Ever notice that the Warmists rarely try to interject actual science into their diatribes? Mostly, they go with cute talking points and unhinged rhetoric and personal attacks. Then they jump in their fossil fueled vehicles for a drive to the airport to take a fossil fueled private jet to a “climate change” symposium in some exotic vacation spot. Anyhow: The dangers of bone-headed beliefs
Surely it’s time for climate-change deniers to have their opinions forcibly tattooed on their bodies.
Not necessarily on the forehead; I’m a reasonable man. Just something along their arm or across their chest so their grandchildren could say, ”Really? You were one of the ones who tried to stop the world doing something? And why exactly was that, granddad?’
On second thoughts, maybe the tattooing along the arm is a bit Nazi-creepy. So how about they are forced to buy property on low-lying islands, the sort of property that will become worthless with a few more centimetres of ocean rise, so they are bankrupted by their own bloody-mindedness? Or what about their signed agreement to stand, in the year 2040, lashed to a pole at a certain point in the shallows off Manly? If they are right and the world is cooling – ”climate change stopped in the year 1998” is one of their more boneheaded beliefs – their mouths will be above water. If not …
The very fact that the idea seriously crosses Warmist Richard Glover’s mind should tell you quite a bit about the way he, and other Warmists/liberals, think. Apparently, Gore is a denier, too, since he bought that palatial McMansion out in California right on the seashore. And, no, we didn’t say “climate change” stopped in 1998: the climate is always changing. We are saying that globull warming slowed after that massive El Nino year. The very fact that Glover has to trot out the silly climate change phrase shows that it is about politics, not science, to him.
OK, maybe the desire to see the painful, thrashing death of one’s opponents is not ideal. But, my God, these people are frustrating. You just know that in 20 years’ time, when the costs of our inaction are clear, the climate deniers will become climate-denial-deniers. ”Who me? Oh, no, I always believed in it. Yes, it’s hard to understand why people back then were so daft. It’s so much more costly to stop it now.”
That’s why the tattoo has its appeal.
Typical violent liberal. One who, throughout the long article, fails to tell us what he himself has done to do away with his own carbon footprint. (via Tom Nelson)
