If All You See…

By William Teach April 19, 2025 – 1:00 pm

…is the dawn of fossil fueled commercial flights killing the planet, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Jihad Watch, with a post promoting jihad in Detroit.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Among Van Hollen’s Trip To See MS-13, Majority Of Americans Support Trump’s Deportation Policies

By William Teach April 19, 2025 – 10:30 am

Personally, I recommend that all Democrats jump on the side of protecting illegals who are gang members, murderers, rapists, and assault children, as well as visa holders who support Hamas, want Jews and Americans dead, and want America destroyed

Democrats Should Take A Good Look At Two New Polls And Think Twice Before Jetting Off To El Salvador

Democrats should take a good, hard look at two new polls before they follow colleague Sen. Chris Van Hollen straight off a political cliff.

The Democratic Maryland senator finally got his wish Thursday evening: a photo-op with deported illegal alien Kilmar Abrego Garcia in El Salvador. The simpatico pair is also now on a first-name basis. Heartwarming, indeed.

The Trump administration mistakenly deported Abrego Garcia to El Salvador due to a clerical error, but maintain that he should remain in the Central American country because of his connection to notorious gang MS-13. On Wednesday, the Department of Justice published a dossier detailing his ties to the gang, while the Department of Homeland Security released a document showing that his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, once sought a domestic violence restraining order against him in 2021.

House and Senate Democrats are probably looking on at Van Hollen in envy. He’s a hero to illegal aliens everywhere, shooting up to national stardom, raking in the fundraising dollars, and taking a vacation in a Central American paradise (likely) on the taxpayer dime. That could’ve been me!

Vacation, eh?

That’s right, one of the high class luxury hotels in San Salvador. You can tell by the gawdawful carpeting. And here’s Excitable Maxine Dexter (D-Or) claiming she’s going. Anyhow

But before they try to emulate, or at least support, Van Hollen’s crusade, they should think twice.

According to a new CNBC survey, President Donald Trump has a net +7 approval on his policy of deporting illegal aliens. The president also has a net +12 approval on his handling of the southern border.

Meanwhile, CNN cited a poll Thursday that found a whopping 56% of Americans support a mass deportation of illegal aliens. In 2016, that number stood nearly 20 points lower, at 38%.

Like lemmings, many Democrats, rushing to defend Abrego Garcia, have plummeted off a cliff. But those who have withheld judgment should continue to do so. The polls tell a different story from the media’s narrative: the supposedly upstanding, wholesome, All-American Maryland man should be deported for good.

No, no, all should do this. It’s what most of them believe. They’d rather put illegals and Hamas supporters over Americans.

Nice digs if the taxpayers can afford them, eh?

That’s Trump meeting with Patty Morin, who’s daughter Rachel was raped and slaughtered by an illegal alien from El Salvador, while Van Hollen meets with an MS-13 member who was suspected on human trafficking.

Read: Among Van Hollen’s Trip To See MS-13, Majority Of Americans Support Trump’s Deportation Policies »

Posted in Democrats, Illegal Immigration | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

UK Government Looks To Suck CO2 Out Of The Sea

By William Teach April 19, 2025 – 7:00 am

The whole thing starts with imprecise and cultish terminology

Project to suck carbon out of sea begins in UK

A ground-breaking project to suck carbon out of the sea has started operating on England’s south coast.

The small pilot scheme, known as SeaCURE, is funded by the UK government as part of its search for technologies that fight climate change.

There’s broad consensus among climate scientists that the overwhelming priority is to cut greenhouse gas emissions, the chief cause of global warming.

But many scientists also believe that part of the solution will have to involve capturing some of the gases that have already been released.

If we’re talking about CO2, carbon dioxide, term it that way. Calling it carbon is horseshit

These projects, known as carbon capture, usually focus either on capturing emissions at source or pulling them from the air.

What makes SeaCure interesting is that it is testing whether it might be more efficient to pull planet-warming carbon from the sea, since it is present in greater concentrations in water than in the air.

You know, what could possibly go wrong? Also, is the CO2 concentration now higher than it was during previous Holocene warm periods?

The project is trying to find whether removing carbon from the water might be a cost effective way of reducing the amount of the climate warming gas CO2 in the atmosphere.

SeaCURE processes the seawater to remove the carbon before pumping it back out to sea where it absorbs more CO2.

Is it removing CO2 or just carbon, which could end up over-oxygenating the oceans?

