EJ Dionne: Obama’s 2013 Wasn’t That Bad, Ya Know!

He thinks 2011 was worse

2013 wasn’t as bad as you might think

“Has this been the worst year of your presidency?”

It was a heck of a way for President Obama to wrap up 2013. In asking the question at the president’s year-end news conference, Julie Pace of the Associated Press captured several things at once: the reality of a genuinely disappointing year for Obama, a mood of skepticism in the media about him, the inevitability of Beltway scorekeeping and the personalization of nearly everything in politics.

Obama, for good reason, avoided a direct answer. But I’d suggest that 2013 was not his worst year. That distinction should be reserved for 2011, when the president emerged from the summer looking weak after protracted negotiations with House Republicans over a debt-ceiling increase.

The year 2013 was better than that. It’s true that the health-care Web site fiasco threatened to engulf Obama’s signature achievement. And Obamacare will undergo new tests in the coming year. The site’s “back end” problems in connecting with insurance companies could create more bad news in January as some who thought they had bought policies discover that their purchases failed to go through.

Dionne notes that the website issues are fixable. Yes, of course they are. But he fails to note that the website is a symptom, the real issues are people losing the insurance they like, losing their doctors, paying higher premiums and, more importantly, much higher deductibles. The number of people who will constantly use the insurance versus those who are healthy. The reduced provider networks. The potential for tens of millions more who get their insurance through their employer to lose their insurance in 2014 and pay lots more.

Moreover, something else happened this year that may, over time, prove far more important than the great Web site flop. In 2013, the tea party began to decline in both real and perceived power, and Republicans began a slow retreat from the politics of absolutism.

Dionne also mentions the Senate Dems instituting the (supposedly) limited nuclear option. Which could seriously backfire on Obama and the Dems in 2015, if the GOP retakes the Senate. Of course, he notes that there was no immigration reform nor gun control.

It’s a nice spin, but let’s consider:

  • His poll numbers have dropped heavily, and especially his polling on people trusting him.
  • The Snowden leaks on how much the NSA is spying on Americans
  • His pure lying about Obamacare
  • Syria – running to Vladimir Putin for help shows extreme weakness, and the war still rages in Syria.
  • What’s up with Syria’s WMD? Beuller? Beuller?
  • China’s massively growing control and belligerence in the western Pacific region
  • Even Senate Democrats didn’t buy into Obama’s deal with Iran
  • IRS targeting
  • What was done with his 2013 State Of The Union agenda? Zip. Nada.
  • His selfies at Nelson Mandela’s funeral
  • Entering his 5th year as president and still needing government help for the long term unemployed, because his domestic economic policies stink (BTW, what about those who are long term unemployed but not eligible for unemployment payments? Does anyone care about them?)
  • Using Barrycades and shutting down all sorts of monuments and federal properties during the “Shutdown”
  • The enormous amount of changes and delays he’s single-handedly instituted for Obamacare
  • Surveillance on reporters and their families

Dionne also notes

This set the stage for this month’s moderate reversal of some of the sequester’s spending cuts. The deal was championed — despite tea party opposition — by Rep. Paul Ryan, the avatar of the anti-spending right. Dozens of House Republicans who had voted for the shutdown in October to fend off primary challenges voted for the compromise in December to put perpetual budget crises behind them. When the roll was called, only 62 Republicans voted no.

You know why this terrible legislation passed? Because Obama was not involved. He stayed far, far away. He didn’t speak about it. He was nowhere to be seen. That’s not a great sign for The President Of The USA.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: EJ Dionne: Obama’s 2013 Wasn’t That Bad, Ya Know! »

Perhaps The NY Times Can Explain The Al Qaeda Links At Youtube Video Protests?

I’m not going to delve to deep into the NY Times idiocy over the Benghazi attack. So many have already done so. Here’s what Kit at Victory Girls Blog (who I linked in the Patriotic Pinup post) wrote

I’m not sure when the New York Times decided to try publishing news again, but they’re still an example of epic fail.  Their latest attempt at journalism comes in the form of an “investigative report” claiming that the responsibility for Benghazi falls on a local militia group affiliated with Ansar Al Shariya, not al Qaeda.  What’s more, they claim that the entire attack was over the same video that Susan Rice, Hilary Clinton, and half the Obama Administration lied about over and over.  There’s only one problem.

Ansar al-Shariya is part of the al Qaeda network. They make no denials of this.

The NYT ignores this, claiming that al-Shariya “had no known ­affiliations with terrorist groups.”

