…is a flooded world because Other People take fossil fueled trips, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The People’s Cube, with a post on the Warm On Women, ISIS style.
Read: If All You See… »
…is a flooded world because Other People take fossil fueled trips, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The People’s Cube, with a post on the Warm On Women, ISIS style.
Read: If All You See… »
If it is, I blame the Warmists for refusing to give up their own use of fossil fuels, hairdryers, ice makers, hair spray, refusing to unplug every appliance not in use, refusing to live in a tiny house, refusing to grow their own food, walk or bike to work, and only buy local
Here’s How We Know Global Warming Made the Blizzard Worse
Manhattan may have gotten the wimpy end of Juno, but the storm chin-checked New England. Boston is buried in snow. Hurricane-force winds buffeted Nantucket. The storm surge may have permanently altered shorelines from New Haven, Connecticut, to Portsmouth, Maine. Storms have always happened in winter, but the excessively violent ones? They’re getting more common, and that’s due to climate change.
“It’s winter, and we have storms, so that part is entirely natural,†says Kevin Trenberth, a senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, the federal government’s center for understanding weather and climate. “The global warming aspect relates to the fact that the oceans are warmer, and the air above them is more moist.â€
So, does this mean that the oceans were super-duper warm during the Little Ice Age, the Dark Ages, and, heck, the last glacial age and Snowball Earth?
Also, weren’t we told that the heat was hiding in the deep oceans?
Trenberth’s expertise puts him in the potentially uncomfortable position of trying to use scientific data to answer what has become a politicized question. But he says that doesn’t bother him because the numbers speak for themselves. Climate models—heavy-lifting computation that simulates the fluid dynamics of the whole planet—show that oceans are like batteries, charging up with extra warmth as atmospheric carbon continues to warm the planet. But that energy storage isn’t free. What goes in must come out, feeding bigger, badder storms. In the case of Winter Storm Juno, extra warmth in the ocean possibly lowered air pressure by a few bars. That means more wind and bigger storm surges.
So this is all based on computer models? Good grief.
Not to be outdone, VICE News goes with
Climate Change Is Bringing More Extreme Precipitation Events to the Northeast
And Full Time Whistle
Blizzard of Nor’Easters No Surprise, Thanks to Climate Change
The contents of the fables pretty much mirror the excerpted one, the same as many, many other articles, so, it looks like Warmists received their marching orders. Then there’s the New Republic
It’s Time to Remind Climate Change Deniers That Weather and Climate Are Different
This myth is routinely debunked, but one more time doesn’t hurt: Weather is not climate. The weather is immediate conditions—rain, snow, sunshine, etc.—while the climate is long-term trends.
Perhaps they should be telling Warmists this, since they now blame every weather event on “climate change”.
A blizzard or a cold snap doesn’t disprove climate change. It doesn’t cancel the fact that ten of the hottest years on record have occured since 2000, with 2014 as the the warmest yet.
So, they set the condition that nothing can disprove their pet cult. And, they apparently haven’t gotten the info that 2014 is not necessarily the warmest yet. But, really, even if it was the warmest, even if they were right on snow being caused by heat, that in no way proves anthropogenic causation.
Weather forecasts are also not the same as climate projections, because weather predictions are short-term by nature. And despite improved forecasting over the last few decades, weather forecasts are only as accurate as meteorologists’ initial data, like atmospheric conditions, ocean surface temperatures, and how well real-world physics is represented in their models. Imperfect knowledge of those conditions makes weather predictions highly variable.
Climate models, on the other hand, can’t predict the weather on a specific day, but they do show trends and averages. They deal with different data, including conditions of the deep ocean, vegetation, and the sun, and how greenhouse gasses impact the system. “The ability (or not) of predicting a single storm on a given day in a specific portion of the U.S. has little relevance to skill in predicting long-term climate associated with long-lived greenhouse gases,†Norman Loeb, an atmospheric scientist with NASA, said in an email.
Which is interesting, because “climate models” have consistently failed. Remember when we were told that snow would be a thing of the past? Remember when we were told that the 2005 hurricane season would be “the new normal”? Then landfalling hurricanes dropped off. We were told that Superstorm Sandy would be the new normal. Nope.
Climate deniers upset that Tuesday’s blizzard skipped New York City can take comfort that the city will face more historic storms in the future.
Of course it will. That’s the way nature works. Of course, in Warmist World, they seem to forget that “weather is not climate.”
Read: Warmists Continue Pushing Notion That Juno Was Proof Of “Climate Change” »
Good thing we exchanged him for 5 hardcore Taliban members, eh?
(NBC News) Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, who was held captive by enemy forces in Afghanistan for five years, will likely be charged with desertion, senior defense officials tell NBC News.
The officials point out that Bergdahl will likely face a lesser charge of desertion described in the Uniform Code of Military Justice as leaving a post to avoid duty or shirk an important assignment, based on his actions when he left a remote outpost in June 2009.
Those charges carry a maximum sentence of 5 years in prison upon conviction, but sources tell NBC News the Army is considering crediting Bergdahl for the 5 years he spent in captivity and be given the opportunity to avoid prosecution by leaving the Army with a “less than honorable discharge.”
If accepted, Bergdahl could be denied as much as $300,000 in back pay and benefits and be reduced in rank from Sergeant to Private First Class or lower.
It does seem that the charges are being lowered, most likely for political reasons, ie, in order to minimize the damage to Obama. An Air Force commander told the Army Times that no decision has been made as of yet, but, I think we can all see the writing on the wall.
Let’s also not forget that the prisoner swap was deemed illegal by the GAO.
