Report: Congressman Darrell Issa Has A Plan For Illegal Immigration

Things that make you go “hmmmmmm”. Supposedly, Darrell Issa (R-Ca), will release a plan to deal with illegal immigrants, somewhat offering a pathway to legal status, a “come out of the shadows” plan, which would provide that legal status for 6 years. Let’s skip to the nuts and bolts of the plan

(Politico) Issa’s forthcoming legislation takes elements from similar legislation he introduced in December 2003, the Alien Accountability Act. The six-year period is intended to whittle down the undocumented immigrant population into several categories, such as immigrants with family ties to U.S. citizens or immigrants who want to participate in a guest-worker program.

Bringing undocumented immigrants out “of the shadows” would also help the government identify undocumented immigrants with a criminal background, who would be deported from the United States, Issa said.

“If somebody has a nexus that would reasonably allow them to become permanent residents and American citizen, we should allow them to do that,” Issa said. He added: “Our view is that long before six years, people would be in those categories heading toward some other pathway, in a guest worker program, or of course, have left the country.”

In other words, this is not some sort of massive “comprehensive” piece of legislation, which no one would have read, and would be so complicated and byzantine that no one would be really sure what it does, while also allowing the Executive Branch to make most of the decisions and regulations. In the case of the most recent “comprehensive immigration reform” bill, that would have resulted in effectively amnesty with little to no border security. This is more of a piecemeal type bill. Which Democrats do not want. The Politico story notes that House Dems have signed on to a bill similar to the Gang of 8 bill, minus any border security provisions.

Read: Report: Congressman Darrell Issa Has A Plan For Illegal Immigration »

Team Obama “Tweeks” Individual Mandate Due To Website “Glitches”

This isn’t quite a case of a delay, as Republicans fought for as Plan B during Shutdown Theater

(Washington Post) The Obama administration confirmed to The Washington Post a little bit ago that it is indeed tweaking the way the individual mandate works as to not penalize anyone who purchases coverage during this first open enrollment period.

It’s not quite right to describe this as a delay of the individual mandate, or an extension of open enrollment. There will still be a requirement to carry insurance coverage in 2014, and open enrollment still ends on March 31, 2014 — two facts that are true now and were true yesterday.

Before getting to what the change is, two pieces of information are helpful to keep in mind. First is the open enrollment period: The health care law’s open enrollment period runs from Oct. 1, 2013 through March 31, 2014. During those six months, shoppers can purchase coverage through HealthCare.gov. On April 1 though, they’re out of luck — and have to wait until 2015 to purchase a health insurance plan.

Wait, wait, let’s stop there for a moment: what if someone wants to actually purchase health insurance in a different month? Are we being told they can’t? What if someone turns 26 in, say, June, and get kicked off their parent’s health insurance? Do they have to wait till January 1st, 2015? Which means they’ll be fined because they cannot get insurance through the Exchange.

(National Review) According to the Post, what the White House did, essentially, was to exempt from the individual mandate penalty anyone who enrolls in an acceptable plan by March 31 and maintains coverage for the rest of the year. The White House is claiming that the “timing hasn’t changed” and the “deadline for having insurance is March 31,” but this wasn’t the practical implication of the IRS’s final interpretation of the law.

This essentially extends the timing by 6 weeks. In contradiction to what The Law itself states. Oh, and it only applies to those who obtain insurance through the Exchange. So, if you get it elsewhere, you’ll be treated differently. Isn’t there something about equal protection under the law?

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Team Obama “Tweeks” Individual Mandate Due To Website “Glitches” »

Was Fainting Human Prop A Fake?

Remember the lady who serendipitously fainted during Obama’s little infomercial? Patriot Lady contends it was all a bunch of mule fritters (via The Weekly Standard through Gumball Brains)

It is obvious that there are quite a few people involved in this latest fraud put out by the Whitehouse. Why did Obama think it was necessary to “catch” a fainting woman just when he said the words, “To free families from the pervasive fear that one illness….” And down she went? Well not actually down. She just weaved and wobbled a little and never quite fainted. And, consequently, Obama never actually caught her. He turned around and put his hand on her shoulder as if to steady her and turned back to the camera to make sure it got a clear shot of his “rescue” efforts.

Make sure to read the whole thing for her rational.

