If All You See…

…is an evil fossil fueled vehicle creating horrific heat snow, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Political Clown Parade, with a post noting Pelosi should not play three dimensional chess with McConnell.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

19 Responses to “If All You See…”

  1. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    So House NuCons described Trump’s impeachment as worse than the Japanese attach on Pearl Harbor and claimed that Trump was treated worse than Jesus.

    • formwiz says:

      I want to see a link to that or is it just another of your constant lies?

    • Kye says:

      I call bullshit Fredo. Show me!

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Dildo and lickspittle are both full of bullshit.

        https://www.vice.com/en_au/article/akwzng/its-impeachment-day-and-jesus-is-trending

        “When Jesus was falsely accused of treason, Pontius Pilate gave Jesus the opportunity to face his accusers,” said Rep. Barry Loudermilk, a Republican from Georgia. “During that sham trial, Pontius Pilate afforded more rights to Jesus than Democrats have afforded this president in this process.”

        Rep. Mike Kelly, Republican from Pennsylvania, also made the argument that America might not want to add Trump’s impeachment to the roster of historic December events — for example, Christmas, the anniversary of the Boston Tea Party, and the anniversary of the Pearl Harbor attacks.
        “Today, December 18th, 2019, is another date that will live in infamy,” Kelly said, echoing what President Franklin Roosevelt said on Dec. 7, 1941, the day Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japanese.

        • Liljeffyatemypuppy says:

          VICE?

          Bwaha. You’re going to have to do better than that.

          LOLgfy little sissybitch https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

        • formwiz says:

          Pontius Pilate gave Jesus the opportunity to face his accusers

          And Schiff For Brains didn’t. I’d say the analogy holds as far as it goes.

          Trump hasn’t been whipped with a cat-o’-nine-tails and crucified, but I’m sure it’s flitted through Jeffery’s perverted head.

          As for Pearl Harbor, he said another day, not a worse one, so Jeffery tells 2 lies.

          And, yeah, you don’t go around quoting VICE if you want to be taken seriously.

  2. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    from the Washington Examiner:

    ‘Profoundly Immoral’: Christianity Today Asserts Trump ‘Should be Removed from Office’

    The evangelical magazine founded by the Rev. Billy Graham called President Trump’s phone call to the Ukrainian president “profoundly immoral” and called for him to be removed from office.

    Claiming they prefer “to stay above the fray and allow Christians with different political convictions to make their arguments in the public square,” editor-in-chief Mark Galli asserted in a Thursday editorial that the moral turpitude of Trump requires the publication to support his removal.

    Appealing to Graham’s legacy of expressing political opinions in “conviction and love,” Christianity Today wrote that while they “love and pray for our president,” the case against Trump is “unambiguous.”

    “The president of the United States attempted to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit one of the president’s political opponents,” the publication said, referring to Trump requesting in a July 25 phone call that Ukraine investigate the alleged corruption of the Biden family. “That is not only a violation of the Constitution; more importantly, it is profoundly immoral,” the magazine continued.

    • formwiz says:

      ‘Profoundly Immoral’: Christianity Today Asserts Trump ‘Should be Removed from Office’

      The evangelical magazine founded by the Rev. Billy Graham called President Trump’s phone call to the Ukrainian president “profoundly immoral” and called for him to be removed from office.

      I’ll see your Billy Graham (who was never my dish of lapsang soochong, anywho) and raise you churches and synagogues (especially synagogues) who say otherwise.

      “The president of the United States attempted to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit one of the president’s political opponents,” the publication said, referring to Trump requesting in a July 25 phone call that Ukraine investigate the alleged corruption of the Biden family. “That is not only a violation of the Constitution; more importantly, it is profoundly immoral,” the magazine continued.

      Golly gee, sounds exactly like your talking points and look here, the Gray Lady and the WaPo just love him. Presbyterian converted to Anglican.

      Not exactly hardcore.

      Especially since he espouses the lies of the Left. Kind of like how all the Lefties flocked to St John of Hanoi as a “war hero” once he started a feud with Trump.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Just more lies from you…

        • formwiz says:

          Which ones? Oh, please, tell us.

          The WaPo and the Gray Lady love the guy and he switched to Anglican, which is a long way from Baptist. And he quoted your nonsense verbatim.

          So I guess you mean your lies.

    • Liljeffyatemypuppy says:

      Well they’re wrong too.

      Lolgfy little sissybitch https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

  3. Liljeffyatemypuppy says:

    Why hell even the Lawfare blog now admits they were wrong.

