Unhinged Michael Moore: Who Will Ask To Repeal The 2nd Amendment?

Is this the same Michael Moore who has his own armed security?

Liberal filmmaker Michael Moore challenges the media: Who will demand we repeal the Second Amendment?

Liberal filmmaker Michael Moore appeared on MSNBC Wednesday to urge the media to call for an end to the Second Amendment, after a gunman killed 19 students and two teachers at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas.

Moore began his argument claiming that America had a violence problem, from the beginning of the country’s founding, starting with guns.

“We won’t acknowledge that we are a violent people to begin with. This country was birthed in violence with the genocide of the native people at the barrel of a gun. This country was built on the back of slaves with a gun to their back,” he told MSNBC host Chris Hayes.

Yeah, a goodly chunk of nations were built on “violence”. Such is life on Earth. The current France was built on a violent revolution. How many criminals were forced to go to Australia and Tasmania? How many African nations were birthed in violence? Canada doesn’t exactly have a stellar record with the “native” population. Funny, though, that people like Moore who seem to hate the U.S. won’t actually leave.

“Who will say on this network or any other network in the next few days, ‘It’s time to repeal the Second Amendment’?” he asked.

So, why isn’t he? Give it a whirl, Credentialed Media. See where that goes. It won’t turn out like you think.

“Look, I support all gun control legislation. Not sensible gun control. We don’t need the sensible stuff, we need the hardcore stuff that’s going to protect ourselves and our children,” he said.

Name it. Name what will stop criminals from being violent.

There are quite a few Democrats, including elected officials, who are saying we need to Do Something, yet, do not actually name what will work. Universal background checks? The Texas nutter passed a background check, it wouldn’t have stopped him

(The Federalist) Before we even knew how the killer of 19 children and two adults at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, had obtained his guns, Chris Murphy was engaging in his customary performative emotionalism on the Senate floor, literally begging Republicans to “compromise.”

Compromise on what exactly? Murphy has never once offered a single proposal that would have deterred any of these mass shooters. Literally minutes after his routine, Murphy was asked about the obvious mental illness prevalent among most of these shooters. “Spare me the bullsh-t about mental illness,” the Connecticut senator responded, “ripping” the GOP. “We don’t have any more mental illness than any other country in the world.” That’s how serious he is about compromise. (snip)

Chuck Schumer planned to introduce H.R. 8, an expanded background check bill, and H.R. 1446, a bill that would close the alleged “Charleston Loophole” (before he realized it wouldn’t be politically expedient.) “Alleged” because Dylann Roof, who murdered nine black churchgoers in Charleston in 2015, got a clean background check, not because of any “loophole,” but because local prosecutors had failed to respond to the FBI’s request for information. It was a case of human error, or negligence. So maybe Democrats should be promoting a “law-enforcement-should-do-its-job” bill. Because all “universal” background checks do is stop friends and families from gifting guns. Straw purchases are already illegal, as Schumer, Pelosi, and Murphy already know. And passing expanded background checks after a school shooting is tantamount to demanding stricter drivers tests after a hit and run. (snip)

Indeed, law-abiding Americans have no obligation to take ownership of a madman’s actions. Nor is there any reason for them to surrender their right to self-defense so that Chris Murphy, who, evidenced in many of his comments, is only interested in incrementally limiting gun ownership. That’s his right, of course. He should try and repeal the Second Amendment. Until then, however, Democrats interested in genuine compromise may want to offer realistic, productive, and germane ideas, rather than using another horrific tragedy to dunk on their political opponents.

Go for it. Try and repeal the 2nd. Or, better yet, offer up solutions that will actually deal with

Whether America is more prone to mental illness or not, these incidents are almost exclusively perpetrated by young men who have exhibited serious anti-social behavior. All of them break a slew of existing laws. All of them have either obtained guns illegally, or legally before having any criminal record. In many, if not most, cases, the shooter is already on the cops’ radar because he has threatened others or written insane, violent manifestos. In a study of mass shootings from 2008 to 2017, the Secret Service found that “100 percent of perpetrators showed concerning behaviors, and in 77 percent of shootings, at least one person – most often a peer – knew about their plan.”

