving more money and services for actual citizens.

The law gives the Tennessee attorney general the authority to investigate allegations and complaints that a local government or employee is violating the law by not reporting someone who is an unauthorized immigrant or continuing services.

The law does not define public benefit or specify which public benefits or local government entities the law applies to.

That’s because it is all for people 18 and over. Why is this difficult to understand for the liberals?

Meanwhile

A new law could create a list of immigrants illegally living in Mississippi. Advocates are alarmed

A new Mississippi law will authorize the state’s top law enforcement agency to compile a list of all immigrants illegally living in the state.

What’s to be done with that information is a bit open-ended. But the law set to take effect Wednesday is sparking alarm among immigrant advocates, who fear it could become a new tactic to target immigrants in conjunction with President Donald Trump’s plan to deport millions of people lacking legal approval to live in the U.S.

Why fear? That’s exactly the purpose. My goodness, the Credentialed Media seems rather dense, eh?

Read: Tennessee To Review Immigration Status Of All On Government Programs »

Pirate's Cove