Is it a conspiracy theory? The “no, really, that’s nuts” type? Would anyone really put it past Team Obama to do this? The Lapdog Media certainly wouldn’t bother investigating or even “just wondering”. Team O had no problem spinning and concealing and confusing when it can to Benghazi. NSA. IRS. Fast and Furious. Spying on journalists. (Weird, 3rd time I’ve gone down this road today. Not planned).

What do you think? And for liberals, just think of all the theories you launched at Bush.

Read: Was Fainting Human Prop A Fake? »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful field that should be clear-cut and be replaced with solar panels, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is the Daley Gator, with a post on the top 5 Obamacare catastrophes the media refuses to cover.

Read: If All You See… »

Wash Post: Ignore Hotcoldwetdry At Our Own Peril

I wonder if the Washington Post, which had an Editorial Board whine about “climate change” on the 20th, and Katrina vanden Heuval, with today’s whine, have given up their own fossil fueled livestyles yet?

One year after Sandy — ignoring climate change at our own peril

It’s been one year since Hurricane Sandy made landfall on the eastern coast of the United States, affecting 24 states and devastating parts of New Jersey and New York. Thousands of homes and businesses were destroyed. Millions were left without power. As many as 100 people died; most of whom drowned as the storm surged in Staten Island and Queens. At $65 billion, Sandy was the second costliest storm in U.S. history.

Today, communities that were reduced to rubble are steadily recovering. And yet, one year later, policymakers have yet to address climate change, which undoubtedly contributed to the strength, magnitude and danger of Sandy. There is little discussion of rebuilding in a way that better prepares us for the ravages of future storms. And after Washington’s most recent shameful display of deadlock and dysfunction, it would be wishful thinking to presume that Congress will act on this issue anytime soon.

Interesting. Because the only tropical system to make landfall this year was Andrea, which wasn’t even at hurricane strength. Both the Atlantic and Eastern Pacific seasons have been very weak. We’re approaching 8 years since the last major hurricane made US landfall. There has only been one landfalling hurricane since 2008, and it could be argued that Issac wasn’t a hurricane, just a very strong tropical storm.

And yet, whether a disaster of our maker or of our making, after the dust settles, after the floodwaters recede, after we comfort the survivors and bury the dead, very little changes. Our leaders pour billions of dollars into rebuilding the same homes and businesses on increasingly vulnerable coastlines but refuse to invest in fortifying them against the volatile elements. Many refuse to acknowledge that global warming contributes to extreme weather events. They refuse to admit that the cumulative effects of these catastrophes cannot be sustained.

Got that? It doesn’t matter if it is natural or man-induced, we need to Do Something. Even though there’s been no statistically significant warming in over 16 years. Talk about deluded, dogmatic, and cultish.

If there’s any good news, it’s that while our politicians may ignore reality, more and more Americans understand that our responsibility to the earth is an existential one. From the growth of the sustainable food movement to groups like 350.org to a rising generation of youth across party lines concerned about climate change, people are embracing the lessons of Wendell Berry. Now, the challenge is to take that energy and generate enough political pressure to spur action.

LOL. The Warmists have been pushing this spreading awareness meme for 25 years, yet still won’t change their own lives. They’re more than happy to push projects, law, and regulations that force Other People to live under the Warmist beliefs, though.

Read: Wash Post: Ignore Hotcoldwetdry At Our Own Peril »

Finally, Someone In Obama Admin Has Been Held Accountable And Fired

Our long national nightmare is over

(Daily Beast) A White House national security official was fired last week after being caught as the mystery Tweeter who has been tormenting the foreign policy community with insulting comments and revealing internal Obama administration information for over two years.

Jofi Joseph, a director in the non-proliferation section of the National Security Staff at the White House, has been surreptitiously tweeting under the moniker @natsecwonk, a Twitter feed famous inside Washington policy circles since it began in February, 2011 until it was shut down last week. Two administration officials confirmed that the mystery tweeter was Joseph, who has also worked at the State Department and on Capitol Hill for Senators Bob Casey (D-PA) and Joe Biden. Until recently, he was part of the administration’s team working on negotiations with Iran.

During his time tweeting under the @natsecwonk name, Joseph openly criticized the policies of his White House bosses and often insulted their intellect and appearance. At different times, he insulted or criticized several top White House and State Department officials, including former National Security Advisor Tom Donilon, Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes, Secretary of State John Kerry, and many many others.

