Gender Confused Bathroom Issue: We Now Have A List Of Which Businesses To Avoid

The confused people who support gender confused people who want to use the bathrooms, locker rooms, and showers established for the biological opposite gender have created a map of private organizations who support the gender confused, and even require an oath

(WNCN) Dozens of business owners across the state have named their businesses as “safe bathrooms” in response to House Bill 2.

Emily Waggoner, the creator of a Google map listing businesses, started the project because she has loved ones who “are directly affected by this legislation.”

How are they affected? Obviously, private organizations can legally allow their bathrooms to be used by the gender confused. This was made quite clear in the legislation as passed.

She said the map is for businesses who have publicly stated their bathrooms are safe for transgender people.

Just not safe for those who aren’t. I’m wondering how many of these bathrooms being designated are single stall.

“Our initial idea was for this to be a resource for our friends in North Carolina, but it has turned into a platform for people to band together, raise their voices, and fight. “

Fight? Really? Over bathrooms?

Business owners are required to submit documentation showing their stance before being added to the map.

They must take a pledge. One wonders how soon it will be before these confused people who support gender confused people will start making demands of private organizations who do not support transgendered bathrooms. When they will start protesting, demonizing them, insulting them, even attempting to shake them down or shut them down. Because, this is the typical end result of the oh-so-tolerant diversity loving Progressives.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

15 Responses to “Gender Confused Bathroom Issue: We Now Have A List Of Which Businesses To Avoid”

  1. Dana says:

    As you said, private businesses can do what they want.

    Of course, I have to wonder how good a business decision it is to accommodate the problems of one out of 30,000 people, versus the 61% — figure derived from the percentage of Houstonians who voted against HERO — who don’t approve of the idea. But, whether a good or bad business decision, it is their decision to take!

  2. John says:

    Haha Teach doubles down on the NC law that the state’s attorney general says is unconstitutional and that he will not enforce
    Will you be posting that long list of companies that you will be boycotting ?

  3. John says:

    Pundits have already, because of Trump and this new law, moved the NC senate race from leans R to toss up
    It’s looking more and more like a D US Senate

  4. drowningpuppies says:

    So as a retarded Transgender maybe johnny can personally explain why he’s so confused about which public bathroom to use.


  5. Hank_M says:

    I’ll admit I did not see this coming, the bid deal about bathrooms for confused people.

    What I’m wondering now is what could possible be next.

  6. david7134 says:

    What is the difference between transgender and those that like sex with animals? Or for that matter, any other perversion. The transgender people that I have seen over the years are sick and need help, not bathrooms. Then, if you are a pervert, what is to keep you from claiming transgender status to get a peak at the women doing their thing. I think the role of government is protection, not making sure that every little nut job should be treated equally. Women should be mad as hell at the liberals that promote their insecurity. Instead, they follow in lock step with the Dems and their stupid outlook.

  7. Jeffery says:


    White Supremacists such as you are far more perverted than intersex folks.

    What’s the different between transgender and those have sex with non-human animals? Non-human animals, of course.

    You claim to be a physician yet you have no understanding of transgender? It’s not about sex acts, you old pervert, you – anymore than a sheet makes you a KKK member.

    I bet you even claim (proudly too, I bet) to be Christian.

    So once the world has accepted gays and transgendered isn’t it the hate-filled right-wingers that are the perverts? “People” like the D-boys and Teach. You probably think AIDs was your god’s punishment for gays.

  8. Dana says:

    Jeffrey whines:

    So once the world has accepted gays and transgendered isn’t it the hate-filled right-wingers that are the perverts?

    Accepts? Homosexuals exist, certainly enough, and I wouldn’t throw them in prison for their same-sex copulation, but normal people still understand that homosexuals are not normal. The CDC, hardly a reich-wing organization, estimated that homosexuals make up a whopping 1.6% of the population, a number that swells to 2.3% if bisexuals are included. THey are very much the exception, not the rule.

    Transsexuals? The numbers are hard to come by, but I’ve seen estimates between one in 3,000 and one in 30,000. That’s an order of magnitude of difference, but even the smaller ratio is a clear indication of abnormality. Again, I wouldn’t throw them in jail for being mentally ill, but they are obviously way, way, way outside of being normal.

  9. This goes both ways. I don’t want to share a bathroom with men, so a list like this would help me know which businesses to avoid. Don’t women and girls have the right to a man-free bathroom?

  10. David7134 says:

    I am so sorry. I did not mean to say bad things about your perversions. It made you cry.

  11. Jeffery says:


    Do you label redheads as abnormal? They are truly a tiny minority. Should a person with freckles be identified as abnormal?

    AB- blood type?

    By your definition, Caucasians should be labeled as abnormal. There are more Asians and Africans than Caucasians.

    How many Americans are well paid government contractors? Wouldn’t that make you extremely abnormal?

    Is that all you mean by abnormal, that someone or a trait is not the predominant one in a population? I bet that is all you mean to imply when you refer to gays and transexuals as abnormal.

  12. Dana says:

    Jeffrey wrote:

    dana, Do you label redheads as abnormal? They are truly a tiny minority. Should a person with freckles be identified as abnormal?

    Abnormal? What redheads, real redheads are is too scarce! Redheads come in only two varieties: drop-dead gorgeous, or butt ugly.

    But homosexuality is certainly abnormal. It’s not only rare, but it is diametrically opposed to a normal function of life, reproduction. It would take a liberal to be stupid enough to think that such a condition qualified as normal.

    How many Americans are well paid government contractors? Wouldn’t that make you extremely abnormal?

    Given that around 18% of the working population does work for the government, I’d say that it doesn’t make me abnormal enough! Nevertheless, I provide a product that is useful, and I work for my money, something conservatives simply do. It’s the left who believe that people ought to be supported if they won’t work for a living.

  13. Dana says:

    But, perhaps I have personally offended Jeffrey; perhaps he is homosexual himself — and no, I don’t know, or even care — and is on this kick because I ave offended him personally. Such was not my intention if he happens to be homosexual or transsexual, but I do not apologize for it.

  14. Jeffery says:

    One doesn’t have to be Black to defend Blacks, or an immigrant to defend immigrants, or a child to protect children…

    Anyway, just ask Mrs. Dana. She can fill you in. I’m sorry you have to find out this way, “stubby”.

    Not sure what “kick” you’re going on about. Do you mean pointing out the fact that you’re a big fat conservative hypocrite making a living off the taxpayers? That “kick”? That you make a good living profiting from the hard work others? That you suck off the teat of the American taxpayer and bitch and whine incessantly about government spending? That “kick”?

    Sorry you take it personally. It’s just business.

  15. Jeffery says:


    So you’ve changed your position? A couple of comments ago you defined abnormality based on prevalence in the population. Now you base abnormality on some qualitative factor. You just “know”.

    You weirdly claim the primary normal function of humans is reproduction. Are folks who choose not to reproduce abnormal? Are huge families like the Duggars (19 and Counting) more normal than small families?

    Since the christian god is supposedly omniscient and omnipotent why does it create “abnormal” humans?

Bad Behavior has blocked 10361 access attempts in the last 7 days.