The Seacure project has £3m of funding from the government and is one of 15 pilot projects being backed in the UK as part of efforts to develop technologies that capture and store greenhouse gases.

In other words, they’re getting almost $4 million dollars of taxpayer money to screw around.

Read: UK Government Looks To Suck CO2 Out Of The Sea »

Posted in Climate Ghouls, Global Warming | 11 Comments | Trackback URL

Crazy Judge Blocks Trump Admin From Restricting Mentally Ill People From Using “X” On Passports

By William Teach April 19, 2025 – 6:45 am

Remember, Democrats are the party of Science! But, to them, Biology 101 is not part of science

Judge blocks Trump administration’s from passport changes affecting some transgender Americans

A federal judge on Friday partially blocked the Trump administration from enacting a policy that bans the use of “X” marker used by many nonbinary people on passports as well as the changing of gender markers.

U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, sided with the American Civil Liberties Union’s motion for a preliminary injunction, which stays the action while the lawsuit plays out. It requires the State Department to allow six transgender and nonbinary people who are plaintiffs in the lawsuit to obtain passports with sex designations consistent with their gender identity.

“The Executive Order and the Passport Policy on their face classify passport applicants on the basis of sex and thus must be reviewed under intermediate judicial scrutiny,” Kobick wrote. “That standard requires the government to demonstrate that its actions are substantially related to an important governmental interest. The government has failed to meet this standard.”

It’s rather important that the government have the proper sex on a passport. And, especially not X. What is that? Just mental illness which is encouraged by Democrats.

Kobick also said plaintiffs have shown they would succeed in demonstrating that the new passport policy and executive order “are based on irrational prejudice toward transgender Americans and therefore offend our Nation’s constitutional commitment to equal protection for all Americans.”

They have equal protection. They don’t get to make up their own sex and force their gender confusion, which is so often simply a fad, on everyone else. We don’t have to play along with it. Seriously, sanity should be a big part of governmental interest. The law states one must have their biological sex on passports. We don’t have to cater to the feelings of wackos. That was the law before Biden tried to change it with an executive order. Trump just rescinded that order. The Supreme Court is looking to be very busy with all these insane, anti-law rulings.

Read: Crazy Judge Blocks Trump Admin From Restricting Mentally Ill People From Using “X” On Passports »

Posted in Beyond Moonbat, Constitution | 6 Comments | Trackback URL

Ana Navarro Trots Out Some TDS On (Climahypocrite) Blue Origin Flight

By William Teach April 18, 2025 – 3:24 pm

You thought what some of the passengers, sorry, they want to refer to themselves as crew, from the All Female Blue Origin flight said was wonky? Well

Jessica Alba Makes Opinion on Controversial All-Women Spaceflight Very Clear

Jessica Alba has made her opinion on the controversial all-women spaceflight very clear.

A group of women, headlined by Jeff Bezos’s fiancee, Lauren Sanchez, made a trip to space. Sanchez was joined by Gayle King, Katy Perry and three others in a flight to space, as part of Bezos’s company, Blue Origin. The group traveled briefly to space on Monday.

While some praised the flight, many were critical, including Hollywood stars like Emily Ratajkowski and Olivia Munn.

“That space mission this morning? That’s end times (expletive),” Ratajkowski told her TikTok followers. “This is beyond parody.”

She added: “Saying that you care about Mother Earth and it’s about Mother Earth, and you’re going up in a spaceship that is built and paid for by a company that’s singlehandedly destroying the planet.”

We’ll get back to that in a moment

“I’ve seen endless criticism of five women doing their space thing,” Ana Navarro, 53, wrote on her Instagram page. “I can’t see how it affects our lives.

“I wish people would show [the] same energy and focus that anger toward fearlessly denouncing [President] Trump’s abuses of power. Which do affect countless lives in the US and the world.”

Alba, meanwhile, had a one-word reaction.

“This,” she wrote, agreeing with Navarro’s comment.

So, it wasn’t really so much Alba, but, Excitable Ana. Straight to Trump Derangement Syndrome. No one is shocked by this from Ana, right?

Why Katy Perry’s celebrity spaceflight blazed a trail for climate breakdown

…

But the backlash was swift. Fellow celebrities piled in to highlight the “hypocrisy” of such an energy-intensive endeavour from a former Unicef climate champion. Evidence was quickly presented to dispute the pollution-free claims of the Blue Origin rocket, which is fuelled by oxygen and hydrogen. (In fact, the water vapour and nitrogen oxide emissions it creates add to global heating, on top of the emissions from the programme as a whole.)

