NY Times Readers Throw Hissy Fit Over Article Saying Dems Don’t Have To Campaign On Hotcoldwetdry

They are all sorts of big mad in these letters, but, weirdly, none are saying what they’ve done in their own lives to make their carbon footprints zero

(NY Times) Re “Democrats Don’t Have to Campaign on Climate Change Anymore,” by Matthew T. Huber (Opinion guest essay, May 12):

It is ironic, dangerous and sad that this writer says the biggest crisis humans have ever faced should no longer be a campaign topic in America. Extreme climate events like insidious fires, floods, droughts, heat waves and storms are very damaging and real! Lives and livelihoods are extinguished.

Yet Dr. Huber views climate change discussions as “yet another issue fueling polarization.” In light of looming global disasters, is political polarization our biggest worry?

Instead, news of our distressed climate needs to be in the headlines daily. It needs to be widely broadcast because it is real and people need to be informed. Many other regions of the world have moved past the talk of climate toward serious mitigation measures. America needs to join in.

Has Sally stopped using fossil fuels? Moved into a tiny home? Given up meat?

As a mother of two young children, I believe that it is simply disqualifying in 2026 for a candidate not to mention climate. Matthew T. Huber may be correct that we can fight climate change without mentioning the word “climate,” but is that the kind of leadership we want in office? The kind that avoids naming a problem and is incapable of making the connections for people about climate change’s effects: poor air quality, health impacts, supercharged storms, skyrocketing energy costs, cities running out of water and homeowners being priced out of or denied home insurance?

Why did you have children if we are doomed? Notice that Ali Simpson, senior manager for field campaigns for Moms Clean Air Force, requires the litmus test, but, I can’t find what she’s done in her own life other than try and force Other People to have their lives changed.

The argument that progressives shouldn’t talk about climate change because it doesn’t have strong bipartisan support is backward: They should be talking about it to build that very support. The retort nowadays is that affordability should be the goal, not clean energy, but that too misses the point. For the first time, solar and energy storage are the cheapest way to lower our utility bills. Clean energy and affordable energy are synonyms.

Jake from Washington fails to note that Dems have been pushing this for 30 years, and even in Washington the Progressives voted against a lot of climate (scam) legislation.

You can imagine the freakouts not published. But, why do their letter, tweets, posts, etc, never include what measures they have taken in their own lives?

Read: NY Times Readers Throw Hissy Fit Over Article Saying Dems Don’t Have To Campaign On Hotcoldwetdry »

If All You See…

…is an area that is turning to desert from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Feral Irishman, with a post on the entertainment of redistricting in Alabama

Read: If All You See… »

Wackos Sue Trump, Desantis, And More Over Gifting Of Land For Trump Presidential Library

What sound does a moonbat make when they bay at the moon?

Miami residents sue Trump, claiming Florida land gift for library unconstitutional

City residents have sued to stop Donald Trump from receiving prime Florida real estate for his presidential library, claiming the land transfer violates the Constitution.

The lawsuit is being brought under the Emoluments Clause, which bars the president from accepting gifts, payments or other benefits from state, federal or foreign entities beyond an official salary. The land where the skyscraper library is set to be built — in a prime waterfront location downtown — was first transferred by Miami Dade College to the state. Then Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Florida Cabinet gifted it to Trump’s library foundation.

The lawsuit targets Trump, his library foundation, DeSantis and members of the Florida Cabinet, as well as Miami Dade College. The 2.63 acres of land in question is valued at around $67 million, though some real estate experts have said it could be worth as much as $300 million given its bayfront location across from the city’s Kaseya Center arena. It’s also next to the Freedom Tower, a historic immigrant processing center that once welcomed Cuban refugees.

Did you know that Obama’s Stalinesque library is being built on public parkland in Chicago’s Jackson Park, and Chicago leased the 19.3-acre parcel to the Obama Foundation for 99 years for just $10? And the city of Little Rock, Arkansas, acquired the 28-acre former industrial site by issuing $11.5 million in municipal bonds. This acquisition was met with legal challenges and local controversy, but the Arkansas Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of the city’s ability to obtain the property for the Clinton Presidential Park. Jimmy Carter was given the land for his library by the State of Georgia. So none of this is unusual, but, moonbats gotta moonbat

Two of the residents listed as plaintiffs say the high-rise building would “compromise” their views and “materially worsen the living conditions in their neighborhood.” Another plaintiff is Dunn’s Overtown Farm, a nonprofit that wants to use the land for an urban farm, as well as a student in urban farming and nonprofit management.