    I feel like all of us, who, you might call us the ‘Lawfare crowd’ who were often denounced or criticized at least in the older days as being too quick to credit and too trust the good faith and completeness of the efforts of the FBI in this kind of context. A lot of us look bad right now…

    https://thefederalist.com/2019/12/19/intel-community-blog-founder-admits-nunes-was-right-about-spygate-from-the-beginning/#.Xfvq4IZcaso.twitter

    lolgfy little sissybitch https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

  4. formwiz says:

    Let’s all ruin Jeffery’s week.

    One of the ConLaw profs who testified for Nadless says, If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president.

    If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all. So, for the next 2 1/2 weeks, Donald Trump has not been impeached.

    In the immortal words of El Kabong, “HO-Laaaaayyyyyy!!!!!!!”.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      Sibley overestimates his influence.

      This piece is by Noah Feldman, the same “prof” Sibley cited.

      https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/474017-feldman-impeachment-articles-are-high-crimes-founders-had-in-mind

      The articles of impeachment under consideration by the House clearly allege high crimes and misdemeanors under the Constitution. Apart from the factual truth of allegations, the articles comport with the definition of impeachable conduct. Start with abuse of office for personal advantage or gain, directly aimed at distorting the electoral process. For the Framers, this conduct was the classic form of a high crime or misdemeanor.

      The takeaway from this historical evidence is that abuse of office for personal gain is the archetype of a high crime and misdemeanor under the Constitution. Thus, if the facts show that President Trump sought his own personal gain when he solicited Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to announce investigations of the Bidens and of Crowd Strike, then he has undoubtedly committed an impeachable offense.
      As for obstruction of Congress, the violation lies in President Trump issuing a blanket denial of the authority of Congress to engage in its impeachment investigation and his direction to all executive branch officials not to appear before Congress or cooperate. The precedent for considering this conduct lies in the article of impeachment adopted by the House Judiciary Committee charging Richard Nixon with obstruction of Congress. However, even President Nixon did not entirely stonewall Congress. In fact, he partially cooperated with the congressional inquiry. The charge against President Trump is for conduct that exceeds that of President Nixon when it comes to obstruction of Congress.
      Under constitutional logic, the basis for this article of impeachment is fundamentally about the separation of powers. The Constitution gives the House of Representatives the “sole power of impeachment.” That means the House holds the power and authority to oversee the conduct of the president to determine whether or not he should be impeached. Thus, by issuing a blanket refusal to cooperate in the impeachment investigation, President Trump denied the House its constitutional authority.
      The only remedy under the Constitution for this denial of congressional authority is impeachment. Consider that the executive branch cannot be responsible for presidential oversight. Consider further that the judiciary likely could not compel presidential participation in an impeachment inquiry, since impeachment is a power conferred on Congress, not the judiciary. It follows that impeachment itself is the clearly defined remedy for presidential refusal of the granted impeachment authority.
      If the president had the authority to reject an impeachment inquiry, he would literally be above the law. He would not be subject to control by the other two branches if he committed wrongdoing. The name the Framers had for such an unimpeachable officer was a monarch. Obstruction of Congress is impeachable under the Constitution because it undercuts the basic structure of democracy that is founded in this country.

      • Liljeffyatemypuppy says:

        The House was denied nothing. They had the power to subpoena anyone the wished. They didn’t do it. They f@cked up.

        Lolgfy little sissybitch https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif.

      • formwiz says:

        Well, that scared him half to death.

        All your (and his) gobbledegook about phony articles of impeachment is not the issue.

        The issue is that, if the articles aren’t handed over to Senate, Trump is not impeached.

        And there are plenty of others who have said pretty much the same.

        Consider the source material:

        The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of…, so you really can’t do anything without a trial.

        And, on the issue of his opinion on the validity of said articles, I’ll see your Noah Feldman and raise you Jonathan Turley and Alan Dershowitz.

        More to the point, it’s clear, with all his name-calling and profanity, the bear suit is back.

        Even Idiot Boy realizes the Lefties have walked into Trump’s trap yet again (makes you wonder if they got the plan for this from Acme Products Co). Trump’s support has risen dramatically the last few weeks and his fund raising has taken off like a rocket. The public has shown its indifference to the whole farce and, if it was the disaster for Trump Jeffery says, the markets should have cratered.

        Nope, new records all over. Of course, only the 1% are in the market. No little guys, right, Bolshevik Bear?

        Or is it Bolshevik Bull?

  5. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    The House didn’t receive a single requested document from the administration.

    • formwiz says:

      A request is not a subpoena, so no obstruction.

      And who in their right mind would co-operate with an inquisition out to destroy him?

      If you agree, you’re as looney as you say Trump is.

Bad Behavior has blocked 8983 access attempts in the last 7 days.