To Get Net Zero Mining Has To Double Or Something

So, it’s not OK to mine for oil, coal, and natural gas, but, it’s fine to create massive environmental messes, often with the use of child labor, for Net Zero?

Climate change: Investment in mining ‘needs to nearly double’ to achieve net zero, BofA says

Current levels of metals needed to decarbonize economies won’t be sufficient to reach climate targets, a recent Bank of America (BAC) note cautioned, and investment in mining needs to double by 2050 in order to satisfy the growing demand for low carbon technologies.

“Raw material markets are tight already and will likely get tighter going forward,” the analysts wrote. “Based on the current resource endowment and market balances, we don’t expect the 1.5°C global warming target to be achieved by 2050: 1.7-1.8°C looks likely. One solution to resolving shortages and constraints, as ever, lies in investment.”

The cost of shifting from fossil fuels to low carbon alternatives won’t be cheap, the note stated, citing UN estimates that adoption will cost developing countries alone $140-$300 billion per year by 2030.

“To prevent metal shortages and achieve net zero, mining [capital expenditure] needs to nearly double,” the analysts stated.

Due to the urgent nature of addressing the climate crisis, returns could be sizable. Using somewhat simplified calculations, the analysts suggested “the return on mining investment could be an impressive +94- 317%.”

Who’s going to pay for this? That’s right, you! Bet the climate cultists didn’t see that coming. Or that a bunch of bankers, investors, and rich folks are going to make more money off your suffering.

Although many of the technologies needed to achieve net-zero targets have been developed, scaling these technologies will require vast amounts of minerals and metals relative to current levels. Between 2020 and 2030, for instance, the analysts contend that nickel demand could grow by 40% while lithium demand could increase by 38%.

In other words, it appears that demand will outstrip supply unless mining capacity increases — and that supply-demand imbalance could impact how rapidly decarbonization occurs.

Which would seriously drive up the price.

Child labour, toxic leaks: the price we could pay for a greener future

But scientists warn there will be an environmental price to pay for this drive to create a world powered by green technology. Prospecting for the materials to construct these devices, then mining them, could have very serious ecological consequences and major impacts on biodiversity, they say. (snip)

Metals such as lithium and cobalt provide examples of the awkward issues that lie ahead, said Herrington. Both elements are needed to make lightweight rechargeable batteries for electric cars and for storing power from wind and solar plants. Their production is likely to increase significantly over the next decade – and that could cause serious ecological problems.

In the case of cobalt, 60% of the world’s supply comes from the Democratic Republic of the Congo where large numbers of unregulated mines use children as young as seven as miners. There they breathe in cobalt-laden dust that can cause fatal lung ailments while working tunnels that are liable to collapse.

Good job, Warmists

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

5 Responses to “To Get Net Zero Mining Has To Double Or Something”

  1. Professor hale says:

    Who’s going to pay for this?

    In Western civilization, it is paid for by private investment, and repaid by a return on that investment. In other words, over time, it pays for itself. But in Africa and most of Asia, they still operate as hunter gatherers, not as investors. And even investments through places like the World bank, normally just get “gathered” by the wealthy connected people and their patrons.

  2. Hairy says:

    Thinks that battery technology will remain fixed at 2022
    He sees no improvements or changes in the future.
    He wants the USA to continue using fossil fuel technology rapidly becoming obsolete
    The price of electricity from renrwables keeps dropping. The price of fossil fuels goes up.
    The Arab oil ministers have already said they want you to pay more, will you?

  3. Jl says:

    “Fossil fuel technology becoming obsolete…”. You know, John-there’s a difference between wanting fossil fuel technology to become obsolete and it even happening. It’s not becoming obsolete at all.
    Wake me up when the technology exists to make solar panels and windmills out panels and windmills.

    • UnkleC says:

      Correct JL, Fossil Fuel technology is not obsolete, it is merely unfashionable with the elite. Most of the food in the grocery is farmed using FF powered equipment and transported with FF trucks. EV technology is not ready for prime time particularly in agriculture and heavy trucks and people that pay attention are aware of the state of battery development. Cobalt and lithium are still needed for the energy density needed and we don’t produce our own. We did have energy independence a few months ago. Developments are coming, maybe, but we have to work with what we have.
      Everyone needs to be ready for the food supply situation that is developing in the near future. Much of what is being consumed now is last seasons crop.

Pirate's Cove