This is the second lawsuit the library has faced. The first — which also involved Marvin Dunn, the owner of the urban farm nonprofit and an emeritus Florida International University professor — alleged that Miami Dade College violated open records laws by failing to give the public enough time to weigh in on the land transfer. The college held another vote and public hearing about the transfer, then voted again, which satisfied a circuit judge who’d temporarily put the transfer on hold.

And there it is, the real reasons, which are not being mentioned in a lot of articles about this lawsuit. I don’t blame the residents for not wanting yet another large building blocking views. Anyway, perhaps the state should simply lease the land to Trump for $10 for 99 years. Also, they should build it somewhere in a GOP voting area in Florida. Regardless, this is all much ado about nothing, just moonbats moonbatting.

Read: Wackos Sue Trump, Desantis, And More Over Gifting Of Land For Trump Presidential Library »

TNR Tells Democrats How They Should Talk About Climate Doom

Hmm, I wonder how culty this will be?

Here’s How Democrats Should Talk About Climate Change

Democrats—who mostly aren’t talking about climate change—are continuing to debate whether they should talk about climate change.

The case against climate-centric messaging usually leans on years of fairly consistent polling. Relatively large segments of the population remain concerned about climate change but prioritize other issues at the ballot box. The point was reiterated earlier this year by the centrist Searchlight Institute, in a report urging advocates and elected officials not to focus on “climate” over more salient topics like affordability and lower energy prices: “While battleground voters overwhelmingly agree climate change is a problem, addressing it is not a priority for them.” Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego has similarly argued that talking about climate change turns voters off, so candidates are better off steering clear. “Honestly, it’s just so loaded,” he told Politico recently. “If our goal is to bring down our carbon footprint—try to restrain climate change—we need to win. And focusing on words versus outcomes, I think, is a real good pathway to losing.”

In other words, lie to voters

Political pollsters accordingly survey voters about climate change alongside a slew of other relatively discrete issues. They don’t typically ask them about capitalism, for instance, and for good reason. Capitalism isn’t a traditional political issue so much as the foundation of—conservatively speaking—most issues that voters care about, from inflation to wages to health care costs. Climate change is likewise already shaping everything from housing and insurance markets to migration. That’s because we live in a world where capitalism and climate change are now structural features of existence. In the United States, at least, discussions of structural forces as such tend to be pretty academic.

It’s instructive, actually, to compare discussions of climate change and capitalism. Putting aside any deeper connections between the two, the analogy offers a different way for politicians to treat “climate.” Socialist politicians—who are typically anti-capitalists—tend to start from first principles. They don’t ask voters to support them because they are socialists; they don’t ask them to believe in socialism or oppose capitalism. Successful socialist politicians, such as New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson, stick to issues that people in their districts care about, like making life more affordable and expanding public services. There are of course other socialists who debate whether this approach represents a betrayal of socialist values. But a key factor in the relative success of socialist politicians over the last decade has been a willingness to speak concretely and with conviction about their plans for improving the lives of ordinary people. Importantly, they also don’t shy away from the label. Mamdani ran and won with the enthusiastic backing of New York City’s chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America. “I will govern as a democratic socialist,” he said proudly in his inaugural address. “Call it Pothole Politics. Call it Sewer Socialism,” he wrote this week on social media, announcing that his administration had closed an inherited $12 billion budget deficit. “It’s government that delivers for the people who make this city run.” 

Hmm, not real policy suggestions (and the massive run on paragraph was the articles), but, some good hating for capitalism and pushing Modern Socialism

To govern according to their principles, socialist electeds find common cause with non-socialists who support things like taxing the rich and bolstering collective bargaining rights. One needn’t identify as a socialist to support the things that socialists do. Figures across the political spectrum frequently voice their disagreements with the worst excesses of capitalism, like extreme wealth inequality, wage theft, and insider trading.

Hmm, so, the same old same old. How does taxing the rich and “bolstering collective bargaining rights” do anything to solve the mythical climate crisis? When the doomsday climate cultists tell you who they are you need to listen. This post using this article is possibly one of the most perfect uses of the Go Green graphic.