There were plenty of warning signs for the Texas shooter, the Buffalo shooter, and so many others, and they were all ignored.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

53 Responses to “Unhinged Michael Moore: Who Will Ask To Repeal The 2nd Amendment?”

  1. So the Fat Moron can’t see past the end of his fork and come to the obvious conclusion that repealing the 2nd would instantly provide the best possible example of why it was proposed in the first place.
    Got it.
    Damn these people are stupid.
    Why does anyone pay any attention to them if they value their life?

  2. UnkleC says:

    How about we repeal Michael Moore? He’s well past his use by date.

  3. Matthew says:

    The end game of the left is a disarmed population, everyone knows that, but they will never be honest and come right out with it. Every single word they have ever uttered about “common sense” reform is bullshit. They absolutely love, love, love it when a group of children are murdered by some violent psychotic asshole. But if you suggest hardening the soft targets, they will fight that tooth and nail. So it’s obviously not about protecting lives, legally armed people are saving lives every day but the left would rather kill your kids than acknowledge that. They just can’t finish the job of enslaving the citizenry and taking complete control of society while we’re still armed. If you think a lot of lives are lost to “senseless gun violence” now just wait until .gov has all the guns.

    • david7134 says:

      I think it is much worse. They just want to be seen doing something. Does not matter what as long as the something would maintain a certain level of uncertainty for parents. Thus a real solution as you suggest would actually work. But then they would not be able to stir emotions and get cash contributions. The Republicans do similar things with tax issues and compensation of doctors. It is all a disgusting game to them…

      But what I would love is for one of the repulsive liberals, like Jeff who calls himself Elwood, to explain how assault weapon bans would stop a crazy guy from killing people. Australia based many weapons and assault went out the roof, especially home invasion. They handled that by not reporting it, so you can’t get the truth of what is going on.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Porter, who uses the sockpuppet david, is full of it.

        He/she asks how keeping assault weapons out of the hands of murderers reduces carnage and then lies about Australia. Connies like Porter simply deny any facts that doesn’t support their narrative.

        Does Porter have credible evidence that the Australia government is not reporting crime?

        • david7134 says:

          Your statements are not what I said in respect to assault weapons. You certainly have shown yourself to be crazy over the last few months and you should not have weapons. You are showing yourself to be extremely repulsive, unhinged, and generally psychotic. I don’t think anyone desires to exchange comments with your considering your mental state.

          • drowningpuppies says:

            Rimjob suffers from Histrionic Personality Disorder.
            As long as he sits at his keyboard he’s safe from any repercussions.

            People with HPD have a high desire for attention, make loud and inappropriate appearances, exaggerate their behaviors and emotions, and crave stimulation.[1] They may exhibit sexually provocative behavior, express strong emotions with an impressionistic style, and can be easily influenced by others. Associated features include egocentrism, self-indulgence, continuous longing for appreciation, and persistent manipulative behavior to achieve their own wants.

            Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            And yet, Porter aka david, here you are once again, having nothing to add. You and your repulsive, unhinged and generally psychotic fluffer dog never have an argument to make.

            Con men are all bluster and bullshit and bloviation.

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            fluffingpuppies once again hoping beyond hope to be relevant… Lolgf

            Bwaha! Lolgf

          • david7134 says:

            What gets me is that he actually thinks anyone here gives a shit about his opinions. Truly pathetic.

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            Porter aka david just cain’t quit me!!

            We realize that the sclerotic minds of the devoted right-wingers can never be changed. Facts are meaningless to a winger. Feelings and dogma are all that matter.

            I would be thrilled never to engage with you ever again, but you don’t have any self-discipline.


          • drowningpuppies says:

            People with HPD have a high desire for attention, make loud and inappropriate appearances, exaggerate their behaviors and emotions, and crave stimulation.

            In another word: Rimjob. https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_wink.gif
            He just can’t help himself.

            Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

  4. Thomas Moore says:

    I have had a few gen grabbers in my life meaning they want ALL guns no matter what banned. England style. Just no one except cops and military and of course criminals so I have come up with a question for those who want all citizen/civilian guns banned total = “what happened to USA when a total ban on alcohol was enacted to national law back in 1920?” Did alcohol sales really stop of course not. Prohibition was the opportunity of a lifetime for criminals and plenty illegal booze flowed and criminals gained an empire. Second what about ban as illegal all criminal street drug? “The Drug War” and how’s that turning out? No drugs? No criminals have and sell drugs? All good Americans just not buying? How about that wide-open idiot FJB border? All secure? What makes ANYONE think that by banning a thing makes that thing go away? All a gun grab would do is disarm a very few citizens not the criminals. My own guns are not to harm anyone but bad guys.

    • JimS says:

      I’ve said before that a gun ban would turn every shuttered machine shop into an “illegal” gun factory. Just like drug laws turned abandoned double-wides into meth labs.
      I’d say make every crime involving a firearm – except those regarding the firearm itself – a capital crime.

  5. Dana says:

    The pro-prenatal infanticide folks keep telling us that banning abortion won’t stop abortions, but just drive them underground, yet they seem to think that banning firearms will actually get rid of firearms.

    • Ultra MAGA says:

      Michael Fats has armed body guards. So do all the leftist pols, celebs and media dopes. Then they put up a sign at a school that reads “This is a gun free school zone” and wait to see the bloodshed. It only makes sense to the leftist mind.

      Michael Moore was denied travel to Epstein’s Island because of BO.

      FJB and MM.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      Abortion is an action, assault weapons are objects.

      How many fully auto machine guns are used in crime?

      • Jim s says:

        All real “assault weapons” are full auto. Calling ARs and the like “assault weapons” is just a scare tactic of the leftards. Semis like the AR series are just cosmetics, not really different from a deer rifle. Most crimes committed with firearms are done with handguns.

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          Jim s types a helping of pigshit. Don’t believe what Teach tells you about rifles. He’s propagandizing.

          He doesn’t know a deer rifle from a water pistol. Have you ever fired a deer rifle? Why do you need a 30 round magazine for deer hunting (most states allow 4-5)? Or a semi-auto? Pistol grip? If you need a flash suppressor you shouldn’t be night hunting. Barrel shrouds? How many times do YOU miss?

          Why do mass murderers love AR-15s so much?

          The AR-15 platform is designed for rapid, repeated fire, flash suppression, random aiming, light weight, short length, low recoil, better penetration of body armor, greater stopping power – just like the selective auto M4 assault rifle.

          The AR-15s are civilian, semi-auto versions of the military M4 carbines.

          Most mass murders in schools, churches, synagogues, theaters are committed with AR-15s.

          • drowningpuppies says:

            Histrionic Personality Disorder:
            The Rimjob Disease

            Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

          • UnkleC says:

            The Armalite Rifle design #15 was a ‘remodel’ of the Eugene Stoner design AR10, which is often used for deer hunting as it is usually built in an appropriate caliber The common AR15 cartridge [.223 Rem / 5.56] is not allowed for deer hunting in many states as it does not possess enough ‘power’. The version developed for the military was the M16 and the M4 is a further development of the M16.
            So far as the accessories mentioned, has our commenter looked at many Olympic target rifles? Or modern sporting rifles? The cartridge began development as a variation of a popular small game round looking to correct and improve several existing cartridges. “Random Aiming” is a term I am simply not familiar with, I usually try to aim with great precision, not randomly.
            Not sure where the comment about ‘mass murders’ has any factual support, but the last information I paid any attention to, put the Kalishnikov AK [and it’s variants] at the top of the list. The most popular weapon of the world’s underworld is the Kalishnikov.
            Finally, the original comment of “How many fully auto machine guns are used in crime?” should be rephrased with ‘how many legal machine guns…’, last count, Zero. Besides ‘fully automatic machine guns’ is redundant.

          • JimS says:

            I acknowledge dowd’s expertise on pigshit, sine he’s full of it.