What, exactly, was the point of this article? Many have chimed in saying that this article is meant for protection for Obama, Susan Rice, and Hillary2016. This is also the Left’s way of minimizing the threat from radical, hardcore Islam, and its constant spread. For whatever reason, Lefties have determined that they will protect Islamists at almost all costs. Here’s something I noticed about the protests at the time:

Read More »

Read: Perhaps The NY Times Can Explain The Al Qaeda Links At Youtube Video Protests? »

If All You See…

…is a rising sea slowly destroying the beach-front, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Sister Toldjah, with a post on dissident feminist Camille Paglia discussing the softening of boys.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another gorgeous day in the Once And Future Nation Of America. This pinup is by Gil Elvgren, with a wee bit of help, meant to usher in the New Year with warm thoughts.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. The Lonely Conservative has the best news bloopers of 2013
  2. The Last Refuge discusses Christmas sales figures
  3. The Gateway Pundit highlights how poorly Al Qaeda is doing in Iraq
  4. Support Your Local Gunfighter has the top 10 list no one wants to make
  5. small dead animals has the decline and fall of the American empire
  6. Doug Ross has Obamacare Comix
  7. protein wisdom has some awesome thoughts on voter ID
  8. neo-neocon wonders what the best response to flash mobs is
  9. Moonbattery explains how to make the Knockout Game noticeable
  10. Joshuapundit highlights how super-awesome liberal talk radio is doing in liberal cities
  11. Golden Geese isn’t impressed with bicyclists
  12. A View From The Beach notices another left wing faker
  13. The Hockey Schtick discovers atom bombs and missing heat
  14. Ice Age Now discusses the coming snowmaggeden for the UK and Europe
  15. And last, but not least, Not A Lot Of People Know That covers a brave Guardian Climahysteric
  16. And one to grow on: Victory Girls Blog digs down into the NY Times “no al Qaeda” article

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Obamacare Supporters Really Psyched Over 1 Million Picking A Plan

And by Obamacare supporters, I mean the Major Media, who are thrilled with an Associated Press report

(Washington Post) A December surge propelled health care sign-ups through the government’s rehabilitated website past the 1 million mark, the Obama administration said Sunday, reflecting new signs of life for the problem-plagued federal insurance exchange.

Of the more than 1.1 million people now enrolled, nearly 1 million signed up in December, with the majority coming in the week before a pre-Christmas deadline for coverage to start in January. Compare that to a paltry 27,000 in October —the website’s first, error-prone month — or 137,000 in November.

*

The figures tell only part of the story. The administration has yet to provide a December update on the 14 states running their own exchanges. While California, New York, Washington, Kentucky and Connecticut have performed well, others are still struggling.

Still, the end-of-year surge suggests that with HealthCare.Gov now functioning better, the federal market may be starting to pull its weight. The windfall comes at a critical moment for Obama’s sweeping health care law, which becomes “real” for many Americans on Jan. 1 when coverage through the exchanges and key patient protections kick in.

They’re acting like this is something special, people being able to go on-line and accomplish something. Strange how people do not seem to have the same problems going online to Amazon, Best Buy, oh, and how about doing your taxes online? Anyhow, we all knew the website would work at some point.

“As we continue our open enrollment campaign, we experienced a welcome surge in enrollment as millions of Americans seek access to affordable health care coverage,” Marilyn Tavenner, the head of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said in a blog post.

The figures actually do only tell part of the story. How many have been moved to the government run Medicaid or SCHIP instead of obtaining private (government run) insurance? How many are young healthies, which are 100% necessary to avoid a death spiral? What is the condition of the pool, in terms of healthy people versus sick people? Oh, and here’s a big one: how many have paid?

The media doesn’t seem too interested in asking the tough questions and investigating to obtain the answers to these important questions. And The Most Transparent Administration Evah! © doesn’t seem to be too interested in releasing the details. There’s two explanations: either they are truly clueless or they know the numbers do not look good.

Of course, no one has actually attempted to use the insurance, and that’s when the rubber meets the road.

* according to the AP picture caption, it took these two ladies 1 hour 47 minutes to process the application. The lady on the right is a “certified enrollment officer, meaning she probably comes from a far left organization and has had no background check. Love the “coexist” bumper sticker, and, wouldn’t a photo of a mostly naked guy get some written up or terminated in the private sector? If a many had something like that up (featuring a woman) he’d be slapped with a sexual harassment suit.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Obamacare Supporters Really Psyched Over 1 Million Picking A Plan »

16k Iowans Need To Reapply For Obamacare

Whew! It sure seems to be getting better

(Des Moines Register) Nearly 16,000 Iowans who tried to apply for coverage via the trouble-plagued federal health-insurance website are being told to apply separately through the state Department of Human Services.

The Friday afternoon announcement is the latest bout of bad news about the website, which is a key part of the Affordable Care Act.

The affected people should be receiving emails and letters about the situation from the state. They are being urged to reapply at the state website, dhsservices.iowa.gov, or by calling 1-855-889-7985.

Apparently the carrier pigeons are to tired (and cold), and all that globull warming created snow took down the telegraph lines.

Oh, and in case you were wondering, Iowa goes through the federal healthcare.fail website. And the plans are, as typical high on the deductibles.

I wonder when we will hear the same for other states?

Read: 16k Iowans Need To Reapply For Obamacare »

If All You See…

…is scorching heat created snow, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is American Power, with a post on GLAAD’s fascist totalitarianism.

Read: If All You See… »

Brave Warmist Tells Us That Turning Off The Lights Can Make A Difference

But not for individuals. We need “collective action”, says Sami Grover at Treehugger

From my rambings on why green lifestyle choices won’t save us to the meteorologist who broke down over climate change and vowed never to fly again, I’ve regularly argued that personal carbon footprints can be a distraction, when what we really need to focus on is collective, system-wide change.

