Chip Roy Introduces Bill To Reinstate Unvaccinated Military Members

How many Democrats will vote for this? I’m betting 8 in the House, and it will get no vote in the Democrat run Senate

Exclusive: Rep. Chip Roy Introduces Bill to Reinstate, Protect Unvaccinated Troops from Punishment

Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) on Friday introduced a bill that would reinstate troops discharged over the Biden administration’s ill-fated military coronavirus vaccine mandate and protect unvaccinated troops, cadets, and midshipmen from punishment, Breitbart News has first learned.

Roy said in a statement:

Thanks to the hard work of many of my Republican colleagues, the Biden administration’s disastrous COVID-19 vaccine mandate was finally ended. But there is more work to be done. Republicans must fight to permanently end these mandates and make whole all the service members harmed by President Biden’s senseless policies. I’ve introduced the Service Restoration Act to do just that.

Roy’s bill, titled the Service Restoration Act, would prohibit any federal funds being used to require a member of the military or a cadet or midshipman at a service academy to receive a vaccine, and would prohibit any “adverse action” against them solely on the basis of not wanting to be vaccinated against COVID-19.

All discharged military members would be reinstated with full pay, their previous rank, and records expunged of adverse reaction. That said, how many will want to come back? Maybe those approaching their 20 years, ones who can come back and retire, but, will a lot of the others want to come back to a military which treated them with such dishonor? To a military that is going completely Woke?

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

11 Responses to “Chip Roy Introduces Bill To Reinstate Unvaccinated Military Members”

  1. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    These are the mandatory vaccinations that all service members are required to receive before initial entry or basic training:

    Hepatitis A
    Hepatitis B
    Measles, mumps, rubella

    And others are mandatory depending on deployment.

    This (Covid-19) will mark the 18th vaccine to be mandated for the armed forces, though it’s unlikely that a service member would receive all of them because many are location-specific, a spokesperson for the Department of Defense told the Washington Examiner on Tuesday.

    Should ALL vaccines for military members become voluntary?

    What is the right-wing war against Covid-19 vaccination really about?

    What do vaccine mandates in the military have to do with “woke”ness??

    • Dana says:

      And all of the vaccines the distinguished Mr Dowd listed had years and years of the normal medical research and testing behind them, whereas the COVID vaccines were developed with unreasonable haste and no long-term testing. Five-year testing hasn’t been done since the vaccines haven’t been around for five years yet.

      But more, the vaccines simply don’t work! Taking the vaccines does not keep you from contracting or spreading the virus, and even the claim that the vaccines make the disease milder if you do contract the virus cannot be proven given that the virus itself has mutated into something which does not cause serious illness in most people.

      And now, even the CDC have admitted that there have been an elevated number of cases of strokes statistically linked to the vaccines.

      If you listed the COVID vaccines along with the others you mentioned, and were then asked to pick out which of these is not like the others, it would always be the COVID vaccines which were chosen.

      • L'Roy White says:

        Trying to talk truth, logic and the obvious to liars, the stupid and the blind is a fools errand.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Mr Dana doubts both the path to approval and the effectiveness of the Covid vaccines.

        The approval WAS based on an accelerated program because of the exigency of the pandemic. We have accumulated safety data in hundreds of thousands of subjects, now for 2 years. Note in drug clinical trials, FDA approval is often granted on trials with a few hundred patients. Some adverse effects (AEs) are only discovered in greater patient distribution (look up Vioxx). At least 75 FDA approved drugs have been withdrawn from marketing based on post-marketing AEs or lab discoveries (carcinogen, degrades to toxin etc). Every new drug you see advertised on TV has only been evaluated for safety in hundreds of patients. We’re all guinea pigs.

        It’s not true that the vaccines don’t work. The early clinical trials showed significant protection against transmission, but only for about 4 months.

        Real world data clearly shows the vaccines reduce the Covid mortality rate. In the US, the unvaccinated die from Covid at a rate several fold higher than the vaccinated. The current 7 day running average is 750 deaths/day. If the new variants are less lethal it’s not showing up in the mortality data, yet. If that rate doesn’t slow, that’s 273,750 Americans dead from Covid in a year, which would make it 10 times more dangerous than “the flu”. About half have received at least one vaccination and half are unvaccinated. It’s likely fully vaccinated are even more protected from severe disease.

        Study after study shows that vaccination cuts the death rate.

        Regarding the safety of the vaccines:

        Serious allergic reactions (called anaphylaxis) occurred in 5 out of 1 million vaccine doses. This is readily treatable, but can be life-threatening if not immediately treated.

        Myocarditis (inflammation of the heart) among young males has been linked to the vaccine. About 100 in 1 million doses result in it, particularly after the second shot. Vaccine-induced myocarditis is less severe than myocarditis from the virus itself.

        Last week, the FDA and CDC announced they are investigating a possible (but not confirmed) link between the Pfizer bivalent booster vaccine and increased risk of stroke in people older than 65 based on results from one of the surveillance databases. So far, at least four other sources of data have shown no link.

        from the NY Post:

        “Compared to published incidence rates of ischemic stroke in this older population, the companies to date have observed a lower number of reported ischemic strokes following the vaccination with the Omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted bivalent vaccine. The CDC continues to recommend vaccination with the Pfizer-BioNTech Omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted bivalent COVID-19 vaccine for all authorized ages and indications.”

        Suggesting that the vaccine REDUCED stroke in this population!

        For whatever reasons, the MAGAtista have chosen to let fly at these vaccines, dressing their political objectives in “concerns”, much like dressing up Old Dobbin with a hat or putting lipstick on a pig.