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          Random aiming is akin to spray and pray shooting. When you have a lot of nearby targets (cowering children) and a lot of bullets, no need to aim carefully. The AR-15s are perfect for the purpose.

          The AK-47 is chambered in 7.62×39mm, is heavier, less accurate, more reliable, cheaper, with more recoil than the AR-15s. If you read a list of U.S. school, theater, concert, store, business mass massacres you’ll find in almost all cases AR-15s were the tool of choice.

          And why are fully auto, machine guns not used in crimes here? They are essentially banned. Some specific bans DO work.

          This is the common pigshit put forth by ammosexuals when it comes to discussing the wisdom of having AR-15s available. Redundant! It’s a magazine not a clip! Assault weapon not assault rifle! It’s a Modern Sporting Rifle! (LOL)

          Maybe you’re just playing dumb.

          • david7134 says:

            Are you aware of the fact that an AR15 has never killed a single person. You can take the weapon and put it on a table and no one will be hurt. But if you allow crazy people to wonder our streets without supervision, then those crazies will kill people. We have multiple laws to restrict this, but liberals fight against crazy care and law enforcement ignores to warnings. You have been very repulsive in committing on this tragedy, more so than you normal level of stupidity. We do not need laws restricting law abiding people in any way. We need enforcement of existing laws and a national effort on crazy, that includes you. And yes, there were a number of things that could have been done to stop this. That is all I will discuss with you as you are not right with the world.

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            Porter aka david,

            You’re right. AR-15s don’t kill people, Republicans kill people. They use AR-15s to propel the 55 grain .223 bullets at about 3000 ft/sec (~ 2000 mph)…

            The bullets fired by an AR-15 are different: They travel at a higher velocity and are far more lethal than routine bullets fired from a handgun. The damage they cause is a function of the energy they impart as they pass through the body. A typical AR-15 bullet leaves the barrel traveling almost three times faster than—and imparting more than three times the energy of—a typical 9mm bullet from a handgun.

            …The high-velocity bullet causes a swath of tissue damage that extends several inches from its path. It does not have to actually hit an artery to damage it and cause catastrophic bleeding.

            … maybe just ban .223 ammunition.

            Surely you know that studies show that few mass murderers meet the criteria of being mentally ill.

    • Ultra MAGA says:

      Dana, the pro-prenatal infanticide folks don’t want to ban guns. That’s what they want you to think. In reality they want to CONFISCATE ALL FIREARMS and eliminate the manufacture sale or use of any firearm.

      They want to go door to door ala Nazi and physically remove every firearm from the house and from the possession of the owners. If after the initial purge a firearm is detected in someone’s possession they will forfeit their home, business or job and be sent to prison for a long time as an example. It’s that simple.

      The object of gun confiscation is to force confrontation between law enforcement and the civilian population so the killing of civilians will be tolerated or even lauded by the media/political/celebrity leftists. Just like forcing people to obey masks, lockdowns, fake vaccinations and mandates were a trial run to see if they can depend on Karens to report their friends, family and neighbors. It worked, the Karens did.

      FJB and all gun grabbers

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:


        We want kids to be able to attend school without the danger of being slaughtered by men with assault weapons.

        Men, especially con-men, are famously emotional and irresponsible.

        Perhaps it’s only a coincidence that these mass shooters use AR-15 type assault weapons, but we suspect it’s their design – the wholesale killing of humans. The killing-convenient AR-15, descended from the M16 and M4, in the hands of white teenagers (and older white men) turns up at mass shootings in schools, churches, mosques, businesses, clubs etc – anywhere people are gathered and a cowardly angry white man shows up.

        Men with limp dicks and other men who make money selling these murder machines make up stories about their value – ‘patriots’ with this weaponry will band together to fight ‘leftist’ gov’t tyranny; hunting; home protection from zombies, bands of rapists, but not police; represent FREEDOM!; makes the old lady finally listen to me; it’s like being in the army without the danger or hard work.

        We need to ban these useless assault weapons. Yes, we know, shitty men will just take their semi-auto 9 mm with 17 rounds, a tactical vest with magazines, and head to a school anyway. And yes, we need more security at schools, businesses, stores etc.