It’s not always a popular position. In fact, some commenters have accused me of being “weazely” – and they may have a point. Like most human beings, I am a hypocrite. And like most hypocrites worth their salt, I regularly feel guilty about it. But it really has never been about me. (Honestly!)

At least he’s honest that he’s a hypocrite. He perfectly encapsulates the Warmist mentality, that taking steps is something Other People have to do, preferably be forced to do, as a collective. I’ll write this slowly so Warmists/Liberals can understand: if you don’t believe in what you’re pushing enough to make even minor changes in your own lives to match your belief set, then why should anyone else? Why should we allow laws to be passed if you won’t walk the talk?

As I read Lloyd’s piece on why so many energy saving tips are bad, I was reminded again that caulking, turning down thermostats and switching off lights are indeed immensely valuable—but that we have to focus the lions’ share of our efforts on those actions which have the biggest, collective impact.

And that means simplifying our messages.

They’ve been messaging for 25 years. Yet, more and more people are learning the truth about the reality of anthropogenic “climate change”. Warmists want everyone forced to change their lives, hence the “collective” crap. Which is not really about any sort of environmental benefit, but about instituting hard-core Progressive dogma, laws, and regulations.

Imagine if, say, 25% of the population installed a Nest thermostat (or just programmed the thermostat they had already). Imagine if 25% changed their light bulbs—oh, wait – we’ll all be changing our light bulbs soon anyway. Imagine if 5% of the population installed solar, if 10% of us crowdfunded a solar project, and if 15% divested from fossil fuels. And maybe if a few more of us started to turn off the lights when we leave the room too.

Good luck with that. Warmists will mostly only make changes when they are forced to. How many are voluntarily giving up fossil fuels?

Read: Brave Warmist Tells Us That Turning Off The Lights Can Make A Difference »

Team Obama Refuses To Allow Small Road Through Wildlife Refuge

A road that would give people access to medical care (via The Lonely Conservative)

(CNS News) Environmental priorities have trumped the medical concerns of a small Alaskan community.

After four years of study, the Obama administration has decided on that the isolated community of King Cove, Alaska may not build a 22-mile, single-lane gravel road through the Izembek National Wildlife Refuge to the town of Cold Bay.

The decision, announced on Dec. 23 by Interior Secretary Sally Jewell, has infuriated the people of King Cove, where the proposed road has been discussed since the 1980s.

The road would have given them access to emergency medical and other services by way of the all-weather airport at Cold Bay.

“Are birds really more important than people? It seems so hard to believe that the federal government finds it impossible to accommodate both wildlife and human beings,” the Associated Press quoted Aleutians East Borough Mayor Stanley Mack as saying.

In exchange for the 200 acres needed for the road, the state of Alaska and the King Cove Corp. would have added 55,000 acres to the refuge.

“I am angry. I am disappointed. I am frustrated. I am sad for the people of King Cove,” the newspaper quoted Murkowski as saying. “Four thousand miles from where they’re sitting, somebody has said you can’t have a 10-mile, one-lane, non-commercial-use road so you can access the second longest runway in the state of Alaska to get out for medical reasons.”

Well, yeah, the birds are more important in this case, as The Lonely Conservative points out

This is the same administration that has no problem with solar panels burning birds or windmills hacking them to pieces.

There are other methods for folks to get medical and other care, but this small, 10 mile road would be a lifeline for these citizens. I’m all for wildlife refuges, protecting the majesty and beauty of nature. One road won’t hurt.

Read: Team Obama Refuses To Allow Small Road Through Wildlife Refuge »

Obamacare Contraception Mandate Loses In Federal Court

Why? Because it’s “in the public interest” to follow the Constitution

(Daily Caller) A federal district court judge in Houston ruled Friday in favor of two Baptist universities seeking relief from the Obamacare contraception mandate.

“The religious organization plaintiffs have shown a sincerely held religious belief that the court cannot second-guess,” reads the decision handed down in favor of East Texas Baptist University and Houston Baptist University by Lee H. Rosenthal.

“The plaintiffs have also shown that if they do not comply with a certain requirement that they believe offends that belief, they will face onerous fines.”

“The public interest weighs in favor of granting the injunction. Protecting constitutional rights and the rights under RFRA [Religious Freedom Restoration Act] are in the public’s interest,” continued Rosenthal, who was appointed to the U.S. District Court of Southern Texas by George H. W. Bush.

Let’s not forget, the mandate to provide free contraception, sterilization, and abortifacients was not in the “Affordable” Care Act, but something that was added by Obama’s far left Department of Health and Human Services. It’s a mandate that could be cancelled in a heartbeat, without legislation. But, that would annoy Obama’s moonbat liberal base. The only thing about anything “reproductive”, other than maternity coverage (which is mandatory, and has been mandatory before the ACA), are mentions of education programs.

According to the Beckett Fund For Religious Freedom, which litigated the case, there are 89 cases pending suing over the unconstitutionality of the Obama contraception decree, two of which are heading to the Supreme Court.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Obamacare Contraception Mandate Loses In Federal Court »

Pirate's Cove