Read: TNR Tells Democrats How They Should Talk About Climate Doom »

Surprise: Illegal Immigration Lawyer Sued For Shady Schemes

The surprise is that this hasn’t happened more, because the whole system is just set up for people to scam all those illegals

WA immigration lawyer who served thousands sued for alleged ‘scheme’

surprise surprise surpriseCalling herself a “lawyer of miracles,” Alexandra Lozano built a sprawling Tukwila-based business with five primary locations across the U.S. and back offices in Colombia, Mexico and Argentina.

The business uses what Lozano has described as a novel approach to immigration law. It has served, according to its website, almost 80,000 people and helped thousands obtain work permits and hundreds get green cards. She has also taught her approach to others, in part by authoring several books on running a law business and one on domestic violence against men, due to be published in June.

But a lawsuit filed Monday in the U.S. District Court of Western Washington on behalf of nine former clients says her services were “illusory, negligent, and even fraudulent.”

Thousands, the lawsuit says, have been affected.

The 50-page complaint lodges a barrage of claims against Lozano (also known as Lozano Kennedy after a 2023 separation), her business and other entities believed to be associated with her. The claims include legal malpractice, breach of contract and fiduciary duty, and violation of the Consumer Protection Act. The lawsuit also accuses Lozano and other entities with violating civil racketeering and conspiracy laws.
Among the specific allegations are participating in a “scheme” to file false or fraudulent immigration documents and, in some cases, asking clients to sign blank pieces of paper so the signatures could be attached to documents they hadn’t reviewed.

If any of this is true then the federal government needs to get involved to file criminal charges. And if that happens then she and her associates could be the first of many dominoes to fall. Seriously, the DOJ needs to really hire about 4 times the employees on contract till at least the end of Trump’s term to investigate all the fraud in immigration, learing centers, Medicare, Medicaid, and so much more.

Immigration authorities detain former Kansas mayor who voted illegally

The former mayor of a conservative Kansas town was taken into custody by immigration authorities Wednesday after acknowledging last year that he had voted in elections despite not being a U.S. citizen.

Joe Ceballos, who was born in Mexico and is a legal permanent U.S. resident, was detained during a meeting at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement office in Wichita, Kansas, according to his attorney, Jess Hoeme. He said Ceballos now fears he could be deported.

I’m not sure why this is in a local Raleigh news outlet. We’d love some local news gathering instead of pulling AP feeds, but, regardless, weren’t we told that this almost never happens, and then we keep seeing it happen?

Read: Surprise: Illegal Immigration Lawyer Sued For Shady Schemes »

Trump Admin Looks To Block PRM Lawsuit Against Oils Companies

It’d be fun of the Trump DOJ mentioned in open court that the state of the People’s Republik Of Minnesota was still using lots and lots of fossil fuels for their operations, and that Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, a Democrat, himself uses lots of fossil fuels for his SUVs and airplane flights

Trump administration moves to block Minnesota climate change lawsuit against oil companies

President Donald Trump’s administration moved Monday to block a lawsuit Minnesota officials filed almost six years ago alleging oil companies and a petroleum trade group deceived state residents about climate change.

The U.S. Department of Justice, the administration’s law enforcement arm, filed an action in federal court in Minneapolis arguing that the federal government has the authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, not states, and that Minnesota officials are trying to improperly impose their policy preferences on the rest of the country.

“The Constitution does not tolerate such a conflict,” Justice Department attorneys argued in the filing. “Nor does it allow Minnesota to national its regulatory powers.”

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, a Democrat, filed a lawsuit in state court in June 2020 against ExxonMobil, Koch Industries, the American Petroleum Institute and refinery company Flint Hills Resources, a Koch subsidiary, accusing them of consumer fraud and deceptive trade practices. At least 15 other states brought similar lawsuits, including Massachusetts, New York and Rhode Island.

They filed the suit 6 years ago, so, the PRM and Ellison have had plenty of time to practice what they preach and stop using fossil fuels which they consider Evil. Yet, they haven’t. They have over 475 aviation facilities, from massive international airports to small public and private to heliports to seaplane ports, and, yet, they are all operating. And more opened in the last 6 years. Very strange.

Read: Trump Admin Looks To Block PRM Lawsuit Against Oils Companies »

If All You See…

…is an island that will soon be flooded from rising seas, you might just be a aWarmist

The blog of the day is Geller Report, with a post on it being open season on NYC Jews.