        • L'Roy White says:

          Another hateful rant full of false accusations, meaningless name calling and lies. You’re over your target man, leftists and morons. LG Brandon keeps pointing this out and you keep ignoring it.

          BTW an AR-15 is not an “assault weapon” and no army on earth uses it as it’s military weapon. You said you own 2 of them. Did you turn them in or are you as one of the “elites” exempt from the illegal bullshit you want done to others? Typical.

          This shooter is a Hispanic supremacist and a communist. He has nothing to do with Trump, MAGA people, Christianity, Jews, white folks or Russians. He’s not even a black guy like me who are more apt to do mass shooting than whites!

          Look for the causes Mr. Dowd and I’ll join your crusade to end needless violence. Keep blaming the gun and not the killer and you can stick with the other partisan opportunists and liars.

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            L.G. Brandon (aka Fuck Joe Biden) must have changed his name.

            Yes, an AR-15 is an assault weapon. Can we please stop going over that tired ground?

            semiautomatic rifles with detachable magazines and “military” features like pistol grips, flash suppressors and collapsible or folding stocks

            Are you really confused about what we’re talking about?

            I do not own any AR-15s.

            Do you have any evidence that the murderer WAS (not IS) a Hispanic supremacist and communist? Why would a Hispanic supremacist slaughter mostly Hispanic children? Lunatic representative Paul Gosar (R-AZ) called the murderer a transexual, illegal immigrant, but took down his post. The murderer was an American citizen.

            Mass shooters in schools, churches, synagogues, concerts are by and large frustrated, white, christian men.

            Until we figure out the cause why not remove the tool of choice? As I’ve explained it will not stop all mass murders but will help protect our children.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      Infanticide requires an infant, which happen to appear post-natally!

      And while pro-natalists want to ban all abortions, most anti-slaughterists only wish to see assault weapons, the weapon of choice for mass slaugherers, banned.

      • CarolAnn says:

        The pre-infanticidists love to use semantics to side step their cruel and inhuman murder of babies. I don’t know what you said when your wife was pregnant but I said “I’m having a baby” which last I checked is a human. I didn’t say I was having a zygote, a fetus or a cow, I said a baby. It matters not at which stage of development you kill a human, it’s still a human. You have no respect for life. Follow the science.

        Also, according to the FBI the “weapon of choice” for mass slaughters is a hand gun and only a few involved fully automatic assault weapons. Get your facts straight.

  6. […] But mostly for the repeal of the second amendment. Via Pirates Cove […]

  7. Professor Hale says:

    How many school shootings were there when COVID had all the schools shut down? It seems that there is already a 100% effective solution. But teachers unions and the campaign money they donate exclusively to one party would stop cold. Democrats can’t have that. Shutting down public schools would also permanently end 30 thousand molestations of children every year not to mention a few hundred thousand other felonies committed against children. If Democrats were serious about saving children, there is a simple and obvious solution. But they aren’t going to go there. It’s as if Democrats personally benefit from molesting children and are willing to let a few hundred of “other people’s children” die every year just to line their own pockets. And they have the arrogance to screech and point at the NRA. Aside from being a political lobby org, the NRA is also the largest gun safety organization on the planet. You don’t increase gun safety by demonizing the gun safety advocates.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      LOL. Gun safety organization. You think gun deaths would GO UP if the NRA went out of business??? LOL.

      Since most molestations happen inside families, banning schools will INCREASE child abuse.

      Rather than ban all schools, why not ban all guns! That would cut school shootings too.

      • drowningpuppies says:

        Since most molestations happen inside families, banning schools will INCREASE child abuse.

        Well you should know, Rimjob.
        BTW, how’s the grandson, perv?

        Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          My nephew is a federal gov’t attorney working child abuse cases. He knows who you are.

          Bwaha! Lolgf

        • drowningpuppies says:

          Is that some kind of threat, tough guy?
          Funny thing, Rimjob, is I along with many others here know exactly who you really are.
          Along with all of your fithy lies that are on record here at the Cove.
          So sue me, tough guy, and tell your nephew I said hello.

