Bummer: NOAA Demolishes Warmist Meme Of Anthropogenic Extreme Weather

Warmists love to blame every single weather occurrence, big or small, on “climate change”. To be clear, when they say “climate change”, they’re referring to the notion that all weather changes and a slight (1.4F) increase in global temperatures in 160 years are caused mostly/solely by Mankind. As for 2013, NOAA says “nope. You guys are nuts”

(Forbes) Scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have demolished claims by global warming activists that global warming caused or worsened many extreme weather events last year.

According to NOAA’s new publication, Explaining Extremes of 2013 from a Climate Perspective, there is no discernible connection between global warming and 2013 extreme weather events such as the California drought, Colorado floods, the UK’s exceptionally cold spring, a South Dakota blizzard, Central Europe floods, a northwestern Europe cyclone, and exceptional snowfall in Europe’s Pyrenees Mountains.

The California drought provides a good example of global warming activists making false and irresponsible claims regarding global warming to deliberately mislead people who aren’t familiar with scientific studies and evidence. The liberal Center for American Progress and its media allies such as the Washington Post, San Jose Mercury News, Associated Press, and others have all published stories claiming global warming caused or worsened the ongoing California drought. Scientists, however, say just the opposite. “[F]or the California drought, which was investigated by three teams from the United States, human factors were found not to have influenced the lack of rainfall,” NOAA reported in an accompanying press release.

The report further goes on to explain that cold spring in the UK of 2013 had nothing to do with “climate change”. Remember, Warmists now like to blame cold weather on “climate change”, you know, because Someone Else drove fossil fueled vehicles.

And the Colorado floods in September 2013? Nope, no human fingerprint.

Adding additional emphasis to the NOAA publication’s findings, scientists reported in the peer-reviewed Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that natural factors such as ocean current cycles and varying wind patterns caused most of the warming along the U.S. West Coast since 1900.

One of the many problems with the Cult Of Hotcoldwetdry is that they’ve over-reached with their cult. They like to blame and/or link everything to “climate change”, from heat waves to massive blizzards. They’ve created this fantasy world where slight increases in carbon dioxide, what they refer to as “carbon pollution”, has caused all this, and is dooming Mankind (many Warmists want significant human population reduction), life on land and in the seas, and the Earth itself. It’s quite apparent that this is more about politics, creating a fully Progressive government and society, not science.

Of course, we all know that Warmists will find a way to deny this NASA report.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Bummer: NOAA Demolishes Warmist Meme Of Anthropogenic Extreme Weather »

Say, Could “Climate Change” Mean the End of the Seasons?

Today’s hyper-alarmist,  bat guano insane blather from the cult of Hotcoldwetdry

(Nature World News) As climate change causes winters to warm, the world becomes more and more like a tropical paradise, possibly meaning the end of the seasons as we know them, according to new research.

The daily and nightly differences in temperatures worldwide are fast approaching yearly differences between summer and winter temperatures, which could wreak havoc on the global ecology by potentially affect crops, insects, malaria transmission, and even confuse migration patterns of birds and mammals worldwide.

 photo facepalm.gif

Read: Say, Could “Climate Change” Mean the End of the Seasons? »

If All You See…

…are super awesome trees helping to slow the rise of the oceans, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Camp Of The Saints, with a post wondering if Obama will go all “Captain Queeg”.

Any suggestions for a theme for next week?

Read: If All You See… »

Tillis Campaign Runs Brutal New Ad Against Hagan: Cocktails

Read: Tillis Campaign Runs Brutal New Ad Against Hagan: Cocktails »

New California Law Requires Doctors To Undergo LGBT Re-education

As if there weren’t enough problems in California thanks to Obamacare, what with doctors retiring early, moving to other states, refusing to participate in the Ocare exchange, refusing to take new Medicare/Medicaid patients, the California government seems determined to drive doctors out

(Breitbart) Gov. Jerry Brown just signed a law requiring that California health care providers be trained to better understand the specific health needs of the LGBT community.

The law is meant to target inequities in medical treatment for LGBT patients who, according to the San Francisco Examiner, suffer from a lack of provider understanding of gay and transgendered health issues.

Assemblyman Richard Gordon, D-Menlo Park, who authored the original bill AB 496, contends that LGBT patients have a variety of negative experiences with doctors and other healthcare professionals.

