Can you guess what’s missing from the BBC article? Any attempt to reach out to the target. Most news organizations are essentially blogs nowadays, taking material and running with it, without reaching out to the people they are attacking. Though, they, like the other articles, did reach out to Warmists to attempt to rebut Newman
Australia PM’s adviser says climate change a UN hoax
A top Australian government business adviser has said climate change is a hoax by the United Nations.
Most climate models were wrong and there was little evidence of climate change, said Maurice Newman.
He said the UN had used climate change as a “hook” to establish and control a new world order.
Sounds pretty bad, eh? Especially that “new world order” thing, which is a conspiracy theory that even had me shaking my head. Until I continued reading.
He wrote in an opinion article for The Australian newspaper on Friday: “It’s a well-kept secret, but 95% of the climate models we are told prove the link between human CO2 emissions and catastrophic global warming have been found, after nearly two decades of temperature stasis, to be in error.”
Huh. That’s true. BTW, since the BBC refused to provide a link (which is the same at many other articles. It’s almost like they do not want you to read it), here it is. Rather than excerpt more from the Beebs, let’s go straight to the opinion piece
Why then, with such little evidence, does the UN insist the world spend hundreds of billions of dollars a year on futile climate change policies? Perhaps Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UN’s Framework on Climate Change has the answer?
In Brussels last February she said, “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution.â€
In other words, the real agenda is concentrated political authority. Global warming is the hook.
Figueres is on record saying democracy is a poor political system for fighting global warming. Communist China, she says, is the best model. This is not about facts or logic. It’s about a new world order under the control of the UN. It is opposed to capitalism and freedom and has made environmental catastrophism a household topic to achieve its objective.
Figueres says that, unlike the Industrial Revolution, “This is a centralised transformation that is taking place.†She sees the US partisan divide on global warming as “very detrimentalâ€. Of course. In her authoritarian world there will be no room for debate or Âdisagreement.
So, what he’s talking about is not a New World Order, but a complete change in world economics and power base as espoused by UN officials (and Warmists in general). They’ve stated time and time again, at least the honest ones, that they want to do away with capitalism.