        These vaccines are more well characterized than Monster energy drinks or the delicious McRib or vaping or Tylenol or hours on TikTok/twitter.

        We know, we know… the gubmint isn’t forcing you to eat a McRib, but few Americans were forced by the gubmint to take the vaccine.

  2. James H Lewis says:

    I beg forgiveness for agreeing with Elwood but even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

    When you join the military, your body is no longer yours. If you don’t like that, don’t join.

    Vaccinations are not given to protect the individual, but to protect the group from disease contracted by the individual. A unit that cannot perform its duties is worthless.

    rMNA research started in the 80’s. It is not new. Plus, enhanced and evaluated testing was done. Prior to its release the Left hated the vaccines because Trump was pushing for them and he couldn’t be allowed to do something good. After Biden stole the election, the vaccine was good. Politics is a silly nasty game played by silly nasty people who want power.

    The government and the media did an absolutely terrible job of explaining what the CDC/FDA said in December, 2020. The efficacy, how the vaccines performed in a controlled environment, was around 92% for Moderna and Phizer. Johnson and Johnson was a distant 73% but it was a 1 shot deal, not 2.

    That meant how effective the vaccines would be in the outside world could be expected to be less. Somewhere around 10% of the vaccinated people would not be protected.

    The secondary benefit of reduced symptoms was initially not touted because it was thought the public would not consider that beneficial enough to take the vaccine.

    Early on it was not recognized that the kill zone was the elderly, with their weakened immune system, along with the obese and anyone else with a disease that comprised their immune system. The young and healthy were relatively safe.

    The many lies told re side effects, etc., was amplified by the Internet. VAERS, a completely uncontrolled list, further muddled things with short answers on a complex subject.

    The result was a complete effiing mess in which people died who shouldn’t have because politics became married to medicine.

    The facts are that the vaccines protect around 90% of the vaccinated. When the vaccines weaken they still reduce the symptoms and hospitalizations drop to near zero. Boosters help but their effectiveness is also limited. Plus, viruses mutate. We now have new anti-viral drugs that reduce the symptoms. I know, I just completed treatment using Paxlovid.

    With 20/20 hindsight it is apparent that the initial thrust should have been to the elderly, obese and immune comprised with heavy emphasis on personal hygiene, social distancing and wearing masks in crowded areas. The shutdown was never needed except to placate the Left who always claims to do things for “your own good” while giving them control.

    Did we learn anything? Maybe.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:


      A stopped clock is correct twice a day. You should strive to be as correct as a stopped clock!

      That said, your tome is mostly spot on!!

      Of course, the election was not stolen.

      Although the elderly and infirm were/are most affected, public health concerns dictate that one way to reduce infecting the elderly is to vaccinate those around them too.

      Nearly 75,000 Americans under 50 died from Covid. That’s about 7% of all Covid deaths. 1400 kids died from Covid. If even 14 kids had died from the vaccines you’d want Dr Fauci burned at the stake. We know, we know, nuCons consider any data from the CDC to be faked or “adjusted”, just like all gubmint information.

      The Dems were not agin the vaccines before they were for them, but they didn’t trust Trump. Who does? Once the clinical trial results were reported Dems were behind the vaccines. It has been conservatives discouraging vaccine usage, at least for others.

      • James H Lewis says:

        Dear Elwood:

        “Once the clinical trial results were reported Dems were behind the vaccines.”

        So you admit that the Lefties attacked the vaccines before they were available and before anything was known of them.

        They then changed after Biden stole the election.

        Fauci originally said don’t do masks. He then said do masks.

        Do you see why the feds lost all creditability?

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          The Dems had no confidence in Trump at all. Who would? He was a well known liar. When the clinical trial results were reported there was evidence the vaccines were effective.

          Did you accept the vaccines on faith?

          Beyond that, that’s little to discuss with you.

          You seem too stupid to understand much.

          Stupid is as stupid does.

          • James H Lewis says:

            Dear Elwood:

            The issue is not confidence in Trump. Trump wasn’t the scientists working on the vaccines. The issue is that the Lefties attacked the vaccine before it was released. Thus when they changed their story, they shot their credibility. As I noted Fauci did the same.

            I accepted the vaccines based on what the CDC/FDA said. I also discussed them with my doctor, just as I do with all health care treatments.

            I see that you have no response beyond insult.

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            Dear James,

            I’m sorry if I hurt your feelings, but stupid is as stupid does. And your belief that Trump won the election is stupid.

            Joe Biden: “I trust vaccines, I trust scientists, but I don’t trust Donald Trump.”

            Nancy Pelosi: “Unless there is confidence that the vaccine has gone through the clinical trials, and then is approved by the independent scientific advisory committee, as established to do just this, there will be doubts that people will have.”

            Kamala Harris: “What we don’t trust is a federal government that has been caught red-handed multiple times circumventing the health experts and ?making political decisions seemingly to boost the president’s re-election chances.”

            NuCons can’t have it both ways. They can’t criticize Democratic leaders for being skeptics of Trump and NOW criticize the vaccines as harmful and ineffective. You are admitting that Dem leaders were CORRECT in doubting the vaccines!

            No disrespect, but you don’t seem to make very persuasive arguments.

            But as you say repeatedly, stupid is as stupid does!

            Buh and Bye. Re-engage when you admit that Trump lost.

  3. L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! says:

    Hey fellas, the stupid democommies in californicate are handing out $5 million in “reparations” to every black person who applies even though there was never slavery in the land of fruit and nuts. And their governor wants to be president. LOL

    Here is my response:

    Common boys, lets identify as schvartze. If one can lie about their sex then one can lie about their race.

Pirate's Cove