Read: If All You See… »

Washington Post Seems Surprised That People With Few Private Sector Skills Having Trouble Getting Jobs

The answer is literally right there in front of the two WP writers. Will they reach the right conclusion?

Why the U.S. job market is so hard, especially for recent college graduates

The American job market is behaving in a way that economists are struggling to explain. The economy is growing. Unemployment is low. And yet, for millions of workers, finding a job has become harder than at almost any other point in decades.

Amanda Munro, 32, followed every rule she had been taught. She earned a graduate degree, cultivated expertise in data science and environmental policy, and began establishing a track record as a policymaker, negotiating line by line with foreign governments over rules designed to protect sharks and rays on the high seas. When she was laid off last year as part of the federal cuts imposed by the U.S. DOGE Service, she expected to find another job quickly. Instead, she ended the year sorting packages in a warehouse in Portland, Oregon, earning $19 an hour. “It feels like the rules changed,” she said.

The struggle is felt across the U.S. workforce, but for the millions of students graduating this spring, it arrives at the worst possible moment.

A government worker bee who surely thinks she’s better than everyone else, who focused on the enviro-weenie policy part, who fancies herself a bigwig in policy and knows people in other countries, and is now finding it hard to get something comparable in the private sector? Huh. It’s almost like all that schooling and experience is not worth much.

Layoffs remain low by historical standards, but they vary widely across sectors. “In some narrow sectors, certainly tech and media included, it is low hire and some fire,” Ullrich said.

They’re replacing workers with AI, along with realizing they do not need that many employees. Plus, they do not need all the super-woke Millennials and Gen Z, people who have low work skills, low work motivation, and are pains in the ass to work with.

Another reason hiring has slowed is uncertainty about artificial intelligence. Even though the technology has not yet replaced large numbers of workers, it is already shaping how companies think about hiring. “I don’t think this is AI displacement,” said Ben Zweig, chief executive of Revelio Labs, a workforce data company. “What we’re seeing is anticipatory.” Instead of rushing to bring on new workers, some firms are waiting to see how the technology evolves and which tasks it will eventually take over.

Well, at least the WP notices that.

AI is also reshaping the hiring process itself. Recruiters say they are being overwhelmed with applications, many generated by AI, making it harder to identify strong candidates. “Everyone knows it’s a problem,” Zweig said. “We’re getting flooded.”

The yutes are taking the easy route for their applications, and it shows.

Samantha Gilstrap, 28, graduated from journalism school in 2019 and has barely caught her breath since. She entered the job market as the pandemic began, later lost a digital reporting job at WUSA9 during industry consolidation, and has since applied for hundreds of jobs. Most applications have led nowhere. “The only times I’ve been able to interact with humans is if it’s a who-you-know basis,” she said. She is now couch surfing to save money. “At some point, if things don’t work out, I will be walking into the nearest McDonald’s.”

If she didn’t graduate from a big-time journalism school, good luck, because the big outlets are full of these Elites. Couple that with local outlets slowly dying when it comes to news gathering (a much longer conversation), and the jobs dry up.

Her experience reflects a broader pattern among recent graduates. The unemployment rate for people ages 22 to 27 who recently completed college hit 5.6 percent in the final months of 2025 — well above the 4.2 percent rate for all workers, according to national data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Nearly half of that age group was underemployed, meaning people were working in jobs that did not require a degree, the highest share since 2020.

Well, so many are getting worthless degrees, ones that have little to no value in the private workplace, and might even be detrimental to getting a job, because even hardcore Progressive companies do not want annoying wackjobs with degrees ending in Studies causing problems. They’d rather hire older people who just get the work done.

Christine Beck, a career coach who works with early-career job seekers, said employers are asking more of the people they do hire. “Companies are trying to do more with less,” she said, pointing to a growing emphasis on candidates who can lead projects and expand an organization’s capacity without adding headcount.

That’s almost always been the case, and they really cannot depend on the Yutes to get this done. They do not like to do the work they’re told to do, much less go above and beyond.

Munro, the ocean policy expert, spent her months working in the warehouse alongside a former graphic designer and an ex-IT contractor whose job with the Forest Service had ended when his contract ran out, each with their own version of the same story.