He also insulted Republicans, including Sarah Palin, Jennifer Rubin, and others. One of the tweets reads

“I’m a fan of Obama, but his continuing reliance and dependence upon a vacuous cipher like Valerie Jarrett concerns me,” he once tweeted.

Yes, he should have been fired. No one in the private sector would put up with this conduct, nor should the White House. It’s interesting though, because no one has truly been fired for the IRS scandal. Nor Benghazi. Nor Fast and Furious. Nor the Healthcare.gov “glitches”. Nor the National Park Service acting like jackbooted thugs during Shutdown Theater. Nor when the EPA has acted the same. Nor for all the failed Obama programs.

That said, one gets the feeling, after watching how Team Obama operates, that if the tweets only insulted Republicans he would still have a job.

Read: Finally, Someone In Obama Admin Has Been Held Accountable And Fired »

Bummer: Website For Unpopular Obamacare Legislation Could Tarnish Obama’s Legacy

No, really, so says the lapdogs at USA Today

Health care website problems jeopardize Obama’s legacy

(Subhead) Law is Obama’s top legislative achievement; its problematic rollout has put it in danger

As his administration scrambles to fix the online enrollment process under the Affordable Care Act, President Obama is facing a challenge that threatens to undercut the most significant legislative victory of his presidency.

The rest of the article is simply filler, noting how poorly the website is doing, how no one really seems to know what is being done to fix it, and no one really knows how many have actually signed up for the health insurance. But, as far as Obama’s legacy, the problems with the website can’t really harm it, because when historians write that essay they’ll note that Obamacare was passed through parliamentary shenanigans with what would be considered bribes in the private sector, and over the severe objections of the American people, who were up in arms over the law even before it was passed. They’ll note that the people who voted in favor of the bill never read it. They’ll note that the Democrat led Congress wasted time on this travesty while the economy was still burning. And they’ll note that it was still heavily unpopular even years beyond its passage.

And that’s just Obamacare. They’ll also note the anemic economy, pissing away almost a trillion dollars on the failed Stimulus, plus the little stimulus plans. They’ll note that Obama’s only “plans” to fix the economy were to call for tax increases and filling potholes. They’ll note the NSA domestic spying. Fast and Furious. Benghazi. Drone strikes on civilians. Tyranny from federal agencies. The IRS scandal. Terrible international relations. All the golfing, parties, and vacations. Not bothering to meet with his economic council. Being the most partisan president ever. There aren’t a lot of things actually in the win column.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Bummer: Website For Unpopular Obamacare Legislation Could Tarnish Obama’s Legacy »

When We Cuddle…

Read: When We Cuddle… »

If All You See…

…is a beautiful natural field that would be perfect for lots of giants wind turbines, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Nice Deb, with some information on ICE.

Read: If All You See… »

If You Won’t Reduce Your Big Carbon Footprint You Hate Children

Well, you. Not Warmists. They spread awareness, so they’re given a free pass. Here’s Time’s resident climahysteric, Bryan Walsh

Saving Our Grandchildren From Climate Change

A new study shows that human beings are too selfish to endure present pain to avert future climate change. That’s why we need win-win solutions now

Why shouldn’t we be selfish? Warmists are. Oh, and they hate Black people, constantly wanting to deny those in 3rd world shitholes developing nations the same modern lifestyle.

You want to know what the biggest obstacle to dealing with climate change is? Simple: time. It will take decades before the carbon dioxide we emit now begins to have its full effect on the planet’s climate. And by the same token, it will take decades before we are able to enjoy the positive climate effects of reducing carbon-dioxide emissions now.

So, we won’t know for decades what the supposed effect of Mankind’s CO2 output (except for statistically insignificant warming for over 16 years), and we won’t know what the effects of any (very expensive, freedom reducing, economy killing) mitigation programs and laws are for decades. Why does this remind me of one of those emails saying they have lots of money for you because their husband left them lots?

Oh, wait, sorry, it’s “for the kids,” an attempt to create an absolute moral authority, meaning no one else is allowed their opinion or facts. Funny how these same liberals aren’t concerned with leaving our future generations massive debt, unsustainable unfounded liabilities, etc.

Read: If You Won’t Reduce Your Big Carbon Footprint You Hate Children »

Pirate's Cove