December 27, 2016 – 3:03 pm
This is Slate trying to out Salon Salon in nuttiness. Give it to a skeptic!: "Climate Science Deserves a Nobel Prize, Too" https://t.co/vYD2lRaSgp — Tom Nelson (@tan123) December 27, 2016 Do you know why? It may not have the wow factor of other sciences, but the goals are equally noble. I don’t know about the […]
December 27, 2016 – 1:00 pm
…is a wonderful low carbon motorbike that probably runs on solar and everyone else should be forced to use, you might just be a Warmist The blog of the day is Virtual Mirage, with a post noting that elections have consequences.
December 27, 2016 – 10:21 am
Katherine Hayhoe really, really, really wants you to believe this is about science Katharine Hayhoe: Why Climate Change Should Matter to You What’s one of the most insidious myths we’ve bought into, when it comes to climate change? It has nothing to do with the science: It’s the simple idea that we have to be […]
December 27, 2016 – 8:25 am
For all the caterwauling from the people who lost the election fair and square, is there any actual hard evidence that fake news had an impact? (Daily Caller) As 2016 draws to a close, the ongoing debate regarding “fake news’ has pressed forward, but notably absent from the debate is any evidence that “fake news” impacted […]
Jl on If All You See…: “You can’t make this stuff up-J with another astounding lack of self-awareness. “I usually don’t read your links”. Why don’t…” Jan 19, 21:29
on If All You See…: “Jil, Few read your links. I usually do not. Why not make your own argument and use the citations to…” Jan 19, 21:14