In January, she was rehired by the federal government. The return brought relief, but did not erase her fear that the ground was still shifting.

In other words, the only place so many have any value is in being government drones. And the WP missed the point that all this high end education does not provide real skills.

Read: Washington Post Seems Surprised That People With Few Private Sector Skills Having Trouble Getting Jobs »

Politico: Comrade Newsom Running Out Of Climate Scam Bribes

If you have to give bribes and “sweeteners” to get everyone to cooperate (at the barrel of the government force), maybe this stuff isn’t that good?

Newsom is running out of climate sweeteners

MONEY BAG: California climate politics are entering their austerity era.

Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to unveil his final May budget revision this week with an eye toward cementing his legacy. Broadly, he’ll be helped by an expected surge in tax revenue tied to anticipated tech company IPOs later this year, as our POLITICO colleagues Eric He, Tyler Katzenberger and Nicole Norman reported.

But on climate, he’s confronting an awkward reality Democrats long tried to avoid: California’s ambitious emissions-cutting regulations are no longer generating enough money to soften the political blow.

Since its inception in 2006, California’s cap-and-trade program was sold not just as a way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but as a machine for generating roughly $4 billion annually for projects lawmakers could bring back to their districts — electric school buses, wildfire prevention, affordable housing near transit, discounts on electric bills, clean water projects and incentives for farmers and drivers to adopt cleaner technologies.

I wonder how much of that money was being spent as intended, and how much ended up going to NGOs and donors and friends as graft and slush money?

That money became the political sweetener that helped sustain support for an otherwise costly and contentious climate agenda, securing votes from recalcitrant moderate Democrats (and even the occasional Republican) eager to deliver tangible benefits back home.

But the sweetener is now running out — leaving Newsom holding the bag. It’s a painful pivot for the likely 2028 presidential contender, who just last year relished rebranding the carbon market from “cap and trade” to “cap and invest” as a nod to the community groups clamoring to spend the program’s revenues.

It was basically a BS program designed to hide how expensive this all is, and now Californians are going to pay for it. More. But, then, the majority of them voted for this cult insanity. Have fun! And maybe they should all give up their own use of fossil fuels.

Read: Politico: Comrade Newsom Running Out Of Climate Scam Bribes »

Federal Judge Whines That ICE Is Ignoring His Order On Arresting Illegals Without Warrants

The judge pretty much made up his ruling, since federal law does not require federal agents to have a warrant to dragnet illegal aliens, something the Associated Press forgot to mention

Federal judge rules ICE in Colorado violated order limiting warrantless arrests

A federal judge ruled Tuesday that immigration officers in Colorado have violated his order limiting when they can arrest people without a warrant.

U.S. District Senior Judge R. Brooke Jackson said Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have violated his November order that barred them from arresting anyone without a warrant unless they had probable cause to believe a person is in the country illegally and likely to escape before officers can get a warrant. Since then, Jackson said ICE agents have violated the order by continuing to make warrantless arrests “without individualized, pre-arrest probable cause determinations of flight risk.”

The judge also ordered immigration agents who are authorized to make warrantless arrests to undergo training on the court’s orders and for the government to turn over records of such warrantless arrests. The ruling came in a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado over so-called collateral arrests of people accidentally caught up in immigration enforcement actions. (snip)

In his latest ruling, Jackson concluded ICE had failed to adequately train its deportation officers on the requirements of his November court order and is now requiring such instruction within 45 days.

He also found ICE had “uniformly failed” to follow documentation requirements for warrantless arrests under his court order.

Whatever. Federal law doesn’t require any of that, and the judge really has no power to usurp the power of the Legislative Branch. Keep whining, Champ!

Also in the People’s Republik Of Colorado

Colorado eyes expansion of state inspection authority over immigration detention centers

A proposal to add new inspection requirements for detention centers and increases the civil liability for sharing information with federal immigration authorities passed both chambers of the Colorado Legislature.

The proposal is now headed to Gov. Jared Polis’ desk.

House Bill 1276 expands a current law prohibiting employees of state agencies or political subdivisions from disclosing an individual’s immigration status to federal authorities by extending the civil penalty liability to the employer.

Good luck! You have no power here.

Read: Federal Judge Whines That ICE Is Ignoring His Order On Arresting Illegals Without Warrants »

Pirate's Cove