Lesbian couples complain that they have difficulty finding OB-GYN doctors willing to counsel them with in vitro fertilization options. Gordon adds that gays and lesbians criticize hospital staff for not treating them with respect while visiting their hospitalized life partners.

Sensitivity training is just another word for “thought control”. The LGBT community constantly tells us that they are just like everyone else. If that’s the case, why do they need extra stuff?

Read: New California Law Requires Doctors To Undergo LGBT Re-education »

Antarctic Sea Ice Sees Record Growth, Cause Climate Change

This is not the first time “climate scientists” and a compliant media attempted to Blamestorm the growth of Antarctic sea ice on Hotcoldwetdry, and probably won’t be the last.

Antarctic sea ice shows record growth, climate change likely cause
The growth of sea ice is not evidence against the effects of climate change, but rather the consequence of it.

Antarctic sea ice is seeing a rapid period of growth this year, but that doesn’t mean the Poles are safe from climate change, says NASA.

NASA reported the ice measurements to be at 7.78 million square miles (20.14 million square kilometers), a day after it exceeded the extent of 20 million square kilometers (7.72 million square miles).

“The planet as a whole is doing what was expected in terms of warming. Sea ice as a whole is decreasing as expected, but just like with global warming, not every location with sea ice will have a downward trend in ice extent,” said Claire Parkinson of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland.

The growth of sea ice is not evidence against the effects of climate change but rather the consequence of it. This could be the result of the rapid melting of land ice which sends fresh water into the ocean making it freeze at higher decision. It could also be the result of changing wind patterns and other external factors.

Remember when all the “climate scientists” told us that global warming/climate change would cause Antarctic sea ice to increase? And, if the ice starts to decrease, this will be Blamed on climate change, as well. Because this is a cult, and everything validates their Beliefs.

Best comment

I heard that if nothing is doing as predicted, we’re to shut up because science.

Exactly. Because you’re anti-science if you dare question the reality of what’s occuring, and you’re nasty if you mention that Warmists rarely practice what they preach.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Antarctic Sea Ice Sees Record Growth, Cause Climate Change »

Federal Judge Nullifies Gay Marriage Law Which 60% Voted For

This should make liberals happy

(WRAL) Nearly two years after North Carolina voters approved a constitutional amendment recognizing marriage only as a union between a man and a woman, a federal court judge in Asheville on Friday overturned the ban, allowing gay and lesbian couples across the state to marry immediately.

U.S. District Court Judge Max Cogburn’s ruling came five days after the nation’s top court declined to hear any appeal of a July decision by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond striking down Virginia’s ban. That court has jurisdiction over North Carolina.

Two points: first, Liberals are really, really like Direct Democracy. Except when they lose at the ballot box, then they sue to usurp the will of the People.

Second, when can bigamists and polygamists get married? Equality, right? If you support gay marriage, but not bigamy and polygamy, why not? Explain, you bigot.

Read: Federal Judge Nullifies Gay Marriage Law Which 60% Voted For »

If All You See…

…are wonderful trees overlooking a place where giant wind turbines should be erected, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Maggie’s Notebook, with a post noting that sometimes the Nobel committee gets it right.

Read: If All You See… »

Sigh: Evengelicals Want Rick Scott To Address “Climate Change” As A Pro-Life Issue

Leftism continues to invade organized religion

(HuffPo) A group of evangelical Christians is taking to the airwaves in Florida to urge Republican Gov. Rick Scott to take action on climate change, arguing that it, too, is a “pro-life” issue.

“I’m pro-life, and I’m pro-family,” says one female voice featured in the ad, sponsored by the Evangelical Environmental Network. “And I do believe we should do all we can to protect our environment. It was given to us by God.”

“Climate change is real. It endangers the health of our children, worsens poverty throughout the world, and threatens our economy,” says a male voiceover. “Call Governor Rick Scott and tell him as pro-life Christians we believe care for God’s creation is one of the greatest moral challenges of our time. Tell Governor Scott now is the time to act to curb climate change.”

Well, true, remember this?

Darned Hotcoldwetdry! Killing off iguanas!