          Bwaha! Lolgfy https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

          • The catholic but not Catholic Elwood P. Dowd says:

            No threat, drowningpuppies, just an acknowledgement that we know what you are and what you do.

            You are right to be ashamed of your actions.

            Bwaha! Lolgfy

          • drowningpuppies says:

            Keep lying, Rimjob. Everyone here knows you lie about everything and
            you don’t scare anyone, you perv.

            Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

  8. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    CarolAnn: The xxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx love to use semantics to side step their cruel and inhuman xxxxxx of babies.

    Elwood: The pro-birthers love to use emotionally charged words to sidestep their scheme to control women.

    Infanticide requires an infant. Murder requires a person. Abortions do not involve infants or persons.

    Abortion is a millennium-old issue. You can call people murderers, child-killers and infanticidilists all you wish but it doesn’t help.

    If and when the Supremes overturn Roe v. Wade the issue will not be resolved. Women will still need and seek abortions. And it’s unlikely that con states will stop with banning all abortions. Some con states are already working on schemes to prosecute women (and anyone who helps them!) for leaving the state to obtain an abortion.

    Do you support non-natural contraception (OCs, condoms, IUDs, implants)? Do you support ANY abortions (life of woman, rape, incest)? How about ‘morning after’ pills that block a potential pregnancy?

    • Dana says:

      Mr Elwood P Dowd wrote:

      The pro-birthers love to use emotionally charged words to sidestep their scheme to control women.

      Infanticide requires an infant. Murder requires a person. Abortions do not involve infants or persons.

      Abolitionists love to use emotionally charged words to sidestep their scheme to control Southerners.

      To oppose slavery requires a human being. To oppose slavery requires a person. Slavery does not involve humans or persons.

      • The catholic but not Catholic Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Mx Dana substitutes ‘abolitionists’ for ‘pro-birthers’ to prove that zygotes are persons, but doesn’t succeed.

        If a fertilized egg is a person, what will he do to protect them? Millions are miscarried every year. Is that ‘God’s Will’ so nothing can be done or is there a plan to save these ‘babies’?

        We disagree with his opinion, but do not wish him dead.

        • CarolAnn says:

          Zygotes are a step in the development of a human. Just like that fertilized egg you keep talking about or that fetus you hate so much.

          We can have a reasonable discussion about abortion but not while you deny a pregnant woman is not having a human baby and not while you insist that a human starts at birth even when you spent years screaming to “follow the science” on climate and Covid.

          Humanity begins at conception because what is conceived is an unborn child in it’s primary and most vulnerable point of existence. You know that and we know that. Denial of that basic truth is deceiving oneself. Why would you deny the humanity of the first spark of life? What do you gain by that?

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:


            There is approximately a 50% chance that a fertilized egg will develop into a human baby.

            Will you take a pregnant woman’s word that she had a miscarriage before 12 weeks gestation or would it require a thorough investigation since she could be covering up 1st degree murder? Would the state require women to report a missed period and a miscarriage?

  9. CarolAnn says:

    Mr. Dowd typed: The xxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx love to use semantics to side step their cruel and inhuman xxxxxx of babies.

    The usual censorship of facts and thoughts leftists don’t like. Nothing new here. Dowd can’t even stand to hear what his cruelty and insensitivity towards unborn HUMAN BABIES and the pain and suffering it causes.

    Elwood: The pro-birthers love to use emotionally charged words to sidestep their scheme to control women.

    i am a woman fool. We don’t want to “control women” we want to save the lives of babies. Why is that a moral dilemma for you? You have spent 70 years convincing women they are not responsible for the life growing within them. You have devalued human life like all leftists do. The results you can’t and won’t even acknowledge. It’s perverse.

    “Infanticide requires an infant. Murder requires a person. Abortions do not involve infants or persons.” Then what is it alive and growing in a pregnant woman? BTW murder requires a human and a developing baby in a woman is a HUMAN baby. You lose.

