Boston Globe Whines That The Girl Scouts Don’t Allow Boys

Sorry, sorry, my bad, I got that headline backwards

Girls not allowed – Coed troops exemplify the work ethic, leadership and camaraderie of the Boy Scouts. So why aren’t they welcome at all levels of scouting?

Because they’re the ……. Boy Scouts?

After a few paragraphs spend discussing a mixed sex outdoors adventure, the BG treats us to

This could be the future of a new Boy Scouts of America. This is its 100th anniversary, and, as many know, its future is uncertain. Scout membership has withered since the 1970s from 4.8 million to 2.8 million. While its “on my honor’’ community values remain timeless and its outdoor program is needed more than ever in a nation that is 27-percent obese, the Boy Scouts of America has diminished itself with stale positions on social issues.

One way it can modernize on a massive scale is to invite girls to participate, from Cub Scout to Eagle Scout.

Notice that there is not call for the Girl Scouts to do the same? Why is it not OK with these dipsh*t liberal busybodies to just let boys be boys? Plus, as we all know, at the Cub Scout age, all girls have cooties. But, I suppose it would be a really Great Idea to mix young men and women on overnight camping trips and such, because there’s no problem with teen pregnancy or anything…..OK, getting too serious for a Saturday evening. How about, instead, these liberal wankers create a new scouting group, and just leave the Boy Scouts, a liberal pet peeve (perhaps that’s why so many liberal boys grow up to carry man bags, wear unisex clothes, and get cramps once a month), alone.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

Comments are closed.

Pirate's Cove