Read: Sigh: Evengelicals Want Rick Scott To Address “Climate Change” As A Pro-Life Issue »

Five Ideas To Help Fix U.S. Representative Democracy

Recently, Salon ran an article about fixing the Constitution. Of course, many of the ideas were meant to make the Constitution more Progressive (nice fascism), but there were a few good ideas that could help all Americans. As I noted, “The Constitution does guarantee (freedom, fairness, and equality). The politicians, the bureaucrats, and people don’t.”

The article recommended several ideas, such as 100% financing of elections by Government, to keep money out of politics. Three years terms for Representatives, with term limits capped at 12 years. Election day being three days, which would include the weekends. And a few others.

Now, a friend asked me what I would do to fix our political system. And I thought “is it really the system that is broken, or the people?” I’ll often write that the immigration system is not broken: it is the people running it that are broken. There are substantive problems within the way the political system works that can be fixed by dealing with the people involved. Here’s what I would do

1. Term limits for the House Of Representatives and Senate

As time goes on, elected Representatives respond less and less to constituents, and more and more to other interests, including simply keeping their party in power. Benjamin Franklin once wrote “In free governments, the rulers are the servants, and the people their superiors . . . . For the former to return among the latter does not degrade, but promote them.” People seeking elected office so often look at serving in the House as a career, when they should serve some time then leave. They become divorced from The People over time. We cannot just “vote the bums out”, because that rarely works. Power corrupts. I recommend a limit of eight years. (a good article here)

For the Senate, I recommend two terms as the limit.

2. No post serving perks

Serving as an elected official is not a job: it is a responsibility and duty, and should come with no post-serving perks. No medical insurance for life, no retirement accounts, nothing. Zip. Nada. The only exception would be Secret Service protection for ex-presidents for as long as necessary.

3. Repeal the 17th Amendment

You’ll notice I made no mention above as to Senators losing focus on their Constituents. They certainly have the same problems as Representatives. However, the original intent of the Constitution was for Representatives to represent their Districts, and Senators to represent their State government. That was lost with the passage of the 17th Amendment, which took election of Senators out of the hands of State legislations and put it in the hands of citizens. Some might wonder why this is bad.

States now have no true representation to the federal government. When it was the General Assemblies electing Senators, it meant that those Senators were beholden to the their state, and its government. It meant that citizens needed to pay more attention to the doings of their state elected officials. It meant Senators did what was best for their state, not for their party, and not for the Federal government. The Founders acknowledged the correct idea that State governments were better equipped to deal with the needs of Citizens than the federal government. It was integral to the notion of federalism, to being a Constitutional Republic. Elected State officials live within our communities. They are not full timers. They have jobs. They have to live under the laws they pass. The minute the 17th was enacted, the massive expansion of the federal government started, shifting power away from states, where it belongs, to a far off government that is barely responsive. (read more here)

4. Restrict Money To “Local”

Liberals often complain about money in politics, despite doing exactly what they complain about. But, they are right: money is a problem in politics. It buys access. It buys “back-scratching”. It is essentially legalized bribery. There are many ideas to fix this. Liberals want to restrict “corporations” and “dark money” groups (while ignoring unions, their own groups, etc). They want to stop Big Moneyed individuals (while allowing their own). I’ve pushed the notion that restrictions should be on elected officials, not people. But, what if we made it “local only”?

What that means is that Representatives could only accept money from people, companies, and groups that are within their own Districts. No money can come from outside. It has long bothered me that candidates can take money from people, companies, and groups (PCG) which are not in their districts, and often not even within their own states. This also goes for campaigning, but it would be un-Constitutional to stop that. Representatives become beholden to PCGs that have nothing to do with their Districts. Why should money from some PCG in another state, or even district, effect the race in my district?

This would also apply to Governors and General Assemblies.

This is very much about “you mind your business, I’ll mind mine”.

5. Recall Elections

The rules to this would have to be very strict, to avoid frivolous recalls, but, there needs to be a way to recall federally elected officials who are Not Doing Their Jobs in representing their Districts. Likewise, General Assemblies could recall Senators who fail to represent their States. Again, there would need to be strict rules, so as to avoid frivolous recalls due to control changing hands.

This would put elected officials on notice that they best damned well represent their Districts/States above all else.

Government is supposed to be “by the People, for the People”. It has moved away from that. It’s time to take it back.

Read: Five Ideas To Help Fix U.S. Representative Democracy »

Pirate's Cove