    I’m not going to keep going around and around with a fool. Humans birth humans. Period. Why you want to kill them is something only you can answer. I say it’s because as a leftist you have no respect for life as proven by the last century where leftist piled up the dead just for fun.

    In Nazi Germany there were a lot of your fellow leftists who believed Jews and others weren’t human. Your own ancestors didn’t consider blacks fully human. My people have always been compassionate towards life. Yours have all been killers for centuries. Nothing will change that.

    Thank God you’re an old man and people who think like you will soon be gone. You leftists even have a plan for that style killing. It’s called Project 75.

    • The catholic but not Catholic Elwood P. Dowd says:

      CarolAnn typed: Then what is it alive and growing in a pregnant woman?

      A zygote, embryo or fetus.

      Another commenter at one time posited: A building is burning. Down one hallway is a crying toddler, down the other an incubator with 100 embryos. You have time to rescue one or the other. What is your choice? I would die trying to rescue the child. You?

      In fact, we understand your grief over abortion. It is challenging both morally and ethically. Few women make the choice trivially. I do not wish you dead.

      But IF you insist that a fertilized human egg is a baby that must be protected as an American citizen you’ve left no room for compromise. Then you MUST ban IUDs and ‘morning after’ pills. You MUST oppose rape and incest exceptions. You MUST consider the life of the ‘baby’ and life of the woman equally. You should be willing to commit billions to miscarriage research to stop nature’s massacre of millions of ‘babies’ in the womb every year. I do not wish you dead.

      For one-half century the compromise was 12 weeks gestation, likely to be reversed by a reactionary Republican Supreme Court that also finds AR-15s in schools just fine and that corporations are people.

      A person serious about decreasing the number of abortions would ALSO work at decreasing circumstances that lead to abortions: poverty, lack of contraception, failure of contraception, limited educational opportunities, did we mention ‘poverty’?, poverty.

      The primary characteristic of a woman in America seeking an abortion is poverty. Most are under 30. Most claim to be Christian. Most are already mothers. Half used contraception. 90% occurred in the first 12 weeks (1st trimester) of gestation. Half of abortions now are medication abortions.

      We appreciate that you wish all Roe v. Wade supporters dead. We’re used to it. After all you’re likely a conservative Christian where hate is a requirement, but I do not wish you dead.

      Can you outline what your ideal NO ABORTION law would look like? Calling others ‘baby killers’ and Nazis is not very persuasive.

      Best, Elwood

  10. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Neither Mx Dana nor Mx CarolAnn address ‘contraception’ methods that prevent implantation of a ‘baby’.


    Thanks. Elwood

  11. dachs_dude says:

    How many of these shooters were prescribed SSRIs, (Adderall or Ritalin), for ADHD or other behaviors?

    The side effects of these drugs are suicidal and homicidal behavior.

    This should be looked into as it’s likely THAT’s the common thread.

    However, rather than let their sons play, run around, and roughhouse, single moms want to medicate them into a docile zombie. All of these ADHD diagnosis are ruining kids and most likely these drugs are NOT being prescribed in Europe.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      Studies demonstrate that 1/3 of mass shooters have a diagnosable condition. There’s no credible evidence that Americans have more mental illness than Europeans. We do have more semi-auto weapons though. By far.

      • david7134 says:

        So it is your contention that assault weapons make normal people into mass murderers. Man, you are stupid.

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          porter dave typed: it is your contention that assault weapons make normal people into mass murderers

          No, but the assault weapons facilitate mass shooters. They are great tools for killing lots of people. That’s why they were developed.

          • david7134 says:

            No Jeff. You clearly think that the meat presence of this type of weapon causes multiple murders. We all realize that you are scared of the weapons looks.

            Maybe instead of wasting effort on gun grabbing by the corrupt politicians, we try to fix crazy.

  12. david7134 says:

    Carol Ann,
    Jeff loves to throw out medical facts, if you can call them that. He gets his information from the internet from dubious site. But the majority of the time he just makes it up. He does have a PhD in pharmacology but that is a nothing as you might tell from your local pharmacist and he did destroy his corporation with stupid actions.

Pirate's Cove