No Statistically Significant Warming In 17 Years And 9 Months

Looks like we can cancle the Warmist apocalypse

As Climate Depot notes

According to the RSS satellite data, whose value for April 2014 is just in, the global warming trend in the 17 years 9 years since August 1996 is zero. The 212 months without global warming represents more than half the 423-month satellite data record, which began in January 1979. No one now in high school has lived through global warming.

Marc Morano also believes that this trend will soon end, as an El Nino even kicks in this year. Of course, we know the Warmists will blame El Nino on “climate change”, much like they’re now blaming the massive 1997 one on the same.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

3 Responses to “No Statistically Significant Warming In 17 Years And 9 Months”

  1. davec says:

    Also, the method used by the N.W.S. to calculate average daily temperatures – which has a direct bearing on their longer range climate models…..is flawed. Simply in the way they calculate. Their method is to take the daily high temperature, add to the daily low temperature and divide by two. A more accurate method would be to take the hourly readings from individual stations, add together over each 24 hour period, and divide by 24.

    Example: their method: High – 51, low – 30. 50 + 31 = 81 / 2 = 40.5. But they of course “round up” to 41.

    My research is showing their method is 1-2 degrees per day higher than the more accurate method I use. Over time, this also skews their models significantly as even a 1 degree difference over 20 years is huge.

  2. john says:

    Is that air temps? what about the part of the earth’s surface that is covered by water ?
    Teach that is an AWESOME graph. I know that you must like it because you show it so often. BUT exactly what is it supposed to be showing?
    When I look at it it seems to be showing that 2012 was far below the 17 year 9 month average. ?????? WTF??? I remeber that year it was hot as blazes.
    Perhaps we should be checking up on this graph?
    HMMMMLet’s see what NOAA has to say about the global temps in 2012, maybe I just thought it was pretty hot .http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/13
    HEY !!! NOAA says that 2012 was the 10th hottest year since 1880
    Global Highlights

    The year 2012 was the 10th warmest year since records began in 1880. The annual global combined land and ocean surface temperature was 0.57°C (1.03°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F). This marks the 36th consecutive year (since 1976) that the yearly global temperature was above average. Currently, the warmest year on record is 2010, which was 0.66°C (1.19°F) above average. Including 2012, all 12 years to date in the 21st century (2001–2012) rank among the 14 warmest in the 133-year period of record. Only one year during the 20th century—1998—was warmer than 2012.
    Teach can you explain please??
    Your graph shows 2012 as being cold, BUT NOAA says HOT
    Do you ever even bother to really look at what you post? Or is it just a matter of “faith” with you?

    Separately, the 2012 global average land surface temperature was 0.90°C (1.62°F) above the 20th century average of 8.5°C (47.3°F) and ranked as the seventh warmest year on record.

  3. Jeffery says:

    Teach,

    You’re either ignorant, which is temporarily excusable, or you’re dishonest and lying to your hapless audience. You’ve been exposed to the truth on this issue numerous times, so one is forced to conclude you’re lying. What a horrible person you have become.

    What real or psychological benefit do you derive from lying to people and further spreading this hoax called denialism? People of your ilk spread ignorance and “de-educate” people.

    The facts are clear. The Earth continues to warm from CO2 polluting our atmosphere; CO2 from burning fossil fuels. Only a few diehard ignorati and liars, such as yourself, contend otherwise.

    We should all learn as much as we can about the world around us. I don’t blame the common person for being mislead by those they trust – I blame the likes of you. Anyone with a platform or forum is obligated to at least try and share truths, not mislead others.

    What real or psychological benefit do you derive from lying to people?

Pirate's Cove