But it’s the negative social effects of this kind of display from celebrities (of any gender) that our research sheds light on. I’m part of a team of social scientists researching the powerful effects of politicians, business leaders and celebrities who lead by example on climate change – or don’t.

LOL, social scientist. And there are lots of articles slamming Perry, but, not so much the other passengers, er, crew members, nor Jeff Bezos. And plenty from years back slamming Bezos and Musk and just space exploration altogether for being Bad for ‘climate change.’ I’m quite confident I could find some back in the archives. These people are just anti-fun, ant-science naboobs.

Read: Ana Navarro Trots Out Some TDS On (Climahypocrite) Blue Origin Flight »

Posted in Barking Moonbats, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach April 18, 2025 – 1:00 pm

…is a horrible fossil fueled plane used for war made more like due to carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Geller Report, with a post on a Sharia compliant Muslim only city deep in Texas.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 7 Comments | Trackback URL

TSA Warns Flyers: The Deadline For REAL ID Is Almost Here

By William Teach April 18, 2025 – 10:30 am

The purpose of REAL ID is to enhance the security of identification documents by establishing minimum standards for state-issued driver’s licenses and ID cards. You can talk about the pros and cons of it all day: it is in force on May 7th. The deadline was moved out due to Wuhan Flu. But, it’s almost here. So

REAL ID looming deadline prompts TSA travel warning: ‘Expect delays’

The fast-approaching deadline for REAL IDs has many Americans rushing to obtain the important new identification even as travel issues may lie ahead.

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) issued a press release reminding Americans of the May 7 deadline while also warning of delays.

“Passengers who present a state-issued identification that is not REAL ID compliant and who do not have another acceptable alternative (e.g., passport) can expect to face delays, additional screening and the possibility of not being permitted into the security checkpoint,” the release said.

Air travelers at domestic airports will be required to present a REAL ID in order to fly.

TSA spokesperson Lorie Dankers told Fox News Digital the agency estimates that “81% of the public is ready for REAL ID enforcement.”

What this could cause would be slight delays per passenger without REAL ID, which would slow down the entire line. I suppose the solution would be to have additional screeners who can pull those without REAL ID aside and let the rest go through.

The NYACLU wrote about the problems that could maybe be caused by it all the way back in 2007, and other ACLU’s have said the same. Many Conservatives have also made the same claims, like about privacy concerns. They say it won’t stop terrorists. Some say it will make it easier for terrorists (no, that was Biden opening the border). Nothing, though, has appeared in the real world. And now you are getting tons of people, both Dems and GOP, whining about having to rush to get on. I have no sympathy. They had 20 years to get one, as it was part of the Patriot Act, which, yes, had plenty of its own issues that were proven. REAL ID has not been proven.

The government already has your information. REAL ID consolidates it, but, they already have it.

More below the fold

Read More »

Read: TSA Warns Flyers: The Deadline For REAL ID Is Almost Here »

Posted in Constitution, Current Affairs | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Massport Hires A Climate Chief Or Something

By William Teach April 18, 2025 – 7:00 am

Surprisingly, the reported salary is $77K a year, but, no one really knows. Of course, if that is the case, that’s a lot less than a lot of other high positions pay. Maybe because the new hire is a woman?

Massport hires first climate chief

THE MASSACHUSETTS PORT Authority, which owns and operates high emissions-producing Logan International Airport, has hired its first chief climate and resilience officer.

The agency, also known as Massport, announced the hiring of Jill Valdes Horwood, who has worked for the Barr Foundation, a grant-making private foundation, and advocacy group Boston Harbor Now, as the new chief. The job includes helping the agency get to its goal of net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2031, the same year Massport turns 75.

“Jill brings a strong track record in climate policy and advocacy that will be critical as we continue our Net Zero initiatives and prepare for the long-term impacts of climate change,” Rich Davey, Massport’s CEO, said in a statement.

At the Barr Foundation, Horwood worked as director of its Boston Waterfront Initiative, which focused on promoting access and development focused climate resilience. She served as Boston Harbor Now’s director of policy, and she previously has done legal work for victims of domestic violence and underserved populations.

So, really no experience in this. But, hey, maybe if she does her job she will shut down Logan airport

Aside from Logan Airport, Massport’s portfolio of facilities includes Worcester Regional Airport; Hanscom, an airfield 20 miles northwest of Boston; the Port of Boston’s Conley Terminal serving container ships; and the Flynn Cruiseport, which serves cruise ships.