…is warmth created snow, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Maggie’s Farm, with a post laughing at the “blizzard of the century”, plus Tuesday links.
Read: If All You See… »
Yet another insane prognostication from the Cult Of Warming
Climate Change Could Turn Chicago into Texas, Report Claims
Last year was the hottest on record, and if climate change persists, it could get a lot worse, a new report claims, warning Chicago’s climate could mirror that of modern-day Texas by the end of the century.
The report, part of a study examining climate change called the Risky Business Project, was funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies, the Paulson Institute and TomKat Charitable Trust, and examined how climate change may affect the Midwest, its cities, communities agriculture and businesses.

“The average Chicago resident is expected to experience more days over 95°F each year by century’s end than the average Texan does today,” the report said.
Uh huh.
Other consequences, the reported predicted, include rising energy costs, an increase in violent crime and economic losses to due agriculture being harmed.
I’d worry more about liberal policies regarding crime than Hotcoldwetdry. Same with rising energy costs. And straight up economic losses.
Read: Awesome: Hotcoldwetdry To Turn Chicago Into Texas Or Something »
I mentioned several Warmists yesterday blaming “Juno” on Hotcoldwetdry. Here are more of the unhinged
Millions feeling the colder side of climate change in the US Northeast right now. Climate science of #Blizzard2015: http://t.co/N61rfxTSAc
— 350 dot org (@350) January 27, 2015
Nate Silver: 5 0f 10 worst blizzards in NYC in last ten years, 0.2% chance that's chance. Climate change at work http://t.co/94u2eXRYol
— Bill McKibben (@billmckibben) January 26, 2015
There are plenty of nutty tweets. Then there’s NY gov Andrew Cuomo
Massive snowstorms such as the one sweeping into the US north-east on Monday are “part of the changing climateâ€, New York’s governor, Andrew Cuomo, declared at a press conference announcing a state of emergency.
Cuomo said on Monday that “there is a pattern of extreme weather that we’ve never seen before†– reiterating his comments in the wake of hurricane Sandy, when he said that “anyone who says there’s not a dramatic change in weather patterns is probably denying reality.â€

Of course, Bill Nye came unglued
After noting that he “just wants to introduce the idea,” Nye conceded, “Now, proving any one storm is connected, especially cold-weather events is quite difficult.” He added, “But I just want to present that.”
According to Nye, “the very strong winds that will be associated with this storm in the next couple of days, these could be connected to climate change.” Considering that this is a snowstorm in winter, Nye was careful to avoid the term “global warming.” Cycle co-host Toure cheered, “I love you for bringing that in.”
And more lunacy
While the “curator†of the Washington Post’s newly-minted online “Energy and Environment†section Chris Mooney tells us in his article that global warming may make blizzards worse by increasing the temperature of the western Atlantic ocean and thereby increasing the moisture feed into the developing storm, meteorologist Ryan Maue is quick to point out that just the opposite is likely the result—that the elevated sea surface temperatures actually act to make such storms tamer.
Maue goes on to add that it is “easy to make case that global warming weakened this blizzard significantly due to warmer [sea surface temperatures].â€
So, one says “climate change” will make snow storms worse, the other says “climate change” reduced the impact. Refer back to facepalm above.
Professor Roger Pielke, Jr., is less than impressed with the pronouncements, noting that no one has been able to attribute any trends in winter storms to a human fingerprint. Of course, that won’t stop warmists. Nothing will. They live in a different world.
Read: Crazy Warmists Continue To Blame Blizzard On “Climate Change” »
In the years Barack Obama has been President, he has more of a hindrance for elected Democrats than a help. They’ve lost House twice, with historic losses in 2010 and 2014. They’ve hemorrhaged Senate seats, leading to the complete loss of the Senate in 2014. In State government
As Amy Walter notes for the Cook Political Report, Democrats lost big at all levels of government, including the states. “Today,â€Â she writes, “about 55 percent of all state legislative seats in the country are held by Republicans. That’s the largest share of GOP state legislators since the 1920s.†What’s more, “just 11 states have an all Democratic-controlled legislature,†and Democrats hold single-party control in just seven states. By contrast, “Republicans have a legislative majority in 30 states, including the battleground states of Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina,†and single-party control in most of the South.
The GOP now is also in control of a majority of governor’s mansions in the States. So, how to read this from Nancy Pelosi?
(The Hill) Rep. Nancy Pelosi says Democrats can recapture control of the House in 2016 by riding Hillary Clinton’s coattails.
“Yes, we can win the House,†the California Democrat said during a sit-down interview in her Capitol office.
“If she runs, she will win the nomination. And if she’s our nominee, she clearly — I mean, the campaign, the joint effort — would be one that could not only take her into office but would [pull Democrats to victory],†Pelosi said.
“There’s opportunity, all kinds of statistics now about if the Democrats have a presidential candidate who … wins by 52 percent — that’s over 20 [House] seats,†Pelosi added. “And so 53 [percent] is a victory [for House Democrats].â€
In 2012, Democrats only gained back 8 seats, though, to be fair, Obama only got to 51.1% of the popular vote. And, of course, Pelosi claimed in 2010 that Dems would keep the House, and in 2012 and 2014 claimed they would retake the House. Hey, she has to say that. But, she has never said anything about riding Obama’s coattails while he’s been president, because Obama is in it for Obama. He hasn’t care much for electing other Democrats.
Crossed at Right Wing News.
Read: Pelosi Slaps Obama, Says A Hillary Clinton Win Would Give House Back To Dems »