Because You Ate A Burger You Enabled The China Flu Pandemic

They just can’t help themselves in attempting to link COVID with you eating a burger after taking a fossil fueled trip

And we’ve gone from “may have played a key role” to “enabled”

Climate Change Made the Coronavirus Pandemic More Likely to Happen

Scientists have concluded that the Coronavirus Pandemic was likely enabled by human-caused Climate Change. But how?

Over the last century, the temperatures have changed quite a bit in China.  As a result, the vegetation has also changed. That caused many species of bats to move around. It is well-known that bats carry many forms of the coronavirus. And many scientists have concluded that the human pandemic started from the transmission of the virus from a bat to a human. So if the climate hadn’t changed, then the bats would not have migrated to where they were in more contact with humans. Here’s a quote from the University of Cambridge:

“The researchers discovered that vegetation changes in this area over the last 100 years had led to the introduction of 40 new bat species and, with them, 100 new types of bat-borne coronaviruses, a University of Cambridge press release explained.”

You can read a complete explanation here: Ecowatch.

It’s always great when a supposed news station, ABC in Columbia, SC, links to a hardcore biased website, eh? A station that uses vast amounts of fossil fuels and energy to operate. I figure within 2-3 weeks they are going to say that the pandemic could not have happened without ‘climate change’ (you know, a whopping 1.5F increase in global temperatures since 1850), that it is specifically the fault of man caused climate change. And to solve it we need a tax and to restrict your liberty, freedom, and choice.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

7 Responses to “Because You Ate A Burger You Enabled The China Flu Pandemic”

  1. Hairy says:

    Cause and effect?
    Teach how on record for telling us why the temps are going up so fast
    Orbital change?
    Volcanic activity??
    We got hit with an asteroid??
    Increase in irrafiance from the Sun?

    • Jl says:

      Typical alarmist-starts from a false premise. You’d first have to prove that this rate is higher than in the past.

  2. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Why would we trust anything Teach types? He believes/feels that trump won the election. LOL.

  3. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Teach does not understand the language of science. Nor does Patrick Moore.

    “Suggests”, “linked”, “likely”, “supports”, “consistent with”, all reflect the reality that scientific theories and hypotheses are not proven, but supported by evidence. “Cigarette smoking linked to lung cancer!” eventually led to the scientific consensus that cigarette smoking is the primary cause of lung cancers. (For years, smoker Rush Limbaugh claimed tobacco use did not cause cancer since every smoker didn’t get cancer – the “cause” – “effect” argument cited by Moore). Did tobacco use cause Limbaugh’s lung cancer? It’s “consistent” with what is known about lung cancer.

    The warming of Earth over the past 150 years ago is “consistent” with the greenhouse gas theory of global warming. Based on the mounting evidence over the past several decades, it’s highly “likely” that CO2 added to the atmosphere is causing global warming.

  4. Dana says:

    Wait a second! I thought that COVID-19 was supposed to be worse in cold weather and winter, so shouldn’t global warming climate change have made it less serious?

Pirate's Cove