And shut them down. Well, she could allow sailing ships into the port. But, everything else uses Evil fossil fuels. BTW, the tide gauge shows a just above average of .97 feet of sea rise per century, a long term gauge going back to 1921. So, below what should be the sea rise of a warm period. Nor is there acceleration.

Read: Massport Hires A Climate Chief Or Something »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Global Warming | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Whoops: GOP Won’t Authorize Payment For Dems To Go Visit MS-13 Member In El Salvador

By William Teach April 18, 2025 – 6:45 am

First you have this guy

But

GOP Rep. Won’t Authorize Dems’ Trip To El Salvador To See Kilmar Abrego Garcia

A top House Republican is refusing to authorize a Democratic congressional trip to El Salvador to investigate the notorious maximum security prison where President Donald Trump’s administration is paying to hold hundreds of migrants from the United States, including Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a 29-year-old man from Maryland.

“If Democrats care so much about defending this individual, they can use their own personal credit cards—not taxpayers’ money—to virtue-signal to their radical base,” House Homeland Security Committee Chair Mark Green (R-Tenn.) said in a statement on Thursday.

Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.), a member of the committee, wrote to Green on Wednesday requesting a congressional member delegation (CODEL) to El Salvador as part of the panel’s oversight duties. She’s one of several congressional Democrats seeking to organize an official trip to the country.

Say, I wonder where Van Hollen is staying? Could it be the 5 star Hilton in San Salvador? Or maybe one of the other luxury resorts? Is he paying himself, or, did he put the taxpayers on the hook for the hotel and plane ride?

Seriously, as many are saying, we thought Dems might have gone all in on “sure, get rid of the criminals and gang members, but, not the good one”, but, no, they went for “don’t deport any, including the violent gang members.”

Read: Whoops: GOP Won’t Authorize Payment For Dems To Go Visit MS-13 Member In El Salvador »

Posted in Democrats, Illegal Immigration | 10 Comments | Trackback URL

Whiny Judge Whines At EPA For Cancelling Climate Scam Grants

By William Teach April 17, 2025 – 3:51 pm

Yeah, these would be all those types of grants where the EPA gives private groups money to Do Something, but, there are no action plans, no end results, and no oversight, and the money just disappears with almost nothing having been done. Except enriching the recipients

Judge Slams EPA for Canceling Climate Grants With ‘No Rational Explanation’

A Washington, D.C., Circuit Court judge issued a sharp rebuke Wednesday to the Trump administration’s Environmental Protection Agency, saying the EPA made accusations of fraud without evidence and overstepped the bounds of its authority when it canceled climate funding agreements with green bank groups.

Judge Tanya Chutkan‘s stinging 39-page memorandum opinion granting the climate groups a preliminary injunction said that EPA acted “arbitrarily and capriciously,” failed to explain its reasoning and acted “contrary to its regulations” when it suspended and then terminated the grants.

“Though repeatedly pressed on the issue, EPA offers no rational explanation for why it suspended the grants,” Chutkan wrote. “Nor has EPA offered any rational explanation for why it needed to cancel the grants to safeguard taxpayer resources.”

They do not need any explanation: it’s the People’s money, and all these groups are not entitled to it, especially since their groups were not specifically mentioned in the funding law.

Chutkan’s order included a stern warning about what can happen when agencies “fail to operate within the bounds of the law.”

The law requires that funding is tracked and has actual purpose, not be handed out to friendly NGOs and stuff.

Anyhow, lots of Credentialed Media are happy to report

Plenty more links like those. Not as many for

Donald Trump Scores Legal Win Over Judge Chutkan

A court has temporarily blocked a ruling from U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan regarding the funding of former President Joe Biden’s climate programs.

The D.C. Court of Appeals halted the judge’s Tuesday ruling that ordered Citibank to release billions of dollars in green bank grants as part of Biden’s 2022 climate, tax and health care bill. (snip)

The Court of Appeals has now issued a partial stay on Chutkan’s ruling in order to give the court “sufficient opportunity” to examine it.

In its ruling, the court said that Chutkhan’s reasoning for her Tuesday decision did not meet the standard required for such an injunction.

In other words, she overstepped her bounds. And this block came on the same day as her order. Just because the money was appropriated doesn’t mean the companies are entitled to it.

I wonder if the judge has a stake in the money? Or, just TDS?

Read: Whiny Judge Whines At EPA For Cancelling Climate Scam Grants »

Posted in Climate Cult, Global Warming | 2 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove